Determinate Space Frame Telescope Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 7/28/04.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ritva Keski-Kuha JWST Deputy OTE Manager May 19, 2009 JWST OTE Development Status JWST-PRES
Advertisements

6-7 July 20051B. C. Bigelow - UM Physics Finite element analysis of DECam May 11 C1 corrector lens – gravity and thermal load cases Bruce C. Bigelow, Physics.
Beams and Frames.
A STATISTICAL METHOD OF IDENTIFYING GENERAL BUCKLING MODES ON THE CHINOOK HELICOPTER FUSELAGE Brandon Wegge – The Boeing Company Lance Proctor – MSC.Software.
Flexures for Optics. Outline Brief overviews of micro flexures Focus on macro flexures in this tutorial Beam bending Symmetry -> precision Degree of freedom.
Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX
George Angeli 11 September, 2001 Current Concepts and Status of GSMT Control Systems.
Delta II –7920 Fitup Study Model TMA-56 f10 optics In-Line configuration Delta II Launch Vehicle 7920 H 10L Composite Fairing.
Using DELPHI for Weak Lensing Measurements: Science Return and Mirror Size Jes Ford, JPL, UNR SURF /21/07 Mentor: Jason Rhodes Co-mentor: David Johnston.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
AAE450 Spring 2009 Mass Savings and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Preparation for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) 100 gram Case Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold]
Telescope Design The W.M. Keck (I & II) Telescopes Jana Hunt & Kent Van ME250 Precision Machine Design April 8, 2003.
Vibrationdata AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS 1 Practical Application of the Rayleigh-Ritz Method to Verify Launch Vehicle Bending Modes.
Vibrations And their effect on electro-optical imaging spacecraft Steve Hearon Applied Math Seminar December 14, 2009 (to fullfill requirements of an optomechanics.
SELECTION OF SUPPORTING ARRANGEMENT FOR CRITICAL PIPING By DILEEP PILLAI.
Oct 17, 2001SALT PFIS PDR - Structure1 Structure Interface/ constraints Loads Structure design rationale Truss Weight and CG Finite Element Analysis/ Image.
Space Frame Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 11/04/04.
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
Scaling Down - The Optimal Choice? Fritz B. Prinz Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University Stanford,
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Example Barrel Structures- Disk Primary FEA of Disk Frame Supports FEA of Disk Frame Supports –Structure 2m long with two end plates.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 5.1 Grid Box Design 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
NST PRIMARY MIRROR CELL: ANALYSIS AND SOLUTIONS BBSO, 02/11/2004 Leonid Didkovsky.
Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.
1 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts B. C. Bigelow, UM Physics 3/24/05.
IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.
LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme New 136mm x 950mm jaw –60cm primary collimator –Helical cooling channel.
Design of a Lightweight Mounted Tip/Tilt Mirror
Progress Report Geo-CAPE Coastal Ecosystem Dynamics Imager (CEDI) IRAD Repackaging Study Jason Budinoff / GSFC Cathy Marx / GSFC May 12, 2011.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Support structure for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring Robert Besuner 12 August 2004.
Specifications for JOOLZ 409- based on the current prototype (as taken by AOK)
Opto-Mechanics for SNAP at UM
After considerable pushing and shoving, this configuration show some promise. I have taken some liberties with the geometry and turned mounts inside-out.
WFIRST Telescope Study Preliminary Analysis Renaud Goullioud, Gary Kuan, Jim Moore, Eric Sunada, Juan Villalvazo, Zensheu Chang JPL in collaboration with.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Fourier-Kelvin.
Design and Development of the FSM (Fast steering Secondary Mirror)
Lower Baffle Robert Besuner 26 August Background/Purpose This study follows on to 12 August study of the Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring. —In.
Jeff Bolognese p1 Super Nova/Acceleration Probe 16 November 2001 Structural Analysis Jeff Bolognese 16 November 2001.
Modeling and control of a Stewart Platform (Hexapod Mount) 1 Frank Janse van Vuuren Supervisor: Dr Y. Kim.
Mass Simulator Concepts Robert Besuner 12 October 2005.
NST PRIMARY MIRROR CELL: ANALYSIS AND SOLUTIONS BBSO, 02/05/2004.
A. Brown MSFC/ED21 Using Plate Elements for Modeling Fillets in Design, Optimization, and Dynamic Analysis FEMCI Workshop, May 2003 Dr. Andrew M. Brown.
Lightweight mirror technology using a thin facesheet with active rigid support J. H. Burge, J. R. P. Angel, B. Cuerden, H. Martin, S. Miller University.
Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 1 – Sub-modules Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/17/04.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
Today’s Objectives: Students will be able to:
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
Mode Superposition Module 7. Training Manual January 30, 2001 Inventory # Module 7 Mode Superposition A. Define mode superposition. B. Learn.
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Rocketry Revision 1.00.
JWST ISIM Primary Structure and Kinematic Mount Configuration Jonathan Kuhn, Tim Carnahan NASA/GSFC Code 542 Andrew Bartoszyk, Steve Hendricks, Charles.
Ares V an Enabling Capability for Future Space Science Missions H. Philip Stahl, Ph.D. NASA MSFC.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Drawing of the Space Infrared Telescope for Cosmology and Astrophysics (SPICA)
13,14 July 2005 Feasibilty/Concept Study Mid Term Status Review CCAT Enclosure Nathan Loewen AMEC Dynamic Structures Ltd. 13 July 2005.
Modal Testing 421L/521L (Lab 9) 10/21/2016. Frequency Response Frequency Response Function – System characteristics in frequency domain How to find FRF.
Spacecraft Technology Structure
Concepts and Requirements for GIMM Structures
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
Spacecraft Structures
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Material Properties and Forces
Space Frame Telescope Structures for SNAP: Part II
Vertical-flexure CCD module: Thermal and Dynamic FEA
Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 2 – FP assembly
Space Frame Structures for SNAP: Another secondary structure…
Yoshiyuki Obuchi NAOJ / Mechanical Engineering shop Dec. 29th 2016
Review of the Modal Analysis of the MiniBooNE Horn MH1
Standardized CCD and MCT detector mounting configurations
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Determinate Space Frame Telescope Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 7/28/04

2 Determinate Space Frames Motivations:  Minimize telescope structure deflections under gravity  Maximize resonant frequencies on ground and orbit  Minimize structure mass, CF outgassing, etc.  Maximum access to optical elements (assembly, test)  Explore parameter space for SNAP structure

3 Determinate Space Frames Determinate space frames:  Loads carried axially (ideally)  Deflections scale linearly with length:  d = PL/AE vs. PL^3/nEI  No redundant members  Free-body strut to node ratio: S = 3*N – 6  Fast and easy to analyze with FEA  May ease assembly (vs. indeterminate structures)  Truss structures are “optimal” for supporting discrete loads  Truss structures make poor fuel tanks and fuselages…

4 SNAP Space Frames Design considerations:  Maintain symmetry to extent possible  Locate nodes for access to primary loads  3 nodes above secondary mirror for hexapod mount  3 nodes above primary for secondary support  3 nodes behind primary for mirror, attach to SC  3 nodes below tertiary axis to stabilize secondary supp.  Locate struts to avoid optical path  Size struts to minimize mass and deflections  Round struts used for constant stiffness vs. orientation  Non-tapered struts used – easy for first cut designs  COI M55J CF used for all struts  CF can be optimized for cross section, thermal expansion

5 SNAP Space Frames Design and analysis:  Still using TMA 63 optics, but results are “portable”  6 structure variants considered  1 selected for analysis  Telescope mass: 360kg loads, 96kg structures  Static FEA  Zenith pointing, gravity-release  Dynamic FEA  Ground test  On-orbit, unconstrained (“free-free”)

6 SNAP Space Frames prtruss3 – initial concept design

7 Baffles fully enclose optical system, FPA

8 Lower baffles removed

9 Radiator removed, FPA clears 12 element (rotated) baffle structure

10 All baffles removed

11 Structure is self-supporting without spacecraft

12

13 View from FPA side

14 View from tertiary side

15 Bottom view

16 Top view

17 Static FEA Static analysis:  Telescope pointed at zenith  Parametric solid and FEA models, run in batch mode  Optics, FPA modeled with 6 DOF solid elements  Struts modeled with 6 DOF pipe elements  Optics, FPA structures ignored except for mass effects  Densities varied to match current design masses  Primary = ULE, 205 kg  Secondary = ULE, 9.7 kg, + 10kg for actuators  Fold = Zerodur, 19 kg  Tertiary = ULE, 17 kg  FPA = MZT, 100 kg (no spectrograph)

18 Static FEA Elements

19 Static FEA Gz, z-axis deflections, in meters

20 Static FEA Gz, deflected shape

21 Static FEA Gz, x-axis deflections, in meters

22 Static FEA Gz, y-axis deflections, in meters

23 Dynamic FEA Dynamic analysis:  Model and loads from static analysis  Modal analysis for ground, launch  f1 = 72 Hz  f2 = 74 Hz  f3 = 107 Hz  f4 = 114 Hz  f5 = 131 Hz  Modal analysis for on-orbit (unconstrained)  f7 = 106 Hz  f8 = 107 Hz

24 Static FEA First ground mode, 72 Hz

25 Static FEA Second ground mode, 74 Hz

26 Static FEA Third ground mode, 108 Hz

27 Static FEA First free mode, 106 Hz

28 Static FEA Second free mode, 110 Hz

29 Determinate Space Frames Conclusions:  Space frames are viable alternatives to plate/shell structures  An space frame design for SNAP was shown and analyzed  Many other alternatives, and combinations, exist  The final telescope structure design will probably result from a trade-off of multiple requirements:  Weight  Stiffness  Ease of modification (additional loads)  Ease of fabrication (cost and duration)  Ease of assembly, integration, and test

30 SNAP Space Frames prtruss1 – symmetric mounts for tertiary, FPA

31 SNAP Space Frames prtruss2 – hexapod tube for tertiary, FPA

32 SNAP Space Frames prtruss4 – 3 stacked hexapods, interferes with PM

33 SNAP Space Frames prtruss5 – 3 stacked hexapods, mid-level elements intersect

34 SNAP Space Frames prtruss6 – alternate support for secondary hexapod