2010 PREx Run – Dithering & Compton Polarimetry Chun-Min Jen on behalf of the Hall-A JLab. Institution: Syracuse University, NY, 13244,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bob MichaelsParity Collab. Mtg. May 17, `07 Integrating Compton DAQ and Analysis Bob Michaels with Reminder about Nov 2006 Results Specification of new.
Advertisements

Robert J. Feuerbach Jefferson Lab Constructed from contributions from the HAPPEX Collaboration Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 5, 2005 HAPPEX-II.
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For MENU 2010 May 31, Williamsburg.
Lumi Analysis for HAPPEx III / PREX Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 5/18/2007.
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
Analysis Overview Kent Paschke HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting February 24, 2006.
1 Beam e ’s from antineutrinos using the pME and LE beams David Jaffe, Pedro Ochoa December 8 th 2006  Part 1: Reminder and update  Part 2: Change in.
Asymmetry Analysis A. Schälicke, 23 May 2006 Status: independent analyses give similar asymmetries but (significant) different errors.
PN12 Workshop JLab, Nov 2004 R. Michaels Jefferson Lab Parity Violating Neutron Densities Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons.
Regression Analysis Regression analysis is a statistical technique that is very useful for exploring the relationships between two or more variables (one.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Section 10-3 Regression.
Proton Form Factor ratio GEp/GMp with polarization method --on behalf of Jefferson lab GEp3 collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China April
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Analysis Meeting vol Shun University.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
HCAL1 Status 2003 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance 2003 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Tests in muon halo beam.
Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
LMS Stability, Data Correction and the Radiation Accident within the PrimEx Experiment by LaRay J. Benton M.S. Nuclear Physics May 2006 Graduate North.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
Nuruzzaman ( Hampton University Group Meeting 1 st November 2011 Beamline Optics Using Beam Modulation for the Q-weak Experiment.
Multiple Regression Petter Mostad Review: Simple linear regression We define a model where are independent (normally distributed) with equal.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
Systematic Errors Studies in the RHIC/AGS Proton-Carbon CNI Polarimeters Andrei Poblaguev Brookhaven National Laboratory The RHIC/AGS Polarimetry Group:
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Afterglow Studies Eric Torrence University of Oregon 183 nd LMTF Meeting 10 October 2013.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
Projected performance of NPDGamma and new systematics introduced by SM polarizer Christopher Crawford University of Kentucky NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting.
Charge Sharing & Hit Identification & Cluster Information.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia Goal: To generate electron fiducial.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Mar 26, JLab.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Met and Normalization Sarah Eno. I wanted to see if we can learn anything about the MET normalization issue using a toy monte carlo. first, we need a.
Compton polarimetry for EIC. Outline Polarized electron beam Compton process Compton polarimeters at Jefferson Laboratory – Parity experiments at Jlab.
Example x y We wish to check for a non zero correlation.
1 Occupancy, Rate Effects & Combinatorial Background By Rusty Towell January 8, 2009.
PREX Issues. Outline New issue: souce systematics and Aug. 07 run. Update on old issues. Progress at SU.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Update on the CNI polarimeter results for Run02 1.Bunch-by-bunch polarization study 2.Profiles of 0-pol bunches Osamu Jinnouchi.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
G. Eigen, Paris, Introduction The SiPM response is non-linear and depends on operating voltage (V-V bd ) and temperature  SiPMs need monitoring.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
LNF 12/12/06 1 F.Ambrosino-T. Capussela-F.Perfetto Update on        Dalitz plot slope Where we started from A big surprise Systematic checks.
Data Screening. What is it? Data screening is very important to make sure you’ve met all your assumptions, outliers, and error problems. Each type of.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) B-Team Meeting September 10, 2008.
RHIC pC Polarimeter status A.Bazilevsky For RHIC CNI Group February 26, 2008.
Kevin Lynch MuLan Collaboration Boston University CIPANP 2006 A new precision determination of the muon lifetime Berkeley, Boston, Illinois, ITU, James.
A Study on Leakage and Energy Resolution
How do you assign an error to a measurement?
Data Taking and Samples
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Analyzing Redistribution Matrix with Wavelet
Compton counting photon analysis
Statistical Methods For Engineers
Wednesday Morning 8: :30 end of fill study - octupole polarity inversion (Elias, Tatiana, Alexey, Georges, …): Goal: study the effect of the.
FFT analysis Goal : Energy calibration ( systematic error estimation)
EMCal Recalibration Check
FFTs, Windows, and Circularity
G0 Beam Polarization T. Horn, D. Gaskell Jefferson Lab
Basic Practice of Statistics - 3rd Edition Inference for Regression
PQB Meeting March 05, 2009.
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
Presentation transcript:

2010 PREx Run – Dithering & Compton Polarimetry Chun-Min Jen on behalf of the Hall-A JLab. Institution: Syracuse University, NY, 13244, USA supervised by P. A. Souder, R. S. Holmes

Dithering for high-current (70uA) runs where are we?

WhatsNewin PREx beam modulation system? Whats New in PREx beam modulation system? connected to the trim card ON relay is open set function generator to configure relay is closed trigger requested set function generator to trigger start a super-cycle FFB (Fast Feed-Back) was paused start looping over the coil sequence

What do weLearnfrom PREx Dithering? What do we Learn from PREx Dithering? We make use of FFT (fast Fourier Transformation) to see the frequency spectrum in PREx dithering data as well as MC, which is generated with signals plus random noises. The random noise's frequency spectrum is rather flat (red graph), and it suggests us the probability of finding all of the possible noise's frequencies, except for the signal's, be "equal." In contrast, PREx dithering data are composed of not only the driving frequency but low-frequency noises which are resulted from "slow drift". run 4755, cycle 61 curvature at lower frequency obviously, flat at lower frequency MC

Monitor against Coil Dithering Slope Here, we showed you monitor against coil dithering slope history plot. According to this, the dithering slope is very stable with time, and there exists very tiny fluctuations which are negligible. Certainly, we applied a list of standard cuts to our dithering data.

Detector against Coil Dithering Slope Here, we looked at detector (normalized to beam current) against coil dithering slope history plot.

Sinusoidal Fit

Sinusoidal Fit – Phase Shift Understanding

Richs work Some dithering outliers are found to be associated with apparent problems with dithering. In each dither cycle a large BPM transient marks the restoration of feedback, which is turned off before the cycle begins. In a few cycles the feedback restoration occurs too early, before dithering is over. This early restoration results in energy vernier dithering slopes close to zero and large phase differences in the position BPMs with respect to the coils. A cut on small energy slope eliminates these bad cycles.

regress-corrected (black-line) v.s. dither-corrected (red-line) UMass regression SU dithering

Compton Polarimetry where are we?

Compton Polarimeter for PREx – convention dictionary T : sumON, where ON means laser-on S (or called sig in plots) : T – B, where B is either Bkg 1 (background type 1) or Bkg 2 (background type 2) diff : diffON, where ON means laser-on A raw : raw asymmetry is defined as A cor (from data points) : corrected asymmetry is defined as 1 st -kind A cor (based on the raw asymmetry) : defined as 2 nd -kind A cor (based on the raw asymmetry) : defined as Δdiff : RMS of diff distribution Δ(T-B) : RMS of (S = T – B) distribution dilution factor f is defined as weighted average

Compton Polarimeter for PREx – background level study in each laser cycle (1) laser on rightlaser on left each laser cycle laser on right laser off before laser off after in each laser cycle, there are a bunch of MPS pulsars. for each pair of MPS pulsars with the opposite sign of helicity state (+/-), thecorrected asymmetry can be obtained based on the following formula: accumulator type take the mean of the sum of both of the histograms

Compton Polarimeter for PREx – Raw/Corrected Asymmetry / background level study in each laser cycle (2) systematic error from the beam condition and the accelerator ??? how to estimate ??? go to the next slide… the statistical weighted average

Since we cannot measure B true, the way that we can estimate how large ΔB is can be based on the fluctuation of T-B meas. distribution. Furthermore, we found In other words, Compton Polarimeter for PREx – background level study in each laser cycle (3) 0

before 2010 Fall done_ done_ investigate the discrepancy in everything between two adjacent laser states, i.e. laser-left and laser-right state. done_ done_ investigate the errors error (or called more accurately, residual) in σB1, σB2, σT and σ(T-B), while applying the linear fitting to the B1, B2, T and (T-B) functions. done done_ investigate the discrepancy between pair-wise asymmetry as well as laser (-cycle) wise asymmetry done done_ study the selection criteria further done done_ give the average of laser cycle wise asymmetry measurement in accumulator 0 for PREx done done_ yield the best fit 2 value done done_suppress the statistic error (background suppression) in the average of beam polarization measurement done done_yield the average of beam polarization measurement in accumulator 0 for PREx

Compton Analyzing Power without adding PMT non-linearity. without adding smearing of resolution adding pile-up and pile-down events theres no obvious difference between with and without pile-down effect

Future Plan – where we are going to be Dithering – – asked to finish low-current slugs; keep looking at the stability of dithering data quality Compton – – need to complete the estimation of systematic uncertainties