Copyright© 2010 Continua Health Alliance ® All Rights Reserved Continua Health Alliance and HL-7 Result of the workshop with Lantana on investigating the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interoperability 101 Bridget A. Moorman, CCE Technical Manager Industry Advisory Board Renewing Health The Continua Alliance.
Advertisements

Model Automated eXchange (MAX) System requirements HL7 Plenary September
ISO/IEEE Personal Health Device Work Group Update Douglas P. Bogia, chair, presenting for the ISO/IEEE Personal Health Device Work Group January.
Copyright© 2010 Continua Health Alliance ® All Rights Reserved Continua Health Alliance and HL-7 Result of the workshop with Lantana on investigating the.
San Antonio – Todd Cooper Chair, ISO/IEEE 11073; Co-Chair HL7 DEV WG HL7 DEV WG ISO TC215 WG7 IEEE EMBS Health Informatics – Devices Update.
Building FHIR Servers on Existing Applications
Enabling Secure Internet Access with ISA Server
Modelling Features as Statecharts Pourya Shaker and Joanne M. Atlee.
Windows Server ® 2008 File Services Infrastructure Planning and Design Published: June 2010 Updated: November 2011.
IHIC 2011 – Orlando, FL Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator HL7 Structured Documents WG.
Starter – Recap Explain what the following mean and why you would use these measurements to asses an individuals health and well being: BMI Peak Flow Blood.
© 2014 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
There is public interest! David S. Mendelson, M.D. Professor of Radiology Senior Associate - Clinical Informatics The Mount Sinai Medical Center Co-chair.
Query Health QRDA Requirements
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 4e Basic Health Data Standards Component 9/Unit.
1 HQMF Update Nov 7, HQMF Progression [2010] HQMF R1 [2011] eMIG-enhanced HQMF R1 [2012] QDM-based HQMF R1 + MAT (=MU2) [TBD] HQMF R2.1 [2013]
© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 Interoperability: future- proofing CAA Niall Sclater CETIS Manager,
QIDAM Issues and proposals for a logical model For discussion during HL7 WG Meeting in Jan 2014 Thursday Q3.
H. 323 Chapter 4.
Continua’s Mission “…to establish an eco- system of interoperable personal health systems that empower people & organizations to better manage their health.
Linking Continua Devices to the Health World (LNI Confidential) Personal Connected Health Charter Project Continua WAN 1.5 Contribution.
WHY DEAL WITH A CDA INCARNATION OF X73? Or, do we really need more problems… Hint: perhaps we do.
FHIRFarm – How to build a FHIR Server Farm (quickly)
Connecting LANs, Backbone Networks, and Virtual LANs
What did Continua do with CDA? Interface to EHR and PHR systems Keith Naylor December 2009.
IT 244 Database Management System Data Modeling 1 Ref: A First Course in Database System Jeffrey D Ullman & Jennifer Widom.
Internet & World Wide Web How to Program, 5/e Copyright © Pearson, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Summary Report Project Name: Personal Connected Health
Stepstone/Continua Sub-Project Proposal. Continua Health Alliance22 The Continua Health Alliance A non-profit, open industry alliance of the finest healthcare.
Query Health Operations Workgroup HQMF & QRDA Query Format - Results Format February 9, :00am – 12:00am ET.
1 Health Level Seven (HL7) Report Out Population Science and Structured Documents Workgroup (SDWG) Riki Ohira September 22, 2011.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Query Health Technical WG 3/8/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Administrative stuff and reminders2:05 – 2:10 pm RI Update2:10 – 2:20 pm HQMF to Java Script.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
EHR-S Functional Requirements IG: Lab Results Interface Laboratory Initiative.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Clinical Document Architecture. Outline History Introduction Levels Level One Structures.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.
1 Incorporating Data Mining Applications into Clinical Guidelines Reza Sherafat Dr. Kamran Sartipi Department of Computing and Software McMaster University,
Standards Analysis Summary vMR –Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts –Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Connecting Devices CORPORATE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, BHOPAL Department of Electronics and.
S&I PAS SWG March 20, 2012 Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) Presentation 1.
A Guide to Getting Started. 2 Free social learning network for teachers, students, schools and districts Safe and easy way to connect Exchange ideas Share.
Open Source & Interoperability Profit Proprietary Closed Free Collaborative Open.
Query Health Technical WG 6/14/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Announcements2:05 – 2:10 pm RI and Spec Updates2:05 – 2:10 pm QRDA Discussion2:10 – 3:00 pm.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Primary Goal: To support case detection and investigation for the reportable infectious diseases (conditions) using electronic information exchanges between.
Open Health Tools Membership Presentation July Continua Health Alliance.
Standards & Interoperability (S&I) Structured Data Capture (SDC) FHIR Profile IG SWG.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Selling a Product or Service Website. Website Objective Developing or Designing a Website 40 Questions and Questionnaire with 30 questions are to be filled.
Query Health Technical WG Update 1/5/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Administrative stuff and reminders2:00 – 2:05 pm Technical Approach Consensus Update.
CDA Overview HL7 CDA IHE Meeting, February 5, 2002 Slides from Liora Alschuler, alschuler.spinosa Co-chair HL7.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, July 11, 2013.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Retrieve Information for Display (RID) Integration Profile Ellie Avraham Kodak Health Imaging IHE IT Infrastructure.
CCD and CCR Executive Summary Jacob Reider, MD Medical Director, Allscripts.
1 Model Driven Health Tools Design and Implementation of CDA Templates Dave Carlson Contractor to CHIO
Patient Care Devices Daegu HIMSS Asia Mini-Showcase PCD Dallas F2F
Information Technology Project Management, Seventh Edition.
Structured Data Capture (SDC) FHIR SDC Pilots Template
Elaboration popo.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
IHE DEC and Continua WAN Interface Proposals for Remote Monitoring
Instructional Design Document
_ Update Seth Blumenthal, MBA Director, Data & Innovation PCPI
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Presentation transcript:

Copyright© 2010 Continua Health Alliance ® All Rights Reserved Continua Health Alliance and HL-7 Result of the workshop with Lantana on investigating the options for Questionnaire Standardization Asim Muhammad (Philips, Chair E2E Architecture) Martin Rosner (Philips, Chair E2E Security ) Confidential Information

| Outline Continua Questionnaire Use Case Sample Questions Workshop with Lantana on the Realization of Continua Requirements –Options –Results Discussion and next steps

| NFC Health Reporting Network (HRN) Interface Personal Device (PAN/LAN/TAN) Weight Scale Pulse Oximeter Independent Living Activity Cardio / Strength Adherence Monitor Glucose Meter Pulse / Blood Pressure Thermometer Peak Flow Application Hosting Device Connectivity Wide Area Network (WAN) Interface WAN Device HRN Device EHR PHR HIE NHIN CCD PCD 01 3 Water Gas Temperature Fall Current Architecture and Enhancements Low Energy

| WAN-Interface Application Hosting Device WAN Device (hosts telehealth services) Future (2013): Enable questionnaires and questionnaire response Continua E2E Reference Topology (with real-world example devices overlayed) Current state: Observations upload based on IHE PCD 01-HL7 v2.6 and WS-I basic profile IHE XDR + HL7 CDA R2 Consent Directive IG

| Questionnaire use case WAN Device Application Hosting Device Questionnaire document (inc. branching logic) Questionnaire Response document The objective is to enable the interoperable representation and exchange of the questionnaire and questionnaire response across the WAN-IF. Defining the rendering / layout (XHTML, XForm etc.) of the questionnaire on the AHD is an implementer responsibility and out of scope for Continua. Patient fills-in the questionnaire Out of scope for Continua

| Question Set 1 Question Set –It groups questions related to a domain e.g. mental well-being. Confidential Information Element (or Attribute) DefinitionMultiplicity Question Set IDThis uniquely identifies a question set within a Questionnaire document.[1..1] Question Set Title This is the title of the question set. For example, Questions related to mental well-being. [1..1] QuestionsThese are the actual questions which may be asked and are organized within the Question Set 1 [1..*]

| Question 1 Element (or Attribute) DefinitionMultiplicity Question IDThis uniquely identifies a question within the Questionnaire document.[1..1] Question text Compared to last week, how would you rate your health status in general? [1..1] Answer options A1The same as last week [1..n] A2Better than last week A3Worse than last week Question type Indicates the type of question. In this example the type of question is Multiple Choice. [1..1] SkipIndicates whether it is allowed to skip this question (Skip=TRUE) or not (Skip=FALSE). By default the value of Skip could be FALSE. [0..1]

| Question 2 Element (or Attribute) DefinitionMultiplicity Question IDThis uniquely identifies a question within a Questionnaire document.[1..1] Question text Compared to last week, please rate your breathlessness. [1..1] Answer options B1B1The same as last week [1..n] B2B2Better than last week B3Worse than last week Question type Indicates the type of question. In this example the type of question is Multiple Choice. [1..1] SkipIndicates whether it is allowed to skip this question (Skip=TRUE) or not (Skip=FALSE). By default the value of Skip could be FALSE. [0..1]

| Question 3 Element (or Attribute) DefinitionMultiplicity Question IDThis uniquely identifies a question within a Questionnaire document.[1..1] Pre condition This element holds the logical expression. For example, Ask this question ONLY if answer to Question 1 is A3 AND answer to Question 2 is B3. [0..1] Question text Why do you feel worse? [1..1] Answer Answer could be I didnt drink coffee. [1..n] Question type Indicates the type of question. In this example, the type of question is Free Text. [1..1] SkipIndicates whether it is allowed to skip this question (Skip=TRUE) or not (Skip=FALSE). By default the value of Skip could be FALSE. [0..1]

| Additional requirements (1/2) A question may also hold link to a multimedia item (e.g. image, video) A question may also consists of attributes that are used to signal the minimum and maximum number of answer option a patient must select (similar to ObservationRange construct) Confidential Information Element (or Attribute) DefinitionMultiplicity Question IDThis uniquely identifies a question within the Questionnaire document.[1..1] Question text Compared to last week, how would you rate your health status in general? [1..1] Answer options A1The same as last week [1..n] A2Better than last week A3Worse than last week Question type Indicates the type of question. In this example the type of question is Multiple Choice. [1..1] Min. of AnswersIndicates the minimum number of answer options a patient should select.[0..1] Max. of AnswersIndicates the maximum number of answer options a patient should select.[0..1] Multimedia item Reference to a multimedia item that needs to be rendered simultaneous with the question text. [0..1] SkipIndicates whether it is allowed to skip this question (Skip=TRUE) or not (Skip=FALSE). By default the value of Skip could be FALSE. [0..1] Additional elements to Question 1 (slide 7)

| Additional requirements (2/2) Confidential Information Element (or Attribute) DefinitionMultiplicity Question IDThis uniquely identifies a question within the Questionnaire document.[1..1] Question text How many hour do you sleep on average during the night? [1..1] Answer[1..1] Question type Indicates the type of question. In this example the type of question is numeric. [1..1] Low valueUsed to indicate the low boundary e.g. 0[0..1] High valueUsed to indicate the low boundary e.g. 24[0..1] SkipIndicates whether it is allowed to skip this question (Skip=TRUE) or not (Skip=FALSE). By default the value of Skip could be FALSE. [0..1] The answer to a question may be of numeric type. Allowed range of values (e.g. 0 to 24) for an answer can be indicated using the ObservationRange construct.

| Workshop with Lantana Three day workshop with Lantana development team where we discussed Continua use case and requirements (slide 6-10) and then developed a small prototype. After several hours of discussion we agreed to focus on the following system diagram: Confidential Information

| Options As a result of the three day workshop we identified the following options for expressing the Questionnaire Document in a standard format Options Confidential Information CDA with extensions Could use moodCode=DEF for defining questions derivationExpr for holding the conditional logic custom extensions to transmit value sets (answer options) in IHE SVS (Sharing Value Sets) XML markup Update to HQMF Questions would be expressed as criteria Could modify the standard to define how a CDA document can be generated in response to criteria. This would benefit QRDA implementation as well as addressing questionnaire logic Need to address what, if any populations would be defined in a Continua questionnaire Template formalism? If this type of questionnaires are a collection of templates with conditional logic, then perhaps all we really need is a balloted template formalism (aka a wire format for templates) where templates encompass conditional logic Mash-up of all the above? Take bits of CDA, HQMF, template formalisms, etc. and build a new standard.

| Results (Questionnaire Document) NOT a clinical document, used to extract the input from patient resulting in a response document Extended the Questionnaire Assessment templates If we go with CDA Extension option, then –Observation/code holds the question text –Observation/value holds the answer option(s) –Answer may be constrained as free text, an integer or multiple-choice expressed as a coded value set Some questions include logic (pre condition- slide 9) that determines what question is shown next depending on the answer(s) to previous questions. –HL-7 Example If observation/value in template A is X-SOME-CODE from LOINC, then template B is required –Continua equivalence If the user answers question A with SOME ANSWER, then show question B next –We also looked at the HQMF IG can be used to realize logical expressions (ex. a pre condition on slide 9) Confidential Information

| Results (Questionnaire Response) We agreed that Questionnaire Response is a clinical document and can be easily mapped to CDA constructs similar to Questionnaire Assessment IG. Confidential Information

| Discussion and Next Steps Feedback on the options –? Project scope statement(s) –Draft PSS(s) for Questionnaire and Questionnaire Response work items –Send draft statements to SDWG by Monday the 17 th of Dec. –Review and address comments up until F2F meeting Confidential Information