The Impact of RTI on Learning Disabilities Identification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
RTI and LD: Case Studies Rhode Island RTI Initiative Module 5 Edition 2, Feb
Response to Intervention: Tools for Improving Achievement District-wide Dr. Laura Boynton Hauerwas, Providence College Ina S. Woolman, Rhode Island Department.
Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Problem Solving and Response to Intervention… Dont be Afraid to Ask! Laura Boynton Hauerwas, Ph.D. Ina S. Woolman.
Response to Intervention: A Systematic Problem Solving Process Rhode Island RTI Initiative Module One 2007.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
A NEW MODEL OF TIERED INTERVENTION REQUIRED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT AS OF JULY 1, PRESENTED BY JESS GRAYUM Response to Instruction and Intervention.
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Response to Intervention Edward Daly & Todd Glover University of Nebraska- Lincoln.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Collaboration for Intervention General Education, BBSST, ELL, RtI, Special Education Shelby County Schools August 31, 2009.
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Considerations in Determining Primary Disability Speech Language Impairment or Specific Learning Disability.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Constitutionally based court findings have set precedents for the rights of all students to be educated in the General Education classroom. “Least Restrictive.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Legal Requirements and Changes: Child Find, Evaluation, Eligibility Administrative Training Carie Hurford Emily McCambridge.
Whittney Smith Adelphi University IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and Special Education.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Response.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Options for Participation and Related IEP Decisions
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Whittney Smith Assistant Principal / SCSE Chairperson Mineola Middle School IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and.
Using the Pyramid of Intervention for Special Education Referrals.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Special Education News to Know for Building Administrators and Counselors Child Find.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Specific Learning Disability (SLD)Eligibility Training
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012
Special Education Process
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

The Impact of RTI on Learning Disabilities Identification

IDEA, 2004 Learning Disabilities The new IDEA allows the use of a process that determines if a child responds to scientific, research-based interventions in determining learning disabilities … Rhode Island guidance expects teams to use this process. The new IDEA prohibits teams from being required to consider a severe discrepancy between achievement and ability … Rhode Island guidance allows teams to make an additional finding on discrepancy between ability and achievement, after making the learning disability determination based on response to intervention.

Special Education Decision Making Prerequisites to determining that a student has a learning disability Student must have been provided with learning experiences appropriate for the childs age and ability levels and thus the determining factor for the eligibility determination is not lack of instruction in reading or math. Rhode Island Regulations Governing the Education of Children with Disabilities, 2000

Curriculum, Instruction and Environment Evidence is gathered to record results of successive interventions and to inform new participants in the Expanding Circle of Support Assessments to monitor progress Documentation of differentiated strategies and fidelity of successive interventions Environmental conditions that support or hinder the students learning

Expand the Circle of Support to Consider Special Education? In spite of successive research based interventions, is the student no longer making progress toward Grade Level Expectations? …or … Is the students progress dependent on a level of support that cannot be maintained over time in general education? IF YES…SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS BEGINS

Evaluation Team Consideration of Referral The team of parents and qualified school personnel answers three questions: 1.Have interventions of appropriate type, progression and intensity been implemented with fidelity? No Consult on additional interventions Yes Question 2

Evaluation Team Consideration of Referral 2.Given students response to interventions, do we suspect that the student might have a disability? No Consult and continue supports within general education Yes Question 3

Evaluation Team Consideration of Referral 3.Are there questions remaining before we can decide if theres a disability, and what evidence do we need to answer those questions? rate of learning? gaps? intensity of instructional need? If yes … conduct relevant comprehensive evaluation

New Direction: To determine a learning disability using Response to Intervention model Questions from the interim guidance document 1. Does the evidence from a variety of sources of converging data indicate that the students needs are greater than 90% to 95% of age appropriate peers? RATE Is the student's learning rate slower, even with high quality interventions? AND GAP Is the student's performance significantly lower? and/or Within a students own performance is there a marked gap in different areas?

Additionally… 2. After careful review, can we rule out any other possible primary causes for this students distinct needs? –Exclusionary conditions –Other considerations If the answer to the first two questions is Yes, the team needs to answer the third question: 3. Does the student require special education and related services in order to meet his/her needs? That is … –Is the instructional intensity needed for the student to make progress greater than 90%-95% of the student's age appropriate peers? If the answer to all three questions is Yes, the team may determine that the student has a learning disability and requires special education supports and services.

Consider Severe Discrepancy? A choice … To do so: First, make the learning disability determination based on evidence of the students response to intervention. Answer the question – does the child have average or above average ability? Consider the degree of discrepancy between the students ability and achievement. Document the findings.

Questions… Ina S. Woolman, Rhode Island Department of Education, Office of Special Populations,