Tysons Circulator Study: Process and Preliminary Results Summary March 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Tysons Transportation: Planning, Analysis, and Design Projects Presented to: Transportation Committee,
1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
Gateway Corridor Alternatives Analysis Findings Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee November 26, 2012.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
CENTRAL CORRIDOR TRANSIT ACCESS STUDY Citizens for Modern Transit March 27, 2014.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
1 Item 9: (DRAFT) Briefing on the Draft Update of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell DTP Presentation to the.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Feasibility Study and Alternatives Analysis Public Workshop Wednesday, October 22 nd, :30 – 9:00 pm Battlefield.
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
Transportation Planning Board: Background, Constrained Long- Range Plan, and Ongoing Work Presentation to the Board of Directors Metropolitan Washington.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Planning & Implementing Transportation Alternatives for Energy Efficiency and the Future Is Now Foundation October 4, 2011 Debbie Griner, Environmental.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
® ® Focus on Place Types. ® ® Focus on: Approach and Classification Transitions Guidance.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1/14 Next Steps for Participating Economies to Develop EE Urban Passenger Transportation 5 March, 2012 APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur Bing-Chwen Yang Team.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
The Concept for City Center – The Power of TOD TOD Advisory Committee Meeting 3 December 10, 2009 The Premier Place for a Premier City.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger Rail Alliance February 24, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
Regional Roads Committee
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Presentation transcript:

Tysons Circulator Study: Process and Preliminary Results Summary March 2012

Background : 1.The Comprehensive Plan for the Tysons Corner Urban Center calls for a System of Circulators in Tysons Corner to: A.Provide quick and convenient access for Metrorail passengers to and from locations within Tysons but beyond walking distance from the Metrorail Stations, and B.To provide a quick and convenient way to travel within Tysons. 2.To support this and many other goals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, the Board of Supervisors adopted a list of 17 follow-on motions along with the adoption of the plan. Follow-on motion 11 specifically pertains to the Circulator Study and directs staff to issue an RFP for the circulator study and to bring the results of that study to a future Board Transportation Committee Meeting for discussion. 3.An RFP for the Circulator Study was issued in December of 2010 and the contract was awarded to a team lead by AECOM in March of March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan2

Steps Completed : 1.Developed Goals and Objectives for the study 2.Network Development Process 3.Network Evaluation Process - Detailed Evaluation March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan3

Goals and Objectives Goal 1: The Circulator will support the comprehensive plan vision to transform Tysons into a walkable transit oriented urban environment. Goal 2: The Circulator will provide high quality transit that will contribute to a reduction in auto dependence and an increase in the transit share of total trips. Goal 3: The Circulator will support a multimodal transportation network within Tysons and provide a convenient link to the regional network. Goal 4: The Circulator will be constructed and operated in a cost effective manner. 2/16/2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan4

Goals and Objectives Goal 1: The Circulator will support the comprehensive plan vision to transform Tysons into a walkable transit oriented urban environment. Objectives: -1.1 Develop a system that is sensitive to and incorporates the urban design principles and elements provided in the comprehensive plan for all aspects of the Circulator Develop a system that enhances walkability in Tysons by reducing the dominance of auto travel, while not hindering pedestrian movements Develop a system that supports the land use goals outlined in the comprehensive plan. March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan5

Goals and Objectives Goal 2: The Circulator will provide high quality transit that will contribute to a reduction in auto dependence and an increase in the transit share of total trips. Objectives: -2.1 Provide efficient, reliable, fast, and high-frequency service that is competitive with automobile travel Provide dedicated transit right-of-way if required and appropriate Utilize a mix of modes as appropriate Attract new transit riders and increase transit mode share for commuters and internal trips within Tysons Provide convenient access to a variety of high trip generating destinations to serve commuters as well as workers and residents Provide coverage to serve the most important destinations in Tysons while maintaining service efficiency and directness of travel. March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan6

Goals and Objectives Goal 3: The Circulator will support a multimodal transportation network within Tysons and provide a convenient link to the regional network. Objectives: -3.1 Provide simple, convenient, and coordinated connections with Metrorail, HOT lanes, BRT/Express bus service, and local bus service Develop a system that allows for phased implementation of routes and modes that works within the transportation and development context of Tysons Provide a system that ensures the safety and security of the passengers as well as pedestrians, bicyclists, and automobile users. March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan7

Goals and Objectives Goal 4: The Circulator will be constructed and operated in a cost effective manner. Objectives: -4.1 Maximize ridership and return on capital investment by taking into consideration all capital costs in the determination of initial and final mode Achieve a high operating performance for interim and final Circulator mode(s) and route(s) by taking into consideration all operating costs associated with different options Provide service at a fare that balances the need for financial sustainability with other project objectives. March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan8

Network Development Process Developed five preliminary networks utilizing Circulator Planning Objectives and Route Design Principles as development framework: -Design based on 2050 forecasted conditions -Networks were built up based on individual circulator routes that were combined into networks -Planning Objectives Utilized in Route Design -Route Design Principles -Preliminary Networks Developed March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan9

Network Development Process (cont.) Planning Objectives Utilized in Route Design : – Provide efficient, reliable, and high frequency service that is competitive with automobile travel. – Attract new transit riders and increase use of transit for commuters and internal trips within Tysons. – Provide convenient access to a variety of high trip generating destinations to service commuters and internal trips. – Provide coverage to serve the most important destinations in Tysons, while maintaining service efficiency and directness of travel. – Provide simple, convenient, and coordinated connections with Metrorail, HOT lanes, BRT/Express bus service, and local bus service. March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan10

Network Development Process (cont.) Route Design Principles: – Keep the system as easy to understand as possible Maintain consistent routing at all times throughout the day Minimize total number of routes in the Circulator system – Find optimal balance between route directness and coverage – Minimize duplication of Circulator route mileage – Minimize use of busiest through roadways (preferably by use of Avenues and Collectors) – Utilize both existing and future roadways March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan11

Network Development Process (cont.) 5 Preliminary Networks Developed – Two Moved Forward for More Detailed Evaluation: – Network #1: Three route network Routes complement each other with each playing a distinct purpose – Network #2: Four route network Designed with a route focus on Tysons Central – Network #3: Four route network: Comparable to Network #1, but with the addition of a loop route to connect Jones Branch corridor to Tysons Central area – Network #4: Two route network Attempts to provide as much coverage as possible with two routes – focus is on those areas beyond a short walk from Silver Line stations and not on internal trips – Network #5: Five route network Comparable to Network #2, but with two routes replacing the West Loop to increase directness and replace potential passenger confusion resulting from a loop service. March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan12

Network Development Process (cont.) Preliminary networks evaluated based on evaluation framework utilizing available data (2050 conditions): – Evaluation Framework: Trip productions within ¼ mile of network System coverage of productions Productions per mile of network Trip attractions within ¼ mile of network System coverage of attractions Attractions per mile of network – Two networks selected for more detailed evaluation based on above factors Productions are trips generated by residential uses within Tysons Corner. Attractions are trips generated by non-residential uses within Tysons Corner. March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan13

Network Development Framework: Preliminary Evaluation Results March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan14 CriterionNetwork #1Network #2Network #3Network #4Network #5 Productions within ¼ mile of network 391,600409,100392,750361,100404,300 System coverage of productions 90%94%90%83%92% Productions per mile of network 45,50039,90034,70053,70037,300 Attractions within ¼ mile of network 587,800605,300591,300538,800605,300 System coverage of attractions 92%95%92%84%95% Attractions per mile of network 68,30059,00052,20080,20055,800 Total System One-way mileage

March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan15 Planned Neighborhood Bus Service Beyond the Circulator

March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan17 Network #1: Three Route Network

March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan18 Network #2: Four Route Network

Trip Production Map – Network # 1 (Three Route Network)

Trip Attraction Map – Network # 1 (Three Route Network)

Network Evaluation Ridership Forecasts – Used regional model adjusted for 2050 conditions – Depend on four variables: Mode Service frequency Parking Cost Circulator fare Speeds March 2012 Tysons Corner Circulator Plan21

Ridership Results March 2012 Tysons Corner Circulator Plan22

Ridership Results (cont.) March 2012 Tysons Corner Circulator Plan23

Network Evaluation Process (cont.) Other factors to be evaluated: Circulator travel time between select origin/destination pairs Transit mode share and changes in mode share Variability of run times Percentage of jobs, retail, residential within ¼ mile of network Number of locations of auto/rail intersection Weekday boardings per revenue hour Operating cost per rider Capital cost per rider Daily weekday ridership March 2012 Tysons Corner Circulator Plan24

Study Schedule Completion: Spring 2012 Tasks 1-4 – substantially complete Remaining Tasks: Desired Mode – bus, streetcar/light rail/other (Task 5) Ultimate Alignment of Circulator Routes (2050) (Task 6a) Guidelines for Interim Circulator Routes (Task 6b) Evolution of Modes (Task 7) Refined Demand Estimate (Task 8) Public Meeting (Task 10) Final Report (Task 11) March 2012Tysons Corner Circulator Plan25