DC8 Registries Breakout. Goals of the session Discuss and clarify : Requirements for registry Framework for policy Relate issues raised to EOR prototype.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Pete Johnston, Eduserv Foundation 16 April 2007 Update on work of Joint DCMI/IEEE LTSC Task.

Advertisements

Putting the Pieces Together Grace Agnew Slide User Description Rights Holder Authentication Rights Video Object Permission Administration.

IATI Technical Advisory Group Technical Proposals Simon Parrish IATI Technical Advisory Group, DIPR March 2010.

Status on the Mapping of Metadata Standards

1 An Update on XML.org Registry and Repository Una Kearns Documentum, Inc.

T. Baker / 27 March 2000 A Registry for Dublin Core Thomas Baker, GMD IuK 2000: "Information, Knowledge and Knowledge Management Darmstadt, 27 March 2000.

THE DONOR PROJECT Titia van der Werf-Davelaar. Project Financed by: Innovation of Scientific Information Provision (IWI) Duration: –phase 1: 1 may 1998.

22 October 2001Dublin Core Workshop, Tokyo1 The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Makx Dekkers, Managing Director, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative

DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Application Profiles: managing metadata.

DC8: Architecture WG day 2 Architecture breakout group Sigfrid Lundberg (NetLab) Dan Brickley (ILRT/W3C)

Registry breakout group DC-8, National Library of Canada 5 October 2000.

DC2001, Tokyo DCMI Registry : Background and demonstration DC2001 Tokyo October 2001 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath Harry Wagner, OCLC

DC Architecture WG meeting Monday Sept 12 Slot 1: Slot 2: Location: Seminar Room 4.1.E01.

Agents and Authority Linking Breakout sessions Oct 4 2-4, Oct 5 3-4:30 Goals: Explore issues in Agent discovery. Do we need an Agents working group? If.

OAForum – September 2003 Muriel Foulonneau Open Archives Initiatives Protocol for Metadata Harvesting Practices for the cultural heritage sector Muriel.

OLAC Metadata Steven Bird University of Melbourne / University of Pennsylvania OLAC Workshop 10 December 2002.

White Paper on Establishing an Infrastructure for Open Language Archiving Steven Bird and Gary Simons.

Proposed Revised Mission of the Conformance Sig Current Mission Statement –The SIG Conformance will provide mechanisms for : 1. Specification of conformance.

A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry British Library, Boston.

PwC SCHEMAS Forum for metadata schema implementers The SCHEMAS project and metadata ETB Workshop, London, 9-10 January 2001 Michael Day,

Ontology Servers and Metadata Vocabulary Repositories Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development

Metadata vocabularies and ontologies Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development

UKOLN, University of Bath

An ontology server for the agentcities.NET project Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development

Preservation Metadata Initiatives: Practicality, Sustainability, and Interoperability Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath ERPANET Training.

Using the SCHEMAS Forum Registry Sharing schemas: progress and future plans SCHEMAS 4th Workshop Den Haag, The Netherlands 30th November, 2001 Manjula.

February Harvesting RDF metadata Building digital library portals with harvested metadata workshop EU-DL All Projects concertation meeting DELOS.

The Discovery Landscape in Crystallography UKOLN is supported by: Monica Duke UKOLN, University of Bath, UK – eBank UK project A centre.

Vocabulary Mapping Framework Tertius Ltd / International DOI Foundation Norman Paskin London Nov Next Steps.

The Dublin Core Collection Description Application Profile (DC CD AP) Pete Johnston, UKOLN, University of Bath Chair, DC Collection Description Working.

The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath JISC Joint Programmes Meeting Brighton, 6-7 July 2004

Advisory Group Meeting 12 October 2005 The Clever Use of Metadata in eGovernment and eBusiness Recordkeeping Processes in Networked Environments.

Agents and Authority Linking Breakout sessions Oct 4 2-4, Oct 5 3-4:30 Goals: Explore issues in Agent discovery. Do we need an Agents working group? If.

The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.

Dublin Core as a tool for interoperability Common presentation of data from archives, libraries and museums DC October 2006 Leif Andresen Danish.

IRS XML Standards & Tax Return Data Strategy For External Discussion June 30, 2010.

W3C XML Query Language Working Group Mark Needleman Data Research Associates ZIG Current Awareness Session July 13, 2000.

Everything Around the Core Practices, policies, and models around Dublin Core Thomas Baker, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft DC2004, Shanghai Library

Metadata Standards and Applications 5. Applying Metadata Standards: Application Profiles.

Metadata Schema Registries: update on current activity Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath September 2005.

The role of metadata schema registries XML and Educational Metadata, SBU, London, 10 July 2001 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.

PwC SCHEMAS Forum for metadata schema implementers Metadata: SCHEMAS and other European projects First Austrian Metadata Seminar, 18 May 2001 Michael Day,

A centre of expertise in digital information management The MEG Metadata Schemas Registry Pete Johnston, Research Officer (Interoperability),

TUESDAY, 4:00 – 4:20PM WEDNESDAY, 4:00 – 4:20PM Douglas Hill, NHIN Implementation Lead (Contractor), Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Vanessa.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS, STORET, and XML Advisory Committee on Water Information September 10, 2003 Kenneth J. Lanfear,

“Integrating Standards in Practice” 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries July 9-11, 2007 New York City, NY USA An international conference to share and.

The Final Study Period Report on MFI 6: Model registration procedure SC32WG2 Meeting, Sydney May 26, 2008 H. Horiuchi, Keqing He, Doo-Kwon Baik SC32WG2.

The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry and IEEE LOM Application Profiles Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath CETIS Metadata & Digital Repositories SIG,

National Information Exchange Model Update for the Global Advisory Committee Spring 2008 Meeting April 10, 2008 NIEM Technical Architecture Committee (NTAC)

Dublin Core Metadata Schema Registry at Tsukuba Shigeo Sugimoto, Mitsuharu Nagamori Graduate School of Library, Information and Media Studies University.

Application Profiles: interoperable friend or foe? Rachel Heery Michael Day TEL Milestone Conference Frankfurt am Main, April 2002.

Metadata Schema Registries in the Partially Semantic Web: the CORES experience Rachel Heery, Pete Johnston, UKOLN, University of.

SCHEMAS Workshop Bath - May 2000 Andy Powell, UKOLN Example tool/registry integration UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council.

The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.

Pete Johnston, Eduserv Foundation 16 April 2007 An Introduction to the DCMI Abstract Model JISC.

May 2007 Registration Status Small Group Meeting 1: August 24, 2009.

Registry of MEG-related schemas MEG BECTa, Coventry, 17 July 2001 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN is supported by:

A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Functional Requirements Eprints Application Profile Working.

DC Architecture WG meeting Wednesday Seminar Room: 5205 (2nd Floor)

A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: IEMSR, the Information Environment & Metadata Application.

IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.

Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.

ESDIS Standards Office Yonsook Enloe, CTSI 3/2/ FGDC Meeting1.

IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.

Grid Metadata Management

SCHEMAS Forum for metadata schema implementers

Software Measurement Process ISO/IEC

The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry

The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry

Some Options for Non-MARC Descriptive Metadata

Presentation transcript:

DC8 Registries Breakout

Goals of the session Discuss and clarify : Requirements for registry Framework for policy Relate issues raised to EOR prototype (Re-)charter registry WG

Agenda Purpose of registry Scope of registry Policy and process –Toms strawman proposal –Versioning Relate issues to technical solution WG charter

What are metadata registries for…..? Purposes are to –Define –Align –Map –Promote –Inform –Control change Who are the users? –Humans –Software tools

Schema Registries Registry Registry provides access to collection of schemas global? national? sectoral? standard schemas and application profiles? how do we discover registries? are registries database or portal? thick or thin?

Thick registry Thick Registry RDF schema Syntax spec App profile Scheme info Mapping profile Usage guide Software toolsUsers schema database

Thin registry Thin Registry RDF schema Syntax spec App profile Scheme info Mapping profile Usage guide Software tools Users schema portal

Prototype registries Meta-Form DESIRE metadata registry DC Registry SCHEMAS registry

User requirements Query status of qualifiers Mappings Who is using what Machine-readability Ability to submit (publish) a schema DC-friendly schemas in XML.ORG

Continued… Granularity of registries: at a detailed element-level, not just schema-level (DTD) Access to additional information related to elements – crosswalks, endorsements DCMI as gateway for Editorial review For every published schema, fifty more out there somewhere

Continued… Look for schemas (elements) by domain Specifying authority Effect of translation or implementation on standards Collecting information on usage Archiving elements no longer in use or declared obsolete

Continued… The DCMI Schema that describes elements and qualifiers in sufficient detail –What working group is discussing this Compatibility with ISO Extensions to RDF Schema in medium term

Scope of DCMI registry Stages of implementation (phase) Feedback loop in usability is necessary Interface issues Access to crosswalks –Annotations about crosswalks Version control, providing authoritative

Scope Pin down requirements (formal statement to circulate to XML Schema, RDF Schema, XML DTD experts) Identify milestones for phased implementation One-place reference for search query formulation Pointers to related services Difference between user guide and registry(no duplication) Specify which sorts of schemas we include and prioiritise (e.g.DC namespaces, application profiles)

Policy and process Strawman: role for usage committee in annotation, role of working groups….. Status of elements depends on agreed criteria Usage committee role limited to valid grammar coniderations WG recommend qualifiers Clarify roles of committees (Registry, Usage, Advisory)

Usage: does it conform Working groups propose AC: the particular status EC: final stamp of approval

Two registries –Registry local schemas Self-publishing versus peer-reviewed publishing Top-down authorized or bottom-up posted Annotation technology depends on policy