1:1 Reconsidered DC-6, November 4, 1998. History zJuly 97: RLG Metadata Summit yArchives, museums, libraries yIdentified need for flexible description.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Dublin Core in Multiple Languages Thomas Baker Sixth Dublin Core Workshop Library of Congress, Washington DC Tuesday, 3 November 1998.

Advertisements

Ali Alshowaish. Collective realization that machine-processability requires a coherent data model A casual discussion at WWW-2 in Chicago, October of.

RDA : the Inside Story The Genesis OLA, February 2, 2008 Ingrid Parent Library and Archives Canada.

AGENTS proposal dc-DC Nov.3, 1998 ad-hoc agents group drafting committee: Priscilla Caplan, Martin Dillon & David Bearman presented by David Bearman.

DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Application Profiles: managing metadata.

DC2001, Tokyo DCMI Registry : Background and demonstration DC2001 Tokyo October 2001 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath Harry Wagner, OCLC

OLAC Metadata Steven Bird University of Melbourne / University of Pennsylvania OLAC Workshop 10 December 2002.

ETD Preservation Workshop Session Four: Collection Management for Preservation Gail McMillan, Virginia Tech.

The PREMIS Data Dictionary Michael Day Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath JORUM, JISC and DCC.

Metadata vocabularies and ontologies Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development

Community, Consensus, and the Trajectory of Progress Reflections on the Dublin Core experience and what it tells us about the future Stuart Weibel OCLC.

UKOLN is supported by: Using the RSLP schema Ann Chapman Collection Description Focus A centre of expertise in digital information management

From content standards to RDF Gordon Dunsire Presented at AKM 15, Porec, 2011.

Towards consensus on collection-level description Collection Description Focus Briefing Day 1 British Library, St Pancras, London 22 October 2001 Bridget.

METS: An Introduction Structuring Digital Content.

13 April User participation in digital collections building Amy Rudersdorf, Digital Technologies Librarian Special Collections.

Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.

Developing a Metadata Exchange Format for Mathematical Literature David Ruddy Project Euclid Cornell University Library DML 2010 Paris 7 July 2010.

RDF AND LINKED DATA Jenn Riley Head, Carolina Digital Library and Archives The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

RDA AND LINKED DATA: MOVING BEYOND THE RULES Jenn Riley Head, Carolina Digital Library and Archives The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Linked Library Data Miiya Holmes October 6-7, 2012.

Data Modeling and Database Design Chapter 1: Database Systems: Architecture and Components.

Dewey Summaries as Multilingual Linked Data Dewey Breakfast/Update ALA Annual July 11, 2009.

Dublin Core A meta future Kara Luedke & Manny Brown.

Using Metadata in CONTENTdm Diana Brooking and Allen Maberry Metadata Implementation Group, Univ. of Washington Crossing Organizational Boundaries Oct.

RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.

Digitization at the National Archives and Records Administration Doris Hamburg Director, Preservation Programs James Hastings Director, Access Programs.

Stuart Weibel OCLC, Inc. October, 1997 Dublin Core Metadata Stuart Weibel Consulting Research Scientist OCLC Office of Research purl.org/net/weibel October.

UKOLUG - July Metadata for the Web RDF and the Dublin Core Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN.

Metadata and identifiers for e- journals Copenhagen Juha Hakala Helsinki University Library

Publishing Digital Content to a LOR Publishing Digital Content to a LOR 1.

Addressing Metadata in the MPEG-21 and PDF-A ISO Standards NISO Workshop: Metadata on the Cutting Edge May 2004 William G. LeFurgy U.S. Library of Congress.

1 © Netskills Quality Internet Training, University of Newcastle Metadata Explained © Netskills, Quality Internet Training.

Interoperability Scenario Producing summary versions of compound multimedia historical documents.

8/28/97Organization of Information in Collections Introduction to Description: Dublin Core and History University of California, Berkeley School of Information.

1 XML as a preservation strategy Experiences with the DiVA document format Eva Müller, Uwe Klosa Electronic Publishing Centre Uppsala University Library,

Metadata Considerations Implementing Administrative and Descriptive Metadata for your digital images 1.

Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.

RDA : Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.

1 Metadata –Information about information – Different objects, different forms – e.g. Library catalogue record Property:Value: Author Ian Beardwell Publisher.

Modularization and Interoperability: Dublin Core and the Warwick Framework Sandra D. Payette Digital Library Research Group Cornell University November.

Digitization Costs & Funding Digital Library Workshop Oct. 2, 2003.

Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.

Access and Query Task Force Status at F2F1 Simon Miles.

Extensible Metadata Developments in the Triangle Digital Library Project.

A Quick Introduction to Metadata Michael Day UKOLN: The UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath

Alternative Architecture for Information in Digital Libraries Onno W. Purbo

RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.

METADATA & META TAGS Presented by Jong Hun Kim INF 385E Information Architecture and Design I September 28, 2004.

Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data

Metadata Metadata Mark-up and Management © Adolf Knoll, National Library of the Czech Republic.

Access and Query Task Force Status at F2F1 Simon Miles.

Digitization – Basics and Beyond workshop Interoperability of cultural and academic resources New services for digitized collections Muriel Foulonneau.

RDA: an introduction Gordon Dunsire Presented to the Workshop on Conceptual Modelling for Archives, Libraries and Museums Jan 2010, National Gallery,

1 Dublin Core and its implementation in RDF/XML Paul Miller Interoperability Focus UK Office for Library & Information Networking (UKOLN)

Application Profiles Application profiles -- are schemas which consist of data elements drawn from one or more namespaces, combined together by implementers,

RDA: history and background Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT ACOC Seminar, Sydney, 24 October 2008.

1 CS 502: Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Guest Lecture William Y. Arms Identifiers: URNs, Handles, PURLs, DOIs and more.

Online Information and Education Conference 2004, Bangkok Dr. Britta Woldering, German National Library Metadata development in The European Library.

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000

Outline Pursue Interoperability: Digital Libraries

Alison Valk Georgia Tech

Attributes and Values Describing Entities.

Cataloging the Internet

Accommodating local cataloguing traditions in a global context

Developing a Metadata Element Set and/or an Application Profile

The new RDA: resource description in libraries and beyond

Attributes and Values Describing Entities.

FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA

July 26, 2019 RDA linked data stuff

Presentation transcript:

1:1 Reconsidered DC-6, November 4, 1998

History zJuly 97: RLG Metadata Summit yArchives, museums, libraries yIdentified need for flexible description of resource manifestations yMetadata Summit: Meeting Report. Willy Cromwell-Kessler and Ricky Erway. July,

History zDC-5, Helsinki, October 97 yRLG proposal raised y1:1 principle emerges

1:1 Status zPublished in D-Lib Magazine yThe [DC-5] discussion resulted in consensus concerning what came to be known as the 1:1 principle -- each resource should have a discrete metadata description, and each metadata description should include elements relating to a single resource. It is desirable to be able to link these descriptions in a coherent and consistent manner [emphasis added]. yDC-5: The Helsinki Metadata Workshop: A Report on the Workshop and Subsequent Developments (

1:1 Status zCrept into DC vocabulary zNot represented in RFC zLacks operational definition and application guidelines zAdoption by implementers uncertain

Our Best Understanding of 1:1 zAny given set of metadata refers to a single discrete resource

Implications of 1:1 zPrecise granularity zProliferation of metadata records yLarge retrieval sets yIncreased record maintenance zAccess vocabulary split over multiple records zConfusion applying selected elements, e.g., Creator, Publisher

Example zOne record for resource with compound characteristics yDigital image from photograph xMetadata conveys aspects of original resource (e.g., photographer), and xMetadata conveys aspects of digital manifestation (e.g., Format)

Example zOne record for multiple formats yElectronic text manifest in ASCII, Word, PDF xMetadata conveys aspects of each manifestation

Example zOne record for set of resources yCollection of images xMetadata conveys aspects of collection and each discrete resource

RDF Model z zAppears to accommodate examples

Summary zIf 1:1 (as we understand it) does not enable implementers to accomplish the requirements expressed above, specific expressed user needs are not addressed zIf 1:1 does enable implementers to accomplish the requirements expressed above, then the concept appears to accommodate user needs zRegardless...

Action Items zRevisit 1:1 zDetermine usefulness and necessity as a DC precept zEnsure that user needs are determined and addressed zFormally adopt, allow, or reject

Action Items zIf adopt, then: zDefine and ratify in RFC zDevelop application guidelines zMonitor implementation experiences and user satisfaction