The National Resources Inventory (NRI)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Recording & Reporting – A Mission Ahead. 2 System Collection of specific components I nformation System Information support in decision making Health.
Advertisements

2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
Proposed Indicators for Ecological Health & Diversity of Rangelands Rod Heitschmidt, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Miles City, MT and Linda Joyce,
Oct. 29, 2002 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable. Oct. 29, 2002 Rangelands 42% of continental U.S. 42% of continental U.S. 587 million acres non-federal.
Knowledge Dietary Managers Association 1 DMA Certification Exam Blueprint and Curriculum Development.
A Presentation of the Colorado Health Institute 1576 Sherman Street, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado Monitoring the.
Wildlife Inventory and Habitat Evaluation of Duck Valley Indian Reservation Project #32008 Shoshone-Paiute Tribes.
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
TREATMENT DATA INDICATORS IN THE UNODC DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM.
Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
Site Visit Review Just-in-Time Training. Pre-work and Training Judging Examiner Evaluation Process Stage 1 Independent Review Stage 2 Consensus Review.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 14 Slide 1 Object-oriented Design 1.
Telephone Interviews Case Study: Restoring Rivers One Reach at a Time: Results from a Survey of U.S. River Restoration Practitioners Boris Bruk February.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
October 5, 2007 Weed Watching Tips for Citizen Scientists Monitoring Invasive Plant Species Citizen Based Monitoring Conference Devil's Head Resort and.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Water in the West: Current Use and Future Challenges Christopher Goemans, Ph.D. Agricultural and Resource Economics 13 th Annual Farmers Cooperatives Conference.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Geospatial 09 Kathie Jewell April 29,2009 National Invasive Species Information Management System NISIMS.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
USDA FOREST SERVICE Technology & Development Program National Soil Quality Monitoring Field Guide.
Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.
1 Developing EPA’s Peer Review Program Joint JIFSAN/SRA/RAC Symposium Dorothy E. Patton, Ph.D., J.D. September 30, 2003.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
INTRODUCTION Organogram of DoF My role In the Department of Forestry
FIELD METHODS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources Division Forest and Rangeland.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
FIA National Users Group Meeting – 8 December 2004 FIA Strategic Plan Greg Reams National Program Leader Forest Inventory & Analysis 1601 North.
By: Cade Ewing 4 th hour ED FOR CAREERS.  The average Wildlife Biologist makes about $27 an hour, which is $56,500 a year.
Weyerhaeuser Company Weyerhaeuser Company: Soil Monitoring Methods for Western Timberlands By: Ron Heninger and Alex Dobkowski Weyerhaeuser Company, Western.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
National Resources Inventory by Robert N. Jones State Conservationist USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
Wisconsin’s Continuous Forest Inventory State Forest Working Group Meeting Plymouth, WI May 10, 2006 Teague PrichardChip Scott WDNR State Lands SpecialistUSDA.
Presented by MOBIL DATA COLLECTIONS ON GRAZING LAND.
Living in a Digital World Discovering Computers Fundamentals, 2010 Edition.
Rangeland Health Assessment and Monitoring (Framework for Ecological Site-Based Assessment and Monitoring in Mongolia) 7 July 2007 Ulan Bator, Mongolia.
Data management in the field Ari Haukijärvi 2nd EHES training seminar.
An Overview of the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Descriptive Analysis Database Archive monitoring network locations, climate, emissions, wildfires, census, political, physical, and image databases Databases.
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
Ground-Truthing the Habitat Inventory for the Fraser River: Status Report and Lessons Learned March 2007 Fraser River Estuary Management Program.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
Status of the CEAP National Assessment Robert Kellogg Jerry Lemunyon Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
Transitions in Rangeland Evaluations David A. Pyke & Jeffrey E. Herrick Jornada Experimental Range Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center.
1 Objectives 1. Why quantitative data? 2. Relationship to attributes and indicators 3. Accuracy and precision of qualitative and quantitative indicators.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
1 What this Broadcast Will Cover Day One Indicators and Attributes Changes from Version 3 to Version 4 Ecological Sites, State and Transition Models, and.
SUMMARY. Summary Instructions After the checklist is filled out and rationale documented, the ID Team discusses the responses, reads the category definitions.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
2015 Regional Management Team Meeting Albany, New York Group Leader Update Bob Ilgenfritz Data Collection.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Ernest Nti Acheampong African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS)
Soil Quality Assessment and the Plant Materials Program Susan S. Andrews, Arlene J. Tugel, Ann Lewandowski, and Mike Hubbs, NRCS Soil Quality Institute.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Introduction to FFI: Why and how FFI was developed Introduction to FFI: Why and how FFI was developed 04/02/2013.
Rangeland NRI: 2002 and Beyond Presentation given to NRCS State Conservationists NRI Exec. Committee Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise.
Delivery of Science Components to NRCS Business Applications
CANAL NETWORK CONTROL AJAY K BASU
Ungrazed deep grassland
Post Enumeration Survey Census
Uses and Guidance BLM Evaluate status of Standards for Rangeland Health Guidance provided in Washington Office Instruction Memorandum No In BLM.
GIS and Related Activities in the
Getting Started with DIMA
Presentation transcript:

The National Resources Inventory (NRI) Is a statistical survey, based on well-established scientific principles Designed & implemented to assess conditions & trends of soil, water, & related resources on non-Federal rural lands Conducted for USDA, by NRCS, in cooperation with the Iowa State University Statistical Laboratory What is the NRI? Who does it?

The National Resources Inventory (NRI) Captures data on land cover & use, soils, soil erosion, wetlands, habitat diversity, selected conservation practices, & related resource attributes -- at 800,000 scientifically selected sample sites Purpose: To provide support for Agricultural & Environmental Policy Development and Program Implementation What the NRI does and overall purpose.

National Sample Density Patterns West coast - more homogeneous wrt agriculture & more federal land (low sampling rates), CA ag lands East cost - ag lands & more heterogeneous Midwest - ag lands

Primary Sample Unit (PSU)

CONTINUOUS NRI NRI 5-Year Cycles – 1982,1987, 1992 & 1997 In 2000 we converted from 5-year inventory to a continuous annual inventory The continuous annual inventory design: - 73,000 PSUs/year by remote sensing -14,000 PSUs by onsite methods.

Example of output. Stress the large chunk of rangeland – of which not a lot is known.

Grazing Lands Nonfederal Grazing Lands Rangelands 45% of all nonfederal lands (*) Rangelands > 40% of all lands in Nation (#) * Excludes Alaska & Federal lands # Includes Alaska & Federal lands This slide tells more about the grazing land and rangeland resource- Foot notes are important here

National Academy of Sciences ISSUES: Disagreement over status of rangeland, over analysis and assessment techniques, over extent of problems, etc. Recommendations to DOI and USDA included implement a coordinated & statistically valid national inventory to periodically evaluate health of Federal and nonfederal rangelands NRI is statistically valid for nonfederal range but proper data are not being collected From the Busby/Cos article- may not want this one for this crowd.

Plans Establishment of Analysis Team – concern re “Continuity and utility of data” (STC) Make sure we can monitor and look at trends over time Make sure that we can and do utilize all data Agency implementation of rangeland field protocols Many pilot studies; inter-agency development Federal government – National Cooperative Rangeland Study – DOI, USDA, SRM, others Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Details plans- again may not want this one for this group.

NRI Rangeland Assessment - Objectives In addition to the usual NRI objectives as stated in policy, use of the NRI (rangeland) field protocols will provide data that: can be used to further range science provide more knowledge about interactions among environmental, soil, and plant variables, and management practices This slide adds to the first list targeting the Rangeland field study.

NRI Rangeland Field Study-2003 Background: High level of interest in identifying resource concerns/treatment needs. High quality imagery available for 2000 NRI Utilize this resource to potential Team of ICCS leaders and other discipline specialists developed this module as a pilot attempt at photo-interpretation of resource concerns. Based on Soil, Water, Air, Plant and Animal concerns previously identified as critical components of a resource management system in NRCS Technical Guides.

Scientific Requirements – for NRI Rangeland Data Continuous NRI To be conducted on the basis of rigorous, scientifically developed sample survey (e.g., statistical) principles and protocols [Policy] Features prescribed mixture of data collection types [on-site; PI; satellite] & full QA program Timely, credible, useful data Move from qualitative/subjective measures to quantitative/objective [National Academy] Last word on scientific nature of the NRI – leading to next segment on Process and protocols of the 2003 NRI Rangeland Inventory.

Sample Design for Field & Special Resource Studies Use photo-interpretation sample First phase in multi-phase design Use historical information to design sample Borrow strength from photo-interp data in estimation Often requires extra stage in sampling Reduce study costs by selecting geographic clusters Example: select counties within states first, then PSUs Design of special studies is an interesting off shoot of the foundation small, natl or region Multi-phase design Large sample w/”cheap” msrmts Smaller (sub)sample w/more expensive measurements Used to balance operational & stat (precision) considerations Phase I: frame for Phase II

NRI Rangeland Data Collection, NRCS Preceded by a number of pilots in association with personnel from BLM/FS/USGS. Part of 3-year effort The 2003 data can not be used by themselves to obtain statistical estimates 2004 and 2005 data collection On-site data collection Standard facet of NRI; Monitoring Continue to work with other agencies and to pursue remote techniques Bob takes over!

2004 and 2005 2003 Sample/Non-Federal 2003- Pilot Year 600 Primary sampling units Across 110 counties in 17 states 2004 and 2005 2400 Primary sampling units/each year 19 States

Rangeland Inventory Oracle Data base (Source for historical data and storage for new submitted data) Front end machines Modem bank or Network access to mobile device PSU and associated historical to mobile computing device New data uploaded from mobile computing device All via modem or network connection

Computer-Assisted Survey Information Collection Hand-held pen-based computer controlled input formats & navigation edit checking communication w/ central server & other peripherals Central warehouse sample data base, process metadata web pages: survey progress, interactive training, data views, instructions

CASI- (Computer Assisted Survey Instrument) Paper worksheet with embedded rules, logic and communication capabilities. Key to high quality data

Equipment/Software Apple Newton Message Pads Model 2000/2100 Modem or Network connection* CASI (Range02.pkg) Rockwell PLGR (GPS) Cables, backpack Some specialized equipment (cover pole, soil stability test kit, tapes etc.) Background: High level of interest in identifying resource concerns/treatment needs. High quality imagery available for 2000 NRI Utilize this resource to potential Team of ICCS leaders and other discipline specialists developed this module as a pilot attempt at photo-interpretation of resource concerns. Based on Soil, Water, Air, Plant and Animal concerns previously identified as critical components of a resource management system in NRCS Technical Guides.

PSU Data/General Entry for data collection team members and job titles. PSU ID information displayed for information.

Locating the Point, Land Cover and Transect Ends Navigation to point location using GPS Entry of appropriate land cover/use opens up rest of data entry screens. Transect ends were also captured using GPS – not likely in 2004.

Plot Layout and Design Intersect at the NRI sample point   Intersect at the NRI sample point Two 150 ft transects oriented NW- SE and NE – SW. North, south, east and west quadrants are identified for some types of data collection.

Landscape and Soils Landscape and soil data elements. Choice lists for most NASIS SSAID and MUSYM brought forward from 2001 NRI. Soil Component name and ID optional depending upon make-up of data collection team.

Ecological Site Information Choice lists for all data elements. Historic 1992 Ecological site brought forward for information Existing list of current Ecological site numbers and names also provided as choice list.

Rangeland Health Rangeland health protocol (same as in BLM/NRCS publication) Two screens Summary information provided on set II screen.

Noxious Weed and Invasive/Alien Plants Sub-list of noxious and invasive or alien plants is created from the two provided plant data bases Record species by quadrant along with an estimate of degree of invasion (from choice list). On board data bases include: NRCS plant data base National noxious weed data base Plants can be sorted by common or scientific name. Plant symbol is displayed as the code.

Disturbance Indicators Record presence or absence of a number of past or present disturbances. Two screens.

Conservation Practices (from NRCS technical guide) Record presence or absence of a number of conservation practices Three screens

Conservation Treatment Needs This is retained from the 1992 NRI. Likely will change to resource concerns as listed in NRCS technical guides in 2004.

Soil Stability Indictor A soil aggregate stability test which provides information on the degree of soil structural development and erosion resistance. This test measures the stability of the soil when exposed to rapid wetting. Involves some special equipment which is provided to data collection teams. Ratings 0- 6 with 0 as unstable and 6 as 75-100 % of ped remains after 5 dips.

Rangeland Inventory

Line Point Transects for Cover Composition Rapid , accurate method for quantifying species composition, ground cover, litter, rocks and biotic crusts. Completed at 3 foot intervals along transects. Sub-list of plants can be created by the user from the large National plants database. Top, basal, and NS layer must be entered. Up to 6 canopy species could be entered prior to the basal layer.

Line intercept Transects for Basal and Canopy Cover Provides an estimate of basal and canopy gaps along both transects 1 foot or larger. Large gaps between plants are important indicators of potential wind and water erosion and weed invasion. Enter beginning an end of gap to the nearest 0.1 of a foot.

Gap Examples Basal gaps Canopy gaps

Cover, Density and Height (Cover pole)   Provides an estimate of cover density along both transects at pre-determined intervals (left column). Visual obstruction readings are made at 10 foot intervals along each transect.. Right most column for estimate of canopy height. Observations made with the cover pole will allow users to reduce complex vegetative conditions found in nature to simplified structures with which to conduct analyses. This will include estimates of both vertical (<5 ft.) and horizontal structural diversity on rangelands

Cover Pole Transect line B Viewing pole A Y 39.4” offset X

Species Composition by Weight (Biomass) Record all plant species and associated weight to the nearest gram. Enter information of yield reconstruction including dry weight percentage, percent ungrazed, percent of total growth, and any needed climate adjustment. Similarity index is also calculated.

Species Composition by Weight (Biomass)

Criterion 1- Soil Based Criterion 1: Conservation and Maintenance of Soil and Water Resources of Rangelands Land Cover /Use Landscape/ soils Ecological Site Rangeland Health Noxious Weed –Invasive./Alien Plants Disturbance Indicators Conservation Practices Conservation Treatment Needs Soil Stability Test Line Point- Cover composition. Line Inter. Basal and Canopy Cover Cover, Density and Height Species Composition by Weight Soil-based Indicators 1. Area and percent of rangeland soils with significantly diminished organic matter and/or high carbon:nitrogen (C:N) ratio. 2 2. Area and extent of rangelands with changes in soil aggregate stability. 1 3. Assessment of microbial activity in rangeland soils. 4. Area and percent of rangeland with significant change in extent of bare ground. 5. Area and percent of rangeland with accelerated soil erosion by wind or water. May be too much detail here but this slide lists NRI objectives.

Criterion 1-Water Based Criterion 1: Conservation and Maintenance of Soil and Water Resources of Rangelands Land Cover /Use Landscape/ soils Ecological Site Rangeland Health Noxious Weed –Invasive./Alien Plants Disturbance Indicators Conservation Practices Conservation Treatment Needs Soil Stability Test Line Point- Cover composition. Line Inter. Basal and Canopy Cover Cover, Density and Height Species Composition by Weight Water-based Indicators 6. Percent of water bodies in rangeland areas with significant changes in natural biotic assemblage composition. 7. Percent of surface water on rangeland areas with significant deterioration of their chemical, physical, and biological properties from acceptable levels. 2 8. Changes in ground water systems. 9. Changes in the frequency and duration of surface no-flow periods in rangeland streams. 10.Percent of stream length in rangeland catchments in which stream channel geometry significantly deviates from the natural channel geometry.

Criterion 2- (Indicators 11-15) Criterion 2: Conservation and Maintenance of Plant and Animal Resources on Rangelands Land Cover /Use Landscape/ soils Ecological Site Rangeland Health Noxious Weed –Invasive./Alien Plants Disturbance Indicators Conservation Practices Conservation Treatment Needs Soil Stability Test Line Point- Cover composition. Line Inter. Basal and Canopy Cover Cover, Density and Height Species Composition by Weight 11. Extent of land area in rangeland. 1 12.Rangeland area by plant community. 2 13.Number and extent of wetlands. 14.Fragmentation of rangeland and rangeland plant communities. 15. Density of roads and human structures.

Criterion 2 (Indicators 16-20) Criterion 2: Conservation and Maintenance of Plant and Animal Resources on Rangelands Land Cover /Use Landscape/ soils Ecological Site Rangeland Health Noxious Weed –Invasive./Alien Plants Disturbance Indicators Conservation Practices Conservation Treatment Needs Soil Stability Test Line Point- Cover composition. Line Inter. Basal and Canopy Cover Cover, Density and Height Species Composition by Weight 16. Integrity in natural fire regimes on rangeland. 17. Extent and condition of riparian systems. 18. Area of infestation and presence/absence of invasive and other nonnative plant species of concern. 1 19.Number and distribution of species and communities of concern. 20.Population status and geographic range of rangeland-dependent species

Criterion 3 Criterion 3: Maintenance of Productive Capacity on Rangelands Land Cover /Use Landscape/ soils Ecological Site Rangeland Health Noxious Weed –Invasive./Alien Plants Disturbance Indicators Conservation Practices Conservation Treatment Needs Soil Stability Test Line Point- Cover composition. Line Inter. Basal and Canopy Cover Cover, Density and Height Species Composition by Weight 21. Rangeland aboveground biomass. 2 22. Rangeland annual productivity 1 23. Percent of available rangeland grazed by livestock. 24. Number of domestic livestock on rangeland. 25. Presence and density of wildlife functional groups on rangeland. 26. Annual removal of native hay and non-forage plant materials, landscaping materials, edible and medicinal plants, and wood products.