School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
Advertisements

Superintendents Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2009.
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Restructuring Plans Glenbrook Middle School Bel Air Elementary School Rio Vista Elementary School Shore Acres Elementary School Mt. Diablo Unified School.
Presented by : Delaware Department of Education March 15, 2011.
Elementary and secondary education in Tennessee is governed by Federal law, Tennessee statutes, State Board of Education Rules and policies of local.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
Minnesotas Plan for Monitoring School Improvement Grant Implementation April 21, 2010 Patricia King Jonathan Luknic 1.
AYP Regional Meetings In Need of Improvement Schools and Districts MDE School Improvement Division and Regional Service Cooperatives August/September 2010.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
How does Wisconsin Use Indistar to Establish Goals and Track Results? Aundrea Kerkenbush, MS Education Consultant; Title I WI Department of Public Instruction.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 6 Informational Webinar June 10, 2015.
School Improvement Grants. Over 13,000 schools are currently under some form of improvement status schools = 5% of schools in some form of restructuring.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
FLDOE Title I Update FASFEPA Technical Assistance Forum September 16, 2009.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Office of Program Administration and Accountability April 19, 2011.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Choosing a Reform Model District Wide Stakeholder Meeting 1.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Priority & Focus School Title I, Part A, Set-Asides and Choice/Transfer Option Requirements Under ESEA Waiver District Coordinators/Administrators Priority.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Title I 1003(g) School Improvement Grants Presented by: WVDE Title I Staff March 9, 2010.
School Improvement Grants Webinar July 23, Webinar Troubleshooting Pin # enables audio communication Questions may be submitted via the chat or.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
Virginia Department of Education March 5,  The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) was informed that on March 3, 2010, USED posted the states’
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
TTIPS Model Overview.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
West Virginia Department of Education
January 2010 Marilyn Peterson Data and Federal Programs
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
School Improvement Grants
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010

Proposed Timeline Submit Letter of IntentMarch 30, 2010 Submit Tier I and II Applications *May 14, 2010* Approve Tier I and II Applications TBD If sufficient funds remain to approve additional LEA applications: Submit Tier III Applications June 15, 2010 Funds AvailableJuly 1, 2010

Funding LEAs may request from $50,000 to $2,000,000 per school per year Funds are renewable for up to 3 years Funds available through September 30, 2013

Four Intervention Models – At a glance in NC Turnaround (4 in NC) Restart (1 in NC) Transformation (21 in NC) Closure Tier I Tier II

Turnaround Replace the principal Screen staff and rehire no more than 50 percent Implement strategies to recruit and retain staff Provide ongoing job-embedded professional development Adopt a new governance structure Implement a vertically-aligned instructional program Promote continuous use of data (including formative, interim, and summative) Provide increased learning time Provide appropriate community services and supports

Transformation Replace the principal Use rigorous, transparent, equitable evaluation systems for teachers and the principal Identify and reward school leaders and remove teachers determined to be ineffective after ample opportunity for improvement is provided Provide ongoing job-embedded professional development Implement strategies to recruit and retain staff Provide increased learning time Provide appropriate community services and supports

Restart Convert the school Close the school and reopen under a charter management organization (CMO) or an education management organization (EMO) Enroll any former student who wishes to attend the school

Closure Close the school Enroll the students in other higher achieving schools in the LEA

Frequently Asked Questions

May an SEA award SIG funds to an LEA for a Tier I or Tier II school that has implemented, in whole or in part, a turnaround model, restart model, or transformation model within the last two years? Yes. The two years referenced are those for which an LEA has complete achievement data. In other words, the last two years are the 2007–2008 and 2008–2009 school years.

May an LEA use SIG funds to offset transportation costs associated with providing increased learning time? Generally, providing transportation to students in order for them to attend school is a regular responsibility an LEA carries out for all students and, thus, may not be paid for with Federal funds unless specifically authorized. However, an LEA may use SIG funds to cover transportation costs if the costs are directly attributable to implementation of a school intervention model, are reasonable and necessary, and exceed the costs the LEA would have incurred in the absence of its implementation of the model.

May an SEA award an LEA a lesser amount of SIG funds than the LEA requests in its application? Yes. An SEAs decision to award SIG funds to a particular LEA does not obligate the SEA to award the LEA all of the funds it requested.

Can a Title I participating school start over in the school improvement timeline? For Title I participating schools that implement a turnaround or restart model, the schools will start over in the school improvement timeline.

Under SIG, what does increased learning time mean? Increase the total number of school hours to provide time for: Instruction in core academic subjects; Instruction in other subjects and enrichment activities that contribute to a well-rounded education; and Teachers to collaborate, plan, and engage in professional development within and across grades and subjects.

Under SIG, what does job- embedded professional development mean? Occurs on a regular basis (e.g., daily, weekly); Aligned with standards and plans; Involves collaborative work facilitated by coaches or mentors; Requires active engagement by participants; and Focuses on understanding what and how students are learning.

Are there specific reporting requirements for SIG funds? Yes. The State must report annually on outcome measures (i.e., improvements in student performance) and leading indicators for each Tier I and Tier II school. The LEA must report its progress on achieving the goals it establishes in the initial LEA application. A State may use these data to determine whether to renew an LEA's SIG award for a second and third year.

Leading Indicators Number of minutes within the school year; Student participation rate on state assessments by subgroup; Dropout rate; Student attendance rate; Number and percentage students completing advanced coursework, early college, or dual- enrollment; Discipline incidents; Truants; Distribution of teachers by performance level on LEAs teacher evaluation system; and Teacher attendance rate

An SEA must post on its Web site a summary of the SIG grants it awarded, including the following information: 1. Name and NCES identification number of each LEA awarded a grant; 2. Amount of each LEAs grant; 3. Name and NCES identification number of each school to be served; and 4. Type of intervention to be implemented in each Tier I and Tier II school being served. 5. All LEA SIG Applications.

Questions of late…

Will the PRC 117/143 Chart of Accounts be updated? Clerical assistance Security assistance/SROs CTE Counselors Principal incentives/bonuses Indirect Costs

For summer program's transportation: Can we do one invoice for the transportation (which would include the bus driver working at the school during the time of the program) or are there going to be additional lines added for this activity?

When do we need to send a calendar waiver to have the school year extended? NC Public School Law 115c-84.2 refers to a minimum of 180 days and 1,000 hours of instruction.

If funds are not available for sustainability after the three years, what will be the consequences? The funds are intended to put initiatives in place that would sustain continued improvement after the funds are no longer available. In other words, SIG funds are intended to build capacity of staff and leadership during the period of funding.

How many copies of the SIG application are we required to submit to DPI for each school? Original signature, one copy.

Questions…