“The 50 – Year Project: Examining Colorectal Cancer Screening History Among Peninsula Institute for Community Health Patients Aged 50 Years and Older ”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Hampshire Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (NHCRCSP) and “DRESS IN BLUE DAY” State of New Hampshire - Wellness Coordinators Susan Kuhn,
Advertisements

Colon and Rectal Cancer Update
1 An Update on Evolving Colorectal Screening Issues May 19, 2011 This first part today will be presented by: Stanley H. Weiss, MD, FACP, FACE  Professor,
1 Colorectal Cancer and Screening Cancer Screening Programs September 2013.
Free Treatment and Full Medical Coverage for Women with Breast or Cervical Cancer at no cost to facilities that accept Medicaid Online Course PowerPoint.
Spotlight on Colorectal Cancer Screening 1 1. Home Screening for Colon Cancer
2.11 Conduct Medication Management University Medical Center Health System Lubbock, TX Jason Mills, PharmD, RPh Assistant Director of Pharmacy.
Colorectal Cancer & Screening Sept Sometimes there are things that may be hard to talk about… But not talking about them is even harder.
Sex Differences in the Prevalence and Correlates of Colorectal Cancer Testing: Health Information National Trends Survey Sally W. Vernon 1, Amy.

Colorectal Cancer Overview
Mobilizing Newcomers and Immigrants to Cancer Screening Programs Funded by Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) The views expressed herein do not necessarily.
Colorectal Cancer Screening 101
Hospital Patient Safety Initiatives: Discharge Planning
Colorectal Cancer Screening John Pelzel MD Sleepy Eye Medical Center.
Haley Hyde Jessica Fordham Jena Hamm  Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer related deaths every year.  150,000 Americans will be diagnosed.
Integrated Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Geriatric Health Maintenance: Cancer Screening Linda DeCherrie, MD Geriatric Fellow Mount Sinai Hospital.
A service of Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Health Care. Women of Color Get It September 8, 2012.
BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER CONTROL PROGRAM Emily Vance Nursing 250.
S Bhagwandin, DO COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION. DEFINING ISSUE Colorectal cancer is almost 90% preventable with recommended screening- early detection.
Knowledge, Cancer Fatalism and Spirituality as Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Practices for African American and Caucasian Women Staci T. Anderson,
Community Partnerships Make a Difference: Free Cancer Clinics in Wyoming County Cheryl McGovern, Valerie Bell, Regina Allen Partnership History The Wyoming.
Implementation of an evidence-based cancer screening program for an urban disabled population Ryan Goetz BSCh Lewis Cancer & Research Pavilion at St. Joseph’s/
Cardiac Rehabilitation Are you or someone you know missing the benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation? July
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans Living in Safe and Sustainable Environments.
Health Care Reform Through the Cancer Lens State and Private Sector Reforms for Hispanic Healthcare Edward E. Partridge, MD National Board President American.
The Health Seeking Behaviors of Young African American Males and Their Thoughts About Prostate Cancer Veronica A. Clarke-Tasker, Ph.D., RN, MBA, MPH, Professor.
Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M. Griffin, PhD Greta Friedemann-Sánchez, PhD Diana Burgess,
The National Prevention Strategy and Behavioral Health Care: Prevention Is Now RADM Peter J. Delany, Ph.D., LCSW-C Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services.
1 Colorectal Cancer # 2 Cancer Killer # 2 Cancer Killer SCREENING SAVES LIVES.
Barriers to Screening BCCEDP CRC Project. Iowa Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program Colon Cancer Education Pilot Project  Goal: Increase.
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May Overview of Colorectal Cancer Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Prevention and Health.
Public State Initiatives in Colorectal Screening: The Colorado Experience Tim Byers MD MPH University of Colorado School of Medicine
1 Colorectal Cancer # 2 Cancer Killer # 2 Cancer Killer SCREENING SAVES LIVES.
“The African American Prostate Cancer Crisis in Numbers”
Better Health. No Hassles. Colorectal Cancer Facts – The 2 nd leading cause cancer-related deaths in the Nation – Highly preventable – Caused 49,920 deaths.
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA: a pilot intervention project William Curry, MD, MS Dept of Family & Community Medicine M.S.Hershey Medical.
An integrated approach to addressing opiate abuse in Maine Debra L. Brucker, MPA, PhD State of Maine Office of Substance Abuse October 2009.
Exhibit ES-1. The Percentage of Young Adults Uninsured Declined over 2010–2012, While Rates Rose in Other Age Groups Note: Totals may not equal sum of.
80% by 2018 Forum: Increasing CRC Screening Rates 80% by 2018 Forum: Increasing CRC Screening Rates Implementing a Quality Screening Navigation Program.
Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA William Curry, MD, MS Mark Dignan, PhD Gene Lengerich, VMD Alan Adelman, MD, MS.
CRC 45: The steps to eliminating Colorectal Cancer Diana Rusz December 12, 2012.
® Changes in Opioid Use Over One Year in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Alejandra Garza, Gerald Kizerian, PhD, Sandra Burge, PhD The University of.
Patient’s Guide to Accessing Women’s Health Care.
Factors Predicting Stage of Adoption for Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy among Non-Adherent African Americans Hsiao-Lan Wang, PhD, RN, CMSRN,
Colorectal Cancer Preventa ble Beata ble Treata ble.
1 WOMEN AND HEALTH REFORM: LESSONS FROM MASSACHUSETTS November 9, 2010 American Public Health Association Annual Meeting Tracey Hyams, JD, MPH, Director.
 Increased life expectancy  Disease prevention  Early diagnosis and treatment of diseases  Improved outcomes  Increased quality of life.
Colorado Colorectal Screening Program Holly Wolf University of Colorado School of Medicine
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 3: Cancer Progress Review August 17, 2006.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services An overview of PACE for potential participants and their families
Measuring UNLV’s Health: Faculty and Staff Tell Us Their Story May 30, Annual Forum Association for Institutional Research San Diego, California.
Colon Cancer. What is Colon Cancer?  Cancer that begins in the colon or rectum  The colon and rectum are both parts of the large intestine  The third.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services Policy and Management 1 Women’s Cancer Screening Services Utilization Versus Their Insurance Source Presenter:
ALI ABBAS BIO 1301 PROSTATE CANCER. QUICK FACTS ABOUT PROSTATE CANCER 1.Prostate Cancer is the most common type of cancer among men in the United States.
A Pharmacy Based Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Did You Know? Bowel cancer kills more Australians each year than breast or prostate cancer (AIHW 2012.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © A Novel Interprofessional Student-Run Clinic: Student Involvement and Patient Satisfaction.
CRC 101; Part One Julie Banahan, RN, BSN, OCN
Take Care of Yourself Your friends and family need you!
CRC 101; Part One Julie Banahan, RN, BSN, OCN
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
A Quality improvement initiative
27th Annual Winter CME Conference
Evidence of a Program's Effectiveness in Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers Robert L. Stephens, PhD, MPH1;
Colorectal Cancer Screening
Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural East Texas
Evaluation of a Spiritually-based Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Among Church-attending African Americans and Whites.
Module 4: Colorectal Cancer
Presentation transcript:

“The 50 – Year Project: Examining Colorectal Cancer Screening History Among Peninsula Institute for Community Health Patients Aged 50 Years and Older ” Jewel S. Goodman, MPA, PhD(c) 1 ; Stacey B. Plichta, ScD 1 ; Angela Futrell, RN 2 ; and Syed Kalamuddin, DDS, MPH 2 1 College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia and 2 Peninsula Institute for Community Health, Newport News, Virginia About PICH Background and Purpose In the US, Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is reportedly the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. A person’s lifetime risk of developing CRC is approximately 6%, with nearly all (90%) CRC cases occurring after age 50. CRC is preventable with timely and accurate colon screening and subsequent removal of polyps that result in development of cancer. Medical research suggests it may take 10 years for this to occur, but the colonoscopy screening examination allows recognition of polyps years before they become dangerous. Screening begins at age 50 years and over and can reduce mortality rates of colon cancer. Over the past 20 years, CRC rates among whites has decreased, but remained constant among African Americans. Of all racial / ethnic groups in the US, African Americans have the highest mortality rates among CRC fatalities. Both men and women are at equal risk. The overall goals of the project were to: actively engage existing patients in discussing their experience with receiving referrals from their PICH physicians to have the colonoscopy screening performed, particularly if they are age-appropriate; and to demonstrate any methods by which PICH could ultimately improve its available pool of resources to assist patients in meeting the recommendations of their physicians as it relates to having the colonoscopy performed. Surveys were administered and focus groups, medical staff interviews, and a medical records review were conducted. The Peninsula Institute for Community Health (PICH), a private, non-profit community health center established in 1978, served an estimated 24,440 unduplicated insured and uninsured patients in Uninsured patients pay based upon family size and income. PICH has three primary care practices, a community dental project, a Health Care for the Homeless program, two school-based health centers, and a pharmacy program to increase access to prescription medications for low-income and uninsured patients receiving care from area safety-net providers. Medical Staff Interview Results A standard protocol for referrals must be implemented so that all age-appropriate patients are referred at the primary care physician level. This project illustrated that although patients are not afraid of the fecal occult blood test, they need more education about the Colonoscopy and what the screening can detect, the impact on their overall health, and increased awareness of free cancer screening events. A collaboration with screening specialists is recommended. Discussion Screening History: When asked if they had a Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) performed, most (n=8, 80%) reported no and when asked if they had been referred for the colonoscopy screening, more than half (n=6, 60%) had not. Those referred for a colonoscopy presented with symptoms such as incontinence, blood in stool, and bowel movement inability, not age. Establishing and Increasing Level of Knowledge: When asked if they knew what a colonoscopy screening examination entailed, participants revealed they were familiar with the term and its link to cancers. A patient stated, “the closest I can come would be cancer of the rectum or the organs that involved in elimination.” One participant stated, “it is something to do with the intestine, the colon, the rectum and the anus”. Among those patients who were referred, they reported the physicians and medical staff failed to provide any explanation of why the procedure was necessary, what the results would show, nor what would happen to them during the screening. Patients agreed that informational handouts would be beneficial to age-appropriate patients not experiencing any symptoms. Determining the Levels of Responsibilities and Follow-up: Participants discussed having nursing staff create a document to accompany medical records of all patients aged 50 years and older to assist physicians in appropriate referrals, “maybe the nurse could do something...tell the doctor, hey look, this here man is 52 and he ain’t got no blood in the stool or nothing, but we still need to send him out for the thing [colonoscopy screening] just cause of his age.” Among those patients who were referred, but had not complied because they did not have insurance, discussion entailed PICH providing resources to assist patients. “See, I have Medicaid and Medicare, so mines will probably be covered, but somebody ain’t got no insurance, what about them, what do you tell them.” Participants suggested PICH provide the colonoscopy screening at a reduced rate as it does with other extended services so that patients can afford it; provide the contact information for facilities that have cheaper rates for the screening; contact information for medical centers that provide the screening free-of-charge; and lastly, provide the additional facets necessary such as transportation assistance. Focus Group Results, cont. Of the 55 medical records reviewed, majority were male (n=32, 58%); 38 had not been referred by their PICH physician for a Colonoscopy nor a FOBT. Of the remaining 17 medical records, two had been referred for the FOBT but no test results in file; 10 had been referred for the Colonoscopy, but no results in file; five had been referred for the Colonoscopy and had participated in the screening; four within the past year; majority female (n=4) and ranged in ages from years. Medical Records Review Results Survey Administration Results Forty-eight (48) participants completed the survey administered at the 16th Annual Screening Event. Most were female (n=29, 60%); African American (n=39, 81%); and between the ages of 50 – 59 years (n=20, 42%) with a mean age of 56 years. The event was open to the public, approximately half (n=27, 56%) were PICH patients. Of the 15 patients aged 60 years and older, nearly all (n=14, 93%) had a FOBT. The majority (n=13, 87%) had been referred for and completed the Colonoscopy screening, with more than half (n=8, 62%) within the past 12 months. One participant was referred but failed to follow-up due to transportation. Of the 20 patients aged 50 – 59 years, almost half (n=9, 45%) had a FOBT; two-thirds (n=14, 70%) had not been referred for the Colonoscopy screening; 30% (n=6) had been referred for the Colonoscopy and nearly all (n=5, 83%) had the screening completed. One participant did not follow-up reported transportation problems. Four of the five patients who had the screening performed had either Medicare or Medicaid health insurance coverage and one had no insurance. Focus Group Results Demographics: Participants (n=10) were evenly distributed as male and female, majority African American (n=9, 90%), and between the ages of years (n=6, 60%) with a mean age of 53.7 years. More than half (n=6, 60%) reported a household annual income of $20,000 or less; 40% (n=4) reported Medicaid or Medicare as current health insurance, and another 30% (n=3) reported not having health insurance. One MD, one PA, two Referral Specialists, three LPNs, and one RN responded. When asked to describe the selection criteria used to select patients to refer for the FOBT or the Colonoscopy screening, participants responded: abdominal pain, frequent urination, rectal exam results, constipation, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, rectal bleeding, change in stool, acid reflux, family history, age, and medical history. When asked to list all factors that patients have shared with them concerning non-compliance with referrals for the screening, medical staff reported: bad prior experience in the health system, men feel violated by the procedure, patient thinks the procedure is painful, no insurance, history of non-compliance, uncomfortable with an instrument in the rectum, no symptoms, no current problems, and afraid of the possible results.