TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Retirement System Board Consideration of Assumption Changes September 5, 2012.
Advertisements

Overview of Act 120 of 2010 A Look at PSERS Retirement Benefit Changes Presentation at: PASBO Annual Conference March 16, 2011.
Reporting Pensions Under GASB 68 KASBO - Spring /7/2014.
Ohio University January 27,  OPERS has a long history of proactively addressing issues as early as possible (examples include the Choices Health.
Georgia Government Finance Officers Association October 1, 2013 How to Read an Actuarial Valuation Report: “It’s Not Just a Sleep Aid”
FCERA Board of Retirement and Fresno County Board of Supervisors Joint Meeting – April 30, 2009 Contribution Volatility and Asset Smoothing FCERA Board.
League of Minnesota Cities Fiscal Futures Policy Committee August 28, 2013 Presented by: Dave DeJonge, Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS Chapter 17.
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
Copyright © 2012 GRS – All rights reserved. TMRS Rate Stabilization Part of the Toolkit October 8, 2012 Mark Randall.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to Senate Finance Committee _____________________________________.
Accounting Clinic VII McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
VRS Overview Virginia Governmental Employees Association Robert P. Schultze, VRS Director September 13, 2014.
Pension Funding Risks & Possible Method Changes Alan Milligan Chief Actuary.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
OPEN – C&HR – INFO 1-2 UM Retirement Plan Annual Valuation Board of Curators January 31, 2013.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review June 1, 2011.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
1 Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 19.
The Illinois Pension Problem What is Wrong with Illinois Pensions?
Chapter 21: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Virginia Government Finance Officers’ Association 2011 Spring Conference Virginia Retirement System Update for Local Government June 10, 2011 Barry C.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
1 Statewide Retirement Systems Funding Updates Presentation to the Legislative Commission on Pensions & Retirement Dave Bergstrom, MSRS Executive Director.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
ARIZONA CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION WINTER CONFERENCE PRESENTATION FEBRUARY 5, 2014 JAMES C. BACON, JR. TOWN MANAGER.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
March 9, 2006www.psers.state.pa.us1 PSERS An Update on the State of the Fund, the Employer Contribution Rate and Pending Legislation.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Funding Public Pensions Seventh Annual Employee Benefits Symposium John Marshall Law School April 20, 2009 by Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
Chapter 10 Objectives: Learn about permanent funds Learn about fiduciary funds Learn how gains and losses are treated How trusts guard against inflation.
Board Retreat – Oct 20, 2011 FCERA 2011 Retirement Board Retreat October 20, 2011 Paul Angelo, FSA Andy Yeung, ASA The Segal Company, San Francisco v2.
South Carolina Retirement Systems Update October 2011 SC Budget and Control Board South Carolina Retirement Systems 1.
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosures Implementing and Auditing GASB’s New Pension Standards.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 FCERA Benefits and Reserves January 11, 2006 P.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
1 Accounting for OPEB Retiree Health Benefits Committee September 11, 2006.
Governmental Accounting and Standards Board Pension Accounting Changes September 10, 2013.
Prepared by Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Consulting Presentation to Iowa School Districts Changes in Postemployment Benefit Accounting July 2015.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. MGFOA Annual Meeting 2016 OPEB and GASB 74/75 May 11, 2016 Daniel J. Rhodes, FSA, MAAA Vice.
Pension Funding Policy Public Pension Oversight Board May 23 rd,
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
CHAPTER 17 Pensions 2.
League of AZ Cities and Towns PSPRS Pension Task Force August 15, 2014
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
Who is Actually Paying the Bill? By Brad Heinrichs, FSA, EA, MAAA
RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status
California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
Other Post Employment Benefits
Twenty Year Period Fiscal Years Ended
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
TRS – PROVIDING FOR YOUR FUTURE
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
GASB 67 and 68: Pension Fund Reporting
OREA ANNUAL CONVENTION October 3, 2018 Tom Spencer, Executive Director
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
Presentation transcript:

TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008

1 Actuarial Valuation  Prepared as of June 30, 2008, using member data, financial data, benefit and contribution provisions, actuarial assumptions and methods  Purposes: ► Measure the actuarial liabilities ► Determine adequacy of current statutory contributions ► Provide other information for reporting GASB #25 CAFR State Pension Commission ► Explain changes in the actuarial condition of TRS ► Track changes over time

2 Membership – Actives and Inactives  The number of active members increased by 545, from 88,133 to 88,678 ► 0.6% increase, following a 1.1% increase last year ► Over last ten years, active membership has increased an average of 1.0% per year  Payroll for members active on June 30, 2008 increased from $3,599 million to $3,751 million, a 4.2% increase ► Payroll has increased by 48% in the last ten years, an average increase of 4.0% per year We assume a 3.5% average annual increase

3 Membership – Actives and Inactives  Average pay for active members increased 3.6%, from $40,835 to $42,304  Average age of active members increased to 45.9, from 45.8 and from 44.3 ten years ago  Average years of service remained at 11.5, and increased compared to 11.2 ten years ago  There are also 6,915 inactive vested members, and 6,908 inactive nonvested members

4 Membership – Annuitants  The number of annuitants increased by 1,732, from 43,506 to 45,238, a 4.0% increase ► Number includes service retirees, disabled retirees, special retirees, and beneficiaries receiving benefits ► Over the last ten years, the number of annuitants has grown an average of 3.5% per year  Average annual annuitant benefit is $17,532  There are 2.0 active members for each annuitant  Ratio is slowly decreasing, was 2.5 ten years ago  Over last ten years, the number of actives has increased 10%, while the number of annuitants has increased 41%

5 Active Members vs. Annuitants 1.0% average increase for active members over last ten years 3.5% average increase for annuitants over last ten years 2.0 active members per annuitant

6 Payroll 4.0% average increase over last ten years

7 Average Salary and Average Benefit 3.0% average increase in average salary over last ten years 2.4% average increase in average benefits over last ten years

8 Assets  Fair market value decreased from $ 9,293 million to $8,634 million ► Assets shown exclude 403(b) accounts ► 64% in equities, 36% cash and fixed income  Four sources of contributions ► Member contributions (7.00% of pay = $287 million) Includes service purchases, redeposits and EESIP payments ► Employer contributions = $309 million EESIP employers: 7.85% / 8.35% Non-EESIP employers: 7.05%/7.55% Rates scheduled to increase in future ► State contribution (5.0% of tax revenues = $267 million) ► Federal matching contributions (7.00%, $21 million)

9 Assets  Total contributions of $884 million, compared to $821 million in FY 2007  The distributions (benefit payments, refunds and administrative expenses) totaled $847 million  Therefore, there is a positive external cash flow of $37 million ► 0.4% of market value at end of year ► Not significant

10 Assets  Return on market of approximately -7.5% in FY 2008 ► Average return for last ten years was 6.6% 9.6% for last five years 9.2% for last fifteen years

11 Assets  All actuarial calculations are based on actuarial value of assets (AVA), not market value  AVA reflects 20% of the difference between last year’s expected return on market and the actual return ► 40% of FY 2007 difference, 60% of FY 2006 difference and 80% of FY 2005 difference ► AVA now $9,257 million vs. $ 8,422 million last year

12 Assets  Actuarial return was 9.4% in FY 2008  AVA is 107.2% of fair market value (was 90.6 % last year)  $623 million in deferred losses, not yet recognized ► Will be recognized over next four years

13 Actuarial and Market Values of Assets AVA is 107.2% of MVA Deferred losses of $623 million

14 Estimated Yield Based on Actuarial and Market Values of Assets 6.6% average compound return on market value over the last ten years 9.2% average compound return on actuarial value over the last ten years

15 Contributions vs. Benefits & Refunds by Fiscal Year * Includes member, state, employer and federal contributions ** Includes administrative expenses

16 External Cash Flow As Percentage of Market Value

17 Benefit and Contribution Structure Changes  New legislation – HB 3112 ► This bill implemented a 2% ad hoc COLA for TRS retirees who retired prior to July 1, Note that we assumed an increase of 1.00% per year in the last valuation, so we have a loss due to this ad hoc COLA Actuarial present value of 2.00% ad hoc COLA = $134.7 million This produced a loss (increase in UAAL) of $67.3 million, net of expected increase We get a gain in years when there was no COLA granted by the legislature

18 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions and Methods  During the summer, the Board voted to increase the assumed future ad hoc COLA assumption from 1% to 2%. Otherwise, the actuarial assumptions and methods used in this report are unchanged from last year.  Assumptions were set by the Board based on experience study following June 30, 2004 actuarial valuation ► Retirement rates modified in 2006 for EESIP  Next experience study scheduled to follow the June 30, 2009 actuarial valuation

19 Actuarial Results  Unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) increased from $ 7,603 million to $9,090 million  The increase in the UAAL is principally due to the increase in our assumed rate of future ad hoc cost of living adjustments (COLA) from 1% to 2%.

20 Change in UAAL for The Year (In $ Millions)

21 GASB #25 Funded Ratio

22 UAAL as a Percentage of Covered Payroll

23 Actuarial Results  Annual required contribution (GASB #25 ARC = normal cost plus 30-year funding of UAAL, using level percent of pay) of $714 million vs. $590 million last year ► 18.19% vs %

24 Annual Required Contribution (ARC) vs. Actual Contributions * Normal cost, plus 30-year level percent of pay amortization of UAAL since FY 2006 Normal cost, plus 40-year level dollar amortization of UAAL before that ** Employer, state and federal matching contributions

25 Actual Contributions as Percentage Of Annual Required Contribution

26 Actuarial Results  Funding period increased from 21.6 years to 54.4 years ► The increase in the funding period is principally due to the increase in our assumed rate of future COLAs from 1% to 2%.  UAAL projected to be fully amortized by end of FY 2063 ► 80% funded in FY 2052

27 Actuarial Results  Funding period and UAAL projections based on projection that: ► Reflects scheduled contribution rate increases ► Assumes net 8.00% market return each year ► Phases in deferred asset losses ► Assumes no benefit changes or other gains/losses ► Assumes no change in number of active members ► Projects state revenue starting from OSF estimate for FY $268 million--increasing at 2.25% through FY 2010, then increasing 3.50% per year ► Starting pay for each group of replacement hires increases 3.50% each year

28 Reporting for State Pension Commission  Specified assumptions ► Investment return rate: 7.50% vs. 8.00% in regular valuation ► Future COLAs: 2.00%/year (same as under regular valuation) ► Mortality: RP-2000 with projections, vs. OTRS tables ► Funding: 30-year amortization (level dollar vs. level %)

29 Reporting for State Pension Commission  Actuarial results: ► Actuarial accrued liability: $19.6 billion vs. $18.3 billion in regular valuation ► Actuarial assets: $9.3 billion (no difference) ► UAAL: $10.3 billion vs. $9.1 billion in regular valuation ► Funded ratio: 47.3% vs. 50.5% in regular valuation

30 Reporting for State Pension Commission  Calculated contribution (in millions)  Was net $719 million last year, or 19.09%