STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD REPORT, DECEMBER 7, 2010 SLO Coordinators: Maggie Taylor (FCC) and Eileen Apperson(RC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Student Engagement Retreat Third and Fourth Years January 29, 2014.
SLO Assessment Departmental Tools and Examples from the Field Sacramento City College Fall Flex Workshop 8/21/08 8/21/08Presenters: Alan Keys Faculty Research.
Degree SLO Workshop 17 Sept Workshop Learning Outcomes Faculty who participate in the Workshop will: – Know the accreditation requirements and timeline.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
I Love Outcomes (or at least not dread them so much) Reedley College Institutional Learning Outcomes Workshop January 8, 2009.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Department Plans for Assessment of Student Learning Teachers Talking February 16, 2011.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Presenters: Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Tracy Schneider, Solano College Facilitator: Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
MBA Experience. Assessment of Learning Assessment of Experience Assessment of Market Conditions and Alumni/Employer Feedback MBA Experience.
Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
SCC Faculty Vision and Core Values Statements 2011.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
The Basics of February 25, 2012 EDTN.  The ACCJC requires it for accreditation  To make course, degree, certificate, and GE outcomes more relevant 
All College Day August 23, 2013 The Homestretch to Reaffirmation! REAFFIRMED.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
“PLANNING” CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Elizabeth Noel, PhD Associate Vice President, Research Office of Research and Development.
Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
S LOs What is New and Due in the Assessment Process: A focus on continued improvement in academic year NOTE: For reference, hyperlinks to resources.
MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
SLO P ROCESSES G UIDE This guide is a compilation of a series of SLO presentations over the last several years. This guide will serve as a review or for.
Barleti School of Public Affairs. Public service in all countries of the Western Balkans (WB) faces many challenges and weaknesses in regards to public.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Committee Orientation
SCC Faculty Vision and Core Values Statements
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Still Lovin’ those Outcomes
Assessment and Accreditation
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Presentation transcript:

STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD REPORT, DECEMBER 7, 2010 SLO Coordinators: Maggie Taylor (FCC) and Eileen Apperson(RC)

What does ACCJC say?  The 2002 Accreditation Standards and Eligibility Requirements placed an increased emphasis on the assessment of student learning as means of evaluating and improving the educational effectiveness of institutions.  Two standards that deal with learning outcomes are Standard IB and Standard II A.1.c. SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

ACCJC Standard 1B Improving Institutional Effectiveness “The institution demonstrates a conscious effort to produce and support student learning, measures that learning, assesses how well learning is occurring, and makes changes to improve student learning.” SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

ACCJC Standard II A 1.c. Student Learning Programs and Services “The institution identifies student learning outcomes for courses, programs, certificates, and degrees; assesses student achievement of those outcomes; and uses assessment results to make improvements.” SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

What are Student Learning Outcomes?  Student Learning Outcomes are meaningful and measureable means to improve learning as established by discipline faculty and student services experts.  Instructional SLOs are based upon the Course Outline of Record.  SLO statements reflect where a student should be upon successful completion of a college course, program, certificate, or degree.  SLOs must be established and assessed at the course, program (both instructional and non-instructional), degree, and institutional levels. SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

SLO Example at FCC Institutional Learning Outcome: Students will demonstrate critical thinking skills in problem solving. Degree SLO: Child Development AS Degree Design, implement and evaluate environments and activities that support positive developmental play and learning outcomes for all young children. Course SLO: CDHEV 1 Assess early childhood settings, curriculum, and teaching strategies utilizing indicators of quality early childhood practice that support all children including those with diverse characteristics. Assessment occurs at the course level.

SLO Example at RC Institutional Learning Outcomes: 1. Interpret various types of written, visual, and verbal information. 4. Employ critical and creative modes of inquiry to solve problems, explore alternatives, and make decisions. 7. Apply historical and contemporary issues and events to civic and social responsibility. Program SLO: History Identify important people, events, and factors influencing the direction of human history. Course SLO: History 11 Outcome 1: Identify the origins of America’s distinctive political traditions and governmental institutions. Assessment occurs at the course level.

The positive outcomes from assessment include:  Keeping our focus on a student-centered environment  Creating an atmosphere beyond assessment (which implies an end) to an atmosphere of ongoing dialogue, adjustment, and creativity  Giving departments a framework to re-examine how students move through a series of courses or services  Giving us more specific feedback on how effective we are with student learning  Creating opportunities to discuss best teaching practices among full-time and part-time faculty  Helping students see the relevance in and connections between their classes  Strengthening student success SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

Direct Assessment Measures Portfolio assessments Locally developed tests, including pre and post tests Internship/service evaluations Standardized departmental exams Licensure certifications/professional exams Course-embedded assessments SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

Indirect Assessment Measures GPA and transfer comparisons Graduation rates Job placement data Graduate follow-up studies Retention and transfer studies Surveys of alumni, employers, faculty, administrators and students SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

ACCJC Standard 1. B. 3 Improving Institutional Effectiveness Requires institutions “assess progress toward achieving stated goals and make decisions regarding the improvement of institutional effectiveness in an ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, resource allocation, implementation and re-evaluation.” SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

“Integrated Planning to Implement College Quality Improvement” “ Integrated planning is neither top-down nor bottom-up; it is an interactive process in which an institution, through its governance processes, thoughtfully uses its values and vision to set priorities and deploy its resources and energies to achieve institutional changes and improvements at various levels of the organization in response to current or anticipated conditions.” (ACCJC News, Fall 2009) SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

Integrated Planning  SLOs have become an integral part of the decision making process and planning.  SLOs and assessment are now part of program review.  Program review is instrumental to the planning process and allocation of resources.  As with other college processes, integrated planning, including SLOs, has included all constituents groups. SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

Integrated Planning By 2012, the colleges are expected to use the assessment results for improvement and further alignment of institution-wide practices. SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,

Course & Program SLO Cycle College Mission Course/Program Goals Course/Program Objectives Course/Program Outcomes (SLOs) Course/Program Assessment and Evaluation Course/Program Improvements SLO Presentation, SCCCD, BOT,