1 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady The Inertial Stellar Compass (ISC) Tye Brady.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aaron Burg Azeem Meruani Michael Wickmann Robert Sandheinrich
Advertisements

LightSail.
Digital Camera Essential Elements Part 1 Sept
© Copyright 2011 MicroStrain Inc. High Performance Miniature Inertial Measurement Systems MicroStrain Inc Mike Robinson
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
PHEOS PSRR Concept of Operations. 2 Scope The purpose of the PCW-UVI Concept of Operations (ConOps) is to communicate how mission systems will operate,
GIS and Image Processing for Environmental Analysis with Outdoor Mobile Robots School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Queen’s University Belfast.
Using DELPHI for Weak Lensing Measurements: Science Return and Mirror Size Jes Ford, JPL, UNR SURF /21/07 Mentor: Jason Rhodes Co-mentor: David Johnston.
Optical Navigation System Michael Paluszek, Joseph Mueller, Dr. Gary Pajer Princeton Satellite Systems EUCASS July 4-8, 2011 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Parth Kumar ME5643: Mechatronics UAV ATTITUDE AND HEADING HOLD SYSTEM.
METEOR Guidance System P07106 Nov 2006 – May 2007 Project Review.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Constellation Orion Visible Light Constellation Orion Infrared Light.
August, School of Aeronautics & Astronautics Engineering Optical Navigation Systems Takayuki Hoshizaki Prof. Dominick Andrisani.
SDW2005, juin, Taormina The Corot Space instrument.
Berkeley workshop summary Redundancy : dual detector Field of view : 3”x6” Spectrograph length goal: < 400 mm Isostatic mount on the base plate with control.
StarNav Advanced CMOS Star Trackers: enhanced accuracy, reliability and speed John L. Junkins Texas A&M University May 16, 2002.
WFIRST Instrument reference information July 1, 2015.
Optical Anchor / Interferometer Status: June, 2004 Josef Frisch.
PhaseSpace Optical Navigation Development & Multi-UAV Closed- Loop Control Demonstration Texas A&M University Telecon with Boeing December 7, 2009 PhaseSpace.
The Relativity Mission, Gravity Probe B Experimental Design, Sources of Error, and Status Mac Keiser Snowmass 2001 July 4, 2001.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Star Tracker 5000 A low-cost star tracker and attitude determination system.
The Field Camera Unit Project definition, organization, planning S. Scuderi INAF – Catania.
Kaitlin Peranski Spencer Wasilewski Kyle Jensen Kyle Lasher Jeremy Berke Chris Caporale.
HESSI Imaging Capability Pre Environmental Review Brian R. Dennis GSFC Tuesday, February 29, 2000.
Accuracy Evaluation of Stereo Vision Aided Inertial Navigation for Indoor Environments D. Grießbach, D. Baumbach, A. Börner, S. Zuev German Aerospace Center.
Navi Rutgers University 2012 Design Presentation
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Deutsches SOFIA Institut Universität Stuttgart Second Gyro System for the SOFIA Telescope J.F. Wagner Deutsches SOFIA Institut, Universität Stuttgart,
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil)
ImAP RSD Ongo-02a Image Acquisition and Processing of Remotely Sensed Data.
Air-launched Earth-observing Ground Information System Carleton University’s 4 th Satellite Design Team Introduction to AEGIS.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
Space-Qualified Hardware for the CALIPSO Lidar
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
Dr. Aprille Ericsson Eric Stoneking June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Attitude Control Systems.
Pointing Determination for a Coherent Wind Lidar Mission
INEMO™ Demonstration Kit DOF (Degrees of Freedom) platform  The STEVAL-MKI062V2 combines accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers with pressure.
1 Pointing and Stabilization of Lightweight Balloon Borne Telescopes SwRI Balloon Workshop on Low Cost Access to Near Space 27 April 2007 Larry Germann.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
1 Tom Dixon 1, Steven Goodman 2, Earl Aamodt 3, Hugh Christian 4 1 NASA /GSFC, 2 NOAA/NESDIS, 3 LMATC, 4 Ryco
October 2008 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Meeting 102 Niagara Falls, NY October 2008 Steve Jacobson (661)
Distributed Adaptive Control and Metrology for Large Radar Apertures PI: James Lux Co-Is: Adam Freedman, John Huang, Andy Kissil, Kouji Nishimoto, Farinaz.
Control Science Center of Excellence Overview 17 Oct 2008 Dr. David B. Doman Control Design and Analysis Branch Air Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research.
1. 2 Content: ► 1pc Magnus Fusion Aircraft Vantage ► 1pc - Notebook based workstation for camera control and video display and storage ► 1pc - Peripherals.
WFIRST DRM2 candidate design – payload summary At SDT7 3/1-2/2012 consensus for concepts w/out overlap w/ other mission, aka “DRM2” was: 1.1m aperture,
March /5/2016 At A Glance STARS is a real-time, distributed, multi-spacecraft simulation system for GN&C technology research and development. It.
1 System Architecture Mark Herring (Stephen Merkowitz Presenting)
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
Ground Control Station Flight conTrol
Science Presentation. Mission Goals & Objectives Verifying U.S Standard Atmospheric Model for altitudes up 100,000 ft Collect data of temperature, pressure,
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y APS Formation Sensor.
Fuzzy Controller for Spacecraft Attitude Control CHIN-HSING CHENG SHENG-LI SHU Dept. of Electrical Engineering Feng-Chia University IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON.
THEMIS MRRSystems - 1 GSFC, Jan 5, 2007 Systems Engineering.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
ISUAL System Design H. Heetderks. PDR 31 August 2000NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL System Design H. Heetderks 2 ISUAL Operations Overview.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder
Strapdown Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) Sensors and UAVs Avionic
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems
Incorporating Hubble Servicing with NASA’s Long-Term Vision
Boresight Results & Conclusions
Star Detection and Tracking Embedded Linux Hardware
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

1 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady The Inertial Stellar Compass (ISC) Tye Brady 03/01/2006 Abstract. Draper’s Inertial Stellar Compass (ISC) is a real-time, miniature, low power stellar inertial attitude determination system, composed of a wide field-of-view active pixel sensor (APS) star camera and a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) gyro assembly, with associated processing and power electronics. The integrated APS and MEMS gyro technologies provide a 3-axis attitude determination system with an accuracy of 0.1 degree at very low power and mass. The attitude knowledge provided by the ISC is applicable to a wide range of Space and Earth science missions that may include the use of highly maneuverable, stabilized, tumbling, or lost spacecraft. Under the guidance of NASA’s New Millennium Program’s ST-6 project, Draper is developing the ISC. Its completion via flight validation will represent a breakthrough in real-time, miniature attitude determination sensors. The presentation describes system design, development, and validation activities in progress at Draper.

2 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady ISC Program at Draper Objective is to develop new type of spacecraft attitude sensor –36 months –$10M program NASA’s New Millennium Program, Space Technology 6 Project (JPL) –Breakthrough technologies Enable new capabilities to meet space science needs Reduce costs of future missions –Flight validation Mitigates risks to first users Enables rapid technology infusion into future missions The Flight ISC

3 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady ~ 3.5 W ~ 2.9 kg Integrated “bolt-on” unit Standalone attitude determination up to 40 deg/sec Better than 0.1 deg accuracy Self-initializing 5Hz output (quaternion, rates, error) Inertial Stellar Compass (ISC) KEY FEATURES Data Processing Assembly Camera/Gyro Assembly Ultra low power, low mass, stellar inertial attitude determination system

4 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Fusion of Gyros and Camera Data Camera updates gyros every couple of minutes –Camera has Lost-in-Space capability –Gyro bias, scale factor, and misalignment errors reduced real time Gyro Data Attitude Time stamped quaternion from camera processing Low Frequency Controllers Request at 80Hz Camera Data  Pulses High Frequency Gyro Acquisition 320 Hz Gyro Compensation ECI Quaternion Determination Kalman Filter (Square Root Type With 27 states) Star Images Compensation Temp Img. Processing & Attitude Determination Rates Axis Error Plot Roll Accuracy (deg) Time (minutes)

5 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Inertial Stellar Compass Hardware CGA DPA 3-axis MEMS gyros provide attitude and mitigate star camera optical interference and high rate slewing problems Low power active pixel sensor acquires star images and provides attitude truth for gyro drift, bias calibration, and self initialization Software running in ERC32 processor blends gyro and camera data Space capable Zeiss lens leverages commercial grade Distagon lens Controller board blends camera and gyro command and control into a single interface

6 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Star Camera Design 21º square FOV 35mm f/1.2 Lens 512 x 512 pixels Sees 1500 brightest stars in sky 0.4 W 37” in roll and 18” in pitch and yaw (1 sigma)

7 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Gyro Design Maximum Input Scaling: 40°/s Board Power = 0.90 W Sampling rate: 320 Hz Performance –Bias Drift Rate = 3.3°/hr –Angle Random Walk = 0.16 °/rt-hr –Scale Factor Error = 100 PPM

8 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Ground Validation Process

9 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Bench Performance Testing Bench Test Approach –Integrate and checkout all flight boards into single electrical system –Perform functional level tests on integrated system –Verified Power draw Interface checkouts Packaging approach Gyro Simulator –D/A in place of gyro sensors Generate any rate or position profile Generate any gyro errors Loopback Mode –ISC software running while processing prerecorded images and real or simulated gyro –Mode to be used during all spacecraft I&T

10 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Thermal Vacuum Tests Approach –ISC subject to relevant space-like environment (vacuum and temperature) Tested/Measured –Focus, Survival, Dark Frame, Noise Equivalent Angle Relative Scaling Temperature (Cº) CGA Dark Frame Calibration TVAC MIT

11 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Vibration and Shock Testing Shock NTV in Los Angeles Vibration Draper CGA tested: ~17grms, ~14grms, ~10grms DPA tested: ~11grms, ~10grms, 11grms CGA (above) and DPA (left) on shaker table

12 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Night Sky Test Approach –Field tested integrated ISC camera to look at real night sky images Tested/Measured –Image processing –Sensitivity –Focal length calculations –Lens distortions Night Sky at Wallace Observatory 08/14/03

13 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Rate Table Testing Approach –Integrated CGA and DPA on two-axis thermal rate table Tested –Ability for MEMS gyros to sense rate over various rates and temperatures –Integrated output of MEMS gyros over various test scenarios Rate Table Testing at Draper

14 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Observatory Tests Approach –Verify integrated ISC output relative to calibrated telescope mount over various rates and crude thermal profiles Tested/Measured –Integrated ISC output Output ISC attitude Reported mount attitude Night Sky at Haystack Observatory 9/24/03

15 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Exceeds Customer Requirements Achieves 0.1º attitude determination in a low mass, low power, bolt-on package Status –Flight-ready unit –Ground validation complete –On RoadRunner spacecraft, waiting for launch Awaiting Flight Test Technology Readiness Level 9 Space Qualified < 0.1 º0.1ºAccuracy 3.5 W4.5 WPower 2.9 kg3 kgMass MeasurementRequirementCriteria

16 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady Flight Validation Imager Telescope Stowed Solar Arrays ISC Composite Bus Structure Bus Payload Deck Launch Vehicle Adapter 350kg Air Force RoadRunner spacecraft, launch late 2006 Charter is to demonstrate advanced technologies 1m visible imagery coupled with RF geolocation Inertial Stellar Compass validation (payload) –Initialize –Point (low angular rate) –Slew (high angular rate) –Sky coverage > 90%