Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past North American connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID assigning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Key Image Notes Evidence Documents Simple Image & Numeric Report Access to Radiology Information IHE Vendors Workshop.
Advertisements

Cross Community (XC) Profiles Karen Witting. Outline Vision – as described in 2006 IHE White Paper on Cross Community Exchange Existing – what has been.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Karen Witting - IBM Cross-Community: Peer- to-Peer sharing of healthcare information.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Karen Witting IBM Cross-Community: Peer- to-Peer sharing of healthcare information.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Karen Witting IBM Cross-Community: Peer- to-Peer sharing of healthcare information.
Extending XDW in Cross-Community Editor: Charles Parisot Notes for the March 19 th, 2013 – ITI Tech Committee.
Use Cases 1)A Clinical outpatient facility providing images to a shared image repository. 2) Sending images and other clinical documents to a referring.
Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing Bill Majurski National Institute of Standards and Technology IT Infrastructure Co-Chair.
This presentation prepared for Now is the time to initiate the one change that will have the most leverage across your business systems Patient Identity.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Distributing Images: Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging (XDS-I) Access to Radiology Information (ARI) Retrieve Information for Display (RID)
January, Steve Moore Lynn Felhofer Connectathon Patient Identifiers.
Cross-Enterprise Document Networking (XDN) Problem – Legacy decommissioning produces large static collections of patient-related documents requiring long-term.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Eye Care Domain Connectathon 2014: Preparation & Processes Lynn Felhofer IHE Technical Project Manager.
Mobile Patient Discovery ITI Proposal Brief. The Problem Data Repositories A eCharts MPI Integration Service Data Repository eRxmyPHR B Integration Service.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Document Registry and Repository Implementation Strategies IHE Vendors Workshop 2006 IHE IT Infrastructure Education.
Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing Bill Majurski National Institute of Standards and Technology IT Infrastructure Co-Chair.
NIST XDS Toolkit SOURCE NIST XDS Toolkit SOURCE VENDOR “ B ” RESPONDING GATEWAY VENDOR “ B ” RESPONDING GATEWAY BLUE REGISTRY REPOSITORY PIX/PDQ/XCPD/etc.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon Prior to the 2010 European connectathon, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon Prior to the 2010 European connectathon, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID.
XDS Testing for new Connectathon monitors Bill Majurski NIST.
Internet testing prior to the Connectathon Welcome!! Please must your line as you enter. We will have Q&A at the end.
Publication and Discovery XDS IHE IT Infrastructure Webinar Series.
Annual Cycle Review for Returning Participants IHE Test Cycle Lynn Felhofer / Steve Moore (MIR) Eric Poiseau (INRIA)
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Key Image Notes Evidence Documents Simple Image & Numeric Report Access to Radiology Information IHE Vendors Workshop.
NA 2009 Connectathon Support Description of Services Provided for Connectathon Participants.
CS 493 Project Definition The project assignment is a simplified version of the Integrating Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing.
IHE NA Connectathon 2015 Registration Training Presented by Sarah Willis-Garcia Coordinator, IHE USA.
Query Dispatch and Aggregate QDA Work Item Proposal October 2014 Vincent van Pelt (Nictiz) Mark Sinke (ForCare) Walco van Loon (ForCare) Albert-Jan Spruyt.
XDW in a multi-community environment and back-linking to Workflow Documents A high-level analysis to avoid design choices that would make XDW Trial Implementation.
Dynamic Document Sharing Detailed Profile Proposal for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting November 10, 2009.
Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Implementing the XDS Infrastructure Bill Majurski IT Infrastructure National Institute of Standards and Technology.
IHE IT Infrastructure Domain Update Karen Witting – IBM IT Infrastructure Planning Committee co- chair.
1 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Care Delivery - IS01 Electronic Health Record (EHR) Laboratory Results Reporting July 6, 2007.
Cross-Enterprise User Authentication John F. Moehrke GE Healthcare IT Infrastructure Technical Committee.
XDStarClient Presentation of a suite of tools developed by IHE Europe for healthcare community Abderrazek Boufahja Mai 25, 2012.
Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Cross-Community Patient Identification (XCPI) Brief Profile Proposal for 2009 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting November.
Publication and Discovery XDS and DSUB IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Ilia Fortunov - Microsoft.
1 IHE ITI White Paper on Authorization Rough Cut Implementation Opportunities for BPPC Dr. Jörg Caumanns, Raik Kuhlisch, Olaf Rode Berlin,
Bill Majurski National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)‏ IT Infrastructure: Profiles for Health Information Exchange.
Federation Karen Witting. Goals of “Federation” Show a vision for support of cross XDS Affinity Domain communication Show cooperation between IHE and.
System Directory for Document Sharing (SDDS) Vassil Peytchev, Epic February 1, 2010.
MV-ECON Revised Schema Decision made at the Profile Kick-off Conference on Tuesday, 3/11/08 regarding MV- ECON  To do a whitepaper this year in preparation.
IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Service Model Task Service Layer Entity Service Layer Utility Service Layer Logical service abstraction layers categorize.
Document Consumer Patient Identity Source Document Registry Document Repository Document Source MHD Document Recipient MHD Document Responder MHD Document.
IHE IT Infrastructure Domain Update Karen Witting – IBM IT Infrastructure Technical Committee co-chair.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Karen Witting – Ready Computing XDS & XCA: On-Demand Documents.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Cross Enterprise Document Sharing Details Keith W. Boone – Dictaphone.
Dynamic/Deferred Document Sharing (D3S) Profile for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting February 1, 2010.
© 2005 IBM Corporation IBM Global Business Services 4/10/2006 | Casey Webster and Kevin Julier © 2006 IBM Corporation IBM NHIN Architecture Leveraging.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past North American connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID assigning.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Patient Index and Demographic Implementation Strategies IHE Vendors Workshop 2006 IHE IT Infrastructure Education Rick.
XDS.b – Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing XDS.b_Doc_Source_Stores_Document XDS.b_Consumer_Query_Retrieve XDR option tests: XDS.b_Source_Do_This_First XDS.b_Registry_Do_This_First.
PIX/PDQ – Today and Tomorrow Vassil Peytchev Epic.
RFD Profile Examine Security Compare to XDS Node Security.
Cross Community Access Profile Karen Witting IBM Co-chair ITI technical committee.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain and one Patient ID assigning authority.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain and one Patient ID assigning authority.
June-September 2009www.ihe.net North American 2010 Connectathon & Interoperability Showcase Series Paul Seifert/ Kinson Ho Solution Architects Agfa HealthCare.
Laika 2009 Concept of Operations. EHR Certification Testing Workflows EHR Laika Test Environment Initialization EHR PIX Feed EHR PIX Query EHR PDQ Query.
Dynamic/Deferred Document Sharing (D3S) Profile for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting February 1, 2010.
Patient Demographics Query (PDQ) Didi Davis Director, Eclipsys Corporation Co-Chair, IT Infrastructure Planning Committee.
NIST XDS Toolkit CONSUMER
Federation Karen Witting.
Connectathon Patient Identifiers
System Directory for Document Sharing (SDDS)
Connectathon Patient Identifiers
Presentation transcript:

Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past North American connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID assigning authority accepted by all XDS.b Registries. – One AD was easier to test (less switching) – But this was not as effective for also testing XCA In April-2010 we had three Affinity Domains for the European Connectathon, and we will follow that model for NA2011.

Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon (Part 2) Each Affinity Domain has its own (different) ‘master’ assigning authority for Patient IDs (eg … , … , ) For ease-of-reference, we call these the ‘blue’, ‘red’, and ‘green’ domains Each XDS.b Registry is assigned to one of these 3 domains for the week. – The Registry’s Patient ID feed must have the Assigning Authority OID for the Registry’s domain – All documents submitted must use the proper Assigning Authority OID in the Patient ID in the document metatdata Affinity domain codes (from codes.xml) are the same across all 3 affinity domains – A simplification to ease testing

XCA GW Registry Repos assigning authority Patient ID feed Patient ID feed Patient ID feed Sources PIX MGR

Three Assigning Authority - effect on XDS actors ) XDS.b Registries: – A given Registry is assigned only one of these values. It only accepts Patient Feeds and Documents with Patient IDs from this Assigning Authority. This value remains the same for the whole week. – We have ~24 Registries for NA2011. That means that eight of the Registries will be assigned to accept a Patient ID with the … value, eight are assigned the … value, etc. This is no different than what we have done up until now with multiple Registries accepting the same assigning authority value. XDS.b Repositories: – A Repository shouldn’t care if it has stored documents for patients with different assigning authority values; the Repository can keep its database and be paired with different Registries during the week with no adverse effect. XDS.b Sources & Consumers / XDS-i.b Img Doc Source & Consumer: – The burden for multiple assigning authority domains lies here. – Sources will have to pay close attention to Assigning Authority of the Registry associated with the Doc Repository to which they are submitting a document. The Patient ID in the document metadata must contain the Assigning Authority for your Registry – Consumers will have to know the Assigning Authority value of the Registry it is querying.

Three Assigning Authority – effect on HL7 actors PIX/PIXv3 Patient Identity Sources: – For tests driven by XDS.b and XDS-I.b, we will use a tool (Geneva) to serve as the Patient Identity Source; it is able to send demographics with red, blue, green assigning authority. – As usual, for PIX peer-to-peer tests, each PIX Patient ID Source actor will have its own assigning authority value assigned to them for the connectathon. PIX/PIXv3 Managers: –Will receive a feed for all patients created by the Patient Identity Source tool (Geneva) used for XDS.b testing (including red, blue, green assigning authority values), as well as from vendors’ Patient Identity Source actors. PIX/PIXv3 Consumers: – Are already required to specify the affinity domain in their PIX Query; they may optionally specify ‘what domain returned’, to query a PIX Manager for a Patient ID in the domain they want PDQ/PDQv3 Suppliers: – As usual, for PDQ peer-to-peer tests, each PDS will have its own assigning authority value assigned to them for the connectathon.

Sample: patient ID Assigning Authority for XDS.b Registries to accept An electronic copy of the NA2011 Registry OID Assigning Authorities: XDS.b Document Registries Patient ID Assigning Authority to accept in your HL7v2 or v3 feed ALERT OTHER_ALERT CareEvolution OTHER_CareEvolution etc.. Allscripts OTHER_Allscripts_Helios Carefx XDSb_REG_Carefx etc… Axolotl XDSab_REG_Ax CSH PACS_CSH_0 etc…

Connectathon demographics We distribute patient demographics prior to the connectathon to be pre-loaded on XDS.b Registry, PDQ Supplier and PIX Manager systems – We have 3 sets – demographics-red, demographics-blue, demographics- green – PIX Managers load all demographics – PDQ Suppliers load demographics marked for PDQ tests – XDS.b Registries load demographics marked for XDS tests. There are red/blue/green versions of demographics that contain the same patient name/DOB/addr for these patients, but different ID values for each of the 3 assigning authorities. The PIX Managers should recognize these as the same person. An electronic copy of the NA2011 patient demographics is here:

Multiple domains & XCA & XCPD XCA Initiating and Responding Gateways: – Connectathon Monitors assigned to XCA will help Gateways “plug in” to this infrastructure – Those Gateways that support the ‘XDS affinity domain’ option can be associated with one of the affinity domains – They will either learn about patients by accepting a Patient ID feed, or will do it some other non-IHE way – A few Gateways will also support XCPD, and can test this as well

Questions? Contact Lynn Felhofer