Zhiwen Zhao (UVa), Paul Reimer (ANL) SoLID Collboration Meeting 2013/03.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panda Solenoid Timelines. General Layout constraints and HOLD POINTS.
Advertisements

Hall C SHMS Fringe Field Analysis Michael Moore Hall C Winter Meeting
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Magnet, Support and Infrastructure Robin Wines July 9, 2014.
SoLID EC Design for IHEP 2012/10. Basic Features of Preliminary Design Based on COMPASS Shashlyk module design. 0.5mm lead/0.12mm air gap/1.5mm scintillator/0.12mm.
Guenther Rosner FAIR Design Study, PANDA 3, GSI, 19/1/06 1 PANDA3: Magnet design and integration of detectors Tasks & participants Progress Milestones.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
GlueX Simulations Status Report on CD3 geometry Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, January 10-12, 2008.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
Vyacheslav Klyukhin, SINP MSU The CMS Magnetic Field Map Aug 7, RDMSV. Klyukhin, SINP MSU1.
LARP QXF 150mm Structure Mike Anerella / John Cozzolino / Jesse Schmalzle November 15, nd Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
LCWS14 Benoit CURE - CERN/PH Dept.1 International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders October 2014 Organized by the Vinca Institute of Nuclear.
Robin Wines. Verbal agreement with BNL to acquire 48D48 magnet Contact at BNL indicates 4 of these magnets in storage BNL agrees to disassemble magnet.
Zhiwen Zhao (UVa), Paul Reimer (ANL), Many Thanks to Eugene Chudakov, Xin Qian, Jian-Ping Chen, Whit Seay, Robin Wines, Javier Gomez, Will Oren, Rolf Ent.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
SoLID baffle update Zhiwen Zhao 2013/04/02. Current Baffle The total distance from plane 1 to 6 is 150cm which is a few cm overlapping with endcap nose.
SoLID simulation Zhiwen Zhao Uva SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2011/6/2 1.
Drilling a Double Cosine-Theta Coil Hunter Blanton, Spencer L. Kirn, Christopher Crawford University of Kentucky Abstract: A double cosine theta coil is.
September 18, 2007H. J. Krebs1 SiD Collaboration One Piece End Door Design Concept plus Forward Equipment Interfaces H. James Krebs SLAC September 18,
Focusing Lens for the SSR1 Section of PXIE Preliminary analysis of main options 3/13/2012I. Terechkine1.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
Support and magnet coil KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Nov. 10, ‘04.
SIDIS Background and Trigger Zhiwen Zhao 2013/11/18 Created 2014/07/06 Updated.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
SoLID simulation Zhiwen Zhao UVa 2011/03/25 1. GEMC, written by Maurizio Ungaro, used for CLAS12 2.
The HCAL barrel absorber structure
SHMS Spectrometer Update Hall C 2008 Users Meeting Paul Brindza January 18, 2008.
Optics, Tracking, and TOF Status/Update/Roadmap Xin Qian KRL Caltech.
Conceptual Design of the Neutron Guide Holding Field Christopher Crawford, Yunchang Shin University of Kentucky nEDM Collaboration Meeting
Hall D infrastructure and integration Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting September 9-11, 2004.
Study of SoLID Baffle, Background and Trigger Zhiwen Zhao UVa, ODU&JLab 2014/07/09 1.
SoLID magnet and yoke by using CLEO-II Zhiwen Zhao 2012/07.
September 20, 2007H. J. Krebs/B. Wands/B. Cooper1 SiD Collaboration Preliminary End Door Design Concept Support of Forward Systems H. James Krebs Bob Wands.
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
SoLID Magnet Options Paul E. Reimer 06 June 2011 Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory The real work has been done not by me but by a growing Monte.
SoLID Background Update Zhiwen Zhao UVa 2013/11/08 1.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
Magnetic Fields in s/f/ePHENIX John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
PVDIS baffle Zhiwen Zhao 2013/10/15. Intro Previously, I couldn’t obtain an ideal baffle with the code (makebaf5.C) For the writeup, we used “BaBar more1.
Status of the Yoke Interfaces Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov February 2013.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
preliminary magnet layout Renzo P.
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Update on PANDA solenoid design
Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and Anti-DID
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Present status of the flux return yoke design
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and DID
SiD Solenoid Status and Plans
SiD Engineering Status Report
SoLID Magnet - Engineering and Cost
HRS at small angles for e+/ e- pair for APEX
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
MQXF coil cross-section status
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
SoLID Simulation Zhiwen Zhao (UVa) SoLID Jlab Physics Division
Field Mapping of Vertical Coils and BigBite Fringe Field
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
CLEO II Magnet in Hall A for SoLID
PVDIS baffle material and neutron shielding
New SoLID Setup Detector Layout Magnet dimension EC size Cables
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Zhiwen Zhao,UVa for EC group
Presentation transcript:

Zhiwen Zhao (UVa), Paul Reimer (ANL) SoLID Collboration Meeting 2013/03

CLEO CLEO-II magnet was built in early 1980s by Oxford in England. Coil is divided into 3 sections, each section has two layers Coil total 1282 turns. Upstream: 166; Central: 309; Downstream: 166 turns per layer. The current density in the end sections is 4% higher than in the middle section. Max current is 3266A and average current density of 1.2MA/m, this reach 1.5T field CLEO-II magnet was built in early 1980s by Oxford in England. Coil is divided into 3 sections, each section has two layers Coil total 1282 turns. Upstream: 166; Central: 309; Downstream: 166 turns per layer. The current density in the end sections is 4% higher than in the middle section. Max current is 3266A and average current density of 1.2MA/m, this reach 1.5T field SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/032

CLEO Barrel flux return is provided by 3 layers of iron separated by spacers It’s in octagon 2 collars supports barrel irons and holding 4 coil rods in horizontal direction. Barrel flux return is provided by 3 layers of iron separated by spacers It’s in octagon 2 collars supports barrel irons and holding 4 coil rods in horizontal direction. SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/033

Will Oren visited Cornell SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/034

5 The outer layer 46cm thick

From CLEO-II to SoLID (reused parts) Reuse coil and cryostat Take two layers of barrel yoke and spacer, keep the upstream ends unchanged, cut the downstream ends (75cm) to our need. Take the upstream collar unchanged, and cut the downstream collar or make a new one to satisfy the acceptance requirement. Make sure the coil rods can still be supported by two collars under axial force All other parts of yokes are new. Reuse coil and cryostat Take two layers of barrel yoke and spacer, keep the upstream ends unchanged, cut the downstream ends (75cm) to our need. Take the upstream collar unchanged, and cut the downstream collar or make a new one to satisfy the acceptance requirement. Make sure the coil rods can still be supported by two collars under axial force All other parts of yokes are new. The parts from CLEO- II is in the red box Endcap Donut Endcap Bottom Endcap Nose Collar Downstream Barrel Yoke Outer Barrel Yoke Inner Coil Collar Upstream Spacer Front Piece shield 6SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

From CLEO-II to SoLID (new parts) All new parts need to be customized made. But it’s unclear if they will be made of newly machined iron ($6/lb) or we can get some unused CLEO-II iron machined (cost?) We might try to use some “stock” parts to save machining cost. All new parts need to be customized made. But it’s unclear if they will be made of newly machined iron ($6/lb) or we can get some unused CLEO-II iron machined (cost?) We might try to use some “stock” parts to save machining cost. Endcap donut: 15cm thick and has 15cm clearance to HallA floor (10 feet high) Endcap bottom: two 15cm plates Endcap nose: flat at back to give clearance for SIDIS forward angle EC and has slope at front to give clearance for cherenkov. Collar downstream: 20cm thick and can be in one piece Front Piece: 30cm thick and can move along z to adjust force on coil shielding: a few 4cm thick plates with gaps in between. Endcap donut: 15cm thick and has 15cm clearance to HallA floor (10 feet high) Endcap bottom: two 15cm plates Endcap nose: flat at back to give clearance for SIDIS forward angle EC and has slope at front to give clearance for cherenkov. Collar downstream: 20cm thick and can be in one piece Front Piece: 30cm thick and can move along z to adjust force on coil shielding: a few 4cm thick plates with gaps in between. The parts from CLEO- II is in the red box Endcap Donut Endcap Bottom Endcap Nose Collar Downstream Front Piece Barrel Yoke Outer Barrel Yoke Inner Coil Collar Upstream Spacer shield 7SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

Cut the donut (15cm thick, 276cm long) out of the outer layer (46cm thick, 533cm long) SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/038 Beamline height 10 feet (305cm)

PVDIS target requirement The chamber needs 30” clearance while we has only 26” Make the first two planes opening to 30” Check how field changes SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/039

Field 10SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

Field Difference The field change is small within solenoid Need to study the fringe field at SIDIS target SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/0311

Summary To use the extra iron or not is more or less a cost question. Fringe field can be tuned (correction coil alike), need more time. More advanced software like TOSCA to do further work More input from CLEO people will help fine tune things. We need to gather more info from them. Iteration with engineering. SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/0312

backup SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/0313

SOLID CLEO Acceptance PVDIS physics requires opening angle from o target at z= 10cm geometry openings is o clearance to endcup nose at endcup entrance (z=189cm) is 12cm for 22 o and 8cm for 21 o clearance to endcup donut at forwardangle EC back (z=370cm) is 10cm for 35 o and 5cm for 35.5 o beamline opening angle at endcup bottom is 3.5 o SIDIS physics requires opening angle from o, JPsi physics requires opening angle from o target at z= -350cm geometry openings is 7.5 – 26.3 o clearance to endcup nose at endcup entrance (z=189cm) is 15cm for 8 o clearance to endcup nose at forwardangle EC front (z=405cm) is 15cm for 8 o beamline opening angle at endcup bottom is 2 o PVDIS physics requires opening angle from o target at z= 10cm geometry openings is o clearance to endcup nose at endcup entrance (z=189cm) is 12cm for 22 o and 8cm for 21 o clearance to endcup donut at forwardangle EC back (z=370cm) is 10cm for 35 o and 5cm for 35.5 o beamline opening angle at endcup bottom is 3.5 o SIDIS physics requires opening angle from o, JPsi physics requires opening angle from o target at z= -350cm geometry openings is 7.5 – 26.3 o clearance to endcup nose at endcup entrance (z=189cm) is 15cm for 8 o clearance to endcup nose at forwardangle EC front (z=405cm) is 15cm for 8 o beamline opening angle at endcup bottom is 2 o PVDIS 21 o SIDIS 26 o SIDIS 8 o PVDIS 36 o SIDIS 14.7 o SIDIS 2 o PVDIS 3.5 o 14SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

SoLID CLEO Field CLEO-II can still reach 1.48T Bz SoLID CLEO only reaches 1.38T Bz, due to large opening and asymmetric yoke design. Unlikely CLEO-II can run higher current (?) The iron of the endcap nose could be saturated with >2T field. The radial field Br can reach a few 1000G where PVDIS GEM plane 1 and 2 are. The field drops to a few 100G in endcap. They are <200G where Cherenkov readout is. CLEO-II can still reach 1.48T Bz SoLID CLEO only reaches 1.38T Bz, due to large opening and asymmetric yoke design. Unlikely CLEO-II can run higher current (?) The iron of the endcap nose could be saturated with >2T field. The radial field Br can reach a few 1000G where PVDIS GEM plane 1 and 2 are. The field drops to a few 100G in endcap. They are <200G where Cherenkov readout is. Bz Br B Bz along beamline 15SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

SoLID CLEO Force on coil unit in tupstreammiddledownstreamtotal inner 2piFz outer 2piFz Total 2piFz inner Fr/radian outer Fr/radian Total Fr/radian Axial force on coil and cell cylinder are squeezing from both sides and it can be balanced under 10t. could leave some net force to avoid accidental force direction change. Preferred direction is negative so upstream collar (unchanged from CLEO-II) can take the force (?) Moving the front piece in z to adjust force (moving upstream, the positive force increase, vice verse.) with gradient 3-5t/cm (It’s very sensitive) Radial force are on the Aluminum shell cylinder From Eugene “If all the force goes to the shell, the azimuthal tension is about 30MPa. The yield limit of aluminum is about 100MPa (to be verified for 4°K)”100MPa Axial force on coil and cell cylinder are squeezing from both sides and it can be balanced under 10t. could leave some net force to avoid accidental force direction change. Preferred direction is negative so upstream collar (unchanged from CLEO-II) can take the force (?) Moving the front piece in z to adjust force (moving upstream, the positive force increase, vice verse.) with gradient 3-5t/cm (It’s very sensitive) Radial force are on the Aluminum shell cylinder From Eugene “If all the force goes to the shell, the azimuthal tension is about 30MPa. The yield limit of aluminum is about 100MPa (to be verified for 4°K)”100MPa front piece 16SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

SoLID CLEO Force on yoke (axial force only) piFz (unit in t) represents the axial force integrated over the whole part in 2pi. positive direction in black, negative direction in Red The opposite force meets at two locations where the endcup connects. Some analysis of potential problems with the coil and yoke mechanical integrity should be done. no calculation of the radial force yet. 2piFz (unit in t) represents the axial force integrated over the whole part in 2pi. positive direction in black, negative direction in Red The opposite force meets at two locations where the endcup connects. Some analysis of potential problems with the coil and yoke mechanical integrity should be done. no calculation of the radial force yet SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

SoLID CLEO: FEA study of axial force Static weight are ignored for now. by Whit Seay 18SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

SoLID CLEO Yoke weight assume steel density is 7.9g/cm3, weight unit is in t material from CLEO-II 376t new material 200t ($2.7M if assume $6/lb machined iron) total 576t assume steel density is 7.9g/cm3, weight unit is in t material from CLEO-II 376t new material 200t ($2.7M if assume $6/lb machined iron) total 576t 19SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

SoLID CLEO: Fringe field at SIDIS pol He3 target location Multilayer of iron plates and gaps have good shielding effect The distance between first shielding plate to the target coil is a few cm. pol He3 holding field is 25G and we need field gradient below 100mG/cm We need additional shielding or correction coil. Multilayer of iron plates and gaps have good shielding effect The distance between first shielding plate to the target coil is a few cm. pol He3 holding field is 25G and we need field gradient below 100mG/cm We need additional shielding or correction coil. Z (cm)Bz(G)Br(G)dBz/dr (mG/cm) dBr/dz (mG/cm) dBz/dz (mG/cm) dBr/dr (mG/cm) Pol He3 target 2 Helmholtz coils Longitudinal R=75.8cm Vertical R=66.7cm 20SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

Add a pair correction coil at the same position of longitudinal coil with current -3465A and -645A No effect on the force on solenoid coil Both field and field gradient are reduced It can be tweaked further and there can be other ideas. Add a pair correction coil at the same position of longitudinal coil with current -3465A and -645A No effect on the force on solenoid coil Both field and field gradient are reduced It can be tweaked further and there can be other ideas. Z (cm)Bz(G)Br(G)dBz/dr (mG/cm) dBr/dz (mG/cm) dBz/dz (mG/cm) dBr/dr (mG/cm) Pol He3 target 2 Helmholtz coils Longitudinal R=75.8cm Vertical R=66.7cm SoLID CLEO: Fringe field at SIDIS pol He3 target location (with correction coil) 21SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/03

SoLID CLEO summary We have a preliminary design It can be improved with more input from engineering Some barrel yoke are reused, no problem to fit with Hall A beamline height. Study by Eugene Chudukov SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2013/0322