IN THE NAME OF GOD Flagship Course on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing; Module 4: : How to construct.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Step 3: Strategy Development. Learning Objectives Define strategy/strategic approach Understand strategy development process Engage in informed dialogue.
Advertisements

Measurement of Government Output and Productivity for the National Accounts: Interim Report Tony Atkinson.
5th Module: Evaluating Information Systems: Structure: 1.Reasons for IS Evaluation 2.Difficulty of IS Evaluation 3.Evaluation Techniques 4.Evaluation in.
From Research to Advocacy
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Basic Principles of Program Evaluation Corinne Datchi-Phillips, Ph.D. CEBP Learning Institute May 26 th, 2010.
HEALTH EQUITY: THE INDIAN CONTEXT Subodh S Gupta.
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
1 Figure 1: Factors affecting the quality of care Impact (change in health status) Quality of Care Supply: health system Demand: expectations and needs.
“Economics 101” -Is Government Intervention necessary in Markets? Training Session 5 Mar 2014.
Public Health Perspective on Radon Control in Ireland Dr. Ina Kelly Specialist Registrar in Public Health Medicine Health Service Executive Department.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
Guidelines and Guideline Development HINF Medical Methodologies Session 13.
Costs and Cost Effectiveness HINF Medical Methodologies Session 15.
A METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE COST- UTILITY OF EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL INTERVENTIONS Quality of improved life opportunities (QILO)
Economic evaluation considers assessment of intervention effects in economic terms, which is often of greatest interest to fund allocators Intervention.
COST–EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS AND COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS
The Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine Marthe Gold City University of London 30 October, 2003.
A tisket, a tasket, is MNCH in your benefits basket? March 2, 2015.
AGEC 608 Lecture 17, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 17 Objective: Review the main aspects of cost- effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA).
Do we need economics in medicine?. Edmund Burke, 1790 dcist.com/2007/12/10/revisiting_edmu.php “…the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists,
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
INTRODUCTION TO HEALTH ECONOMICS March 2007 Health Economic Course Series: 1 of 12
Generating evidence for change: Implementing the post-ICIUM research agenda Dennis Ross-Degnan, ScD Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH SYSTEMS Anne Mills DCPP Editor London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Economic Evaluations, Briefly… CHSC 433 Module 6/Chapter 13 UIC School of Public Health L. Michele Issel, PhD, R N.
Importance of Health Information Systems Information explosion during 1990s  It is estimated that in the next 50 years, the amount of knowledge currently.
TRANSFORMATION IN HEALTH CARE: ARE WE THERE YET? Thulani Matsebula.
HSC Core 1: Health Priorities in Australia
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Advancing Excellence in Health Care Provision of Preventive Services in the Complex Patient AHRQ.
GENDER ISSUES ACADEMIC YEAR The impact of globalization and development on gender equality (E.Chiappero-Martinetti)
Summary of measures of population Health Farid Najafi MD PhD School of Population Health Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
Chapter 6 Equity and Income Distribution
Knowing what you get for what you pay An introduction to cost effectiveness FETP India.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning a Statistical Project Section A 1.
Education & Training Curriculum on Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC) Strategies & tools to support health professionals caring for people living with MCC.
Shifting resources: disinvestment and re-investment Craig Mitton, PhD Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research.
05_XXX_MM1 Implementing Safe Abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems Ronnie Johnson, PhD UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme.
Economic evaluation of drugs for rare diseases CENTRE FOR HEALTH ECONOMICS K Claxton, C McCabe, A Tsuchiya Centre for Health Economics and Department of.
Workshop The science and methodologies behind HTA, diversity and commonality across the EU Achieving more patient centred HTA in different countries.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Health Impact Assessment.
انواع ارزيابي های اقتصادي سيدرضا مجدزاده مرکز تحقيقات بهره برداری از دانش سلامت و دانشکده بهداشت دانشگاه علوم پزشکي و خدمات بهداشتي درماني تهران.
Selecting priorities for MNCH Prioritizing activities of identified problems or challenges.
LEVELS OF HEALTH CARE VINITA VANDANA.
Epilepsy and WHO | 17 Oct |1 | WHO's six-point agenda The overarching health needs 1.Promoting development 2.Fostering health security The strategic.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Chapter 5: Therapy, Part 2 Thomas F. Byars Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM.
Themes Emerging from Country and Related Presentations Notes from session 1545 – 1730 Thursday 17 February 2011 Albert Weale.
1 The Economics of Health Care and New Technologies Friday October 18, 2002 Between Technology and Humanity, Brussels Jan Busschbach PhD, –Department of.
Waiting Time Management Strategies for Scheduled Services Ottawa March 28, 2012 Minimizing the Cost of Waiting Ray Naden, New Zealand.
Flagship Program on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing.
Capital Insight Pty Limited ABN Berry Street North Sydney NSW 2060 t f Health Economics.
Chronic diseases as tracer conditions in international benchmarking of health systems: the example of diabetes 1 European Centre on Health of Societies.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS? A selection of key economic inputs.
Health Economic Course Series
Alternative Approaches to Healthcare Resource Allocation.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Health Policy Analysis: Chapters 10, 11 and 14 Nutchanart Bunthumporn Beth Faiman.
Who is involved in making NICE guidance recommendations and what evidence do they look at? Jane Cowl, Senior Public Involvement Adviser Tommy Wilkinson,
The US Preventive Services Task Force: Potential Impact on Medicare Coverage Ned Calonge, MD, MPH Chair, USPSTF.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Community Medicine Lec -11-
33 MEETING OF THE UNAIDS PROGRAMME COORDINATING BOARD GENEVA, SWITZERLAND DECEMBER 2013 THE EQUITY DEFICIT: UNEQUAL AND UNFAIR ACCESS TO HIV TREATMENT,
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
Medical Necessity Criteria An Overview of Key Components Presented by BHM Healthcare Solutions.
Planning health policy Health/finance dialogue (1) 6 April 2011 Nairobi.
Global burden of diseases
Resource Allocation in Health Care
Strategies to incorporate pharmacoeconomics into pharmacotherapy
Sergio Bautista-Arredondo National Institute of Public Health Mexico
EAST GRADE Course 2019 PICO Question Formulation
Presentation transcript:

IN THE NAME OF GOD Flagship Course on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing; Module 4: : How to construct

How to toConstruct A BASIC PACKAGE OF HEALTH SERVICES A BASIC PACKAGE OF HEALTH SERVICES

Information needed for prioritization 1. Many different types of information will need to be combined in order to adequately define a package of services 2. All of the different information that is required may not be readily available, but it may be possible to simplify the data requirements in practice

Historical Context (1) Most dev. countries have been reluctant to accept the notion of prioritization in the health sector. Most dev. countries have been reluctant to accept the notion of prioritization in the health sector. Instead, they have attempted to offer all services, ranging from the simplest to the most complex. Instead, they have attempted to offer all services, ranging from the simplest to the most complex. This approach has resulted in de facto rationing, through queues, shortages of inputs, and simply an inefficient and inequitable use of resources. This approach has resulted in de facto rationing, through queues, shortages of inputs, and simply an inefficient and inequitable use of resources.

Historical Context (2) The focus of this session will be on how to make the admittedly difficult choices that can avoid this problem The focus of this session will be on how to make the admittedly difficult choices that can avoid this problem

Principles for Making Difficult Decisions in Difficult Times 1. The financial resources for health limited. 2. Consider the financial costs of the treatments. 3. Limitation make it necessary to set priorities. 4. It isn’t possible to cover every treatment 5. The goal is to maximize the health of the population served, subject to the available resources. 6. The priority a treatment should not depend on the patient who would receive that related to us 7. Determining the priority needs magnitudes of its benefits, harms, and costs

1. Estimates of benefits, harms, and costs should be based on empirical evidence. when empirical evidence contradicts subjective judgments, empirical evidence should take priority. 2. Before its use, a treatment should satisfy three criteria: 1- There is convincing evidence it is effective in improving health outcomes 1- There is convincing evidence it is effective in improving health outcomes 2- Its beneficial effects should outweigh any harmful effects on health outcomes 2- Its beneficial effects should outweigh any harmful effects on health outcomes 3- Compared to the next best alternative treatment, the treatment should represent a good use of resources and satisfies Principle #5 above. 3- Compared to the next best alternative treatment, the treatment should represent a good use of resources and satisfies Principle #5 above. 1. Judgments should reflect the preferences of the individuals who will actually receive the treatments. Principles for Making Difficult Decisions in Difficult Times

Approaches to toprioritizing

Different Approaches to Prioritizing Defining categories of care Defining categories of care Using explicit criteria Using explicit criteria Using guidelines or technology assessment Using guidelines or technology assessment Using formulas or models Using formulas or models

Defining categories of care Leaving more specific decisions to both politicians and health professionals Leaving more specific decisions to both politicians and health professionals Its advantages are: Its advantages are: 1. Flexibility 2.It can minimize political resistance 3.There are no explicit exclusions which can serve as a focal point for opposition Its disadvantages are: Its disadvantages are: 1.not be able to achieve an efficient allocation of resources 2.health professional incentives may not closely match with those of society as a whole.

Using explicit criteria 1) the identification of community needs and preferences for defining a priority list of services -Oregon, USA, 1) the identification of community needs and preferences for defining a priority list of services -Oregon, USA, 2) the criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, and necessity, and a determination of whether the service can be left to individual responsibility- Netherlands 2) the criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, and necessity, and a determination of whether the service can be left to individual responsibility- Netherlands 3) the criteria that a health problem involves a large number of people, services are available and effective, and quantified targets can be set - UK 3) the criteria that a health problem involves a large number of people, services are available and effective, and quantified targets can be set - UK

The disadvantages difficult for the population to agree on what criteria difficult for the population to agree on what criteria Difficulties in measurement Difficulties in measurement

Using guidelines or technology assessment informing both patients and practitioners informing both patients and practitioners distinct advantage of clearly defining when a service may be technically beneficial or not distinct advantage of clearly defining when a service may be technically beneficial or not does not include an economic component, nor does it incorporate community values or seek public opinion about social preferences. does not include an economic component, nor does it incorporate community values or seek public opinion about social preferences.

Using formulas or models Select the best mix of services Select the best mix of services based on assessments of the burden of disease and cost-effectiveness analysis to determine the best way to meet health objectives based on assessments of the burden of disease and cost-effectiveness analysis to determine the best way to meet health objectives

The advantages & Disadvantages It explicitly considers efficiency, and can incorporate social preferences through the valuation of distinct health states or outcomes It explicitly considers efficiency, and can incorporate social preferences through the valuation of distinct health states or outcomes need for detailed (and often unavailable) data (both technical and social) need for detailed (and often unavailable) data (both technical and social)

Combine methods It may be possible to combine certain aspects of each into a more comprehensive approach to defining priorities and constructing a basic package of health services

Quantifying Burden of Disease Measuring Mortality Measuring Mortality not the only measure of health status Measuring Morbidity Measuring Morbidity depend on what data are available, and the relative “weights” of death for sickness Combined Measures of Morbidity and Mortality Combined Measures of Morbidity and Mortality

Combined Measures of Morbidity and Mortality The Disability Adjusted Life Year Approach (DALY) The Disability Adjusted Life Year Approach (DALY) DALY approach includes discounting over time

Main Criticisms of DALY 1. The DALY imposes social preferences that have not been validated 1. The DALY imposes social preferences that have not been validated 2. The age weights do not reflect common preferences among health specialists, economists and general population 2. The age weights do not reflect common preferences among health specialists, economists and general population 3. The disability weights ignore the handicap attached to some permanent disabilities in different societies 3. The disability weights ignore the handicap attached to some permanent disabilities in different societies 4. DALYs are not applicable in countries with scarce health information 4. DALYs are not applicable in countries with scarce health information 5. The exclusion of late fetal deaths is unjustifiable 5. The exclusion of late fetal deaths is unjustifiable

Population Behavior and Preferences Focusing on current utilization of services Focusing on current utilization of services People may not necessarily seek the type of care that they should. This may result from lack of information, or perhaps a lack of supply of the type of care they should be seeking. People may not necessarily seek the type of care that they should. This may result from lack of information, or perhaps a lack of supply of the type of care they should be seeking. ignore the question of unmet demand ignore the question of unmet demand

Population Behavior and Preferences Potential result of ignoring population behavior: A package may be rejected politically if it does not correspond to society’s values Potential result of ignoring population behavior: A package may be rejected politically if it does not correspond to society’s values

Health Interventions and Outcomes How effective a given health intervention may be depends on at least three factors: How effective a given health intervention may be depends on at least three factors: the coverage rate the coverage rate the efficacy rate the efficacy rate the compliance rate the compliance rate 1- Use of expert judgment 2- Multiple impacts of an intervention

“Think it over...”

Cost &prioritizing

intervention 12 High priority 0% Coverage 100% Floating line determined by available resources intervention 1 intervention 2 intervention 3 intervention 4 intervention 5 intervention 6 intervention 7 intervention 8 intervention 9 intervention 10 intervention 11 Basic package of health services Horizontal rationing

intervention 12 High priority 0% Coverage 100% intervention 1 intervention 2 intervention 3 intervention 4 intervention 5 intervention 6 intervention 7 intervention 8 intervention 9 intervention 10 intervention 11 Basic package of health services vertical rationing

intervention 12 High priority 0% Coverage 100% intervention 1 intervention 2 intervention 3 intervention 4 intervention 5 intervention 6 intervention 7 intervention 8 intervention 9 intervention 10 intervention 11 Basic package of health services diagonal rationing

intervention 12 High priority 0% Coverage 100% intervention 1 intervention 2 intervention 3 intervention 4 intervention 5 intervention 6 intervention 7 intervention 8 intervention 9 intervention 10 intervention 11 Basic package of health services combined rationing