Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Figure of Merit Should We Use to Evaluate Dark Energy Projects? Yun Wang Yun Wang STScI Dark Energy Symposium STScI Dark Energy Symposium May 6, 2008.
Advertisements

Observational tests of an inhomogeneous cosmology by Christoph Saulder in collaboration with Steffen Mieske & Werner Zeilinger.
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course
Christian Wagner - September Potsdam Nonlinear Power Spectrum Emulator Christian Wagner in collaboration with Katrin Heitmann, Salman Habib,
PRESENTATION TOPIC  DARK MATTER &DARK ENERGY.  We know about only normal matter which is only 5% of the composition of universe and the rest is  DARK.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Modeling the 3-point correlation function Felipe Marin Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics University of Chicago arXiv: Felipe Marin Department.
Neutrinos in Cosmology Alessandro Melchiorri Universita’ di Roma, “La Sapienza” INFN, Roma-1 NOW-2004, 16th September, 2004.
Minji-verse(?) CosKASI group workshop 2014 At Sobaek Observatory(11.11~12) Oh, Minji.
Inflationary Freedom and Cosmological Neutrino Constraints Roland de Putter JPL/Caltech CosKASI 4/16/2014.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
Impact of Early Dark Energy on non-linear structure formation Margherita Grossi MPA, Garching Volker Springel Advisor : Volker Springel 3rd Biennial Leopoldina.
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
July 5, 2012Stockholm, MG13 Testing gravity at cosmic scales with clusters of galaxies, the CMB and galaxy clustering David Rapetti DARK Fellow Dark Cosmology.
Robust cosmological constraints from SDSS-III/BOSS galaxy clustering Chia-Hsun Chuang (Albert) IFT- CSIC/UAM, Spain.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Cosmological Particle Physics Tamara Davis University of Queensland With Signe Riemer-Sørensen, David Parkinson, Chris Blake, and the WiggleZ team.
David Weinberg, Ohio State University Dept. of Astronomy and CCAPP The Cosmological Content of Galaxy Redshift Surveys or Why are FoMs all over the map?
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
Ignacy Sawicki Université de Genève Understanding Dark Energy.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
Array for Microwave Background Anisotropy AMiBA SZ Science AMiBA Team NTU Physics Figure 4. Simulated AMiBA deep surveys of a 1deg 2 field (no primary.
Cosmic Inhomogeneities and Accelerating Expansion Ho Le Tuan Anh National University of Singapore PAQFT Nov 2008.
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
Anisotropic Clustering of Galaxies in High-z Universe as a Probe of Dark Energy Taka Matsubara (Nagoya Univ.) “Decrypting the Universe: Large Surveys for.
23 Sep The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun Peking Univ./ CPPM.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
6dF Workshop April Sydney Cosmological Parameters from 6dF and 2MRS Anaïs Rassat (University College London) 6dF workshop, AAO/Sydney,
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Xiaohu Yang (SJTU/SHAO) With: H. Wang, H.J. Mo, Y.P. Jing, F.C van den Bosch, W.P. Lin, D. Tweed… , KIAS Exploring the Local Universe with re-
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 2: More about Λ Distances at z ~1 Type Ia supernovae SNe Ia and cosmology Results from the Supernova Cosmology Project, the High.
Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
How Different was the Universe at z=1? Centre de Physique Théorique, Marseille Université de Provence Christian Marinoni.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Taka Matsubara (Nagoya Univ.)
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
CTIO Camera Mtg - Dec ‘03 Studies of Dark Energy with Galaxy Clusters Joe Mohr Department of Astronomy Department of Physics University of Illinois.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity models with Gong-bo Zhao (Portsmouth), Baojiu Li (Durham)
Cosmological Structure with the Lyman Alpha Forest. Jordi Miralda Escudé ICREA, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos University of Barcelona, Catalonia Edinburgh,
Inh Jee University of Texas at Austin Eiichiro Komatsu & Karl Gebhardt
Cosmic Momentum Field and Matter Fluctuation Study of Matter through Motions of Galaxies Changbom Park (Korea Institute for Advanced Study)
The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey : cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample arXiv:
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Redshift Space Distortions
Ben Wandelt Flatiron Institute
STRUCTURE FORMATION MATTEO VIEL INAF and INFN Trieste
Images: M. Blanton. Images: M. Blanton Figures: M. Blanton & SDSS.
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles: Isolating the Evolution of
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints from the Anisotropic Clustering Analysis using BOSS DR9 (E. V. Linder, M. Oh, T. Okumura, C. G. Sabiu, Y.-S. Song) CosKASI (Cosmology group at Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) Minji Oh

Contents Motivation Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Measurements –Distances & Cosmic growth rate with Simulation Results –Combined, Northern and Southern maps of DR11 Testing Cosmology Conclusion 2015 High1

Contents Motivation Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Measurements –Distances & Cosmic growth rate with Simulation Results –Combined, Northern and Southern maps of DR11 Testing Cosmology Conclusion 2015 High1

Motivation As known, the Universe is undergoing the accelerated expansion. To understand the nature of Cosmic Acceleration(CA), which is caused by, so- called, ‘Dark energy’, several models such as cosmological constant, dynamic scalar field, and modified gravity, etc. were suggested. Among these, finding out the best description for CA is one of the most challenging problems in cosmology High1

Motivation The expansion history and Large-scale structure formation of the Universe can be used for studying the characteristics of the dark energy. Wide-deep redshift galaxy survey can provide information about the cosmic distances( D A, ) and growth rate (, ) through which the expansion and structure growth rate of the Universe can be explored High1

Contents Motivation Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Measurements –Distances & Cosmic growth rate with Simulation Results –Combined, Northern and Southern maps of DR11 Testing Cosmology Conclusion 2015 High1

Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) : Anisotropic features in the clustering pattern of galaxies in redshift space Main features –At linear regimes, Kaiser effect- squeezed clustering pattern along line of sight –At non-linear regimes, Finger of God effect- elongate clustering along line of sight caused by the random virial motions of galaxies residing at halos 2015 High1

Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Improvement in 2D Power spectrum in redshift space –Kaiser(1987) –Scoccimarro(2004) –Taruya, Nishimichi, and Saito (Improved)(2010) 2015 High1

Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Decomposition Song, Nishimichi, Taruya and Kayo(2013) 2015 High1

Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) - Comparison with simulation Song, Nishimichi, Taruya and Kayo(2013) 2015 High1

Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) From to – in more explicit form 2015 High1

Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) From to – By Fourier transformation 2015 High1 Song, Okumura and Taruya(2014)

Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) - Correlation function Song, Okumura, and Taruya(2014) - The dotted: theory with simple Kaiser and Gaussian FoG effect - The solid: the improved/ blue filled contour: the observed using simulated map - Level: (0.2, 0.06, 0.016, 0.005, 0.002, , ) 2015 High1 Landy & Szalay (1993)

Contents Motivation Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Measurements –Distances & Cosmic growth rate with Simulation Result –Combined, Northern and Southern maps of DR11 Testing Cosmology Conclusion 2015 High1

Measurement: distances Decrease D A by 10% (Thin black solid to thin blue dashed) Decrease H -1 by 10% (Thin black solid to thin blue dashed) -The BAO circle : squeezed along the transverse direction -The BAO circle : squeezed along the radial direction Song, Okumura and Taruya et al.(2013) 2015 High1

Measurement: structure formation Increase G b by 10% (Thin black solid to thin blue dashed) Increase G theta by 10% (Thin black solid to thin blue dashed) - The BAO tip points move counter-clockwise - 2D BAO circle: inv. - The BAO tip points shrink toward the pivot point - 2D BAO circle: inv. Song, Okumura and Taruya et al.(2013) 2015 High1

Measurement: cut-off S cut σ cut 2015 High1

Measurement: fitting method After fixing the shape (scale-dependence) from the early universe information (Planck prior) Fitting by rescaling the transverse and radial distances The other fitting parameters: G b, G theta, and σ p (model-independent) –σ p representing non-linear contamination to the power spectra of the density and velocity fields (FoG/ Gaussian) -↑The observed anisotropy Correlation Function using ‘LCDM concordance model’ -The theoretical C.F.↑ 2015 High1

Contents Motivation Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Measurements –Distances & Cosmic growth rate with Simulation Results –Combined, Northern and Southern map of DR11 Testing some Cosmology Conclusion 2015 High1

Data 11 th Data Release(DR) of Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), a part of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Especially on sample with Constant MASS (CMASS) Covering the redshift range z = 0.43 ~ 0.7 (On average, z ~ 0.57) over ~8,500 square deg. Containing 690,826 galaxies, 520,805 in Northern hemis phere and 170,021 in Southern hemisphere. Coordinate transformation performed using the fiducial Planck best fit flat LCDM cosmological model High1

Result - applying on BOSS DR The thin black solid represents the best fit and the thin dashed ‘LCDM concordance’model - The contour level=(0.2, 0.06, 0.016, 0.005, 0.002, , ) from the inner one 2015 High1

Result - applying on each hemisphere High1

Contents Motivation Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Measurements –Distances & Cosmic growth rate with Simulation Results –Combined, Northern and Southern maps of D11 Testing Cosmology Conclusion 2015 High1

Testing Cosmology Several consistency-check on Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology using relation between D A and General relativity and FRW using the relation between and 2015 High1

Testing Cosmology “Planck early universe prior” D A -H inv planeG theta -D A planeG theta -H inv plane 2015 High1 - Our model-independent analysis agrees within the 68% confidence level with the cosmology that assumed LCDM and GR

Contents Motivation Redshift Space Distortion(RSD) Measurements –Distances & Cosmic growth rate with Simulation Results –Combined, Northern and Southern maps of DR11 Testing Cosmology Conclusion 2015 High1

Conclusion Using BOSS DR11 CMASS sample with Planck CMB prior, model-independent 2D redshift clustering analysis allow us to: –measure the angular diameter distance DA, Hubble scale Hinv, and growth rate Gtheta, which are consistent with Planck LCDM prediction –test several cutoff on the small scale and find that convergence is achieved for >40h/Mpc –find consistency with FRW and GR within 68% CL –compare the measurements from North and South sky samples and find consistency with Planck LCDM 2015 High1 σ cut

Thank you :) 2015 High1