Development of Tungsten Injection System for High Z Impurity Transport Study in KSTAR Hyun Yong Lee 1,2 *, Suk-Ho Hong 3, Joohwan Hong 1,2, Seung Hun Lee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Plasma-Wall Interaction Task Force meeting November 2006 Lubljana, Slovenia "Interaction of a liquid Gallium jet with ISTTOK's edge plasmas: first.
Advertisements

Development of experimental devices to study first wall conditioning and transport phenomena in RFX-mod experiment Stefano Munaretto Università degli studi.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
9th TTF Spain September 11, 2002 B. J. Peterson, NIFS, Japan page 1 Radiative Collapse and Density Limit in the Large Helical Device.
Physics of Fusion Lecture 1: The basics Lecturer: A.G. Peeters.
1 CENTER for EDGE PLASMA SCIENCES C E PS Status of Divertor Plasma Simulator – II (DiPS-II) 2 nd PMIF Workshop Sep. 19, 2011 Julich, Germany H.-J. Woo.
마스터 부제목 스타일 편집 Wonho CHOE Fusion Plasma Transport Research Center (FPTRC) Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) February 18, 2014.
Design and tomography test of edge multi-energy soft X-ray diagnostics on KSTAR PPPL, Feb. 18, 2014 Juhyeok Jang*, Seung Hun Lee, H. Y. Lee, Joohwan Hong,
Shock wave propagation across the column of dusted glow discharge in different gases. A.S.Baryshnikov, I.V.Basargin, M.V.Chistyakova Ioffe Physico-Technical.
Review 2.
Development of Mach probe for the ion flow measurement in VEST
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
Physics of fusion power
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Study of D-D Reaction at the Plasma Focus Device P. Kubes, J. Kravarik, D. Klir, K. Rezac, E. Litseva, M. Scholz, M. Paduch, K. Tomaszewski, I. Ivanova-Stanik,
Conceptual Design Review Senior Design
ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
No Li No Li 47 mg 5 mg/s 10 mg/s.
PFC meeting 9-11 May 2005 PPPL CDX-U E-beam experiments on CDX-U Presented by Dick Majeski R. Kaita, T. Gray, H. Kugel, J. Spaleta, J. Timberlake, L. Zakharov.
Measurements with the KSTAR Beam Emission Spectroscopy diagnostic system Máté Lampert Wigner Research Centre for Physics Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Force on a Moving Charge A charged particle experiences a force when moving at a non-zero angle with respect to a magnetic field. The force on the charge.
Vacuum Photodiodes for Soft X-Ray ITER Tomography Yu.Gott, M.Stepanenko 10th ITPA Meeting, Moscow, 2006.
Initial wave-field measurements in the Material Diagnostic Facility (MDF) Introduction : The Plasma Research Laboratory at the Australian National University.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
Impurity transport analysis & preparation of W injection experiments on KSTAR February 18, 2014 Joohwan Hong*, Seung Hun Lee, H. Y. Lee, Juhyeok Jang,
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgements: M. G. Bell 2, R. Kaita 2, H. W. Kugel 2, R. Raman 3, A. L. Roquemore 2 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Correlation Analysis of Electrostatic Fluctuation between Central and End Cells in GAMMA 10 Y. Miyata, M. Yoshikawa, F. Yaguchi, M. Ichimura, T. Murakami.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.
TIME-RESOLVED OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY OF HIGH-TEMPERATURE PLASMAS M.J. Sadowski  , K. Malinowski , E. Skladnik-Sadowska , M. Scholtz , A. Tsarenko ¤
10th ITPA conference, Avila, 7-10 Jan Effects of High Energy Ions Accelerated in front of ICRF Antennas in LHD S. Masuzaki on behalf of the LHD Experimental.
Status of Target Injector and In-Chamber Tracking Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Neil Alexander, Gottfried Besenbruch, Tom Drake, Brian Vermillion, Bob Stemke,
H. W. Kugel 45 th APS DPP Meeting Oct 27-31, 2003, Albuquerque, NM 1 Lithium Experiments in the NSTX Boundary Physics Program H.W.Kugel, M.Bell, R.Kaita,
TPC R&D status in Japan T. Isobe, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, and M. Inuzuka Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo Contents 1.Development of a prototype.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
Pellet Charge Exchange Measurement in LHD & ITER ITPA Tohoku Univ. Tetsuo Ozaki, P.Goncharov, E.Veschev 1), N.Tamura, K.Sato, D.Kalinina and.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Probe measurements on the GOLEM tokamak Vojtech Svoboda 1, Miglena Dimitrova 2, Jan Stockel 1,2 1 Faculty of Nuclear Physics and Physical Engineering,
5.5 inch 8 inch 6 inch V = m/s Freq = Hz Independent Control:
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
20 Magnetic Field & Forces. Magnetism S N S N Extended…
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
Design of an Inertial Fusion Energy Target Injection & Tracking System Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Mike Hollins, Chuck Gibson, Neil Alexander, and Gottfried.
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
بسمه تعالی Fast Imaging of turbulent plasmas in the GyM device D.Iraji, D.Ricci, G.Granucci, S.Garavaglia, A.Cremona IFP-CNR-Milan 7 th Workshop on Fusion.
Warp LBNL Warp suite of simulation codes: developed to study high current ion beams (heavy-ion driven inertial confinement fusion). High.
2008 Science (Physics) Section A Questions, Answers and Comments.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
Compressor Helium filled optional equivalent plane imaging laser beam dump hole in mirror for e-beam SSA and more.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Erik P. Gilson** PPPL 15 th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Fusion June 9 th, 2004 Research supported.
Transverse Coherent Transition Radiation (TCTR) Experiment First Ideas for a Measurement Setup Max-Planck-Institute for Physics Munich Olaf Reimann, Scott.
For the NSTX Five-Year Research Program 2009 – 2013 M.G. Bell Facility and Diagnostic Plans.
Magnetic Fluctuations In High Density Pulsed Plasma
Study on Plasma Startup Scenario of Helical DEMO reactor FFHR-d1
Construction and Status of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus at SNU
2010 Spring Korean Physical Society
Predictive Modeling and Simulation of Charge Mobility in 2D Material Based Devices Altaf Karim Department of Physics, COMSATS Institute of Information.
Department of Nuclear Engineering Seoul National University
Design and Fabrication of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus (VEST)
Summary of activities of the pellet target development
Electron Beam Welding Welding Technology/4.3 Electron Beam Welding.
Impurity Transport Research at the HSX Stellarator
Wakefield Accelerator
1st Hg jet run with pulsed solenoid
Fig. 1 Experimental schematic and setup.
Presentation transcript:

Development of Tungsten Injection System for High Z Impurity Transport Study in KSTAR Hyun Yong Lee 1,2 *, Suk-Ho Hong 3, Joohwan Hong 1,2, Seung Hun Lee 1,2, Siwon Jang 1,2, Juhyeok Jang 1,2 Taemin Jeon 1,2, Jae Sun Park 1,2, and Wonho Choe 1,2 ** 1 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) 2 Fusion Plasma Transport Research Center (FPTRC) 3 National Fusion Research Institute (NFRI) **Corresponding author:

Candidates for the W particle injector  Laser blow-off system (C-Mod) - Well controlled temporal form of the source function - Adjustable injecting amount of particles - Difficulties : high cost (laser system), short preparation time  Pellet injection (LHD) - Can deposit impurities deep inside the confined plasma - Difficulties : designing of pellet, short preparation time  Particle dropper (NSTX) - Simple design, easy to inject W dusts into plasmas - Difficulties : A lack of install locations (need to modify passive stabilizer and upper port of KSTAR) It is required to try a simple injector system under the current condition for first W injection experiments on KSTAR.

Design of Tungsten Injection System  Design goals 1) Flight-distance of particles > 10 cm Injection system will be mounted on the manipulator The manipulator is inserted into the vacuum vessel around 10 cm away from the LCFS. 2) Compact size Gun: diameter ~ 8 mm, length ~ 50 mm Piezo-electric motor (R40NM, Piezo technology©) 3) Tolerance for strong B-field & high vacuum environments STS316 Piezo-electric motor (R40NM, Piezo technology©) 4) Reloadable system 5) Capability to inject a small amount of metal particles 10 cm

Performance Test Performance test with Cu & W 1 atm Source: 1) Cu Φ=0.2 mm, length~1 mm - Cu: Z=29, Density ~ 8.94 g/cm 3 (~20 ℃ ) 2) W Φ=0.2, 0.1 & 0.06 mm, length~1 mm - W: Z=74, Density ~ g/cm 3 (~20 ℃ ) Test menu 1) Particle amount (Cu Φ=0.2 mm, 5,10,15, 20 mg) 2) Particle size (W Φ=0.2, 0.1 & 0.06 mm, 10 mg) 3) Vacuum & B-field test Cu 0.2 mm

Experimental Set-up Target plate position: l =100 mm Central axis (y,z)=(0,0) on the target plate A piezoelectric motor moves the trigger. Pictures of deposited particles on the target plate are taken by a DSLR camera (CANON EOS 500D).

Edges 10 mm (y,z)=(0,0): central axis  evaluated from edges of injection gun (Injection gun’s diameter ~ 8 mm) 0.2 mm diameter of Cu, l = 100 mm y z Example of Performance Test To evaluate deposited locations To estimate 2-D distribution Deposited locations Cu particles on the target plate 2-D distribution image Averaged drop

Amount of particles (Cu 5,10,15, 20 mg) Target plate: 10 cm away from the injection gun Launched Cu: 5,10,15, and 20 mg of 0.2 mm diameter particles Amount of Cu reached to the target plate 5 mg: 93%, 10 mg: 88%, 15 mg: 84%, and 20 mg: 67% Distribution of Cu l = 10 cm 1) Averaged vertical drop on the target plate - 5 mg: Δz = -3.2 mm - 10 mg: Δz = -9.1 mm - 15 mg: Δz = mm - 20 mg: Δz = mm 2) Average initial velocity (v 0 ) - v 0 ~ 1.5~4.0 m/s ・ Amount of particles↑: averaged drop↑, Loss↑ Amount of Cu particles vs. Δz

20 mg15 mg Distribution of Cu on the target plate I Deposited locations of launched Cu particle on the target plate (a) 5 mg, (b) 10 mg (c) 15 mg, and (d) 20 mg 5 mg10 mg (a) (b) (c) (d)

5 mg 10 mg 20 mg 15 mg Distribution of launched Cu particle on the target plate (a) 5 mg, (b) 10 mg (c) 15 mg, and (d) 20 mg (a) (b) (c) (d) Distribution of Cu on the target plate II

Target plate: 10 cm away from the injection gun Launched W particles  0.2, 0.1 & 0.06 mm, (10 mg x 5 times = 50 mg) Amount of particles reached to the target plate  Less than 2 mg (< 5%) Distribution of l = 10 cm 1) Averaged vertical drop at the target plate mm: Δz = mm mm: Δz = mm mm: Δz = mm 2) Average initial velocity (v 0 ): ignoring air resistance - v 0 ~ 2.3 m/s ・ In the case of W, particle size does not affect change of averaged drop Particle size (W 0.2, 0.1 & 0.06 mm)

0.06 Deposited locations of launched W particle on the target plate (a) 0.2 mm, (b) 0.1 mm, and (c) 0.06 mm (a) (b) (c) Distribution of W on the target plate I

Distribution of launched W particle on the target plate (a) 0.2 mm, (b) 0.1 mm, and (c) 0.06 mm (a) (b) (c) Distribution of W on the target plate II

Discussion (Cu vs. W) Distribution - Cu is much broaden than W - The case of heavy particle has a narrow distribution (see error-bars) Amount 1) Cu: amount ↑ averaged drop ↑ 2) W: amount ↑ averaged drop → W: Particle size does not affect increase of averaged drop ϕ vs. averaged drop

Vacuum test Injection gun was operated by ~ 6x10 -6 Torr (Torr) ◯/☓◯/☓ 3.0x10 -2 ◯ 6.0x10 -3 ◯ 5.0x10 -5 ◯ 1.5x10 -5 ◯ 5.6x10 -6 ◯ Injection gun

B-field test B-field test of piezo-electric motor was performed with a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) device A piezo-electric motor was operated under 7 Tesla of magnetic field → It is enough to use in KSTAR environ ment NMR device 7 Center NMR device Piezo-electric motor Schematic view

Summary  A tungsten injection system for KSTAR plasma is under developmen t and a performance test was carried out. - Source: Cu (0.2mm diameter) & W (0.2, 0.1 & 0.06 mm diameter) - Distance to the target plate: atm. 1) Flight-distance of particles > 10 cm ✔ (v 0 ~ m/s) - Distribution: narrow (heavy particle), broaden (light particle) - Effect of amount & size of particles: small (heavy particle), large (light particle) 2) Compact size ✔ 3) Tolerance for strong B-field (< 7 T) ✔ high vacuum (~ 6x10 -6 Torr) environments ✔ 4) Reloadable system Δ 5) Capability to inject a small amount of metal particles Δ

Future work & Discussion  Future work 1) Performance test in vacuum environment (W Φ = 24 & 12 μm) 2) Optimization of injection amount, position and impurity size (considering pellet type) 3) Finding reloadable injecting condition using tiny W dusts ( μm)  Discussion 1) Amount of injecting particles 2) Adopting dropper system for future experiments (vertical & horizontal injection at the same time)