Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Evaluating the Impact of Part D on Beneficiaries: Early Lessons Susan Payne Institute for Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Figure 0 The Transition of Dual Eligibles to Medicare Drug Coverage: Implications for Beneficiaries.
Advertisements

Solution in Drug Plan Management 2011 September 8, 2011 Basil Rowe Vice President, Total Rewards and Shared Services Shoppers Drug Mart
Introduction to Medicaid Roger Auerbach Rutgers Center for State Health Policy Regional Housing Conference September 10, 2003.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● February 2011 ● No. 12 Dual Eligibles Across the States In 2008, dual eligibles as a percent of the total Medicare.
Donald Mack, M.D. Ohio State University Medical Center Gregg Warshaw, M.D. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.
Challenges of Serving Low-income Medicare Beneficiaries: Impact of Cost Sharing Cindy Parks Thomas Brandeis University Schneider Institute for Health Policy.
Opportunities to Leverage HIT for Medicaid Reform in New York Rachel Block, United Hospital Fund C. William Schroth, NYS Department of Health eHealth Initiative.
Healthy Indiana Plan Hoosier Innovation: Health Savings Accounts 1992: Hoosier pioneers medical savings accounts 2003: Tax advantaged HSAs authorized.
Medication Therapy Management: Methods to Increase Comprehensive Medication Review Participation Harrell T, RPh, Diaz M, PharmD Candidate, Ortega Y, PharmD.
New York State EPIC Program January 2012 Changes.
2.11 Conduct Medication Management University Medical Center Health System Lubbock, TX Jason Mills, PharmD, RPh Assistant Director of Pharmacy.
Access Denied? The Medicare Part D Benzodiazepine Challenge and Maine’s Coverage Solution. Stacie Sparkman Medicare Prescription Drug Specialist Eastern.
MEDICARE: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Department of Sociology & Anthropology.
Using Linked Data to Track Participation in the Medicaid Buy-In Program Henry T. Ireys Su Liu The Future of Disability Statistics: What We Know and Need.
Deciphering Medicare Part D Susan Miller, Patient Education Douglas A. Magenheim, MD, MBA, FACP.
Mercy Care Advantage HMO SNP
Meeting the Medication Needs of Iowans: the IowaCare Pilot Pharmaceutical Program and UIHC Medication Assistance Center Lisa Mascardo, PharmD Assistant.
© 2005 National Mental Health Association The Medicare Drug Benefit: What Is It and What Does it Mean for Mental Health? Get Educated, Get Enrolled An.
Self-Select Voluntary Separation Program (SSVSP) 1.
Section 5: Public Health Insurance Programs Medicare Medical Assistance (Medicaid) MinnesotaCare General Assistance Medical Care (GAMC) Minnesota Comprehensive.
Medicare Prescription Drug Coverage Extra Help with Medicare Prescription Drug Costs for Those Who Need it Most.
Medicare Prescription Drug Coverage. What’s Different About Prescription Drug Information? One size does not fit all, more than ever before Distinct messages.
Medicare Modernization Act, Part D Prescription Drug Benefit Presentation for County Program Administrators September 1, 2005.
Special Needs Plans Susan Nedza, M.D., M.B.A. Chief Medical Officer, CMS Chicago Regional Office March 23, 2006.
California Department of Health Services California Dual Eligibles’ Transition to Medicare Part D Presentation to National Medicaid Congress by Teresa.
Joint Informational Hearing The Federal Medicare Prescription Drug Act: State Readiness, Implementation, and Consumer Issues Bonnie Burns, Training and.
1 State Perspectives on Medicare Part D: Lessons from Pharmacy Plus Programs Cindy Parks Thomas Donald Shepard Christine E. Bishop Daniel M. Gilden Brandeis.
© 2005 National Mental Health Association The Medicare Drug Benefit: What Is It and What Does it Mean for Mental Health?
Q&A Public Benefits. What is Circuit Breaker? How does it work? Circuit Breaker is a program run through the Illinois Department on Aging that provides.
Affordable Care Act Aging Network Opportunities Judy Baker Regional Director Health and Human Services October 18, 2010.
Medicare 101 Module 1B. Medicare 101 9/18/20152 Medicare 101 Introduction to Medicare Original Medicare Medicare Supplement Insurance (Medigap) Medicare.
1 South Carolina Medicaid Coordinated Care and Enrollment Counselors Programs.
Current Process for Enrolling Dual Eligibles Kenneth D. Nibali, Consultant on Social Security Former Associate Commissioner for Disability with the Social.
STATE PERSPECTIVES ON IMPLEMENTATION OF MEDICARE PART D: COORDINATING MEDICARE AND MEDICAID COVERAGE THROUGH SPECIAL NEEDS PLANS James M. Verdier Mathematica.
AdultBasic…. Health Insurance for Adult Pennsylvanians Patricia Stromberg Deputy Commissioner of CHIP and adultBasic Pennsylvania Department of Insurance.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 22, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
Pennsylvania’s CHIP Expansion to Cover All Uninsured Kids.
High Plains Educational Cooperative 10/1/2015 Open Enrollment August 5 th & 6 th, 2015.
TOP IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES: WHERE WE ARE NOW AND SOLUTIONS FOR THE FUTURE John T. Tighe, III, CEO
40,000 volunteers staffed more than 50,000 enrollment events across the country 90 percent of people with Medicare have drug coverage More than 80 percent.
1 Passport Advantage A Special Needs Plan for Dual Eligibles April 20, 2006.
Medicaid Managed Care Program for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Pamela Coleman Texas Health and Human Services Commission January 2003.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Our first care is your health care Arizona Health Care Cost Containment.
CSC Proprietary 1 Analytic Resources on DAVE People: Technical Expert Panel Analytic Workgroup Statistical and infrastructure support within the DAVE team.
Avalere Health LLC | The intersection of business strategy and public policy The Medicare Modernization Act: The Impact on States and Low-Income Beneficiaries.
Implications of the 2003 Medicare law for older adults and people with disabilities Translating “Legislative Sausage” into Understandable Choices Diane.
Figure 1 K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Dual Eligibles: The Basics Barbara Lyons, Ph.D. Director, Kaiser Commission on.
1 Cost Sharing for Low-Income Beneficiaries and Supplementing Part D Examples from Pharmacy Plus Medicaid Demonstration Programs Summit for State Health.
Medicaid Lecture 15A Medicaid Established in 1965 along with Medicare Medicaid is a federal and state program that helps low income and disabled individuals.
Rx Coverage, Use and Spending Among US Seniors: Where Did Things Stand on the Eve of Part D Implemention & How Can This Inform Us Now? Presented at: AcademyHealth.
1 State Options for Supplementing Medicare Part D Drug Coverage Invitational Summit on Medicare Part D Implementation Issues Jack Hoadley Georgetown University.
Benefit Programs Which Can Help You Transition to Employment Concurrent Session 2C Advancing Inclusion: The Future of State Government for Persons with.
Exhibit 1. A Majority of Adults Who Are Potentially Eligible for the Affordable Care Act’s Insurance Options Are Aware of the Marketplaces and Financial.
Special Needs Plans Sandra Bastinelli, MS, RN Acting Director, Division of Special Programs Medicare Advantage Group Center for Beneficiary Choices.
Avalere Health LLC | The intersection of business strategy and public policy The Impact of Enrollment in the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit on Premiums.
State Responses to Medicare Part D Presented by: Kimberley Fox, Senior Policy Analyst, Institute for Health Policy Academy Health Annual Research Meeting.
Ashley Steffen Spalding University Healthcare Policy and Regulation Final Presentation November 18 th, 2015 Long-term Care in Medicaid.
Medicare Open Enrollment For Coverage in 2016 Starts October 15, 2015 Ends December 7, MEDICARE Medicare.gov.
Managed Care Nursing Facility Quality Initiatives February 2, 2015.
Www2.illinois.gov/hfs 11 Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Medicaid Managed Long Term Services and Supports (MLTSS) Implementation.
Implications of Medicare Part D on Pennsylvania Medicaid
manatt | phelps | phillips
Kandeke C, Chibuta C, Banda D
Presented by Jim Grant, MA Physician Practice Pharmacy QIOSC FMQAI
67th Annual HSFO Conference Louisville, KY
2018 Employee Benefits 5 October 2017
State Implementation of MMA
Presented by Tricia Neuman, Sc.D.
Medicare Prescription Drug Congress November 2, 2005 MMA Implementation: MMA Part D Long Term Care Implementation.
Presentation transcript:

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Evaluating the Impact of Part D on Beneficiaries: Early Lessons Susan Payne Institute for Health Policy Muskie School of Public Service 2006 Academy Health Annual Research Meeting Seattle, Washington

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Objectives To describe the early impact of an outreach and education effort to encourage Part D enrollment To draw lessons for evaluating the impact of Part D on beneficiaries

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Experience of MaineCare Workers with Disabilities -- Dual Eligibles -- before and during the Transition from Medicaid to Medicare Part D Authors: Carolyn Gray and Larry Glantz Consultants: Kim Fox and Susan Payne Funded by CMS

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy The Workers with Disabilities option (aka WWD Option, Working Disabled, or Medicaid Buy In) Enables workers with disabilities to earn up to 250% Federal Poverty Level and still keep MaineCare (Maine Medicaid) benefits Eligibility Meet Social Security guidelines for a disability Have a job Meet financial guidelines More info at

Buy In participants are dual eligibles – Medicare and MaineCare. Nationally, 36% of Medicare beneficiaries are dual eligibles. They tend to have fewer financial resources, more health problems, and higher health care costs than other Medicare beneficiaries.

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Special outreach was in addition to assistance from MaineCare to all dual eligibles Informational phone calls: Provided basic information about the transition to raise awareness and provide resource information Brochures and mailings: Information on what the change means for duals, how to decide what plan is best, potential problems getting medications, and how to resolve issues Informational sessions and video: Targeted sessions for service providers and for duals about transition to Part D Webpage: Disability-specific information and resources linked to the state’s Medicare Part D website

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Survey to assess special outreach efforts to Buy-In Members Supported by CMS Phone interviews conducted in March, 2006, 66 questions. Knowledge about Part D, evaluation of outreach and education efforts, experience so far in using it $5 prepaid phone card offered as an incentive Average time of 15 minutes 60% response rate: 299/501

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Caveats Self reported information -- not validated Emergency coverage (“wrap”) was in effect -- measures impact on enrollment

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Results There was a high level of reported enrollment – 87%. There was still some lack of knowledge…..

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Letters and news/newspapers most common source of information In person assistance the most helpful.....

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy 85% had tried to buy medications under Part D. Of those % had problems getting a prescription filled 15% had to switch to a different medication 4% had to switch to a different pharmacy 8% said the change in coverage affected their health There was some confusion and lack of information about enrollment.

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Conclusions There will be a continuing need for personalized outreach and education to beneficiaries. It is feasible to get information from beneficiaries on Part D by phone.

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Evaluation of the MaineCare Preferred Drug List : Preliminary results Authors: Susan Payne, Robert Keith, Deborah Thayer, and Erika Ziller Funded by: Maine Department of Health and Human Services and Edmund S. Muskie School of Public Service

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Objective To evaluate the impact of the MaineCare (Maine Medicaid) Preferred Drug List (PDL) on Continuity of medication use Potentially drug-related adverse event rates

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Data and methods Design: Retrospective observational study Population: MaineCare members eligible for full benefits for >5 months during the study period who were enrolled prior to April 1, 2003 Data: MaineCare and Medicare administrative data. Due to data limits, this report covers MaineCare only group (n= c. 200,000) Study period: January, 2003, through June, 2004 (18 months pre PDL, 18 months post PDL) Medications: 67 higher-volume medications, with medications consistently classified and used as either preferred or non-preferred during the study period Analysis: Descriptive statistics, graphs, and Poisson regression analysis

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Preliminary results: Continuity Members discontinued medications frequently before the PDL was introduced. There were different patterns by medication: Changes in medication discontinuity from pre-PDL to full PDL implementation period (n=67) Number and percent of Therapeutic subclasses with… Preferred medications Non-preferred medications Increase in discontinuity38.9%91.0% No change9.0%3.0% Decrease in discontinuity52.2%6.0% Total100.0%

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Adverse events -- deaths, drug-related falls, adverse drug reactions, emergency visits, hospital and nursing home admissions There were no apparent trends in adverse event rates when all members were studied. Trends did show up when smaller groups were studied.

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Looking at the subgroup of members who discontinued a drug after it was put on the PDL….. Rates for some adverse events got Better (dropped) after the PDL was implemented: emergency visits Stayed the same: deaths, falls, adverse drug reactions, nursing facility admissions Got worse (increased): hospital admissions

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Conclusions Include a broad range of therapeutic classes of medications. Compare use and switching patterns before and after Part D. Document changes in formularies over time OR study only medications that were consistently classified.

Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Study subgroups. Include a variety of outcomes. Account for related measures. Medicaid was a great source of information on members’ medication use prior to Part D. This emphasizes the importance of current, comprehensive data on medication use after Part D.