Unit 2 Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications for Math Instruction Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Illustrating the 3 Shifts K-1 Common Core Lead Teachers Spring 2012.
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Focus Grade 3.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Coherence. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School.
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Focus. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers.
CCSS Mathematics Instructional Shifts 2 nd Grade Overview.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 5.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 3.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Common Core State Standards Wolcott Elementary School West Hartford Public Schools.
The Instructional Advances in ELA/Literacy CCR Standards for Adult Education Unit 1 Connecting the College and Career Readiness Standards to the Key Advances.
Unit 4 Creating High-Quality Writing Prompts Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Unit 3 Identifying Questions Worth Answering Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Common Core State Standards Focus on Math Training Module II.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
CCSS Community Forum: Elementary Mathematics Presented by: Brian Byrne SPS Curriculum Associate for Elementary Math
Unit 1 Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
Unit 3 Engaging the Three Components of Rigor Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: The Key Shifts.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 2.
PARCC Assessment Math Shifts Becky Justus Math Teacher Greene County Tech Junior High PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member.
UNDERSTANDING CCSS AND K- 12 INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS IN MATH Jamie Sirois, Cooperative Middle School, Statham, NH Adapted From: Maxine Mosely CCRS 101 NH-CCRS.
MATHEMATICS. Number and Operations K 12 Measurement and Geometry K 12 Algebra and Functions K 12 Statistics and Probability Traditional U.S. Approach.
Instructional Shifts for Mathematics. achievethecore.org 2 Instructional Shifts in Mathematics 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the Standards focus. 2.Coherence:
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW The Shifts: What they are and why they are important.
Exploration of Key Instructional Advances in Mathematics Mimi Alkire of StandardsWork, Inc. U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical, and.
Understanding the Shifts in the Common Core State Standards A Focus on Mathematics Wednesday, October 19 th, :00 pm – 3:30 pm Doug Sovde, Senior.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Unit 2 Selecting Texts Worth Reading Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
 Declining US competitiveness with other developed countries  Largely flat performance on NAEP over the past 40 years  High rates of college remediation.
 Common Core State Standards Or College and Career State Standards CCSS.
Office of Curriculum and Professional Learning Elementary Division Parent Leadership Academy Workshop Overview of Common Core Standards and Smarter Balanced.
Welcome! U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education StandardsWork, Inc. New Orleans April 1—2, 2014.
The Importance of Coherent Lessons in Elementary Mathematics Linda Schoenbrodt, MSDE, Elementary Programs Specialist October, 2014.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Cutler Middle School February 4, 2014 Cutler Middle School February 4, 2014.
Teachers today must prepare students for a world of possibilities that may not currently exist. The workforce of tomorrow must be flexible, motivated,
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Unit 4 Connecting Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork,
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Mathematics Shifts and Integration of Initiatives Common Core State Standards Session 2 K-5 Mathematics.
+ College and Career Readiness. December present 46 of 50 states adopt Common Core Common Core State Standards.
CCGPS Mathematics Georgia Department of Education Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent June 27, 2012  In CCGPS mathematics, content is divided.
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
1.Mathematical Practice Standards 2.Mathematical Content Standards Link Part 2: Mathematical Practices.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
Grades K-2 Guidebook and Remediation Guidance. Please have open on your computer: -Session Power Point -Grades K-2 Math GuidebookGrades K-2 Math Guidebook.
Common Core Math Introduction Part 1: Instructional Shifts.
Key Advances, Math Practices, and Translating Math Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Curriculum and Instruction.
Common Core Confessions of a Math Teacher. So, what is this Common Core thing all about? The standards define the knowledge and skills students should.
Secondary Math Olympia School District Fall 2015.
The College and Career Readiness Standards: An Brief Overview Troy Goracke, Program Administrator;
Providing a Mathematically Rich Common Core Classroom Please add a sticky dot to represent YOU on the following charts: – On the Road to Implementation.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
EnVisionMATH Common Core K-8 Publisher’s Criteria for the Common Core State Standards.
Key Advances, Math Practices, and Translating Math Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Curriculum and Instruction.
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
Common Core State Standards and Disciplinary Literacy
Welcome to the Math SBAC Parent Information Session
Why New Standards?   Why did the state adopt the Common Core State Standards and embed them into Colorado Academic Standards. This video shares the importance.
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Presentation transcript:

Unit 2 Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor, Reingold, Inc. December 2014 The Instructional Advances in Mathematics CCR Standards for Adult Education

The Three Key Advances Prompted by the CCR Standards 2 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the CCR Standards focus. 2.Coherence: Design learning around coherent progressions from level to level. 3.Rigor: Pursue conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application—all with equal intensity.

Unit 2 Objectives Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning  Understand the research base that explains the importance of coherence in standards and curricula.  Extend understanding about the focus of content in each level to include coherence within and across the levels.  Develop an understanding of the progressions of critical concepts across the CCR levels as a foundation for developing a coherent and rigorous mathematics curriculum. 3

4 Rationale for Coherence Relevance and Importance Based on the Research Research emanating from TIMSS and the ACT National Curriculum Survey support the premise that coherent standards and curricula are important for college and career readiness:  Coherence allows students to demonstrate new understanding built on foundations from previous study.  Coherence prevents standards from being a list of isolated topics.  Coherence means that each standard is not a new event, but rather an extension of previous learning.

Implications of Coherence on Instruction  Content unfolds meaningfully.  Connections between concepts are made both within and across the levels.  Students and teachers expect knowledge and skills to build and grow. 5

6 Now let’s do some hands-on work with coherence …

Materials  Directions for Participants  Resource: Major Work of the Levels  Resource: CCR Standards for Adult Education  Resource: Color-coded set of standards cards 7

1.Identify the progression topic to which each color-coded group of standards belongs: fluency with operations, expressions and equations, or real-world applications. 2.Begin with the fluency (blue) cards. Use knowledge of how concepts and skills build on one another to organize the color-coded cards in a logical order of progression from the lowest to the highest level. 3.Use knowledge of the CCR Standards and the Unit 1 resource, Major Work of the Levels, to help identify the level (A, B, C, D, or E) for each standard on a fluency card. 8 Directions

4.Share results with others at your table, and discuss any points of agreement and disagreement. 5.Repeat steps 2 through 4 for expressions and equations (yellow) and real-world applications (green) cards. 9 Directions (Continued)

Reflections 10  What have you learned from the activity about coherence across the levels?  Did you find some examples of coherence within a level?  What connections between “thinking across the levels” and “focusing where the standards focus” do you see?  How might you apply what you learned to your classrooms?  Why do you think some standards appear in more than one of the progressions?

Next Steps  How has participating in this activity changed your thinking about the CCR standards?  How will you use the information and understanding you have acquired to improve your teaching practice and student learning?  What additional training and tools would strengthen your ability to do so? 11