The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning

Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132 School Districts 3 PennDOT Districts 10 Transit Agencies

SPC Roles and Responsibilities As MPO, SPC is responsible for planning and prioritizing the use of all state and federal transportation funds allocated to the region. Legal Obligations include preparation of Long Range Plan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Air Quality Conformity Determination Partners within the region 60 Commissioners on the Governing Board 10 County Planning Offices City of Pittbsurgh 3 PennDOT Districts 10 Transit Authorities, and other State and Federal Agencies 550 municipalities School Districts, COGs, Advocacy Groups and others

 Twenty five year vision for the region  Identifies what we want the region to be in the year 2040  Creates vision, and goals for the region  Generally does not include specific projects  If projects are identified, they must be “fiscally constrained”

 Four year program of projects to be advanced.  The TIP lists specific projects  If a project is federally funded, regionally significant or meets certain other criteria, it must be identified on the TIP.  TIP must be “fiscally constrained”

 Anticipated revenues from known sources are projected ◦ Federal formula funds - allocated based on land area, lane miles of roadways, number of bridges, population, etc., can be loosely projected into the future ◦ Federal discretionary funds - traditional levels of funding are often used as rough guides.  CMAQ traditionally brings about $25 million to the region each year. ◦ Other recurring funding programs at state and federal levels

 Not all funding sources are consistent, from year to year  Net Present Value of future funds must be calculated  FHWA Federal Aid Highway Program includes more than 90 funding programs and projects ◦ Not all are available in every region ◦ Some are formula based, some are discretionary (aka competitive) ◦ Different programs and funding sources might have different rules, eligibility, etc.

 In Pennsylvania, transportation funding comes from a variety of sources, including: federal funds (highway and transit), liquid fuels taxes, licenses and fees, transfers from the Pennsylvania Turnpike, sales tax, lottery proceeds, General Fund monies, and other, more minor sources.

 Most federal funding for highways and transit originates from the federal Highway Trust Fund (HTF). Since it was established in 1956, the HTF has generally provided stable, reliable, and substantial highway and transit funding.  However, that stability and adequacy has diminished in recent years. The major sources of revenue to the Highway Trust Fund are the federal 18.4-cent per gallon tax on gasoline and the 24.4-cent per gallon tax on diesel fuel. These user fees have not been increased since  As fuel prices increase, fuel sales decrease, tax revenues decrease

 The Fuel Tax Conundrum: less fuel usage means less revenue  TIP – $1.5 billion  TIP - $1.25 billion - 21% Reduction

Status of the Federal Highway Account Trust Fund * Assumes 2% annual growth in highway program obligation limitation

Anticipated Funding through 2040  The 2040 Transportation and Development Plan for Southwestern Pennsylvania (the regional Long Range Plan) estimates that $17.2 billion will be available for highways, bridges and other non-transit programs from now through the year 2040 for the SPC region. ◦ Bridge Capital Maintenance: $8.04 Billion; 51% ◦ Roadway Capital Maintenance: $4.03 Billion; 25% ◦ Traffic Operations & Safety: $3.23 Billion, 20% ◦ New Capacity, Highways & Bridges: $601 Million, 4%

 A four year program of projects  Most projects are individually listed, although some projects may be included in “line items” for later identification  Fiscal constraint requires that we know exact project details and phasing, so we have the money to do the project as we need it, but no money sits around waiting to be used.  The future costs of a given project must be determined. This is the “year of expenditure” cost of a project.

 By the Numbers: (Southwestern PA Region) ◦ 2,163 - Number of miles of state-maintained roads in poor condition in Southwestern PA ◦ $1.2 Billion – Backlog of road repairs needed ◦ 1,482 - Structurally deficient bridges ◦ 51 – Average age of local owned bridge ◦ $5.8 billion – Backlog of bridge repairs needed

 Extensive Infrastructure/Basic Maintenance Needs ◦ Bridge Conditions (both State and Local) ◦ Continued Maintenance of Roads (State and Local) ◦ Construction Costs are up % from  Limited State & Federal Funds ◦ No adjustment in funding levels since 1993 ◦ Federal Authorization pending (currently under extension)

 Dedicated sources of funds ◦ Transportation Enhancement (TE) Program  Region has completed approximately $53 million in TE projects  Approximately $14 million in TE projects remain to be completed  Existing projects need to be completed before region will receive funds for new projects; the last competitive round of TE funding was in 2006 ◦ Safe Routes to School Program  Falls under the TE program for most intents and purposes  Most recent funding round provided $3 million to region

 Competitive Funding Sources  Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative (PCTI) ◦ Region received $55 million in funding  CMAQ Program ◦ Biennial funding program  Region gets approximately $100 million every four years  Recent reduction to approximately $80 million for TIP  Regionally competitive program

 Goal is to reduce Congestion and/or improve Air Quality  Most of SPC region is eligible for funding based on federal standards of air quality  Requests for funding often exceed available funds by 200 or 300 percent  Projects are assessed for air quality benefit, and then reviewed by a CMAQ Evaluation Committee  CMAQ Evaluation Committee ranks projects, makes recommendations to SPC Transit Operators Committee and Transportation Technical Committee

 Other Sources of funding for Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodation  Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) ◦ PennDOT allocates funds for safety improvements in accordance with goals as articulated in the State Highway Safety Plan (per federal regulations) ◦ In 2006 PA Coordinated Highway Safety Plan, Pedestrian Safety was one of the “Vital Six” goals.  Bicycle safety was identified as an “additional goal”  Assigned a priority of 12 ◦ In 2010 PA Highway Safety Plan, neither pedestrians nor bicycles are identified as a priority goal, although the reduction of pedestrian fatalities related to motor vehicle crashes remains a Core Performance Measure.

 Allocation of HSIP funds in Pennsylvania  Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds are allocated to each region based on lane miles, vehicle miles traveled, fatalities and reportable crashes.  The project selection criteria are “set” by the goals, strategies and core performance measures of the PA Highway Safety Plan. The reduction of the most severe accidents, and those resulting the gravest injury (or fatality) are prioritized.  SPC region receives about $9 million annually

 The region makes funding decisions collaboratively.  The programming of transportation funds is the responsibility of the Transportation Technical Committee (TTC)  Responsibility for the transit portion of the regional TIP is one of the primary responsibilities of the Transit Operators Committee (TOC).  The Transportation Technical Committee, and the Transit Operators Committee, have the responsibility of making recommendations to the SPC Board (the Commission).