Writing for National Board Certification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Advertisements

IncentivesPlus I+NB Meeting – Jan. 30,  1: Teachers are Committed to Students and Their Learning  2: Teachers Know the Subjects They Teach and.
By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
National Board Support Review of Entry 4 and Creating Videos and Writing Tips November 16, 2012.
What is Author's Chair? This strategy provides a way for readers to share with each other the excitement of a particular moment in relation to a book.
PATHWISE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION SYSTEM
Critical Thinking. Critical thinking Critical Thinking Critical thinking has to do with evaluating information and determining how to interpret information:
Liberty for All? Opposing Viewpoints on Democracy American History Foundations August 10, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
Definitions – John Dewey
Office of School Support
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Writing Instructional Objectives
Assessment Strategies Visual Tools EDUC 4454 P/J Methods.
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: K-5 Teachers.
Chapter One – Thinking as a Writer
Reflective Writing Beth Metcalf Teacher-in-Residence UNCW Watson School of Education.
Writing for National Board CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Copyright VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Welcome National Board Candidates Welcome National Board Candidates Sign in. Pick up the handouts, your name.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Writing Analytically.
NBPTS the 2 nd day A closer look at the certificate standards for ASTL 6325.
Critical Thinking.
Copyright VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Welcome National Board Candidates Sign in. Pick up the handouts and your name tag. Turn in one copy of your.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
Bell Ringer What did you do to motivate students in the first few weeks of school?
© Department of Secondary Education, 2007 National Board Candidate Support Session 4 CSU Fullerton College of Education.
MATH COMMUNICATIONS Created for the Georgia – Alabama District By: Diane M. Cease-Harper, Ed.D 2014.
Writing a Personal Narrative. What is a Personal Narrative? A Personal Narrative is a form of writing in which the writer relates an event, incident,
Presentation 1 Roles for Discussing Student Work There are four roles for discussing student work: Presenting Teacher Participant Recorder Facilitator.
Constructed Response Developing this writing practice as part of ongoing classroom assessment The value of constructed response is that it is teaching.
Take One! January 28, How Do I Become A “Good” Teacher?
CCS Support Session Saturday Dec. 14, 2013 WRITING INSTRUCTION AND ANALYZING STUDENT WORK.
Copyright VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Welcome National Board Candidates Welcome National Board Candidates Sign in. Pick up your name tag and a playing.
Practical Suggestions for Success Lois Yocum, Ph.D. University of Arkansas – Fort Smith.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
1 Personalizing Student Learning in YOUR Classroom Gathering the EVIDENCE required to complete Professional Certification Washington State Professional.
Sketch noting. EXAMPLES OF SKETCHNOTING Writing a Reflective Essay English 20.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
No warm-up; instead, prepare for doom…. REMINDERS  Any/all late work from September are due Wednesday.  After this, no late work will be accepted. 
Writing a Personal Narrative
1 of 7 Data interpretation Copyright © AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. Disclaimer This is an example of a teaching aid to support learning.
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
IncentivesPlus TAKEONE! LNI – December 17, 2009.
Analyzing Student Work – Whole Class
National Board Candidate Support Session 3
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Writing a Personal Narrative
Reaching Out, Pushing Away
Understanding by Design
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Welcome National Board Candidates 
Welcome National Board Candidates 
Writing a Personal Narrative
The Framework for Teaching
Writing a Personal Narrative
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Component 2 Differentiation In Instruction Session 3
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
JUSTIFIED LIST.
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
10th Literature October 31st
Assessing My Writing with Portfolios
Writing for NBPTS Commentaries
Critiquing Qualitative Research
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
National Board Cohort Meeting Six.
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

Writing for National Board Certification

Three Types of Writing Descriptive Analytical Reflective All three types of writing will be featured in each section of your portfolio.

Qualities of Descriptive Writing Descriptive writing is a retelling of what happened in a classroom situation. This kind of writing should allow the reader to visualize and understand what the teacher is describing. It “sets the scene” for the assessors.

Description is called for when the entry prompt uses verbs like state, list, describe, what, when, where or which. For example: “What are the relevant features of your teaching setting that influenced your selection of this assessment/prompt and these students?”

When a teacher is asked to describe, his or her response should meet these criteria: accurate and precise enumeration and/or explanation; clear and logical ordering of the elements or features of the event, person, concept, of strategy described; and inclusion of supporting features or elements that would allow an outsider to “see” whatever is described.

Qualities of Analytical Writing Analysis depends on the interpretations the teacher made of what happened, examination of why the elements or events described are the way they are. It shows assessors the thought processes the teacher employed to arrive at the conclusions made about a teaching situation.

Analysis is called for when a prompt asks how, why, or in what way(s) Analysis is called for when a prompt asks how, why, or in what way(s). Analysis is required when teachers are asked: to identify a particularly successful moment in a sample of teaching and why they regard it as successful; for a rational; or what a student performance suggests about their teaching.

When a teacher is asked to analyze, his/her response should meet these criteria: the subject ( work sample/videotape)of the analysis should be available to the reader; the focus of his/her writing is not on what happened (descriptive) but rather on why and how it happened (analytical).

Analytical Writing Focuses on why and is grounded in evidence Offers: reasons, motives and rationales, interpretations, concrete evidence, significance of evidence, and conclusions reached. Example: How did you present the material?

Qualities of Reflective Writing Reflection, a particular kind of analysis, always suggests self-analysis, or consideration of practice. Reflection includes written consideration of what a teacher will do next time-based on his/her analysis of what happened and why it happened that way.

Reflection is called for when the entry prompt asks the teachers: to consider the successes of their lessons, and what they would do differently and why.

When the teacher is asked to reflect, his/her response should meet these criteria: the focus of his/her writing is not on what happened (descriptive) but rather why it happened (analytical) and how it will influence future instruction.

Reflection serves as the “glue” of the portfolio and gives substance to the evidences provided and guides the assessor to a deeper understanding.

Examples of Reflective Questions: What worked? What needs improving? What conclusions can you make? What next? Give them about 10 minutes to discuss. 10 minutes to share

Reflective Phrases to Incorporate into your writing: Upon reflection… After observation… The significance of this activity… This comment tell me that… It is important for me to realize that… This is significant because… This activity prompted me to… These comments indicate… This could be more effective if… This helped me to recognize that… Continuing to reflect… I realized that…

More Phrases The evidence of this collaboration was… The intent of my question was… This helped me to refocus on… I chose this goal to … I now realize that… The test results helped me to… I chose this goal because… I recognize differences and now know…

Things to Remember! Audience Standards Voice Bias Clear writing Evidence

A Few More Tips! Follow the sequence of the questions/prompts Be clear, concise and consistent Review rubric 4 The “proof is in the pudding”! 30-45 minutes

Questions