Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Follow-Up Reports Linda Suskie Website: 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Evaluator 102: An Introduction to Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Chairs & Evaluators Workshop: Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Writing the Team Report Chairs and Evaluators Workshop.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Understanding Middle States Expectations for Assessment
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations Part II MSCHE 2009 Annual Conference Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie.
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2010 Debra G. Klinman Vice President, MSCHE.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs)
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Enhancing Excellence in Assessment: Being Successful with MSCHE Standards 7 & 14 Deborah Moeckel Nancy Willie-Schiff SUNY Council on Assessment November.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
Choosing AQIP to Propel Your Accreditation. AQIP Staff and Support Stephen D. Spangehl Anita Daniel Mary Fleming Charles Dull Lynn Priddy Rozumalski.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Orientation Compliance Certification Report Thursday, September 30, – 11:00AM 209 Main Building.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
MSCHE Expectations for Governance Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference December 12, 2011.
RISE Grant: Proposal Writing Workshop UAF RISE Board February 21, 2014.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
What the *!# Is Middle States Looking For? A Review of Standards 7 and 14—Institutional & Student Learning Assessment Presentation to the Association of.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
What Does Middle States Want? Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia PA Web:
M4 - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Multi-Purpose Projects Module M4: Telling the Plan Formulation Story.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.
Preparing a Written Report Prepared by: R Bortolussi MD FRCPC and Noni MacDonald MD FRCPC.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
BILL TRACKING & FISCAL NOTES Becka Johnson Poppe Senior Legislative Analyst Office of Planning & Budgeting January 6, 2016.
SELF STUDY: COUNTDOWN TO THE TEAM VISIT MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE – 2009 Debra Klinman.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
How to Help Your Evaluation Team Help You: Peer Review and your ACCJC External Visiting team Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Dolores Davison—Area B Representative.
Assessment and Accreditation Deborah Moeckel Campus Senior Staff Orientation Albany, NY November 17, 2014.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
9 tips for writing a school policy
Accreditation Pathway
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Follow-Up Reports Linda Suskie Website: MSCHE Annual Conference Washington DC

MSCHE Guidelines Click on Policies on left side. Click on Policies on left side. Scroll down to Follow-Up Reports & Visits Scroll down to Follow-Up Reports & Visits

What is Follow-Up? Progress report Progress report Monitoring report Monitoring report Supplemental report Supplemental report Commission liaison guidance visit Commission liaison guidance visit Small team visit Small team visit

Why Did You Get a Follow-Up? Concern about compliance with Concern about compliance with –Standard(s) –Requirement(s) of Affiliation

Progress Reports Meet the Commissions standards Meet the Commissions standards But MSCHE needs assurance that activities planned or being implemented are carried out. But MSCHE needs assurance that activities planned or being implemented are carried out.

Monitoring Reports #1 Meet the Commissions standards Meet the Commissions standards But MSCHE has concerns about ongoing compliance with one or more standards But MSCHE has concerns about ongoing compliance with one or more standards

Monitoring Reports #2 Warning or probation Warning or probation –Lack of evidence that the institution is in compliance with Standard(s)

USEDs Two-Year Rule If MSCHE finds your institution out of compliance… If MSCHE finds your institution out of compliance… –Warning –Probation Accreditation must be reaffirmed within two years. Accreditation must be reaffirmed within two years.

Preparing an Effective Follow-Up Report

Read the Directions! Read carefully & understand the Commissions action. Read carefully & understand the Commissions action.

Understand MSCHEs Underlying Concerns & Expectations Why did the Commission ask for this report? Why did the Commission ask for this report? What are the Commissions underlying concerns? What are the Commissions underlying concerns? How does the request relate to the Standard under review? How does the request relate to the Standard under review?

Resources for Understanding Commission Concerns Characteristics of Excellence Characteristics of Excellence Report from MSCHE peer evaluators Report from MSCHE peer evaluators Your MSCHE VP liaison Your MSCHE VP liaison

Answer Every Question Organize report by Organize report by –Each requested item? –Each Standard and each Fundamental Element? Clearly document compliance with Clearly document compliance with – Standard(s) –Fundamental Element(s)

Provide Documented Evidence Not just assertions, platitudes or a couple of examples Not just assertions, platitudes or a couple of examples Support every statement with links or citations of documentation Support every statement with links or citations of documentation –Links/citations are evidence that the statement is accurate. –Answers without links/citations arent answers.

Focus on Past and Present, Not Future Current compliance Current compliance Sustained compliance Sustained compliance –Concrete details on work to be done

Focus on Outcomes More than structures & processes More than structures & processes –What is the governance structure? vs –Is the governance structure fulfilling its responsibilities?

Be Forthright & Honest Honesty is the best policy! Honesty is the best policy! Standard 6: Integrity Standard 6: Integrity If theres a problem… If theres a problem… –Explain why. –Provide clear, specific plans.

Be Concise & Well-Organized Respect readers time and energy. Respect readers time and energy. Avoid data dumps. Avoid data dumps. Cull out irrelevant documentation. Cull out irrelevant documentation. Make the report easy to follow. Make the report easy to follow. –Well-organized appendices of documentation Self-studies are 100 pages. Self-studies are 100 pages.

Format? Title page template Title page template Introduction Introduction Progress to date and current status Progress to date and current status –Summary –Analysis What does documentation say to you? What does documentation say to you? –Next steps to sustain compliance? Appendices of supporting documentation Appendices of supporting documentation

Your MSCHE VP Liaison is Your Friend! or telephone with questions. or telephone with questions. Meet in Commission offices? Meet in Commission offices? Meet during MSCHE Annual Conference? Meet during MSCHE Annual Conference? Commission Liaison Guidance Visit Commission Liaison Guidance Visit Campus visit? (Fee charged) Campus visit? (Fee charged) Cannot review drafts Cannot review drafts