Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Entry Requirements for U.S. Accreditation Hellenic American Union, Athens, Greece October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission.
1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Substantive Change Process
Substantive Change Policy – Response to the HEOA of 2008 Accreditation Provisions Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Barbara Samuel Loftus Vice President, MSCHE.
Understanding Expectations for the Self Study from the HEOA 2008 Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Debra G. Klinman.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Mary Beth Kait – Senior Director for Policy & Planning,
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs)
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities Robert K. Clark Cumberland County College Vineland, NJ.
Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
Substantive Change, SACS and Electronically-delivered Programs FDLC Panel Presentation May 15, 2009.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
SACS Reaffirmation Robert B. Bradley October 2013 THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY 1.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
CCLC Conference March 18, 2005 Pam Deegan, CIO President, Miramar Randy Lawson, CIO President Elect, Santa Monica.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
The New Mission Frontier: The Community College Baccalaureate Degree Pilot John Stanskas, ASCCC Executive Committee Jolena Grande, Cypress College Jackie.
Higher Learning Commission: Reaccreditation under Pathways.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Addressing Past Recommendations; Substantive Change Reports; & Eligibility Requirements Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda Maggie Taylor, Fresno City.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
NON-ACADEMIC POLICY TIMELINE For February 2010 Policies of great importance or policies that relate to a University regulation may need to go to the BOT.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Accreditation Preparation
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Welcome June 8, 2018.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Fort Valley State University
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009

What is Substantive Change? Accreditation applies to conditions existing at time of Commissions decision Institutions can and do change Changes may affect the quality, integrity, or effectiveness of institutions When substantive changes occur, the Commission is obligated to review how the change affects the institution

What changes are considered Substantive? Consult the Commissions policy on substantive change Typical changes included in current policy: – Significant changes in mission, goals, or objectives that change the nature of the institution – Distance Education, Content or Mode of Delivery (50% or more of degree) of courses and programs – Higher Degree or Credential Level – Contractual Agreements

What changes are considered Substantive? (cont.) – Non-credit offerings that affect mission – New Branch Campus or Additional Locations – Rapid Growth – Significant changes in governance or programs – Mergers and other changes in legal status, ownership, or form of control – Site Closure & Institutional Closures – Clock/Credit hours

What are the most common changes? New Sites/Locations Distance Education New Degree Level/Professional Degree Others: Contractual agreements & changes in ownership

Understanding the Process Originally part of Committee on Follow-Up Substantive changes go to Executive Committee of the Commission Meets every two months Committee readers are assigned proposals Role of the staff liaison Consent agenda Meetings via conference call Committee Actions

Preparing a Report One page executive summary What is the change, purpose, and how does it fit into the mission Financial impact Legal authorization to conduct the program or activity (state approval, etc.) Additional documentation and evidence

What to include in the report Dont assume the readers know about you Include any relevant documents, such as: – Basic planning documents such as budgets and financing – Resources (faculty, library, facilities, etc.) – Analysis of impact on the institution (will it take away from other programs) – Intended constituency – Governance and administrative structure (oversight) – Assessment plans (make sure you give details) – Records of institutional processes for approving the activities, contractual arrangements, publications, etc.

Additional Materials to Include Branch campuses/Additional Locations: educational programs and financial projections, governance, oversight, comparability of services and resources at the site, faculty, degrees being offered & requirements New degree programs: constituency, faculty resources, educational resources, assessment processes for the degree, degree requirements Distance learning programs: technology, access to library, campus resources, assessment, verification of student identity, etc. Rapid Growth: enrollment projections, institutional impact and resources Approval of state or other agencies Dont assume anything

What do readers look for? Type of change Relations to institutional mission Readiness for review (are all supporting documents included such as budget, impact analysis, resources, need, etc.) Is there evidence of sufficient resources, outcomes assessment, proper oversight, appropriate planning, & realistic projections Impact on other campus programs? Related entities and contractual agreements

Planning Ahead Allow sufficient time to submit the report: – Submission deadlines: 1 st business day of January, March, May, July, September, November – Committee Action: 3 rd Wednesday of February, April, June, August, October, December Dont let change sneak up on you Fees, visits, and follow ups When in doubt, ask your staff liaison!

New Challenges and Developments More title IV audit reviews New programs that might not follow logically from existing programs may need to be reviewed Requirements have changed as result of Higher Education Act More Distance Learning Review Standards 11& 13 related to Substantive Change Keep informed of the policy on-line

Resources Policy on substantive change Commission website Staff liaison FAQ