Post Hoc/Faulty Causality/ Non-Sequitur

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Of.
Advertisements

Dolch Words.
(Faulty Casualty/Non-Sequitur) Evan Payne
Responding to Text Dependent Questions
Fallacy: Slippery Slope Mrs. Hughes – 2 nd Period Group: Alex, Michael, & Tyler.
(also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy, fallacy of false choice, black-or-white thinking, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses) This is.
The Crucible Act I.
HASTY GENERALIZATION Tristan Shaw A hasty generalization is a broad claim based on too- limited evidence.
By Madison Kerley and Rachel Haynes.  Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument.
Red Herring Matt Zuccari Ashley Steenbergen. The man tries to divert the conversation to something that is completely irrelevant but more supportive of.
Crucible Reverse Jeopardy Characters Literary Terms Plot Events SettingQuoteSignificance
Who’s Who in The Crucible Written by Arthur Miller.
The Crucible by: Arthur Miller. Characterization Reverend Parris – “I have many enemies.” “There is a faction that is sworn to drive me from my pulpit.”
Ad Populum Appeal to Popularity Bandwagon
Societies desire scapegoats whom they can blame their problems on The proceeding pages explain connections between The Crucible, history, current society,
Nov 21 – Jr American Lit You will need: The Crucible - Act I Agenda:
Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy By: Cole Mutter & Ashley Hart.
100 Most Common Words.
The Crucible - Arthur Miller ARTHUR MILLER » (1915 – 2005) Considered one of the greatest dramatists of the twentieth century The Crucible, All My Sons,
Argument from authority
Logical Fallacy Project An example of the project.
Writing a Thesis Statement. Subject + Opinion = Thesis statement.
The “story-maker-upper.” 6A3.  Born on May 12 th, 1961 in South Salem, New York  Was raised by very helpful parents and was very well educated  Started.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Post Hoc/Faulty Causality/Non- Sequitur By: Cindy Williams & Sarah Madrigal.
Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning
The Crucible Characterization Group Activity
The Crucible Bellringer #17 9/5/13 1. What does Giles accuse Mr. Putnam of in the beginning of Act III? 2. When Danforth gives John Proctor the offer to.
Title Slide Include an image and title of your project Also include your name.
“It takes faith to believe in God just like it takes faith to believe in the Easter bunny -- but at least the Easter bunny is based on a creature that.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
The Crucible – “Candle Essay”
Begging The Question Kelsey Turner and Chelsey White.
Hosted by Ms. Gharda Setting Who Said It? Go Figure Literary Elements
Post Hoc Kelsy Mullins. Definition Post Hoc- the fallacy of assuming that temporal succession is evidence of causal relation. A fallacy in which one event.
Two years! Two years of his life, gone forever. It didn’t seem possible. He had still been considering, debating, when he stepped into the elevator. Should.
Post Hoc Billy Estes. Post Hoc Explained Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc occurs when a faulty assumption.
Chapter 10 (a deliberate attempt to influence the thought and behavior of others through the use of personal, psychological, and logical appeals)
Person A has position X. Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X). Person B attacks position Y. Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
I’ll Follow Him Little Peggy March. I love him, I love him, I love him I love him, I love him, I love him And where he goes I’ll follow And where he goes.
Ad Populum/ Appeal to Popularity/ Bandwagon Krystal Sims & Makayla Glass.
By: Samantha Hammer & Trevor Baise. Defined Hasty Generalization – a conclusion formed without evidence, often the product of an emotional reaction. A.
Day Two Agenda- 9/5 & 9/6 Bellwork- Journal
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
Scare Tactics - - coercing a favorable response by preying upon the audience's fears. - - My definition- using the fears of the readers to change their.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
By: Kennedy Logsdon. Definition of Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Ignorance is the assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of ridicule.
Arguments from Authority/False Authority Kelsay Manion & Sean Belding Example: In some cases, the expertise may be just for show -"I'm not a doctor, but.
The Crucible Characterisation- Act One. Reverend Parris “evidently in prayer” “evidently in prayer” “seems about to weep” “seems about to weep” Look at.
GET REAL FORGET THE CELEBS Marketers are using ordinary folks to give their ads a dose of realism.
MY WEB QUEST. Introduction We will be focusing on family. Emily wanted to find out from her brother what is a family. But he could not explain it simple.
Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.
AP3 You will have 5 minutes for each page to review the Applied Practice questions with your group. Use this as an opportunity to have meaningful dialogue.
Syllabus test.
RESPONDING TO TEXT DEPENDENT QUESTIONS
Syllabus test.
ONLINE STATEMENTS On the main eStatements page, the user can:
Dogmatism By: Tristan Hurt.
Makayle Botts and Kaitlin Graves
Post Hoc Kassi Hall.
The Crucible Fallacies: Post Hoc
The Cruicble Red Herring fallacies
By: Roderick Knew and Tia Monroe
By: Ben Leftwich John Miller
What were Arthur Miller’s characters like in real life?
Digital Storytelling With Primary Sources.
Syllogisms Basic Argumentation.
Write the word..
False Dilemma/ Either-Or/False Dichotomy
Presentation transcript:

Post Hoc/Faulty Causality/ Non-Sequitur By: Leah Thompson and Emily Baker-King

Definition: Post Hoc: afterward.

DEFINITIONS: Faulty Causality: bad relationship of cause and effect.

Continued.. Non-Sequitur: A statement containing an illogical conclusion.

POPULAR CULTURE: This is an example of non-sequitur because the dolphin has nothing to do with the American Bank.

CRUCIBLE EXAMPLE Act One: Page 189: Mrs. Putnam: “I knew it! Goody Osburn were midwife to me three times. I begged you, Thomas, did I not? I begged him not to call Osburn because I feared her. My babies always shriveled in her hands.”

CRUCIBLE EXAMPLE Act Three: Pages 224 and 225 Danforth: “ Why can they only repeat you?... A little while ago you were afflicted. Now it seems you afflict others; where did you find this power.”

Citations: Zupan, Pete. Image of Non-Sequitur. Digital image. Center For Inquiry. Center For Inquiry, Sept.-Oct. 2001. Web. Feb.-Mar. 2012. Cham, Jorge. PHD Comics: Post Hoc vs. Post-doc. Digital image. Piled Higher and Deeper. PHD, Aug.-Sept. 2009. Web. 15 Feb. 2012. Marin, Lucian E. "Established « JazzRoc versus “Chemtrails”." JazzRoc versus “Chemtrails”. Word Press. Web. 15 Feb. 2012 "Dolphins." The Financial Brand: Marketing Insights for Banks & Credit Unions. Pettus Advertising. Web. 16 Feb. 2012. Miller, Arthur. The Crucible, a Play in Four Acts. New York: Viking, 1953. Print.