Protocol Topology Support for IS-IS Kay Noguchi draft-ietf-noguchi-isis-protocol-topology-01.txt 56th IETF San Francisco, CA, USA March 18, 2003.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Release 5.1, Revision 0 Copyright © 2001, Juniper Networks, Inc. Advanced Juniper Networks Routing Module 5: IS-IS Multi-Area Networks.

Advertisements

OSPF Two-part Metrics Jeffrey Zhang Lili Wang Juniper Networks 88 th IETF, Vancouver.

Lonnie Decker Multiarea OSPF for CCNA Department Chair, Networking/Information Assurance Davenport University, Michigan August 2013 Elaine Horn Cisco Academy.

1 © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc. Integrated-ISIS Route Leaking.

1 Introduction to ISIS SI-E Workshop AfNOG The Gambia Noah Maina.

IPv6 Routing IPv6 Workshop Manchester September 2013

0131_09F7/c21 Link-state protocols SPF algo. 2 Henk Smit jan1999 Summary The basic ideas of link-state protocols Dijkstra’s Shortest Path First algorithm.

Release 5.1, Revision 0 Copyright © 2001, Juniper Networks, Inc. Advanced Juniper Networks Routing Module 4: Intermediate System To Intermediate System.

Routing Protocol.

IS-IS Extensions to support OTV Hasmit Grover Ayan Banerjee Dhananjaya Rao.

Nov 11, 2004CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 IP Routing: OSPF Network Protocols and Standards Autumn

Announcements List Lab is still under construction Next session we will have paper discussion, assign papers,

OSPF Two-part Metrics Jeffrey Zhang Juniper Networks 89 th IETF, Landon.

Signaling & Routing Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-availability-03 draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-02.

Reverse Metric TLV draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-01 draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric Authors: Shane Amante Tony Li Naiming Shen Mikael Abrahamsson Proposed.

Link State Routing Protocol W.lilakiatsakun. Introduction (1) Link-state routing protocols are also known as shortest path first protocols and built around.

© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 1 1 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter.

Lecture Week 10 Link-State Routing Protocols. Objectives Describe the basic features & concepts of link-state routing protocols. List the benefits and.

1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks George SwallowCisco.

1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.© 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. OSPF and ISIS v6 Khalid Raza

TCOM 515 Lecture 2. Lecture 2 Objectives Dynamic Routing Distance Vector Routing Link State Routing Interior vs Exterior RIP - Routing Information Protocol.

© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter 10.

1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 2 Single-Area OSPF.

1 Multi Topology Routing for OSPFv3 (draft-mirtorabi-mt-ospfv3-00.txt) Sina Mirtorabi

Simplified Extension of LSP Space for IS-IS draft-ietf-isis-wg-extlsp-00.txt Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi Mike Shand.

86th IETF, Orlando, March 2013 IS-IS Support for Unidirectional Links draft-ginsberg-isis-udl-00.txt Les Ginsberg

Networks and Protocols CE Week 8b. Link state Routing.

IS-IS An introduction to IGP routing protocols Hagai Kahana.

OSPF Extensions for ASON Routing draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-02.txt IETF67 - San Diego - Nov’06 Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel)

© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ROUTE v1.0—3-1 Implementing a Scalable Multiarea Network OSPF- Based Solution Lab 3-5 Debrief.

57 th IETF VIENNA draft-sheng-ppvpn-isis-bgp-mpls vpn-01.txt 57 th IETF meeting IS-IS as the PE/CE Protocol in BGP/MPLS VPN draft-sheng-ppvpn-isis-bgp-mpls-00.txt.

1 Multicast Routing Blackhole Avoidance draft-asati-pim-multicast-routing-blackhole-avoid-00 Rajiv Asati Mike McBride IETF 72, Dublin.

Cisco Confidential © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 draft-pillay-esnault-ospf-service-distribution-00.txt Padma Pillay-Esnault.

© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter 10.

88th IETF, Vancouver, November 2013 IS-IS Support for Unidirectional Links draft-ietf-isis-udl-01.txt Les Ginsberg

ISIS IETF 68 Chris Hopps, David Ward. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft.

Extended procedures and Considerations for Loop Free Alternatives draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-01 Uma Chunduri Ericsson Inc. Jeff Tantsura.

OIF Liaison on Routing IETF 75 – Stockholm – Jul ‘09 L. Ong (Ciena)

66th IETF meeting, July 2006 Extensions to the OSPF Management Information Base in support of GMPLS Extensions to the OSPF Management Information Base.

Draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospf-extension-03 draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-00 IETF 88, November 3-8, 2013 P. Psenak, S.Previdi,

86th IETF, Orlando, March 2013 Flooding Scope PDUs draft-ginsberg-isis-fs-lsp-00.txt Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi.

CSE 421 Computer Networks. Network Layer 4-2 Chapter 4: Network Layer r 4. 1 Introduction r 4.2 Virtual circuit and datagram networks r 4.3 What’s inside.

1 Introduction to ISIS AfNOG 2011 SI-E Workshop. 2 IS-IS Standards History  ISO specifies OSI IS-IS routing protocol for CLNS traffic A Link State.

Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS

Update on Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS

Multi-Instances ISIS Extension draft-ietf-isis-mi-08.txt

Multi Topology Routing (MTR) for OSPF

Routing Protocols and Concepts

Link-State Routing Protocols

ISIS Flooding Reduction in MSDC

ISIS Route Tag sub-TLV draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-02.txt

OSPF Extensions for ASON Routing draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-03.txt IETF67 - Prague - Mar’07 Dimitri.

Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in OSPF

Intra-Domain Routing Jacob Strauss September 14, 2006.

Chapter 5: Dynamic Routing

MPLS Traffic Engineering

IS-IS Reverse Metric IETF 97, Seoul

Link State on Data Center Fabrics

Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in ISIS

Link-State Routing Protocols

Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing draft-gulkohegde-spring-separating-routing-planes-using-sr-00 IETF 98 – Chicago, USA Shraddha Hegde

ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-00

IETF South Korea PCEP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing draft-li-pce-pcep-ls-sr-extension-01 Zhenbin Li (Huawei) Xia Chen (Huawei) Nan.

draft-pim-with-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh

IS-IS Flooding Reduction in MSDC

Link-State Routing Protocols

Chapter 10 Link State Routing Protocols

draft-pim-with-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh

draft-ietf-pim-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh-01

IETF105 IS-IS V6/MT Deployment Considerations draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-mt-deployment-cons-02 Uma Chunduri [Futurewei] Jeff Tantsura [Apstra] Shraddha Hegde.

Presentation transcript:

Protocol Topology Support for IS-IS Kay Noguchi draft-ietf-noguchi-isis-protocol-topology-01.txt 56th IETF San Francisco, CA, USA March 18, 2003

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. Contents RFC 1195 Restrictions Goal New TLV and Sub-TLV Adjacency Formation LSP Encoding SPF Calculation Migration Mechanism

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. RFC 1195 Restrictions Every router MUST be capable of all network layer protocols that are present in an area. –Can’t mix IPv4 only and IPv6 only routers Protocol Support capability MUST be identical on all interfaces. –Node oriented protocol support capability

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. Goal IPv4 only, IPv6 only and IPv4/IPv6 dual routers can co-exist. –By maintaining different SPF trees for each network layer protocols. Different protocol support capability on each Interface –Interface oriented protocol support capability

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. New TLV and Sub-TLV Interface Protocols Supported TLV –Encoded in IS-IS Hello. –Convey interface oriented protocol support capability to neighboring routers. Protocols Supported Sub-TLV –Encoded in Extended IS-Reachability TLV. –Flood interface oriented protocol support capability in the area.

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. Adjacency Formation MUST drop IS-IS Hello which doesn’t contain Interface Protocols Supported TLV. –To avoid possible routing loop. Point-to-Point Interfaces –MUST NOT form an adjacency if at least one of the same protocol capability is not met with neighboring router. Broadcast Interfaces –MUST attempt to form an adjacency regardless of the neighbor’s protocol capability. No change in DIS election.

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. LSP Encoding Use Protocols Supported Sub-TLV. Point-to-Point Interfaces –ANDing local and remote side of protocol support capability. Broadcast Interfaces –Regular LSP Local side of protocol support capability –Pseudo-Node LSP Remote side of protocol support capability

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. SPF Calculation SPF MUST be calculated separately for each network layer protocol. New Protocol Supported Sub-TLV MUST be used instead of old Protocols Supported TLV. –Reverse protocol support check is not “MUST” because pseudo-node LSP also contains Protocol Supported Sub-TLV.

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. Migration Mechanism 1) Start to advertise new TLV and Sub- TLV in addition to the old TLV. 2) Change adjacency formation and SPF calculation based on this draft. 3) Stop to advertise old TLV. 4) Change interface protocol support capability appropriately.

Copyright © 2003 IP Infusion Inc. All Rights Reserved. Questions?

Questions to M-ISIS Non M-ISIS IPv4 router and M-ISIS IPv6 router. –How to make adjacency? Non M-ISIS IPv4/IPv6 dual router and M-ISIS IPv4/IPv6 dual router. –Possible routing loop? IPv6 Reachability TLV and MT Reachable IPv6 Prefixs(M-ISIS). –Do we need both?