Mathematical Understanding: An Introduction Fuson, Kalchman, and Bransford.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Advertisements

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
How Students Learn Mathematics in the Classroom June 18, 2009.
Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
Common Core Math: 2 > 4 Super Week Norms Silence your technology Limit sidebar conversations.
The Development of Mathematical Proficiency Presented by the Math Coaches of LAUSD, District K Based on: Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics,
Discourse and Mathematical Argumentation in the Classroom Wednesday, June 6, 2012.
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
Developed by ERLC/ARPDC as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation.
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Developing Number and Operations through Reasoning, Sensemaking and Connections Minnesota Council of Teachers of Mathematics April 27, 2013 Linda Gojak,
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
Total Participation Techniques Making Every Student an Active Learner.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Chapter 3 Teaching Through Problem Solving
Lesson Planning Educ 3100.
Introduction to Workshop 10 Choosing Learning and Teaching Approaches and Strategies.
Principles and Standards for School Mathematics National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Formative Assessment Lessons General Information.
Manipulatives – Making Math Fun Dr. Laura Taddei.
Teaching Secondary Mathematics
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Dr. Laura McLaughlin Taddei
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
Manipulatives – Making Math Fun Dr. Laura Taddei.
September, Network for New Science/Math Teachers September 24, 2010 Meeting 1, Year 2 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute.
Nicora Placa January 15, 2014 Helpful Elementary Homework Resources for Parents.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Getting Started with the Practices Investigations.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Teaching Mathematics Session 6. Math Failure Students are failing in math as in reading as compared to other countries throughout the world Compared to.
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption May 29, Overview What Elementary Math Looks Like Historical Perspective District Philosophy Process and Criteria Why.
Classroom Discussions in Math: A Teachers Guide for using talk moves to support the Common Core and more, Third Edition Adapted Original Presentation by.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Math Standards  NCTM  Common Core State Standards for Math (CCSSM)  Needs of Diverse Learners.
Meaningful Mathematics
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Session 2 Objective You will synthesize your knowledge of Mathematical Practice Standard 4 Model with Mathematics.
. Do one problem “Meal Out” or “Security Camera”.
Instructional Strategies That Support Mathematical Problem Solving Janis FreckmannBeth SchefelkerMilwaukee Public Schools
Teaching for Understanding Appalachian Math Science Partnership
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Welcome Enjoy breakfast Use three post-its to answer these questions:
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Welcome to Parent Math Night Haslet Elementary School.
Common Core Confessions of a Math Teacher. So, what is this Common Core thing all about? The standards define the knowledge and skills students should.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
509A UNIT 1-WEEK2 Dr. Hasan Fall Classroom Observation Unit 1 In your small groups, reflect on your observation of the classroom video lesson using.
Take a few minutes to complete the survey on your desk.
Welcome! Please arrange yourselves in groups of 6 so that group members represent: A mix of grade levels A mix of schools 1.
Balanced Math Overview
EdTPA Task 4 Boot Camp Spring What is required for students to be mathematically proficient? According to The National Research Council (2001),
Number Talks: A Powerful Math Instructional Practice.
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Big Ideas & Problem Solving A look at Problem Solving in the Primary Classroom Lindsay McManus.
Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs)
The Learner Centered Classroom
How Students Learn Mathematics in the Classroom
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
Reflecting on Practice: Making Connections that Support Learning
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Exploring Explicit Instruction: Think Aloud
The curriculum The curricullum tells «What and how the learners should learn» at specific levels of the education system. It includes the objectives and.
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Guided Math.
Presentation transcript:

Mathematical Understanding: An Introduction Fuson, Kalchman, and Bransford

Why the negative association with math? Instead of connecting with and building on student’s math understanding and intuitions, math instruction often overrides student’s reasoning and replaces it with a set of rules that disconnects problem solving from meaning making.

Why the negative association with math? Instead of organizing the skills required to do mathematics around a set of core concepts, the skills become the center (and possibly the whole) of the instruction.

Why the negative association with math? Since procedural knowledge is separated from meaning making, students are not using meta-cognitive strategies when they solve math problems.

An Observation by John Holt One rather good students was working on the problem “If you have 6 jugs and you want to put 2/3 of a pint of lemonade into each jug, how much lemonade is needed?” The student responded with “18 pints” The teacher followed this answer up with some questions.

An Observation by John Holt T- How much is in each jug? S- Two-thirds of a pint T- Is that more or less than a pint? S- Less T- How many jugs are there? S- Six T- Then 18 doesn’t make sense if the 6 jugs each have less than 1 pint

An Observation by John Holt The student shrugs and responds “Well that is the way it worked out” Holt argues that the student has long since quit expecting school to make sense. They tell you these facts and rules and your job is to put them down on paper the way they tell you. Never mind whether they mean anything or not.

Adding it Up- National Research Council report Their report argues for an instructional goal of mathematical proficiency (far beyond mastery of procedures) by detailing five intertwining strands. Conceptual Understanding Procedural Fluency Strategic Competence Adaptive Reasoning Productive disposition

These 5 strands map directly to the principles of How People Learn

PRINCIPLE #1: Teachers must engage students’ preconceptions People posses informal strategy development & mathematical reasoning that can serve as a foundation for learning more abstract math but the link is not automatic. Teachers must build on existing knowledge and engage student’s preconceptions

Common Preconceptions about Mathematics Math is about learning computations Math is about following rules to guarantee the correct answer Some have the ability to do math and some do not. (widespread belief in US but not elsewhere. Other countries attribute effort to math success. And teaching reflects this)

Instruction therefore must: Allow students to use their own informal problem solving strategies and then guide their math thinking toward more effective strategies Encourage math talk- clarify their strategies and compare benefits/limits of alternate approaches Bridge common conceptions & math understandings

PRINCIPLE #2: Understanding requires factual knowledge and conceptual frameworks Teachers must help students build & consolidate prerequisite competencies, understand new concepts in depth, and organize both concepts and competencies into a network of knowledge Math proficiency requires students master concepts AND procedures to reason & solve problems effectively.

PRINCIPLE #2: Understanding requires factual knowledge and conceptual frameworks Emphasizes importance of both conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. The concepts underlying an area of mathematics must be clear to the teacher if they are to develop mathematical proficiency within their students Balance must be maintained between learner-centered and knowledge-centered needs.

PRINCIPLE #2: Understanding requires factual knowledge and conceptual frameworks Viable alternative methods for solving a problem, and discussions of the advantages and disadvantages of each that facilitates flexibility and deep understanding of the math involved.

PRINCIPLE #3: A Metacognitive Approach Enables Student Self- Monitoring Learning about oneself as a learner, thinker, and problem solver is an important aspect of metacognition. A teacher can help a student become a better mathematical thinker by moving the student through the following levels of the “math-talk learning community”:

1. Traditional, Teacher Directed Format -where the teacher asks short answer questions and the student provides answers directed at the teacher 2. “Getting Started” Level -where the teacher begins to pursue and assess students’ mathematical thinking 3. “Building” Level -where teacher elicits more student responses with more descriptions of their thinking. Also multiple methods to solving a problem are discussed 4. “Math-Talk” Level -where students justify their own ideas, ask questions of other students and help other students

Instruction That Supports Metacognition “Debugging” – shift focus from right and wrong answers to “debugging” answers by finding the error, figuring out why it is an error, and correcting the error. “Dialoguing” – teachers need to emphasize the importance of communicating mathematics. Students need to reflect on and communicate their mathematical thinking. “Seeking and Giving Help” – students need enough confidence to engage in problem solving and try to solve them but also to seek help when they get stuck.

The Framework of How People Learn: Seeking a Balanced Classroom Environment Learner-centered – draws out and builds on student learning. Knowledge-centered – focuses simultaneously on the conceptual understanding and the procedural knowledge of a topic. Assessment-centered - there are frequent opportunities for students to reveal their thinking on a topic so that teachers can shape their instruction in response to student learning. Community-centered – the members of the classroom value student ideas, encourage productive interchange, and promote collaborative thinking.

Next Steps: Create teacher-learning communities (our PLCs) Learn to use student thinking in video clubs (upcoming teacher observations) Have lesson studies on how to build on student knowledge (possibly in the future) Use teachers as curriculum designers to determine learning paths (currently working on with PROM/SE)