Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Education Assessment AAC&U GE and Assessment Conference March 1, 2007.
Advertisements

The 21st Century Context for
Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
The Teacher Work Sample
Deena Sue Fuller Tennessee State University Adapted from a presentation by Brenda Marsteller Kowalewski at Weber State.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Daniel Peck January 28, SLOs versus Course Objectives Student Learning Outcomes for the classroom describe the knowledge, skills, abilities.
Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Service Learning: Transforming Courses and Programs.
Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees Shelly Potts, Ph.D. Arizona State University
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Teacher Judgement
It defines acceptable evidence of student’s attainment of desired results. It determines authentic performance tasks that the student is expected to do.
Handouts for Session 4 Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics.
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Mary Allen Qatar University September Workshop participants will be able to:  draft/revise learning outcomes  develop/analyze curriculum maps.
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
How well did the assessment task do what we wanted it to do? Janina Drazek Manager — Assessment & Comparability, QCAR Queensland Studies Authority.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
The Washington State University Critical Thinking Project Diane Kelly-Riley Kim Andersen Paul Smith Karen Weathermon Washington State University.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Welcome… The attendee will understand assessment basics with a focus on creating learning activities and identifying assessment expectations. Apply the.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Frequently asked questions about development, interpretation and use of rubrics on campuses 1.
Unwrapping Standards.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
Authentic Assessment Principles & Methods
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
1 Selecting Appropriate Assessment Methods Presented at the Teaching & Learning Innovations 17 th Annual Conference At the University of Guelph May 12,
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Alternative Assessment
On SLOA (SLO Assessment). (after Munch) Will Lecture die? No…
Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.
The Basics of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment SACSCOC Summer Institute July 20, 2015 handout for this session is in the online program Timothy S.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
PRIJ, 3030 January the 22nd Assessment. Guiding questions… What are the implications for your general practices around planning and assessment? How will.
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Using UDL to Set Clear Goals and Support Every Student’s Learning.
The Lesson PlanningProcess The BLaST IU17 Liberty Fellowship September 20, 2011 Dr. Fran Macko
An Assessment For Learning. A rubric is a scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” and clearly defines gradations of.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
Identifying Assessments
Department of Sociology Learning Assessment Development Heather Zaykowski, Ph.D.
College of Education and Allied Studies Office of Semester Conversion Academic Programs and Graduate Studies February 4, :00 pm – 4:00 pm Oakland/Concord.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
 Summative  Formative  Individuals,  Assignments,  Learning activity  Courses,  Programs,  Institutions.  Assessment at a point in time.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Service-Learning: A pedagogy and scholarship of civic engagement Marie Watkins, Ph. D. Faculty Assembly August 24, 2011.
Evaluation Of and For Learning
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Closing the Assessment Loop
Diagnostic Essay Feedback Analysis
3 Stages of Backward Design
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning

Why evaluate?  Assessment as a continual Service Learning improvement tool  Clarification of critical learning objectives, ability to focus on Service Learning specifics  Yields useful information for programs, faculty, students  Evidence and support claims

SL Outcomes: Ù Service Learning Claims: Ù Understanding of course content Ù Theory to practice Ù Understanding of Community Ù Community related skills Ù Civic Engagement Ù Diversity Ù MORE?

Student Learning Focus  Value of authentic work samples  Moving from self-report  Moving from less integrated forms of assessment (i.e. observation, focus group)

Continual Improvement  Feedback to actual courses, programs  Applicable/actionable assessment  Can be course/assignment based  Can serve other programmatic goals

How do we know what works? A working model for assessment based on the premise that there are: Ù Key questions to ask Ù Logical steps to follow Ù Usable data Ù Transforms student learning and community experiences

1 Assessment Cycle Model 4 Develop Learning Objectives Identify Work Samples Locate Critical Junctures Determine Assessment Criteria/Quality Test Validity /Reliability Disseminate Revise/Revisit

Assessment Cycle Model 4 Develop Learning Objectives Identify Work Samples Locate Critical Junctures Determine Assessment Criteria/Quality Test Validity /Reliability Disseminate Revise/Revisit

Assessment Cycle Model What am I trying to assess? Action: Define Student Learning Outcome  Student Learning Outcomes in the context of:  Mission  Priorities  Program Goals 1

What are appropriate work samples? Action: Identify Student Work Samples  Qualitative vs. Quantitative  Examples: Portfolios, Papers (writing samples, essays, reflective papers, editorials, journals…) Performances, Artwork, Lab reports Assessment Cycle Model 2

When should I assess? Action: Identify critical junctures  Critical Junctures  Entering students  Passages  Culminating Assessment Cycle Model 3

What am I looking for in student work? Action: Define scoring criteria  Rubric Development: Scoring Criteria  What indicators will I use to demonstrate desired student learning?  Examples: Bloom's taxonomy 4 Assessment Cycle Model

How do I evaluate the range of student work? Action: Define performance levels  Rubric Development: Performance standards  How many levels will my rubric have and how will I define performance at each level?  Specific clear descriptors at each level  Qualitative differences  Common errors 4 Assessment Cycle Model

Sample Rubric Work Sample Scoring Criteria 1 Scoring Criteria 2 Scoring Criteria 3 Performance Level 1- Low Performance Level 2- Medium Performance Level 3- High

Once I have a rubric how do I know it's valid? How do I know if the rubric is reliable?  Evaluate the rubric against the learning objectives, learning opportunities etc… Is there clear alignment?  Pilot test with multiple evaluators  Discuss how well the rubric works  Compare scores for consistency  Determine procedures for inconsistent scores 5 Assessment Cycle Model

What's next? Action: Back to the cycle  Revise and revisit - learning outcomes, learning opportunities, assignments, critical junctures, rubrics, program, course offerings/order, curriculum, pedagogy… 6 Assessment Cycle Model

SL Case Study Ù University Studies - General Education ï 4 Year integrated program ï Interdisciplinary program Ù Critical Features ï Clearly defined goals Communication, Critical thinking, Diversity, Civic Responsibility ï Common Pedagogy ï Required Courses

SL Case Study Student Learning Outcomes Action: Define Student Learning Outcome Appreciation and Understanding of Civic Responsibility  PSU Mission - Let Knowledge Serve the City  University Studies Goal - Civic Responsibility 1

SL Case Study Work samples Action: Identify Student Work Samples Common assignment given in each class  Paper 2

Critical Junctures Action: Identify critical junctures Pilot in Senior Capstone Classes Ù Senior Capstone required course Ù Culminating group experience for major and general education Ù Application of expertise to a real project in the community SL Case Study 3

Common Assignment “Please write a 3-5-page reflective analysis summarizing the ways you have gained experience with the University Studies goal of Civic Responsibility. Use specific examples from your discussions and course readings, or in completing your project.” SL Case Study

Scoring Criteria and Performance Levels Action: Define scoring criteria/levels Civic Responsibility Stages  Based on Bloom's taxonomy SL Case Study 4

Valid Rubric How do I know if the rubric is reliable?  PSU Mission - Let Knowledge Serve the City  University Studies Goal - Civic Responsibility  Pilot test with multiple evaluators  Compare scores for consistency.  Discuss how well the rubric works. SL Case Study 5

Revisiting Process Suggestions for improvements  Revise assignment for clarity  Revise rubrics for specificity  Clarify pedagogy Confirmed  Program goals addressed in class  Basis of assignment is valid  Keep assessment in Capstone SL Case Study 6

 Focus on student learning objectives  What are appropriate work samples?  Are there existing critical junctures?  How do we evaluate quality?  How can this improve our practice? SL Assessment in practice

 Connect to goals and mission  Knowledge of the process that is transferable  Assessment as a tool for partnerships  Applicable/actionable assessment Lessons Learned

For More Information Susan Agre-Kippenhan