Financial Literacy Corland E. Forrester

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Concepts for AmeriCorps. Session Objectives Provide an opportunity for participants to network in program specific group Discuss key fiscal and grant.
Advertisements

SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
INTERNAL CONTROLS.
Financial Literacy May 10, 2007 Jonnie M. Jenkins, CPA Walker and Company LLP.
Financial Monitoring Techniques
1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
Key Focus Areas for AmeriCorps Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, 2008 (updated 2010)
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
Match& Inkind Donations:. 2 Session Objectives Gather and retain proper documentation Understand allowable, allocable, necessary & reasonable costs Learn.
Securing and Documenting Match and In-kind Support
Threshold System Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Fall Title I Directors Conference October 23-25,
Accounting and Financial Reporting
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews May 15, 2008 Bruce Robinson FTA Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation.
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodias development challenges 1.
California Department of Food and Agriculture
Office of Management & Budget
Internal Control and Control Risk
12 Financial Management 12-1 Financial Planning
Audit of the Sales and Collection Cycle
Proper Management of Federal Grants – Support for Salaries and Wages or Time & Effort Reporting 1.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
4/28/2015 Presented by David McQuay, Jr., CPA 1 Non-Profit Financial Management Florida Non-profit Housing, Inc. Self-help Housing Conference.
More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Administrative Costs Leveraged Resources Accrued Expenditures & Unliquidated Obligations MoHealthWINs.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium. Documentation.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Thomas Chin October 5, Presentation Topics Requirements – Internal Control Time and Effort Reporting Statistics on Single.
1 2 Financial Management Training Learning Objectives Participants increase their knowledge of financial management requirements. Program gain a clear.
THE BIGGEST WINNER FISCAL EDITION. Test Your Fiscal Fitness Fiscal Basics Property & Facilities Cost Allocation Nonfederal Share Records & Reports
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Establishing Internal Controls.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Updates and Fixed Awards.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
INTERNAL CONTROLS. Session Objectives Understand why an organization should have internal controls Understand the key components of internal controls.
AUDITS. Session Objectives To familiarize participants with the Inspector General Audit Process To better prepare participants for the audit by providing.
Office of Field Services Fiscal Review Process Becky Pennington Susan Szymas February 7, 2013.
Programmatic and Fiscal Compliance as a Team Effort 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
Securing and Documenting Match and In-kind Support
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Financial Management What you need to know…. Agenda –Introductions –Webinar logistics –Financial management systems Policies and procedures OMB circulars.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM ATLANTA, GEORGIA APRIL 26-29, 2005.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
Kiev, Ukraine October 2009 Cost Share. Objectives  Understand the definition of Cost Share  Identify USAID regulations that apply to Cost Share.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Financial and Administrative Management
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT -
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews
2016 AmeriCorps Texas All-Grantee Meeting February 25-26, 2016
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Presentation transcript:

Financial Literacy Corland E. Forrester cforrester@mbicfs.com 1 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Session Objectives Key items that AmeriCorps grantees should consider to: Develop effective internal controls; and Document match 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Session Outline Internal Controls Internal controls and audit findings What Are Internal Controls Purpose/Objectives of Internal Controls Defining a Good Internal Control Environment Process To Establish Internal Controls Written Policies and Procedures Examples of Key Internal Controls Element for AmeriCorps Grantees 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Session Outline Documenting Match Match requirements Documentation basics Recording In-kind and Valuing Contributions 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Internal Controls and Audit Findings Types of audit findings A questioned cost that becomes a disallowed cost is a violation of a provision of law, regulation, contract, grant, cooperative agreement or other agreement or document governing the expenditures of Federal funds. A reportable condition in which the design or operation of an internal control does not reduce, to a relatively low level, the risk that errors or irregularities would result in significant or material issues _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Most Audit Findings Result From Inadequate Internal Controls Potential impacts of inadequate internal controls: Audit findings – questioned costs, material weakness Federal funds may be managed inappropriately Funding sources are jeopardized Inconsistencies in practices, processes, reviews, approvals, results, documentation Inefficient use of time and resources Repayment of disallowed or unallowable costs 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Examples of Audit Findings Due to Inadequate Internal Controls General: Late submission of financial reports Missing or questionable source documents Timesheets/evaluations not signed or dated AmeriCorps: Member eligibility – documents, records, files Timesheets hours don’t support earning education award Unacceptable justification for changes made to timesheets 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

What are Internal Controls? Organizational policies, procedures, processes, and systems A system of checks and balances Clear identification and appropriate separation of authorities, responsibilities, duties Not a “organizational burden,” but a to way to optimize and manage resources 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Purpose of Internal Controls Improve accountability to customers (Federal Government, CNCS, trustees, etc.) Help organization achieve performance and budget targets and operate efficiently and effectively Help ensure financial integrity of organization and reliability of financial reporting Prevent loss of resources, public assets and trust Help ensure compliance with laws, regulations, requirements ___________________________________________________________________________ 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Purpose of Internal Controls? (cont.) Help ensure decisions, actions and transactions are appropriately justified, reviewed, approved and documented Support effective management Help minimize opportunity for waste, fraud and mismanagement Help reduce legal liability 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

A Good Control Environment Includes Positive “atmosphere” in the work environment Existence of a code of conduct and code of ethics Written job descriptions Timely/appropriate communications with Board Written policies to hire, train, promote and compensate employees Safeguards for employees related to whistle-blowing A clear chain of command Clear, written delegations of authority & responsibilities ___________________________________________________________________________ 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

A Good Control Environment Includes (cont.) Written policies, procedures and processes Adequate review process for financial transactions, financial reports, budgets, etc. Adequate cash management procedures (e.g., monthly bank reconciliations by supervisory personnel) System to track participants’ & employees’ activities System to follow up on problems to ensure resolution 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Process to Establish Internal Control 1. Review Mission/Vision Statement 2. Set up organization’s goals and objectives 3. Establish organization’s policies and procedures 4. Design controls to ensure policies and procedures are followed 7. Review policies, procedures and controls-modify as needed Internal Controls Process Cycle ___________________________________________________________________________ 5. Educate personnel on policies and procedures 6. Monitor internal control compliance 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute 13

Written Policies & Procedures is essential to establishing Internal Controls Because They: Establish the standards for the organization’s operations Help maintain information that is crucial to operations that would otherwise remain in employees’ “heads” Help orient new employees and substitutes if the appropriate personnel are absent Assist with consistency and clear communication of expectations ___________________________________________________________________________ 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Examples of Key Policies & Procedures Authorizations of transactions Payroll procedures Cash receipts procedures Procurement policies Travel regulations Specific Policies Governing Federal Funds: FFR completion Drawdown of Federal funds Matching requirements Financial reporting Budgeting Record retention Conflict of interest Timekeeping 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Staff Timesheet - Key Elements For Non-profits: Signed and dated by employee and by supervisor Reflect after-the-fact time determination of actual activity Are prepared at least monthly and coincide with one or more pay periods Account for the total activity for which employees are compensated and which is required in fulfillment of their obligations to the organization Provide support for charges for salaries and wages must also be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Job Description – Key Elements Job title: Reports to: Supervises: Basic function: Duties and responsibilities: Qualifications: Classification: 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Accounting Systems – Key Elements System must be capable of: Distinguishing grant vs. non-grant related expenditures Identifying costs by program year Identifying costs by budget category Differentiating between direct and indirect costs (administrative costs) Maintains Federal and non-Federal matching funds separately from grant funds Records in-kind contribution as both revenues and expenses 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Chart of Accounts – Key Elements Numerical outline of accounts (codes) Narrative description of each line item (object class) Note: special account codes should be created to track CNCS funded activities by separate grant 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Budgetary Controls Monitor budgets against actual year-to-date and current period expenditures or outlays Explain any budget variations that are unexpected or unusual and determining necessary adjustments Ensure compliance with laws, regulations, and CNCS provisions, particularly matching percentage requirements Request and assure budget changes are properly approved Review adjustments between line items and verify if they are within provisions and/or guidelines 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Documentation – Key Elements Documentation should ensure that costs: Conform to grant/contract limitations Are allowable under the budget and cost principles Are treated consistently Are in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) All documentation should support: What services or goods were obtained Why the transaction is allowable for the grant purposes The value of the contribution ___________________________________________________________________________ 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Documenting Match 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Federal and Grantee Share funds must be treated consistently Project Costs The total allowable budget or expenditures incurred to operate the program and accomplish its objectives is divided into 2 sections: Federal Share Portion of budget or expenditures paid for with Federal funds (CNCS) Grantee Share aka: match Portion of total expenditures not paid for with CNCS funds Federal and Grantee Share funds must be treated consistently 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Examining “Overall Match” Requirement § 45 CFR 2521.60(a) – Regulatory Match: Grantees must meet minimum requirements as shown in table below up to 50% overall match $1 dollar for every CNCS $1 - by year 10   Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall Minimum Share 24% 26% 30% 34% 38% 42% 46% 50% 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Sources of Match Contributions received by cash, check, electronic funds transfer, credit card, or payroll deduction Cash Contributions Value of non-cash contributions provided by non-Federal third parties May be in the form of real property, equipment, supplies, services, and other expendable property In-Kind Contributions Approved Budget  Match amount and Sources of Match Sources of Match Changed Significantly  Contact your Grants Officer 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Administrative Requirements Acceptable Match is . . . Cash and in-kind contributions are accepted as part of the grantee’s cost sharing or matching when contributions meet all of the following criteria: Are verifiable from the grantee's records Are necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient accomplishment of project or program objectives Are allowable under the applicable OMB cost principles Are not paid by the Federal Government under another award, except where authorized by Federal statute to be used for cost sharing or matching Are provided for in the approved budget Conform to other grant provisions or OMB Circulars Administrative Requirements 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Establish a written record retention policy Documentation Basics Why Retain Documentation? To track incoming information To review information To provide historical evidence To provide evidence of accomplishments To prepare for an audit Establish a written record retention policy See Handout 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Finding Match Cash: In-Kind Contributions: Value of donated services Donations Leases, sale of goods/services Local governments State appropriations Foundation grants or corporate contributions In-Kind Contributions: Value of donated services and/or donated goods    Labor  space  vehicles  training  supplies  equipment  services Grantees cannot use other Federal funds as match unless approved by the other Federal agency 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Exception: Volunteer Match Do not count as match - The value of direct community services performed by volunteers Do count as match - Services that contribute to organizational functions Count services such as accounting, legal, training of staff or members that are elements of the grantee’s cost allocation plan 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Recording In-Kind Contributions Maintain adequate documentation to support amounts claimed as match Maintain same documentation for both CNCS Federal share and for grantee’s share Documentation must meet same standards as other expenditures within organization Record donation and valuation of item in detail Enter into the General Ledger as income and expenditure Failure to enter match contributions into general ledger requires a formal explanatory policy and separate spread sheet accountability of receipt and use 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Why Record In-Kind in the General Ledger? Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS #116) sets the standard: Contributed services are recognized in financial statements if services received: Create or enhance non-financial assets, or Require specialized skills, are provided by individuals possessing those skills, and would need to be purchased if not provided by donation. 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Recording In-Kind Contributions Enter into the General Ledger as income and expenditure: Example: A local paint store donates a professional paint sprayer with a fair market value of $550.00 $550.00 – 7250 In-Kind Expense Account (debit) $550.00 – 5250 In-Kind Income Account (credit) 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Valuing In-Kind Contributions Use fair market price Consider what it would cost to obtain similar goods or services The donor must provide the value of the donation Review the donation letter or form to ensure the value is reasonable What is not an in-kind contribution? Discounts on memberships on “bulk memberships.” If an organization charges one price for individual memberships and another price for multiples, such as $100 for one person, $800 for ten people, the $200 “saved” because you have 10 people getting memberships you would have paid $1,000 for if you didn’t request all ten, is NOT an in-kind contribution. This is happening with dues to AmeriCorps alums. The IRS defines fair market value as the price that item would sell for on the open market  2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Documenting In-Kind Contributions Document the basis for determining value of personal services, material, equipment, building, and land Obtain written acknowledgement from the donor to include: Name and signature of donor Date and location of donation Detailed description of item or service Estimated value of contribution, how value was determined, who made the determination Whether the contribution was obtained with Federal funds *** Keep a copy of the receipt in your files *** If audited, a grantee may be required to obtain full supporting documentation from all donors, if not available during the audit. 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Sample: In-Kind Contribution Form 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute

Questions? & Complete Evaluations Wrap-Up Questions? & Complete Evaluations 2009 Financial & Grants Mgmt. Institute