doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 1 Proposed TGv Selection Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEEs name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEEs sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: 19 September 2005 Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 2 Motivation As TG intends to call for substantive text in September 05, TG needs to put in place a process to evaluate various proposals for eventual inclusion in base draft. The following process lays out a timeline and methods for considering all proposals, in order to achieve adoption of a unified proposal as the basis for the draft, and to avoid a draft that includes a quilt of mismatched methods

doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 3 Process Overview Call for Substantive Text in September Substantive text selection for base draft –Step 1: Intent for proposing substantive text –Step 2: Preliminary Substantive Text –Step 3: Complete Substantive Text for Base Draft Subsequent additions and modifications can be submitted after the base draft is adopted in TG

doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 4 Step 1: Intent for proposing substantive text Submitter should send intent (to TGv Chair) for proposing substantive text The intent to submit must indicate the specific objectives or requirements (refer to TGv Objectives) that proposed substantive text addresses The intent to submit is due by midnight EST 30 days before the TGv meeting at which the proposal will be presented

doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 5 Step 2: Preliminary Substantive Text Presentation: November 13-18, 2005 Due at IEEE: November 6, 2005 by midnight EST –The slot will only remain on the agenda if the material is on the server and an sent to the TG reflector announces this availability. Otherwise, the item is removed from the agenda Merge/No/Abstain vote after proposed substantive text presentation. –The vote shall consider The substantive text that addresses objective X is worthy of inclusion in the base draft, with choices being Merge/No/Abstain Merge = The substantive text that addresses objective X is worthy of inclusion in the base draft No = The proposal is not going to be included in the base draft, but it is encouraged to submit the proposal as subsequent additions or modification after the base draft is adopted in TG Abstain = No opinion expressed –Proposals must get a simple majority of Merge votes to continue

doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 6 The remaining proposals that address the same objective are required to merge to one proposal (one proposal per objective) Presentation: January 15-20, 2006 Due at IEEE: January 11, 2006 by midnight (EST) Yes/No/Abstain vote after each of proposal presentations. –The vote shall be Include this Proposed Normative Text in the draft. Proposals must get 75% or more yes to be included in draft. –If a proposal receives 75% yes, then instruct the TG editor to adopt/merge it into the base draft. –If more than one proposals are targeted for the same objective and they are contradictor, voters must vote Yes for at most one of them –If no proposal achieves 75%, vote shall be given at each subsequent meeting until one or more proposals get 75% or more yes to be included in draft. At end of July 2006 meeting, if no proposal has been adopted into the base draft, then TG votes to rescind its PAR Step 3: Complete Substantive Text for Base Draft

doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 7 Subsequent Additions and Modifications Subsequent additions and modifications can be submitted after the base draft adopted in TG Proposals must get 75% or more to be included in draft. Must be compatible with the base draft and clearly instruct editor how to include it in the base draft

doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 8 Motion TGv shall update the process for the substantive text selection to produce the base draft as defined in doc# r3

doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 9 Backup