1 AGENDA: HBD NIM paper#2 Itzhak HBD HV system HBD monitoring Acceptance and total number of channels Proposal status Large GEM tests Lev Monte Carlo Ilia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benji Lewis APS April Meeting Hadron Blind Detector implementation during PHENIX Run-10 Benji Lewis On behalf of the PHENIX Collaboration.
Advertisements

1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, April 9, 2008 April 9, 2008.
D. Peterson, “Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program” TPC R&D Mini Workshop, Orsay 12-January Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program: first events with.
January 25, 2003Richard Talaga1 High Voltage Distribution for RPCs Simple Model of Detector & HV Specifications & Requirements Simple HV Distribution Layout.
BaBar/LST Meeting Dec 8, 2003K. Honscheid, Ohio State University Module Assembly Quality Control High Voltage Ohio State Status Report.
CsI Photocathode Production and Testing
Low Voltage Power Requirement of TOF FEEs. Maximum tray. Low Noise:  Periodic and Random Distortion (PARD) < few mV RMS Floating.
01/07/08I. Ravinovich1 HBD Update Ilia Ravinovich DC Meeting, January 9, 2008.
HBD Operation in Run 9 Thomas K Hemmick for the HBD Crew.
1 Sasha Milov DC meeting Dec 7, 2005 HBD upgrade status. Sasha Milov Dec 07, 2005.
1 HBD Construction status Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL, February, 2006 Plans for Run-6 Box construction GEM assembly and testing Status of urgent items.
1 Searching for the QGT: Quantum Efficiency Gain Transparency TK Hemmick for the HBD Crew.
1 July GEM R&D Activity in USTC Yi Zhou University of Science & Technology of China.
HBD Meeting 3/14/06 B. Azmoun BNL Testing and Preparation of HBD Full Scale Prototype for Upcoming Engineering Run Puzzling Behavior of GEM’s To Do List.
1 Sasha Milov DC meeting Jan 11, 2006 HBD upgrade status. Sasha Milov Jan 11, 2006.
Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.
Preliminary Results from a Trial Beam Test of the Small HBD Prototype at LEGS Bob Azmoun BNL HBD Working Group Meeting May 10, 2005.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL, April 11, 2007.
Sasha Milov EC/DC meeting March 9, Assembly and testing facility. Sasha Milov March 9, 2005 Sequence of operations Glove Box Evaporator Other needs.
1 Thomas K Hemmick May 17 th, The Gas Electron Multiplier: GEM Thomas K. Hemmick Stony Brook University.
Itzhak Tserruya, BNL, Aug. 11, Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann Institute, Israel BNL, Upgrades Meeting, Aug. 11, 2004 HBD: Infrastructure and Integration.
Design of a readout system for RPCs Olu Amoda2 The LODEN Group The group is an association of Fermilab scientists who teamed up to build a cosmic ray.
Itzhak Tserruya IEEE 2007, October 29, 2007, Hawaii Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel for the HBD group: for the HBD group:
Status of GEM T2 assembly Outline Status of the GEM components Summary Tests TOTEM Collaboration meeting CERN / Risto Orava for Kari Kurvinen.
1 HBD Update: DC Meeting June 2006 Thomas K Hemmick for the HBD Crew…
12/12/09 MPGD 神戸大学 1 Yusuke Komatsu A B. Azmoun B, C. Woody B, K. Ozawa A University of Tokyo A,Brook Haven National Lab. B.
HBD Gas and QE Monitoring Craig Woody BNL HBD Working Group Meeting October 19, 2005.
1 HBD update Itzhak Tserruya DC Upgrades meeting, January 14, 2005 NIM paper II: Generic R&D ~ completed Full scale prototype construction Pending issues.
The 21st International Conference on Ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, March 30 – April 4, Knoxville, TN Results from cosmics and First LHC.
Itzhak Tserruya, July 7,  Towards HBD Proposal  Ongoing activities and plans for the next two months Itzhak Tserruya HBD meeting at BNL, September.
1 Sasha Milov DC meeting... March 7, 2007 HBD status Sasha Milov March 7, 2007.
1 TPC R&D proposal from the WIS group I. Ravinovich WIS I. Ravinovich12/15/2015.
HBD CDR Gas System and Monitoring Craig Woody BNL DC Upgrades/EC Meeting March 9, 2005.
6-Aug-02Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX Upgrade mini-Workshop1 Boris Khachaturov, Alexander Kozlov, Ilia Ravinovich and Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann Institute, Israel.
HBD Status Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting October 3, 2007.
Itzhak Tserruya, BNL, May13, HBD R&D Update: Demonstration of Hadron Blindness A. Kozlov, I. Ravinovich, L. Shekhtman and I. Tserruya Weizmann Institute,
HBD Status Report C. Woody For the HBD Crew DC Meeting June 13, 2007.
TPC/HBD R&D at BNL Craig Woody BNL Mini Workshop on PHENIX Upgrade Plans August 6, 2002.
HBD Status for Run 10 C.Woody For the HBD Group Collaboration Meeting January 15, 2010.
Future Possibilities for Measuring Low Mass Lepton Pairs in Christine Aidala for the Collaboration Quark Matter 2002, Nantes.
Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002.
Triple GEM Beam Test within PHENIX DC Upgrades Meeting 4/14/04 B. Azmoun PHENIX Brookhaven National Lab.
1 HBD: Update and Schedule Itzhak Tserruya DC Meeting, BNL, April 13, 2005 Outline:  Full scale prototype status  Light source test  Construction Schedule.
Chamber Quality Control Before the construction several checks are performed on:  Panels (cathode and pad PCB)  GEM foil Tests on assembled detector.
1 Sasha Milov DC meeting Sept 12, 2007 HBD status Sasha Milov Sept 12, 2007.
Update on the HBD Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting May 11, 2005.
Collection of Photoelectrons from a CsI Photocathode in Triple GEM Detectors Craig Woody Brookhaven National Lab B.Azmoun 1, A Caccavano 1, Z.Citron 2,
RICH detector for CLAS12 CLAS12 Technical Workshop P. Rossi Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - INFN.
Status of PHENIX Drift Chamber Drift Chambers (DC) are one of the vital components of PHENIX central arms. During the last RHIC Run3 the major activities.
Plans to Test HBD Prototype in Run 6 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting March 8, 2006.
1 HBD R&D: Update Itzhak Tserruya (for A. Kozlov, I. Ravinovich and L. Shekhtman) Weizmann Institute, Rehovot DC meeting Feb. 14, 2003.
PHENIX Safety Review Overview of the PHENIX Hadron Blind Detector Craig Woody BNL September 15, 2005.
HBD Status Report from Run 9 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting July 8, 2009.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
Collection of Photoelectrons from a CsI Photocathode in Triple GEM Detectors C. Woody B.Azmuon 1, A Caccavano 1, Z.Citron 2, M.Durham 2, T.Hemmick 2, J.Kamin.
1 HBD Update Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure T.K. Hemmick for the Wyld Stallions.
1 HBD: Responsibilities, Cost and Schedule Itzhak Tserruya EC/DC Meeting, BNL, March 9, 2005.
Preparations to Install the HBD for Run 6 Craig Woody BNL PHENIX Weekly Meeting January 26, 2006.
Initial Performance of the PHENIX Hadron Blind Detector at RHIC Craig Woody Brookhaven National Lab For the PHENIX Collaboration N IEEE Nuclear.
P HOTON Y IELD DUE TO S CINTILLATION IN CF4 Bob Azmoun, Craig Woody ( BNL ) Nikolai Smirnov ( Yale University )
T2 GEM Production in Helsinki Kari Kurvinen TOTEM T2 EDR meeting Radiation Detector Laboratory of Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP) and Department.
Update on HBD Activities at BNL Craig Woody BNL HBD Working Group Meeting November 16, 2004.
Faculty of Physics, University of Belgrade Collaboration meeting, Budapest 15 th of May, ToF-L/R detector HV upgrade Jovan Puzović, Faculty of Physics,
R&D on Hadron Blind detector, recent results Issues addressed: - gain limits in CF 4 with heavily ionizing particles - operation.
HBD HV Control and Monitoring System STATUS UPDATE Manuel Proissl HBD Meeting 01/19/2009.
6/29/2016I. Ravinovich1 HBD status in Run-10 I. Ravinovich WIS.
1 Stony Brook Update Cross Roads T.K. Hemmick for himself.
Development of GEM at CNS
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Presentation transcript:

1 AGENDA: HBD NIM paper#2 Itzhak HBD HV system HBD monitoring Acceptance and total number of channels Proposal status Large GEM tests Lev Monte Carlo Ilia CAARI, IEEE-Rome Conferences Craig Analog electronics Digital electronics Chi HBD Assembly and Testing Facility Sasha AOB Itzhak Tserruya HBD meeting at BNL, October 13, 2004

2 HBD NIM paper #2: (I) Layout Title: A Hadron Blind Detector for the PHENIX Experiment at RHIC. 1. Introduction 2. HBD Concept 3. Set-up and Experimental conditions 4. Detector response as function of the drift field; - response to pions and alpha particles - pion rejection facto - response to photoelectrons 5. CsI Quantun Efficiency 6. Discharge probability - lab tests with alpha particles - test of a triple GEM detector in PHENIX 7. Aging studies 8. Summary Time table: we should be able to circulate an almost complete draft within 1-2 weeks

3 HBD HV system (I) Overview The HBD consists of two identical detectors, one on the West arm and one on the East arm. Each detector has 4 azimuthal sectors. Each sector has two detector elements. So there are 8 detector elements per arm and 16 detector elements in total. Each detector element consists of a pad plane at ground potential, three GEMs and one entrance mesh all under negative HV. A three-branch resistive chain circuit with one single HV power supply (see description below) is used to power the three GEMs, and a second power supply is used for the mesh. So we need two HV power supplies per detector element, i.e. a total of 32 HV power supplies for the whole HBD. Figure 1 shows the entire HV diagram for one detector element. Resistive Chain The main advantage of the three-branch resistive chain is that if a permanent short occurs in one of the HV segments of one GEM, the two other GEMs will be totally unaffected. The resistors R2 are surface mounted on the GEM foils and are therefore located inside the HBD detector. All the rest of the resistive chain sits in a box outside the HBD. The values of the various components are: R=5 MΩ, R1=1.2 MΩ, R2=20 MΩ and C = 2nF. The normal operating voltage across the GEMs to achieve a gain of 104 is almost 500 V per GEM. This corresponds to a total voltage of 3740 V and a total current of 300 mA supplied by the power supply, or 100 mA in each branch. Under normal operation, there is no current and no voltage drop across the resistors R2. However, if a short occurs in a HV segment of one of the GEMs, then this GEM will have a lower voltage of only 451 V whereas the other two GEMs will remain at 500 V. This will result in a smaller overall gain of the detector by a factor of about 2.5. One can restore the nominal gain either by increasing the HV on each GEM by about 15 V or by replacing the 5MΩ resistor of the shorted GEM with a 5.7MΩ resistor. The system must be protected against discharges. If a discharge occurs in one GEM, the corresponding power supply should ramp down (to avoid continuous discharges). The associated mesh power supply should also ramp down simultaneously in order to avoid an excessive HV gradient between the mesh and the first GEM. The difference between the total current in case of a discharge in one GEM and the total current in regular regime will be ~1.3 mA. Thus the precision of the current monitoring in the power supply should be significantly better then this value to provide reliable tripping in case of discharge. All the above considerations fix the specifications of the require HV power supply: l HV > 4000 V, I > 300 μA with a resolution much better than 1 μA, and spark protection.

4 HBD HV system (II): 3-Branch Resistive Chain Main advantage: if a short occurs in a HV segment of one of the GEMs, then this GEM will have a lower voltage by about 10% whereas the other two GEMs will remain totally unaffected.

5 HBD HV system (III): list of components ItemQuantityDescriptionSupplier and model number 11Universal multichannel high voltage power supply system CAEN SY2527 a 24b4b 12 channel plug-in board, 6 kV output voltage, 1 mA current full scale, 100 nA current resolution CAEN A c HV cable coaxial cable with SHV connectors Draka Multimedia Cable FRNC HTC SUHNER 11 SHV C 4112 d HV connector bulkhead mounted, hermetically sealed SUHNER 22 SHV , 5144 e HV panel connectorSUHNER 22 SHV MΩ surface mount high voltage chip resistors (SMD) Welwyn Components HVC M JTR MΩ High Voltage resistorsRS Components , MΩ High Voltage resistorsRS Components , 9642 nF, 6KV capacitorsRS Components Items 1-3: BNL/SUNY Items 4-9: WI

6 HBD Monitoring HBD gas gain monitoring The gas gain in the HBD can vary due to a variety of factors. It varies during the first several hours following HV application. It varies from one GEM to another, from one point to another within a given GEM and as function of time due to variations of temperature and pressure. Since we want to make use of the analog response of the detector to distinguish between single and double hits it is imperative to have a reliable and periodic gain mapping over the whole detector on a pad by pad basis. A very fast and accurate gain calibration can be obtained by collecting data with positive drift field and using the well defined mip peak. This will necessitate two independent HV power supplies per detector element, one to power the mesh and one to power the triple GEM such that the drift field can easily be varied from positive to negative by changing the mesh HV power supply. CsI QE monitoring A crucial factor for the HBD operation is the monitoring of the CsI QE. In the initial production phase, we will need to measure the absolute QE of the CsI layer evaporated on GEMs with a monochromator. Once we are convinced that the photocathodes are healthy we could just use some relative measurement of the QE. This procedure will have to be developed and will have to be used in order to monitor the relative QE of the HBD detector over time. **** We need a simple and reliable method to monitor the QE CF4 UV transmission monitoring We must ensure a very clean gas system in order to avoid absorption of UV photons in the radiator gas and to avoid formation of the acid HF which could be catastrophic for the detector operation. The gas system has provision to monitor the input and output gas for concentrations of oxygen and water down to the ppm level. In addition to that, the return gas line should be periodically monitored for UV transmission using a monochromator.

7 Acceptance and number of channels(I) Central arm acceptance: φ = 90 o, |η| = 0.35  θ = ± 19.7 o HBD acceptance: φ = 100 o, |η| = 0.4  θ = ± 22.3 o Two inconsistencies: * Veto area should be the same in φ and θ. * Blob size was not taken into account (~2 o ) Need: φ = 104 o, θ = ± 26.7 o  area increases by ~25%. Monte Carlo underway to optimize the HBD acceptance

8 Proposal 1. Write all text in latex 2. Web page: 3. Zeev is waiting for input !!!!

9 Plans for the next 2-3 months As anticipated at our last meeting in September: 1. Large GEM test : Sept-Oct  almost completed 2. Full size prototype: Oct-Nov  not yet started 3. Monte Carlo: Sept-Oct.  excellent progress The focus for the next two months: Full-size prototype construction Finish the proposal Submit the NIM paper