Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis for J2 chamber Yousuke Kataoka (University of Tokyo) Atsuhiko Ochi, Yuki Edo (Kobe University) 11 / 12 / 2012 Micromegas weekly meeting 1.
Advertisements

Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
CO2 cooling for FPCCD Vertex Detector Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 1.
1 FPCCD Vertex Detector for ILC Yasuhiro Sugimoto  Concept of FPCCD VTX  FPCCD prototype  VTX inner radius.
Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
JC and Marina 12/18/00 Pixel Detector Simulation with Magnetic Field  Effects with magnetic Field o Deflection o Effective mobility o Non-constant Hall.
10 Nov 2004Paul Dauncey1 MAPS for an ILC Si-W ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
A new idea of the vertex detector for ILC Y. Sugimoto Nov
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
R&D Status of FPCCD Vertex Detector Dec.1, 2006 Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK.
Fine Pixel CCD Option for the ILC Vertex Detector
Eunil Won/Korea U1 Vertex/Tracker summary Jul Eunil Won/Korea University.
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
R&D status of FPCCD VTX and its cooling system Yasuhiro Sugimoto for FPCCD VTX group 1.
1 R&D Status and plan for FPCCD VTX Yasuhiro Sugimoto
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
Vertex Detector for GLD 3 Mar Y. Sugimoto KEK.
2016/6/4 Taka Kondo (KEK) 1 Issues of the SCT Digitization model 2 nd meeting of SCT Digitization TF Taka Kondo (KEK) 1.Current SCT digitization.
Yosuke Watanabe….. University of Tokyo, RIKEN A, KEK C, Development of a GEM tracker for E16 J-PARC 1 Thanks to ???????????
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
1 Engineering issues for FPCCD VTX Detector Y. Sugimoto KEK July 24, 2007.
EPS-HEP 2015, Vienna. 1 Test of MPGD modules with a large prototype Time Projection Chamber Deb Sankar Bhattacharya On behalf of.
Fine Pixel CCD for ILC Vertex Detector ‘08 7/31 Y. Takubo (Tohoku U.) for ILC-FPCCD vertex group ILC vertex detector Fine Pixel CCD (FPCCD) Test-sample.
2006 Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 25-Apr Study Items Basic study of fully depleted CCD Simulation studies for FPCCD VTX Radiation damage Thin wafer and.
JLC CCD Vertex Detector R&D Y. Sugimoto KEK
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
FPCCD option Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/5/24 ILD 1.
FPCCD Vertex detector 22 Dec Y. Sugimoto KEK.
A TPC for ILC CEA/Irfu, Apero, D S Bhattacharya, 19th June Deb Sankar Bhattacharya D.Attie, P.Colas, S. Ganjour,
Silicon Detector Tracking ALCPG Workshop Cornell July 15, 2003 John Jaros.
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
1 FPCCD VTX Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 2010/1/22. 2 FPCCD: Features and R&D issues (1/2) Small pixel size (~5  m) –Sensor development Small size chip; ~6mm.
R&D Plan in FY2003 Vertex Detector Subgroup Y. Sugimoto 11 Apr
Report to LCFI Oversight Committee, January 2007 ■ Introduction – towards the ILC ■ Some international VXD developments ■ Progress with LCFI sensor development.
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
Vertex detector update 1 Oct Y. Sugimoto KEK.
ILD Vertex Detector Y. Sugimoto 2012/5/24 ILD
J. Brau LCWS 2006 March, J. Brau LCWS Bangalore March, 2006 C. Baltay, W. Emmet, H. Neal, D. Rabinowitz Yale University Jim Brau, O. Igonkina,
Review of Micromegas Tracking Detectors for CLAS12 – May 7, 2009 Reviewers: Madhu Dixit, Mac Mestayer Presentations covered the following topics: –detector.
The Prototype Simulation of SDHCAL Ran.Han Gerald.Grenier Muriel.Donckt IPNL.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
1 Performance of a CCD tracker at room temperature T. Tsukamoto (Saga Univ.) T. Kuniya, H. Watanabe (Saga Univ.); A. Miyamoto, Y. Sugimoto (KEK); S. Takahashi,
FPCCD VTX Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 2010/1/22. FPCCD: Features and R&D issues (1/2) Small pixel size (~5  m) –Sensor development Small size; ~6mm x 6mm Full.
TRACKING AND VERTEXING SUMMARY Suyong Choi Korea University.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
Vertex detector R&D Work Plan in /3/11 Y. Sugimoto for KEK-Tohoku-TohokuGakuin-Niigata- ToyamaCMT Collaboration.
6/19/06 Su DongSiD Advisory: VXD DOD Summary II1 VXD DOD Summary (II) Sensors & Other system Issues.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Towards Snowmass Jul. 13, 2005 Y.Sugimoto. Charge for Detector WGs Charge for Concept Groups: work towards a baseline design define performance criteria.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
R&D status of FPCCD VTX for ILD
First Testbeam results
Potential Ion Gate using GEM: experiment and simulation
DEPFET Vertex Detector Simulation
FPCCD Vertex Detector for ILC
Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 17 R&D status of FPCCD VTX Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 17
CCD based Vertex Detector for GLC
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
FPCCD Vertex Detector for ILC
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
GLD IR optimization and background study
Enhanced Lateral Drift (ELAD) sensors
Status of CCD Vertex Detector R&D for GLC
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

FPCCD Vertex Detector Accumulate hit signals for one train and read out between trains (Other options read out 20 times per train) Fine pixel of ~5  m (x20 more pixels than “standard” pixels) to keep low pixel occupancy Fully depleted epitaxial layer to minimize the number of hit pixels due to charge spread by diffusion Two layers in proximity make a doublet (super layer) to minimize the wrong-tracking probability due to multiple scattering Tracking capability with single layer using cluster shape can help background rejection Three doublets (6 CCD layers) make the detector Operation at low temperature to keep dark current negligible (r.o. cycle=200ms)

Tracking efficiency Large number of background hits may cause tracking inefficiency: mis-identification of signal hit with background hit  : Background hit density  0 : Multiple scattering angle For a normal incident track, the probability of mis-identification of hit is given by; Angular and momentum dependence;

Tracking efficiency cos  p mis d=10mm,  =40/mm 2 d=2mm,  =40/mm 2 d=10mm,  =2/mm 2 Mis-identification Probability (p=1 GeV/c,t Si =50  m) Expected hit density 40/mm 2 /train (TESLA) 20/mm 2 /train (Nominal) 15/mm 2 /train (LowQ) at R=20 mm, B=3 T

Cluster shape Effective background rejection will be possible by requiring angles of hit clusters in two layers of a doublet and the angle of the line connecting the two hits to be consistent with the extrapolated track. (tracking capability with single layer!) Standard pixel FPCCD

Baseline design

Advantages of FPCCD Free from beam-induced RF noise  x ~1.4  m even with digital readout Simple structure : advantageous for large size Active circuit on one edge : easy to control temperature Readout speed: 15MHz is enough (128(V)x20000(H)/200ms=12.8MHz) (CPCCD:>50MHz) CCD MAPS/FAPS/ISIS

Impact parameter resolution Full simulation study by Jupiter Parameters: Old standard option: R=24, 36, 48, 60 mm t = 330  m/layer  = 4  m FPCCD option: R=20, 22, 39, 41, 58, 60 mm t = 80  m/layer  = 2  m Be beam pipe (common): R=18 mm t = 500  m

Impact parameter resolution p=1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 GeV/c T. Nagamine

Lorentz angle Lorentz angle in depleted-layer tan  =  n B  n : electron mobility Carrier velocity saturates at high E field:  n =0.07 m 2 E=1x10 4 V/cm  n =0.045 m 2 E=2x10 4 V/cm Small angle can be cancelled by tilting the wafer May not be a serious problem Number of hit pixels does not increase so much B=3TB=5T E=1x10 4 V/cm  =12deg  =19deg E=2x10 4 V/cm  =7.7deg  =13deg

Lorentz angle Calculation of E-field in epi-layer Tools FEMLAB (COMSOL in Japan) 3.1 Solve Poisson equation by finite element analysis (FEA) Parameters Material is assumed fully depleted (No free charge) n-layer: N D =1x10 16 /cm 3 =1.6x10 3 C/m 3 Epi-layer: N A =1x10 13 /cm 3 =-1.6 C/m 3 V G =4 V t SiO2 =100 nm t n =1  m t epi =15  m

Lorentz angle Result of E-field calculation

Lorentz angle Result of E-field calculation – Potential

Lorentz angle Result of E-field calculation – Summary Almost constant E-field of ~10 4 V/cm in epi-layer can be achieved E-field in epi-layer depends on gate voltage Higher (positive) gate voltage gives higher E-field Positive gate voltage should be applied during train crossing in order to get saturated carrier velocity and less Lorentz angle (Inverted (MPP) mode can be maintained for ~1ms) The Lorentz angle of 12 degrees is expected at B=3T

Summary and outlook We propose FPCCD option for the ILC Vertex Detector Fully depleted CCD with 5  m-square fine pixel size Accumulate 2820 BX and readout between trains Two layers make a doublet (super layer) to pick up signal hits out of background hits If the thickness of the wafers is less than 80  m, the impact parameter resolution better than  b = 5  10/(p  sin 3/2  )  m can be achieved with R in =20 mm and B=3T Electric field in the epitaxial layer has been calculated. From the results, the Lorentz angle of ~12 degrees at B=3T is expected Tracking efficiency under beam background is the most critical issue for FPCCD. Simulation study is urgent.