May 19-22, 2008.  Become familiar with the Fostering Algebraic Thinking materials.  Examine activities that may be challenging to facilitate. 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Fostering Algebraic Thinking October 26 December 1 6-hour Assignment after Session 2 January 20 Presented by: Janna Smith
Number Talks Presented by: Kim Mott, Instructional Coach Beechgrove
Developing Mathematical Practices for Geometry, Algebra II and Beyond Developed by Education Development Center, Inc. with support from the Massachusetts.
Developed by ERLC/ARPDC as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation.
 9:00-9:30Announcements  9:30-10:30Marcy’s Dots Undoing Marcy’s Dots  10:30-10:45Break  10:45-11:15Documenting Algebraic Thinking on ___  11:15-12:00The.
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Fostering Algebraic Thinking October 26  December 2  6-hour Assignment after Session 2  January 20 Presented by: Janna Smith
Algebraic Reasoning January 6, State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.
Math /Algebra Talks: Mental Math Strategies
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Vacaville USD September 4, 2014
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
Misunderstood Minds 1.
Common Core Mathematics Implementation Kindergarten January 6, 2014.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
9.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 17 SEPT 2014 TAKING CHANCES (IN CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY)
Slide 1 Welcome California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Year 2, Follow Up 3 January 22, 2011.
Supporting argumentation as an everyday event Verbal Written.
Journey into Algebra: Describing Change Dr. Henry Kepner, Dr. Kevin McLeod, Dr. DeAnn Huinker, Mathematics Partnership (MMP) Math Teacher Leader (MTL)
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS MATHEMATICAL PRACTICES OBJECTIVE: APPLY BEST MATH PRACTICES TO SOLVE PROBLEMS TO BECOME A MATHEMATICALLY PROFICIENT STUDENT.
+ Operations and Algebraic Thinking Success Implementing CCSS for K-2 Math Day 2.
Flowcharts. Problem Solving Computer programs are written to solve problems or perform tasks Programmers translate the solutions or tasks into a language.
A GENDA  9:00-9:15Announcements  9:15-9:45Candles Problem  9:45-10:15Candles Problem Discussion  10:15-10:20MTR  10:20-10:35Break  10:35-11:15Introduction.
WELCOME BACK TO CAMP!. Agenda Warm-Up for statistical and probabilistic thinking Norms for our PD Teaching through problem solving Break Lesson Study:
Day 3 Professional Learning for Mathematics Leaders and Coaches— Not just a 3-part series 1.
Science and Engineering Practices: Models and Argumentation “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Math Fellows January 22, Setting Goals and Selecting Tasks 1.Anticipating 2.Monitoring 3.Selecting 4.Sequencing 5.Connecting The Five Practices.
Project M3: Mentoring Mathematical Minds Richmond, Virginia
Creating and thinking critically
CONCEPTUALIZING AND ACTUALIZING THE NEW CURRICULUM Peter Liljedahl.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
1 Math CAMPPP 2011 Plenary Three Multiple Representations Fostering Student Conjectures Linking Important Math, Expectations, Learning Goals and Tasks.
1 Learning to Lead Mathematics Professional Development.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
How Are Computers Programmed? CPS120: Introduction to Computer Science Lecture 5.
BC Curriculum Revisions 1968 → what 1976 → what 1984 → what + how 1994 → what + how 2003 → what + how 2008 → what + how 2015 → how + what.
THE NEW CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: So far Revised resources Collect evidence from a “faculty meeting” Debrief Planning.
Anne Watson Hong Kong  grasp formal structure  think logically in spatial, numerical and symbolic relationships  generalise rapidly and broadly.
MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic to explore, make connections,
Experience Protocols Tools that provide framework for discussions By Claire Dean.
Slide 1 Welcome California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Year 2, Follow Up 3 January 22, 2011.
Plenary 1. What’s important about the Math we Teach? A Focus on Big Ideas Marian Small
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
To Middle, High and beyond Teachers C/O 6.EE, 7.EE, & 8.FA Postage Stamp Problem HCPSS, MD From Fostering Algebraic Thinking by Mark Driscoll.
Curriculum Leadership Council Elementary Mathematics Break-Out Session November 21, 2013.
Welcome! Please arrange yourselves in groups of 6 so that group members represent: A mix of grade levels A mix of schools 1.
Vista Unified School District Meaningful Algebra.
Curriculum Leadership Council High School Model Lesson Functions and Everyday Situations June 20, 2013.
Number Talks: A Powerful Math Instructional Practice.
Welcome to Day Four. Agenda Number Talk Linear Function Video Cases Break Hiring Problem Lunch Connecting Number to Algebra Break Scientific Notation,
Mathematical Practice Standards
USOE Professional Learning Series
MELT Grades 6-8 Algebra Sheila S. Brookshire
Vacaville USD December 8, 2014
Grade 6 – Module 5 Module Focus Session
Content Learning Targets
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
MELT Grades 6-8 Algebra Sheila S. Brookshire
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
HANDOUT Page for facilitators that lists all the hand outs needed for the workshop and the meanings of icons used on the slides in this workshop. SLIDE.
Welcome to Day Three.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

May 19-22, 2008

 Become familiar with the Fostering Algebraic Thinking materials.  Examine activities that may be challenging to facilitate.  Develop plans for implementation at your sites.

 How students think about mathematics.  Understanding students’ thinking through analysis of different kinds of data.  Understanding how algebraic thinking develops.  Instructional implications.

 Analyzing Student Written Work  Listening to Students  Asking Questions of Students  Documenting Patterns of Student Thinking

 Monday AM Introductory Session  Monday PM Analyzing Written Student Work  Tuesday AM Analyzing Written Student Work  Tuesday PM Listening to Students  Wednesday AM Asking Questions of Students  Wednesday PM Planning for Implementation  Thursday AM Documenting Patterns of Student Thinking  Thursday PM Closing Session

 Begin and end on time.  Respect your colleagues’ ideas and opinions.  Monitor your own participation.  When working in groups, allow time for group members to read and think about the problem before beginning your discussion.  Only one conversation should take place in a group at a time.

 9:00-9:30Announcements  9:30-9:55Introduction to A-HOMs  9:55-10:25Postage Stamp Problem  10:25-10:40Break  10:40-11:20 Postage Stamp Discussion  11:20-11:45Making a Mathematical Thinking Record  11:45-12:00Group Process Discussion Announcements

 1:00-1:30A-HOMs Discussion  1:30-2:15Crossing the River Problem  2:15-2:30Break  2:30-3:00Crossing the River Discussion  3:00-4:00Crossing the River Example Papers

 Build the foundations of a comfortable and productive study group.  Familiarize yourselves with the FAT sessions and some of the tools, such as the Mathematical Thinking Record (MTR).  Explore the concepts of algebraic habits of mind.  Become comfortable working on mathematics activities together and sharing mathematical ideas.

 Have you heard this phrase before in the context of mathematics?  What does the phrase mean to you?  What ideas or other phrases does it bring to mind?

The algebraic habits of mind are a language for describing algebraic thinking. We will use this language as a tool to understand and talk about the kinds of thinking that you and your students do about mathematics.

 Which of these lines of thought seem familiar to you?  Can you think of things you have seen your students do that indicate that they are engaging in these productive lines of thought?

 In groups of four people, work on the Postage Stamps math activity.  While working on this problem, think about the methods people in your small group tried, the questions they asked, the process for coming to a deeper understanding, and the different ways of thinking about the problem.  Post your group’s work.

 In what ways is this problem “algebraic”? How does it elicit algebraic thinking?  You may have noticed yourself working from output to input. How did different group members work from output to input to answer questions such as “How can I make 53¢ worth of postage?”

 What computational shortcuts did group members use as they worked on the problem?  How were these shortcuts useful?  What rules did group members come up with to help them generate postage values of 5¢ and 7¢ stamps?

 What would you like to recall about the different strategies and/or solutions used by your colleagues? Record the approaches and strategies you would like to remember.  What would you like to recall about the algebraic thinking? Record the specific features of habits of mind that you have seen in the different solutions.  What would you like to recall about the different strategies and/or solutions used by your students? Record the mathematical approaches or strategies you would like to remember.

 How does the way the group works help you develop a spirit of inquiry and ask questions about algebraic thinking or the teaching of algebraic thinking?  How could the group do this better?

 Explore the Algebraic Habits of Mind.  Examine algebraic thinking in your own and your colleagues’ written work.  Use student written work as data during the process of exploring algebraic thinking.  Explore the range of algebraic ideas that can occur in students’ thinking.  Look for potential in students’ written work.

 Doing-Undoing  Building Rules to Represent Functions  Abstracting from Computation

 Input from output  Working backward

 Organizing information  Predicting patterns  Chunking the information  Describing a rule  Different representations  Describing change  Justifying a rule

 Computational shortcuts  Calculating without computing  Generalizing beyond examples  Equivalent expressions  Symbolic expressions  Justifying shortcuts

 Work with the members of your group on the Crossing the River activity.  As you work, think about the strategies you are using to solve the problem.  Post your group’s work.

 Did everyone come up with the same solution (or partial solution) to the problem? Why or why not?  What aspects of algebraic thinking were involved in the various approaches?  What might the strategies for solving this problem indicate about understanding the algebraic concept of “variable”?  The last question is sometimes difficult for students. Why do you think that is?

 What would you like to recall about the different strategies and/or solutions used by your colleagues? Record the approaches and strategies you would like to remember.  What would you like to recall about the algebraic thinking? Record the specific features of habits of mind that you have seen in the different solutions.  What would you like to recall about the different strategies and/or solutions used by your students? Record the mathematical approaches or strategies you would like to remember.

 Follow the instructions in Activity 1, pages 5-14.

 The small group discusses: What evidence do you see in these papers of the habit of mind Building Rules to Represent Functions? How did students organize information? In what ways do they describe any rules they are building? Do any other features of Building Rules to Represent Functions play out in the student work?  What evidence do you see in these papers of Doing/Undoing or Abstracting from Computation?

 Review Sums of Consecutive Numbers activity.  Review The Staircase Problem.  Select one or two examples of student work to bring to the group.  Read “Algebraic Thinking Tasks”.