Seismic interferometry-by- deconvolution for controlled-source and passive data Kees Wapenaar, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Deyan Draganov, Juerg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relations between reflection and transmission responses of 3-D inhomogeneous media Kees Wapenaar Department of Applied Earth Sciences Centre for Technical.
Advertisements

Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar 75 th SEG meeting, Houston November 8, 2005.
Attributes UH Energy Numerical Modeling Numerical Modeling Prestack Data Analysis Prestack Data Analysis Data Processing Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Time-lapse Seismic and AVO Modeling, White Rose, Newfoundland
Mirror migration of ocean-bottom node data: Atlantis, Gulf of Mexico Department of Earth And Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston Emin Emrah.
On the relation between codas in seismic reflection and transmission responses Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Jan Thorbecke Delft University of Technology.
Seismic interferometry: Who needs a seismic source? Roel Snieder Center for Wave Phenomena Colorado School of Mines
One-way acoustic reciprocity and its application in time-lapse seismic By Kees Wapenaar Jacob Fokkema Menno Dillen Pieter Scherpenhuijsen Delft University.
Chapter Fang Li 《 Quantitative Seismic Interpretation 》
Center for Wave Phenomena Department of Geophysics Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado.
Part II: The new Malargüe seismic array Workshop, Cambridge, April 19 th 2011 Elmer Ruigrok, Deyan Draganov and Kees Wapenaar.
Neustadt July 8, 2009 Seismic Interferometry by cross-correlation (CC) and by multi-dimensional deconvolution (MDD) using ambient seismic noise Deyan Draganov,
Correlations 1 Surface waves and correlations  Correlation of time series  Similarity  Time shifts  Applications  Correlation of rotations/strains.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Interferometric Extraction of SSP from Passive Seismic Data Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.
Wavelet Extraction using Seismic Interferometry C. Boonyasiriwat and S. Dong November 15, 2007.
Theory of acoustic daylight imaging revisited
Seismic interferometry by cross-correlation or deconvolution?
Seismic interferometry for passive and exploration data:
Mitigation of RTM Artifacts with Migration Kernel Decomposition Ge Zhan* and Gerard T. Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology June.
6 months at CWP: Done a lot, but not done yet Or: how to deal with black magic by Dr. Ernst Niederleithinger Senior Scientist and Deputy Division Leader.
Automatic selection of reference velocities for recursive depth migration Hugh Geiger and Gary Margrave CREWES Nov 2004.
Observation of diffuse seismic waves at teleseismic distances
Predicting Site Response. Based on theoretical calculations –1-D equivalent linear, non-linear –2-D and 3-D non-linear Needs geotechnical site properties.
3D Seismic Imaging based on Spectral-element Simulations and Adjoint Methods Qinya Liu Department of Physics University of Toronto 1 st QUEST Workshop,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Apr 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Wireline Logging Wireline Logging is the practice of lowering a geophysical.
Wave-equation migration Wave-equation migration of reflection seismic data to produce images of the subsurface entails four basic operations: Summation.
Brad Artman 1, Deyan Draganov 2, Kees Wapenaar 2, Biondo Biondi 1 1 Stanford Exploration Project, Geophysics, Stanford University, 94305, USA 2 Department.
Passive seismic reflection imaging, on the earth and on the moon Kees Wapenaar Guy Drijkoningen Deyan Draganov Elmer Ruigrok Delft University of Technology.
Seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar with many contributions from: Deyan Draganov, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Evert Slob, Juerg Hunzicker, Jan.
Green function retrieval versus Interferometric imaging Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Delft University of Technology 2005 Joint Assembly May 25, 2005 New.
Green’s function retrieval by iterative substitution or inversion (
Direct Migration of Passive Seismic Data Brad Artman 1, Deyan Draganov 2, Kees Wapenaar 2, Biondo Biondi 1 1 Stanford Exploration Project, Geophysics,
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Turning noise into signal: a paradox? Kees Wapenaar, Delft University of Technology Roel Snieder, Colorado School of Mines Presented at: Making Waves about.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Continuous wavelet transform of function f(t) at time relative to wavelet kernel at frequency scale f: "Multiscale reconstruction of shallow marine sediments.
Seismic interferometry: a comparison of approaches Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Joost van der Neut Jan Thorbecke Delft University of Technology.
Controlled Noise Seismology Sherif M. Hanafy 2015 SEG Annual Meeting New Orleans, October 2015.
Does It Matter What Kind of Vibroseis Deconvolution is Used? Larry Mewhort* Husky Energy Mike Jones Schlumberger Sandor Bezdan Geo-X Systems.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 20 Apr 2016
1 Introduction to Applied Geophysics & Geophysical Exploration Prof Jeannot Trampert (coordinator) Dr Fred Beekman
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics Last time: Course Overview Fundamental elements of every geophysical imaging tool include Instrumentation, Sampling,
1.1 Seismic Interferometry Optical interferometry.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Seismic interferometry, the optical theorem and a non-linear point scatterer Kees Wapenaar Evert Slob Roel Snieder Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
ABSTRACT –Basic Principles and applications
Call For Proposals January 2008
WAVEFIELD PREDICTION OF WATER-LAYER-MULTIPLES
1-D Mississippi embayment sediment velocity structure and anisotropy: constraint from ambient noise analysis on a dense array Chunyu,Liu1; Charles A. Langston1.
Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France
POTSI Gaboring Advances
Accommodating the source (and receiver) array in the ISS free-surface multiple elimination algorithm: impact on interfering or proximal primaries and multiples.
Review of the Green’s Theorem deghosting method
Source wavelet effects on the ISS internal multiple leading-order attenuation algorithm and its higher-order modification that accommodate issues that.
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Adriana C. Ramírez and Arthur B. Weglein
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
Adriana Citlali Ramírez
Remarks on Green’s Theorem for seismic interferometry
bc POTSI Gaboring Advances
Codas in reflection and transmission responses
Elastic Green's theorem preprocessing
Prestack depth migration in angle-domain using beamlet decomposition:
Bogdan G. Nita *University of Houston M-OSRP Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Seismic interferometry-by- deconvolution for controlled-source and passive data Kees Wapenaar, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Deyan Draganov, Juerg Hunzicker, Evert Slob, Jan Thorbecke 70 th annual EAGE meeting June 11, 2008 Rome

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

Seismic interferometry by cross-correlation

Uncorrelated noise sources

target virtual source Cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by cross-correlation

Summary: The correlation function is in a specific way related to the Green’s function e.g. Seismic interferometry by cross-correlation

Properties: Requires no knowledge about sources and medium Trace-by-trace process Sources on closed surface (except on free surface) Sensitive to irregular source distribution Medium is assumed lossless

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

Correlation approach:

Deconvolution approach:

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach: data

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach: Correlation function Deconvolution function data

Wapenaar and Verschuur, 1996, Delphi Amundsen, 1999, SEG, Wapenaar et al., 2000, SEG Holvik and Amundsen, 2005, Geophysics Schuster et al., 2006, Geophysics Seismic interferometry by deconvolution target (reservoir) Reflection response R + Upgoing wavefield P - Downgoing wavefield P +

OBC example (1996) Seismic interferometry by deconvolution

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach:

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach:

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach:

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach:

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

van der Neut et al., Thursday 14:55 P272

black = directly modeled red = retrieved Cross-Correlation PP reflection

Deconvolution black = directly modeled red = retrieved PP reflection

Cross-Correlation directly modeled retrieved black = directly modeled red = retrieved PP reflection

directly modeled retrieved Deconvolution black = directly modeled red = retrieved PP reflection

black = directly modeled red = retrieved PS reflection Cross-Correlation

black = directly modeled red = retrieved PS reflection Deconvolution

directly modeled retrieved Cross-Correlation black = directly modeled red = retrieved PS reflection

directly modeled retrieved Deconvolution black = directly modeled red = retrieved PS reflection

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

USArray

Cross-correlation

Deconvolution

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1 … 26 … 51

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1 … 26 … 51

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1 … 26 … 51

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1 … 26 … 51 with

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1 … 26 … 51 with

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1 … 26 … 51 with

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1 … 26 … 51 with

(a) Correlation t (s) Cross-correlation

t (s) (b) Deconvolution Deconvolution

Ground Truth:Cross-correlation:

Ground Truth:Deconvolution:

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach: The correlation function and the deconvolution function are each in a specific way related to the Green’s function

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach:

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach:

Review of seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Introduction Theory Controlled-source data (‘virtual source’) Passive data (surface wave retrieval) Passive data (transmission-to-reflection) Theory (revisited) Conclusions Contents

Seismic interferometry by cross-correlation Requires no knowledge about sources and medium Trace-by-trace process Seismic interferometry by deconvolution Requires no knowledge about sources and medium Can deal with one-sided illumination Irregular source distribution Dissipation allowed (e.g. CSEM)

59 CSEM by deconvolution (Slob et al.) 2D TM-examples for shallow and deep sea Blue curves: no reservoir Red curves: with reservoir

60 Electric field Magnetic field

61 Down going Up going

62 Deconvolved result not dependent on sea depth

CSEM by deconvolution Solve: and are decomposed diffusion fields. Correlation method not applicable

64 Numerical example: Seabed Logging in shallow sea overburden effect 2D TM-examples for receivers in horizontal well Blue curves: no reservoir Red curves: with reservoir

65 Electric field Magnetic field

66 Down going Up going

67 Deconvolved result not dependent on overburden

Random source distribution 100 sources + 20 in cluster A + 30 in cluster B Center freq of wavelet: 20 Hz Dispersion receivers in array 1 21 receivers in array 2

Correlation approach: Deconvolution approach:

‘Virtual source’ by cross-correlation Evaluate: ‘Virtual source’ by deconvolution Solve: Cross-correlation method is an approximation of deconvolution method

Conclusions Correlation method: trace-by-trace process Deconvolution method: Regular receiver grid Irregular source distribution Dissipation allowed