Labour and Living Conditions Division 1 07 / 08 / 2014 HISTORY OF POVERTY MEASUREMENT AND RECENT STUDIES ON IMPROVEMENT OF POVERTY MEASUREMENT IN TURKEY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Child Poverty Study Sierra Leone Report to the Regional Workshop in Abidjan 12 th -14 th February 2008.
Advertisements

1 Purchasing Power Parity and poverty comparisons Jed Friedman / Andrew Dabalen/ Ruslan Yemtsov.
Are current poverty measures sufficient during recessionary times? A Case Study for Ireland Pamela Lafferty Marion McCann Central Statistics Office.
Conference on Indicators, February 2010 Hans Steiner Federal Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Consumer Protection Political Relevance of EU-Social.
5 th Meeting of the Poverty Alleviation Working Group February 26 th, 2015 Ankara, Turkey Making Cooperation Work For Building an Interdependent Islamic.
Coordination of unemployment insurance and social assistance benefits: experience, challenges, and improvement measures Professor Romas Lazutka Vilnius.
Poverty Measurement in Latvia Practical Experience Gained during the Crisis UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE CONFERENCE OF EUROPEAN STATISTICIANS.
Poverty Measurement in Tajikistan
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) Palestine Poverty Maps 2009 March
Seminar on Poverty Measurement Geneva, 5-6 May 2015 POVERTY STUDIES in TURKEY Zeynep GÜRSOY TurkStat.
Results of the survey on methods of poverty measurement in official statistics in the UNECE region – general review SEMINAR ON POVERTY MEASUREMENT GENEVA,
Importance of multidimensional poverty measures 1.Must be part of the measurement of progress/development, along with GDP and inequality:
Influence of the adopted methodological solutions on the assessments of the monetary poverty range. The case of Poland. Seminar on Poverty Measurement.
POVERTY PRESENTATION AT UNDP OFFICE POVERTY STATUS AND TREND IN TANZANIA MAINLAND, /12 Presented by Sango A. H. Simba National Bureau of Statistics.
1 Economy and Poverty Bratislava, May 2003 Jean-Etienne Chapron Statistical Division UNECE.
Measuring poverty and inequality in the Republic of Belarus Inna Konoshonok Head of the Living Standards Statistics and Household Survey Department NATIONAL.
Sudan Experience on Poverty Survey Somaia K.E.Omer Date 7-8 Aug بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
New Human Development Measures DOHA, 9-11 May, 2011 HDR 2010.
DIRECCIÓN DE PLANEACIÓN Y NORMATIVIDAD DE LA POLÍTICA DE EVALUACIÓN The Importance of the Institutionalization of M&E: The Mexican Case Gonzalo Hernández.
June 2014 Turkish Embassy 1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TURKISH ECONOMY AND BILATERAL ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL RELATIONS BETWEEN TURKEY AND CZECH REPUBLIC. Necmi.
Poverty Ms. C. Rughoobur Africa Statistics Day 18 November 2013.
Statistics Division Beijing, China 25 October, 2007 EC-FAO Food Security Information for Action Programme Side Event Food Security Statistics and Information.
DFID: STATISTICS TRAINING DAY LONDON, NOVEMBER 11, 2013 JONATHAN HAUGHTON Measuring.
Comparing SPI and SSI Data Formats The case of Sri Lanka Ruwanthi Elwalagedara Joint ADB / ILO / OECD Korea Policy Centre Technical Workshop on Social.
PADI Action Agenda for China(draft) History of Poverty Reduction in China History of Monitoring & Evaluation in Poverty Reduction Objectives.
Analysis of unemployment and monetary poverty in European countries Analýza nezamestnanosti a monetárnej chudoby v krajinách Európy Ing. Iveta Stankovičová,
Jane Scobie Cross-national research on well-being of older people: Insights from Global AgeWatch Index Setting the scene: Population.
Poverty measurement: experience of the Republic of Moldova UNECE, Measuring poverty, 4 May 2015.
HBS Results, Topics  HBS general characteristic  Indicators obtained based on HBS  The main characteristics of households under the survey 
Multidimensional Poverty Assessment: Experience of Ukraine Inna Ossipova Household Survey Department State Statistics Service of Ukraine.
Presented by: Edoardo Pizzoli - HANDBOOK ON RURAL HOUSEHOLD, LIVELIHOOD AND WELL-BEING: STATISTICS ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND AGRICULTURE HOUSEHOLD INCOME.
Child Poverty in 6 CEE/CIS Countries International Society for Child Indicators 3 rd International Conference Meg Huby & Jonathan Bradshaw University of.
Indian and Northern Affaires indiennes Affairs Canada et du Nord Canada First Nation and Inuit Community Well-Being : Describing Historical Trends ( )
Eurostat Introduction to EU-SILC. Eurostat AGENDA 1.Scope of the instrument 2.Organization of the data 3.Main statistical concepts 4.Information sources.
Self-employment and relative Poverty in Turkey Ahmet Yereli, Necmidden Bagdadioglu and Alparslan Basaran Hacettepe University, Department of Public Finance.
WYE City Group Meeting on Rural Development and Agricultural Household Income Rome, June 2009 Anna Szukielojc-Bienkunska, CSO Poland
Household Economic Resources Discussant Comments UN EXPERT GROUP MEETING 9 September 2008 Garth Bode, Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Poverty Measurement Methodology December, 2009.
Workshop on 2008 SNA and GFSM for EECCA and SEE Countries Jointly organised by UNECE, EFTA, and Eurostat, in collaboration with IMF and Turkstat National.
INTERSTATE STATISTICAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES (CIS-STAT) Analysis of Poverty Measurement Methods in the Commonwealth of.
Improving of Household Sample Surveys Data Quality on Base of Statistical Matching Approaches Ganna Tereshchenko Institute for Demography and Social Research,
Rio Group on Poverty Statistics 1 Background Information 2 Present Objectives and Work Program 3 Approaches to Poverty Measurement 4 Transversal topics.
Slide 1 Summary of responses on vulnerability measurement Vania Etropolska, UNECE 4 May 2015.
السلطة الوطنية الفلسطينية الجهاز المركزي للإحصاء الفلسطيني Palestine National Authority Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics POVERTY ASSESMENT IN PALESTINE.
vital statistics system Myanmar Presented by Myanmar
Xavier Mancero Statistics Division, ECLAC Seminar on poverty measurement Geneva, 5-6 May 2015.
Cards 2003 Regional Programme - lessons learned and suggestions for the future Albania.
1 st meeting of the working group constructing indicators of progress/well-being with citizens/communities Monica Brezzi OECD Public Governance and Territorial.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Comparative Development: Differences and Commonalities among Developing Countries.
1 MONITORING OF THE INDICATORS OF MDG: EXPERIENCE OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Turdubayeva Chinara Chief of the Division of Consolidated Works and Information.
POVERTY IN KENYA, 1994 – 1997: A STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE APPROACH.
DR. ROZIAH MOHD RASDI Faculty of Educational Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia
Planning, preparation and conducting TQS in Tajikistan Agency on statistics under the President of Tajikistan.
PROVIDING INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY OF POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
Interstate statistical committee
EU indicators on social inclusion and social protection and the EU 2020 poverty and social exclusion target – state of play Kornelia Kozovska Secretariat.
Community RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
Poverty Measurement in the World
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY IN MALAYSIA (1999, 2007)
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY IN MALAYSIA (1999, 2007)
Affiliation: TURKISH STATISTICS INSTITUTE
Chapter 17 How Economies Grow and Develop.
Multidimensional Poverty in Arab Countries
The Mexican way of measuring and reducing poverty
HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY
Poverty and Inequality Statistics: Development of Methodology in the Russian Federation Geneva, 5-6 May 2015.
Bangladesh Child-Focused
Rm per month per household (1)
Rm per month per household (1)
Presentation transcript:

Labour and Living Conditions Division 1 07 / 08 / 2014 HISTORY OF POVERTY MEASUREMENT AND RECENT STUDIES ON IMPROVEMENT OF POVERTY MEASUREMENT IN TURKEY

Labour and Living Conditions Division 2 Contents

Labour and Living Conditions Division 3 Poverty Studies

Labour and Living Conditions Division 4 Poverty Studies

Labour and Living Conditions Division 5 Absolute Poverty

Labour and Living Conditions Division 6 Absolute Poverty

Labour and Living Conditions Division 7 Absolute Poverty

Labour and Living Conditions Division 8 Absolute Poverty

Labour and Living Conditions Division 9 Absolute Poverty The poverty rates according to poverty line methods MethodsPercentage of poor individuals (%) (*) TURKEY Below 2,15 $ per capita per day (1) 3,042,392,491,551,410,520,470,220,210,14 Below 4,3 $ per capita per day (1) 30,3023,7520,8916,36 13,338,41 6,834,353,662,79 URBAN Below 2,15 $ per capita per day (1) 2,371,541,230,970,240,090,190,04 0,02 Below 4,3 $ per capita per day (1) 24,6218,3113,5110,056,134,403,070,960,970,94 RURAL Below 2,15 $ per capita per day (1) 4,063,714,512,493,361,491,110,630,570,42 Below 4,3 $ per capita per day (1) 38,8232,1832,6226,5925,3517,5915,3311,929,616,83 (1) Here TL, TL, TL and 0,830 TRY, 0,921 TRY, 0,926 TRY, 0,983 TRY, 0,917 TL, 0,990 TL and 1,004 TL which are the equivalents of 1 $ purchasing power parity (PPP), are used for 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively. (*) New population projections are used since 2007.

Labour and Living Conditions Division 10 Relative Poverty

Labour and Living Conditions Division 11 Relative Poverty

Labour and Living Conditions Division 12 Relative Poverty Poverty treshold, number of poor and poverty rate by poverty treshold methods, Turkey Methods Poverty threshold (TL) Number of poor (Thousand) Poverty rate (%) % ,6 60% , % ,3 60% , % ,7 60% , % ,1 60% , % ,9 60% , % ,1 60% , % ,3 60% ,7

Labour and Living Conditions Division 13 Persistent at Risk of Poverty Rate (*) 60% of equivalised disposable median income is taken into account in calculating persistent- at-risk-of-poverty-rate.

Labour and Living Conditions Division 14 Persistent at Risk of Poverty Rate In the following table, the situations of 1, 2, 3 and 4 refer to population persistent at risk of poverty.

Labour and Living Conditions Division 15 Material Deprivation Rate

Labour and Living Conditions Division 16 Material Deprivation Rate

Labour and Living Conditions Division 17 Assumptions used with regard to the previous methodology Significant differences due to the assumptions used, Assumptions lose their validity within time, Difficulty in construction of comparable series because of the assumptions in use, Assumptions in use weren’t decided by a committee Inadequacy of sample size Number of persons under food poverty threshold Socio-economic characteristics of the poor Regional estimates Need for revision

Labour and Living Conditions Division 18 TURKSTAT started studies in collaboration of local and international experts and institutions in order to update its poverty methodology in It is aimed to launch a better way of measuring poverty that reflect social conditions in Turkey, consider all aspects of poverty and enable to compare poverty lines over time and space. Improvement Studies

Labour and Living Conditions Division 19 In the scope of improvement studies, a working group has been constructed by TURKSTAT consisting of academicians, representative from different national institutions and ministries, non-governmental organizations and unions: There are four sub-groups within working group and each one study on different aspects of poverty Improvement Studies

Labour and Living Conditions Division 20 First sub-group focuses on recent methodologies and applications related poverty measurement Second sub-group makes research on how to improve monetary poverty measures. Equivalence scales and its effect on poverty figures are under responsibility of third sub-group. Last sub-group works on non-monetary poverty and factors affecting poverty in Turkey. Improvement Studies

Labour and Living Conditions Division 21 Joint Workshop with World Bank

Labour and Living Conditions Division 22 Poverty Measurement Workshop, Antalya

Labour and Living Conditions Division 23 Poverty Seminar, Geneva

Labour and Living Conditions Division 24 Meetings within TurkStat Video conference with World Bank and OPHI experts

Labour and Living Conditions Division 25 Absolute poverty (national poverty line) Relative poverty Persistent at Risk of Poverty Material deprivation Multidimensional poverty What Poverty Indicators will be calculated?

Labour and Living Conditions Division 26 Absolute poverty will be calculated with revised assumptions according to the recommendations of experts Relative poverty will be calculated as before (necessary for comparison with the EU) Persistent at Risk of Poverty will be calculated as before (necessary for comparison with the EU) Material deprivation will be calculated as before (necessary for comparison with the EU) Multidimensional poverty will be calculated What will be done?

Labour and Living Conditions Division 27 Recently, the most remarkable method of measuring multidimensional poverty is belonging to Alkire and Foster (2007) which has been widely applied recently by countries, institutions and researches. Mexico’s official multidimensional poverty methodology, which is based on Alkire-Foster (2007) method, is one of the best practises of multidimensional methods. Having aimed to reflect all aspect poverty and being attracted by Mexico case, TURKSTAT has concentrated more on adopting a multidimensional poverty measures. Improvement Studies on Multidimensional Poverty

Labour and Living Conditions Division 28 Need for Multidimensional Poverty Source: estimates by CONEVAL based on MCS-ENIGH 2010.

Labour and Living Conditions Division 29 Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty

Labour and Living Conditions Division 30 Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty (OPHI)

Labour and Living Conditions Division 31 Multidimensional Poverty Measurement in Mexico Social Rights Deprivations 0 3 Vulnerable people by social deprivation Vulnerable people by income Not poor and not vulnerable Wellbeing Income Source: estimates by CONEVAL based on MCS-ENIGH Extreme poor Moderate poor

Labour and Living Conditions Division 32 Thank you...