TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008 www.PosterPresentations.com Leadership Lessons: Decision Making Process Physician Leaders Need to Recognize & be Vigilant for ADMINISTRATIVE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mark Wickham. Effective o bservation is fundamental to accurate evaluation and decision-making: Effective o bservation is fundamental to accurate evaluation.
Advertisements

Screen 1 of 20 Reporting Food Security Information Reporting for Results Learning Objectives At the end of this lesson you will be able to: understand.
Introduction to Engineering Ethics – 2 Engineering Ethics Agenda Review Ethics I Introduce resources for ethical decisions in engineering References Challenger.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
Manned Space Exploration From Apollo to present. Project Apollo Purpose: Land on the moon & return safely to the Earth Purpose: Land on the moon & return.
(Clockwise starting in left back row)  Ellison S. Onizuka, Mission Specialist  Sharon Christa Mc Auliffe, Teacher  Greg Jarvis, Payload Specialist.
The Normalization of Deviance at NASA. Background January 28, 1986 Shuttle engineers were worried about launching at the predicted temperature of 31 degrees.
Three Ethical Case Studies
Introduction to the Ethics of Engineering Introduction to Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas-Pan American College of Science and Engineering.
Case 3.5 – The Columbia Shuttle Disaster by Margaret Battin & Gordon Mower.
Faiz Almansour Alemu Azanaw Rachel Downen Timothy Herbig Angie Schneider.
Comprehend the Challenger accident Comprehend the Columbia accident The Space Shuttle Program: Challenger and Columbia Accidents.
STS-107 COLUMBIA ACCIDENT STS-107 COLUMBIA ACCIDENT MISSION,CREW.
Crisis & Risk Management Introduction. Crisis happens more than we imagine. They are not always easy to see unless they affect our own lives.
Roger Boisjoly and the Challenger Disaster
Decision Making. Learning Goals Managers constantly engaged with issues that have no optimal answers. How do you make these decisions. Help to prepare.
Notes on Challenger DisasterChallenger Disaster Stephen Scott March 12, 2003.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
Transportation Technology
Project Closure CHAPTER FOURTEEN Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
SPACECRAFT ACCIDENTS: EXAMINING THE PAST, IMPROVING THE FUTURE Overview and Challenger Case Study Bryan Palaszewski working with the Digital Learning Network.
How to Implement, Process and Administer the Preventive Action Process
Preventive Action Training
Traveling in Space 1.The Space Agency 2.Unmanned Space Vehicles 3.Manned Space Vehicles 4.Equipment needed in Space 5.The Future of Space Exploration NASA.
Critical Thinking and Argumentation
The purpose of this poster is to document some of the lessons learned during my first 3 months in a new leadership position at a.
MODULE 2 THE DRIVER. FACTORS INVOLVED IN COLLISIONS Three factors in collisions, of which you only have control over the first two; – 1. Driver – 2. Vehicle.
The Challenger Justin Winslow Science. Early History Fell apart 73 seconds after takeoff. Killed all seven crew members. Devastated the United States.
COMPLEX PROBLEMS CLASS 6
FAILURES AND CAUSES NASA MISSIONS SYSM Advance Requirements Engineering Dr. Chung Muhammad Ayaz Shaikh 05/19/2012.
Comprehend why the shuttle was developed Comprehend the space shuttle’s main features Comprehend the shuttle’s legacy The Space Shuttle Program.
Unit 4 vocabulary/ page 44 L.1/ What caused the explosion? 1F. Dwaikat.
Columbia Space Shuttle: The Disaster By: Blair Raphael.
Groupthink II By: Yousuf Ahmed, Rob Bertram, Heather Link, and Emily Gentry.
CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Case study. CASE STUDY: Investigate mechanical properties of rubber at different temperatures.
Managing Data Against Insider Threats Dr. John D. Johnson, CISSP.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Leadership Lessons From History Physicians Can Use The Lessons From History in Their Careers By Calvin.
Everyone needs a red book today! Log in your new assignment!  Bellringer  Who was the first person in space?  Yuri Gagarin.
By: Rachel Gambacorta.  Challenger was NASA's second space shuttle  It had 9 successful launches.
The Space Shuttle On January 5, 1972, President Nixon announced that NASA would proceed with the development of a reusable low cost space shuttle system.
Space Shuttles By Frederick. Launching Space Shuttles To lift the 4.5 million pound (2.05 million kg) shuttle from the pad to orbit (115 to 400 miles/185.
 Space Shuttles allowed astronauts to live in space for up to two weeks to complete experiments or repairs on space equipment.  It lands like an airplane.
Where We Are Now 14–2. Where We Are Now 14–2 Major Tasks of Project Closure Evaluate if the project delivered the expected benefits to all stakeholders.
Introduction to Kaizen Introduction Kaizen Facilitation.
Create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Office of Communications create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Columbia Disaster Robiel Ghebrekidan SYSM 6309: Advanced.
Human Space Flight Trials and Tribulations. Human Space Flight Challenges of Human Space Flight NASATragedy Future of Human Space Flight.
Learning Goals  I will be able to identify the names of the space shuttles in NASA’s program.  I will be able to identify two shuttle disasters.
EMGT 506 Challenger Case Study Question 2 Group B.
Thermal Protection for Space Craft The problem of space craft high heating The solution The crash of the Columbia space ship national Alex&TybyNational.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER DISASTER By: Nick Clarke.
1 MSL 202, Lesson 02b: Advanced Time Management Revision Date: 30 November 2010 Advanced Time Management Poor management of time will prevent you from.
By. Eric nard. 1979,the united states Steve lindsey nicole stott michael barrat alvin drew steve brown and eric doe.
 Exploring the Possibility of Using Independent Oversight to Determine Standards for Space Vehicles Operating in the NAS By: Tara Halt.
Management, Supervision, and Leadership in Law Enforcement.
CHALLENGER DISASTER : CASE STUDY – TO BE
Manned Space Exploration
Anna Kozhemyakov PBRL425-F1WW (F16)
Columbia Space Shuttle: The Disaster
Space Travel Present & Future
Thinking In College In this lesson, we’ll explore what it means to be a college-level thinker, and how to develop strong thinking skills. Any questions.
Thinking In College In this lesson, we’ll explore what it means to be a college-level thinker, and how to develop strong thinking skills. Any questions.
What’s the campaign about?
Fault Tree Analysis Why do we need fault tree analysis? What is it?
Where We Are Now 14–2. Where We Are Now 14–2 Major Tasks of Project Closure Evaluate if the project delivered the expected benefits to all stakeholders.
Documentation and Billing
Managing Self Kamal Nayan Pradhan Sheetal Moktan Managing Self
Managing Self Kamal Nayan Pradhan Shital Moktan 10/25/2019
STS-114 Return to Flight Lessons Learned Bill Parsons
Presentation transcript:

TEMPLATE DESIGN © Leadership Lessons: Decision Making Process Physician Leaders Need to Recognize & be Vigilant for ADMINISTRATIVE THINK By Calvin J. Maestro, Jr., MD, FAAFP, MBA in Healthcare Management What is “Administrative Think?” Point: Ask the right questions On 28 January 1986, the American Space Shuttle Challenger blew up after takeoff. This was caused by freezing temperatures compromising the O- rings in the shuttle's solid rocket boosters (SBRs). Not wishing to fall behind in their space launch schedule, NASA was too impatient for a go-launch recommendation from Morton Thiokol, the contractor for the SRBs. Thiokol assessed the situation from the perspective of whether or not it was too dangerous to launch in the cold conditions. Experts have agreed that what they should have asked is whether or not it was SAVE enough to launch. (What they didn’t know was that inspections of prior space launches had shown that some of the O-rings almost had ruptured in the past!) Lesson: Mistakes are made by improperly framing the big question(s) “There is Plenty of Time…” Administrative Think is bad Because… Points: Frequently, the approaches and solutions favored by those demonstrating Administrative Think ignore or are ignorant of all the pertinent facts and evidence, or are self-serving. Effectively, Administrative Think often is a subtle attempt to intellectually circumnavigate the core issues, or to avoid implementing effective but unpleasant or unpopular solutions or changes based on a realistic and honest appraisal of the situation. Financial considerations often are a root cause of stimulating Administrative Think in people. The vignettes in this poster are examples of Administrative Think in action. Trust, But Verify“Nothing can be Done” “It Never Happened Before”Conclusions Recommendations: 1.Do not jump to conclusions 2.Ask the right questions 3.Get all the facts 4.Study the past 5.The absence of accidents may just be due to good luck 6.Lack of news does is not the same as lack of evidence 7.Appoint a “Devil’s Advocate” 8.Challenge every assumption made 9.Keep your priorities and values straight 10.Be forthright, realistic and honest 11.Use common sense! Lastly, ask yourself if this decision is consistent with your organization’s stated Mission and Corporate Value Statements *Pictures from Yahoo.com unless stated otherwise. “There is no Evidence of…” “We Never Knew About…” As physicians move into higher leadership roles, they will need to recognize and be prepared to deal with an unusual organizational cognitive process I call Administrative Think. Administrative Think is a cognitive process, exhibited by individuals or groups, characterized by faulty thinking, altered priorities, distorted values, and, at times, amnesia of past events, decisions, or precedents. Administrative Think frequently comes disguised as a simple, logical, or fair approach to solving a particular problem or troublesome operational issue. Often, decisions made using the Administrative Think process are done in isolation of other issues or conditions; i.e., they lack situational awareness. Airborne Ebola Viruses & Unreported Blown Tires Or, how is a deadly virus and a major tire/vehicle recall in related? From: Examiner.com According to Richard Preston, author of he book The Hot Zone, © 1994, in 1989 infectious disease experts believed that airborne transmission of the Ebola virus was not possible. This despite several researchers having evidence of such; they simply lacked the administrative support to publish their findings. Years later, a major U.S. Auto company replaced millions of tires due to vehicle rollover issues related in part to tire thread separation. The recall was delayed by the lack of official reporting of the accidents to the NHTSA by the plaintiff’s own lawyers! Concorde man faces suspended sentence over (July 2000) Paris crash. Paris, France (CNN) A blown tire sent debris into the wing, causing the insufficiently protected fuel tank to rupture and the plane to crash, killing 113 people. According to the accident report, there were more than 60 tire blowouts over the Concorde's 25 years in the air. Yet, the Concorde owners never corrected this design flaws in the plane. Lesson: Too many administrative levels can result in vital information not reaching the decision makers at the top until too late. Costa Concordia sinks off the Italian coast USA Today news article by Gene Sloan, February 10, 2012 Part of the chaos on board ship during the accident was due to the fact that the passenger safety briefing had been scheduled for THE NEXT DAY! Administrative policies allowed cruise ships to sail first and hold the safety briefing later! Lesson Learned (The Hard Way): “ Cruise passengers will (now) get safety briefing before sailing.” Management Space Shuttle Columbia The Columbia completed 27 missions before being destroyed during re-entry on February 1, The Investigating Board determined that a piece of insulating foam from the external fuel tank had punctured the Columbia's wing during launch. But, after analyzing the takeoff videos, and for two weeks, NASA administrators refused to act on it, or even have an Army satellite take pictures of the shuttle in space to survey the wing for any damage Lesson Learned: Ignorance is not bliss. Columbia’s crew had a right to know the condition of their ship before re-entry.