Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCIENCE & TESTING. CMT-SCIENCE Given for the first time in Spring 2008 in grades 5 & 8 Consists of multiple choice and open ended questions Based on student.
Advertisements

Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2013 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
______________________________ Connecticut Mastery Test Student Information.
WASL Data Only Slides Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10 Note: These data include all students enrolled in grade 10, even if they took.
The Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Overview.
E DUCATIONAL E XPANSIONS E DUCATIONAL E XPANSIONS (EE ) Research Projects T EACHERS FOR A N EW E RA.
What is the Advanced Placement Program? The Advanced Placement Program are courses taught at local high schools, which allow students to participate in.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
Valentine Elementary School San Marino Unified School District Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Spring 2009 California Standards Test.
Learning Trajectory Everyday Mathematics Program Goals.
P RE - SERVICE T EACHER E DUCATION : IMPACT OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ON PUPIL MATHEMATICS PERFORMANCE EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOR THE GOOD OF SOCIETY.
Connecticut Academic Performance Test Spotlight on Assessment University of Connecticut Neag School of Education March 28, 2008.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Totoket Valley Elementary School Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Action Plan
1 State Testing March 2006 Grades 3-8 (NJASK and GEPA)
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Mathematics Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient.
Science CAPT 2014 Greenwich High School. Dates of the Test Tuesday, March 1850 minutes Wednesday, March 1950 minutes.
CAHSEE MATH PREP Includes test overview, scoring, and practice questions.
2009 CAHSEE Review 10th Grade Test Date Wed. March 18th.
U-32 Spring 2013 NECAP Presentation March 27,
______________________________ Connecticut Mastery Test Parent Information.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
MCAS 2007 Grade 10 ELA – Math – Science & Technology.
1 Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status District Reading.
1 WASL Mathematics: Grade 7. 2 WASL Math: Where are we now? Questions to answer: How are we doing? How are we doing? Compared to district &
CMT Connecticut Mastery Test When: March, 2010 Direct Assessment of Writing: March 2 Reading Comprehension: March 3 Reading Comprehension: March 5 Editing.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
1 Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting.
Georgia Milestone EOG information
1 Draft Content Standards for High School Mathematics Helen Maguire for Paul Hibbard Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
Thomaston High School 2008 CAPT Report. Math – % at Goal.
Milestones EOG Assessments – Domains (topics) Social Studies Geography Government /Civics Economics History Mathematics Geometry Statistics & Probability.
NECAP Presentation for School Year March 26,
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10 Note: Unless otherwise noted, these data include all students enrolled.
Milestones EOG Assessments Information Scroll down past FAQs for Lovinggood Data on GA Milestones.
Milestones EOG Assessments – Domains Social Studies Geography Government/Civics Economics History Mathematics Geometry Statistics & Probability Ratios.
What is the Advanced Placement Program? The Advanced Placement Program are courses taught at local high schools, which allow students to participate in.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT “HARTFORD MAGAZINE RECOGNIZED GMHS AS THE SIXTH RANKING HIGH SCHOOL IN HARTFORD COUNTY.” 2011 High School Testing.
10/25/10 SPS Goals Somers Public Schools Building and Department Goals Academic Year.
CMT Action Plan Beecher Road School Presentation to the Woodbridge Board of Education October 2012 Gina M. Prisco, Principal Nancy White, Assistant Principal.
GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT 2009 High School Testing Report.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
2010 CMT & CAPT Score Report. Grade 3 CMT Results Math Reading Writing.
Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis.
2011 CONNECTICUT MASTERY TEST RESULTS Presentation to the Woodbridge Board of Education September 2011 WOODBRIDGE CMT PRESENTATION - SEPTEMBER
2011 CMT & CAPT Score Report. Grade 3 CMT Results - Reading.
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Granby Memorial Middle School 5 Year School Improvement Plan
Spring 2011 MCAS Results.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
Jill Correnty, Ed.D. October 17th, 2016
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Science CAPT 2016 Greenwich High School.
Is Your Child’s IEP Individualized?
Science CAPT 2016 Greenwich High School.
Student Assessment Updates
JACKSON SCHOOL DISTRICT Middle School Math Informational Night
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September 26, 2011

General Information All Connecticut public school students in grades 3-8 and grade 10 participated in the statewide assessment in March. Students in grades 11 and 12 may retake any part of the CAPT if they did not reach goal in that part. The tests measure skills that students are expected to master in reading, writing, science and mathematics. Some special education students might have been eligible to participate in a Modified Assessment or a Skills Checklist.

District Reference Groups District Reference Groups (DRGs) have been defined based on characteristics such as income and education level of parents because research indicates that there is a strong link between test results and socioeconomic factors.

Connecticut Mastery Test Components Reading Mathematics Writing Science (grades 5 & 8)

Reading Degrees of Reading Power (DRP) Reading Comprehension – Forming a General Understanding – Developing Interpretation – Making Reader/Text Connections – Examining the Content and Structure

Mathematics Numerical and Proportional Reasoning Geometry and Measurement Data: Probability and Statistics Algebraic Reasoning Integrated Understandings

Writing Direct Assessment of Writing (Essay) Editing and Revising – Composing / Revising – Editing

CT Performance Level Scores Advanced Goal Proficient Basic Below Basic

Grade 3 Guilford Public Schools CMT Generation 4 % At or Above Goal

Grade 4 Guilford Public Schools CMT Generation 4 % At or Above Goal

Grade 5 Guilford Public Schools CMT Generation 4 % At or Above Goal

Grade 6 Guilford Public Schools CMT Generation 4 % At or Above Goal

Grade 7 Guilford Public Schools CMT Generation 4 % At or Above Goal

Grade 8 Guilford Public Schools CMT Generation 4 % At or Above Goal

2011 Comparison Data – Grade 3 Percent of Students Meeting State Goal (Proficient) Math – State – 63.3% – DRG B – 81.2% – Guilford – 84.9% (95.1%) Reading – State – 58.4% – DRG B – 76.1% – Guilford – 77.5% (91.9%) Writing – State – 61.1% – DRG B – 78.1% _Guilford – 77.5% (91.2%)

2011 Comparison Data – Grade 4 Percent of Students Meeting State Goal (Proficient) Math – State – 67.3% – DRG B – 85.4% – Guilford – 83.3% (94.8%) Reading – State – 62.5% – DRG B – 81.2% – Guilford – 81.0% (88.8%) Writing – State – 65.5% – DRG B – 82.8% – Guilford – 82.7% (94.9%)

2011 Comparison Data – Grade 5 Percent of Students Meeting State Goal (Proficient) Math – State – 72.7% – DRG B – 89.1% – Guilford – 82.7% (92.2%) Reading – State – 61.4% – DRG B – 80.9% – Guilford – 80.1% (88.3%) Writing – State – 66.8% – DRG B – 84.6 – Guilford – 82.8% (95.5%) Science – State – 60.2% – DRG B – 81.8% – Guilford – 77.3% (94.2%)

2011 Comparison Data – Grade 6 Percent of Students Meeting State Goal (Proficient) Math – State – 71.6% – DRG B – 89.6% – Guilford – 88.7% (97.8%) Reading – State – 76% – DRG B – 91.4% – Guilford – 91.6% (96.4%) Writing – State – 65.3% – DRG B – 83.6% – Guilford – 90.2% (98.2%)

2011 Comparison Data – Grade 7 Percent of Students Meeting State Goal Math – State – 68.7% – DRG B – 88.1% – Guilford – 89.9% (96.3%) Reading – State – 77.8% – DRG B – 92.5% – Guilford – 94.4% (98.5%) Writing – State – 58.9% – DRG B – 79.6% – Guilford – 80.5% (93.4%)

Math – State – 66.8% – DRG B – 88.0% – Guilford – 92.5% (99.7%) Reading – State – 74.7% – DRG B – 90.4% – Guilford – 94.9% (98.6%) Writing – State – 64.8% – DRG B – 83.7% – Guilford – 86.8% (97.3%) Science – State – 63.3% – DRG B – 84.2% – Guilford – 86.4% (96.9%) 2011 Comparison Data – Grade 8 Percent of Students Meeting State Goal (Proficient)

Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) Components Mathematics Science Reading Across the Disciplines Writing Across the Disciplines

Reading Across the Disciplines Response to Literature Reading for Information

Mathematics Algebraic Reasoning: Patterns & Functions Numerical & Proportional Reasoning Geometry & Measurement Data: Probability & Statistics

Writing Across the Disciplines Interdisciplinary Writing (2 sessions) Editing and Revising

Science Energy Transformations Chemical Structures & Properties Global Interdependence Cell Chemistry & Biotechnology Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity

Grade 10 CAPT

Math – State – 49.6% – DRG B – 74.1% – Guilford – 76.2% (95.2%) Reading – State –44.8% – DRG B – 69.4% – Guilford – 78.2% (95.6%) Writing – State – 61.3% – DRG B – 83.7% – Guilford – 85.8% (98.9%) Science – State – 47.2% – DRG B – 72.3% – Guilford – 77.7% (96.3%) 2011 Comparison Data – Grade 10 Percent of Students Meeting State Goal (Proficient)

Next Steps for Schools Analyze data by subgroups. Analyze data by content strands. Use analysis to inform professional development plans and make curricular / instructional adjustments. Monitor student progress.

For more information: Visit