1 2008 Corsica TLE Workshop Fast 2-D Photometric Imaging of Elves June 24, 2008 Robert T Newsome* Umran S Inan Space, Telecommunications, and Radioscience.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Astronomy Notes to Accompany the Text
Advertisements

Lightning Imager and its Level 2 products Jochen Grandell Remote Sensing and Products Division.
Vestrand Real Time Transient Detection with RAPTOR: Exploring the Path Toward a “Thinking” Telescope Tom Vestrand on behalf of the RAPTOR Team Los Alamos.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture 3 – Physical Optics b) Diffraction.
Amsterdam, Oct 2010 Sprite Halo and Streamer Onset H. C. Stenbaek-Nielsen 1, M. G. McHarg 3, R. Haaland 2, and T. Kanmae 1 1) Geophysical Institute, University.
Leiden October 2007 High Time-Resolution Sprite Imaging: Observations and Implications H. C. Stenbaek-Nielsen Geophysical Institute University of Alaska.
High-energy particle acceleration in the shell of a supernova remnant F.A. Aharonian et al (the HESS Collaboration) Nature 432, 75 (2004) Nuclear Physics.
1 Investigations of lightning-induced sudden brightening in the OH airglow layer observed by ISUAL onboard FORMOSAT-II Satellite 1.Physics Department,
Dielectric Materials for Advanced Applications Progress Report (Oct – Feb. 2011) Xuewei Zhang and Prof. Markus Zahn Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Auroral dynamics EISCAT Svalbard Radar: field-aligned beam  complicated spatial structure (
Transient Luminous Events and the 9 May 2007 Oklahoma Mesoscale Convective System Contact Info: Timothy J. Lang, CSU Atmospheric Science, Ft. Collins,
SCIFER2 UV Emissions Allison Jaynes, UNH Dartmouth CASCADES2 Meeting 10/30/09 Allison Jaynes, UNH Dartmouth CASCADES2 Meeting 10/30/09 (Images, movie and.
1 MURI review meeting 09/21/2004 Dynamic Scene Modeling Video and Image Processing Lab University of California, Berkeley Christian Frueh Avideh Zakhor.
Nov Boston Meeting1 Mercury at the TNG Cesare Barbieri Dept. of Astronomy University of Padova With the collaboration.
Observations and statistics of small-scale streamer and bead features in sprites Robert A. Marshall, Umran S. Inan STAR Laboratory, Stanford University,
What’s on page 13-25? Tom Butkiewicz. Refresh Rates Flicker from shutter systems Halve refresh rates 2 eyed 120Hz != 1 eyed 60Hz Phosphors 2 Polarized.
X-ray sources in NSVS Tim McKay University of Michigan 04/03/04.
Transient Luminous Events (TLEs) and Early VLF events Prepared by Robert Marshall, Benjamin Cotts, and Morris Cohen Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY.
1 Correlated High Speed Video, Medium Range E-Field, and B-field observations of Sprites Takeshi Kammae, H.C. Stenbaek-Nielsen Geophysical Institute, University.
Lightning-driven electric and magnetic fields measured in the stratosphere during the Brazil Balloon Campaign Jeremy N. Thomas (U. of Washington,
Sprites, Blue Jets, and Elves What’s On the Other Side of the Storm.
1 Fluorescence Cameras -Dr James Milnes -Live Cell Imaging – Stem Cell Research -Portland Place, London, 24 June 2009 Live Cell Imaging.
Computer Animation Rick Parent Computer Animation Algorithms and Techniques Motion Capture.
Spatio-Temporal Quincunx Sub-Sampling.. and how we get there David Lyon.
Proxy Data and VHF/Optical Comparisons Monte Bateman GLM Proxy Data Designer.
Ground-based optical auroral measurements
Chapter 5.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to the MOPITT team, especially the groups at University of Toronto and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR),
Radiation & Telescopes ____________ radiation: Transmission of energy through space without physical connection through varying electric and magnetic fields.
THUNDERSTORMS AND LIGHTNING GENERATING SPRITES Rumjana Mitzeva.
National Space Institute Technical University of Denmark TLEs: Combining Observations, Simulations, Theory and Instrument Technical Aspects Torsten Neubert.
Characteristics and Activity of Storms Associated with TLEs Production during Eurosprite campaigns: Statistics and Case Studies S. Soula 1, O. van der.
15 October Observational Astronomy Direct imaging Photometry Kitchin pp ,
Workshop on Coupling of Thunderstorms and Lightning Discharges to Near-Earth Space June 2008, University of Corsica, Corte in Corsica, France (weekends.
Optical Aeronomy Calibration Facility CEDAR WORKSHOP JUNE, 2007 Jeff Baumgardner, Center for Space Physics Boston University.
Stanford VLF Remote Sensing Science, Engineering, Educational outreach Morris Cohen Along with Phil Scherrer, Deborah Scherrer, Umran Inan, Ray Mitchell,
1 B. C. Stratton, S. von Goeler, J. Robinson, and L. E. Zakharov Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, USA D. Stutman and K. Tritz.
Near-infrared photometry of Venus Richard W. Schmude, Jr. Gordon State College.
Characterization of core and edge turbulence in L- and H-mode Alcator C-Mod plasmas Outline: Alcator C-Mod tokamak Fluctuation diagnostics Low to high.
Coordinated Global Measurements of TLE from the Space Shuttle and Ground Stations during MEIDEX Yoav Yair 1, Colin Price, Zev Levin, Peter Israelevitch,
NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL / ROCSAT-2 August 2001 Sprites observation by ISUAL on the ROCSAT-2 satellite J. L. Chern, R. R. Hsu, H. T. Su, A. B. Chen, and L.
Chapter 3: Factors of Image Quality 1. Interlaced vs. progressive scanning 2. Matrix size 5. Field of view (FOV) 3. Vertical resolution 4. Horizontal resolution.
1 C. E. Bush (ORNL), B. C. Stratton, S. von Goeler, J. Robinson, L. E. Zakharov, E. Fredrickson (PPPL) D. Stutman and K. Tritz (JHU) and the NSTX Team.
بسمه تعالی Fast Imaging of turbulent plasmas in the GyM device D.Iraji, D.Ricci, G.Granucci, S.Garavaglia, A.Cremona IFP-CNR-Milan 7 th Workshop on Fusion.
On the Role of Electric Field Changes when Calculating Thunderstorm Currents Yu.V. Shlugaev, V.V. Klimenko, E.A. Mareev Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
1 On remote sensing of TLEs by ELF/VLF wave measurements on board a satellite F. Lefeuvre 1, R. Marshall 2, J.L. Pinçon 1, U.S. Inan 2, D. Lagoutte 1,
1 Access and Use of Auroral Imaging Data Harald U. Frey Space Sciences Laboratory University of California at Berkeley Credit: D. Hutchinson.
SPRITE OBSERVATIONS DURING MEIDEX Yoav Yair, Colin Price, Zev Levin and Adam Devir Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Tel Aviv University,
G. Ferioli, R. Jung - LHC-BI Review Workshop November 19&20 LHC Screen Profile Monitors G. Ferioli, R. Jung Introduction BTV LHC layout Monitor set-up.
Surface Layer SLODAR J. Osborn, R. Wilson and T. Butterley A prototype of a new SLODAR instrument has been developed at Durham CfAI and tested at the Paranal.
Extremely-Low-Frequency Whistler-Like Waves Observed at South Pole Station Drastically lower frequency ELF events are found between Hz, as opposed.
MMT Observation Database for Light Curve Analysis Vladimir Agapov Presentation for the WG1 session 33rd IADC meeting, Houston.
1 COSPAR Assembly, Montreal, COSPAR Assembly, Montreal, Prompt optical observations of GRB B astro-ph/ , submitted.
Stanford VLF Remote Sensing Science, Engineering, Educational outreach Morris Cohen Along with Phil Scherrer, Deborah Scherrer, Umran Inan, Ray Mitchell,
Some results of observation of ultraviolet and infrared emission from lightning discharges at Aragats Cosmic Station LEAD workshop Armenia, NOR AMBERD.
بسمه تعالی Fast Imaging of turbulent plasmas in the GyM device D.Iraji, D.Ricci, G.Granucci, S.Garavaglia, A.Cremona IFP-CNR-Milan 7 th Workshop on Fusion.
ISUAL Design Concept S. Mende. SDR 7 Jun NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Design Concept S. Mende Sprite Example Sprite Image obtained by Berkeley/NCKU 1999.
1 B. C. Stratton, S. von Goeler, and R. Feder PPPL J. Lowrance, V. Mastrocola, and G. Renda Princeton Scientific Instruments NSTX Physics Meeting June.
Solar X-ray Imager (SXI) Current and Future Requirements 22 May 2001 Steve Hill Solar Causes and Effects... Operational Requirements Improvements for GOES-R+
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
for Lomonosov-GRB collaboration
SOLIS-VSM Magnetic Synoptic Maps
E. Ponce2-1, G. Garipov2, B. Khrenov2, P. Klimov2, H. Salazar1
FIGURE A microwave pulse is sent out from the radar
Factors that Influence the Geometric Detection Pattern of Vehicle-based Licence Plate Recognition Systems Martin Rademeyer Thinus Booysen, Arno Barnard.
Digital Image Processing
Validation of airborne 1
Development of a Large Area Gamma-ray Detector
Observational Astronomy
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Corsica TLE Workshop Fast 2-D Photometric Imaging of Elves June 24, 2008 Robert T Newsome* Umran S Inan Space, Telecommunications, and Radioscience Laboratory Electrical Engineering Department Stanford University, Stanford, California

2 Overview  Introduction to the PIPER instrument  Imaging with PIPER  2007 Observation Campaign  TLE(s) at 06:01:46 UT on July 10, 2007  Video camera data  PIPER data  Comparison  The elve at 06:01:46 UT on July 10, 2007  More elves from July 10, 2007  Summary

3 Introduction to PIPER  Photometric “camera”, with  High sampling rates (up to 25k samples/sec)  High optical sensitivity  Traded off against spatial resolution, BUT  Some spatial resolution recovered using multi-anode photometers (vs. conventional single-anode photometers)  Four Hamamatsu R5900U-20-L16 16-anode photometers  18 degree fields of view  Operate in pairs  Turned at right angles  Augmented w/ video camera (not shown)

4 Introduction to PIPER

5  Optical interference filters  Longpass 650 nm for N 2 1P emission band  Bandpass 470/100 nm for N 2 + 1N emission band  50 mm f/1.4 Canon lenses  16 mm x 16 mm active photometer area  Produces 18 degree square field of view  Hamamatsu C4900 photometer power supply  15 V in to –1200 V out  64 8-pole Chebyshev anti-aliasing filters  Cutoff at 12 kHz to allow 25 kHz sampling  Two National Instruments PCI-6254 DAQ cards  Photodiode-controlled CS45 electronic shutters

Introduction to PIPER 6

7 Imaging With PIPER Photometer Data = Field of View =281 =107 =155 =258 =287 =283 =233 =167 =113=143=262=310=282=253=226 Photometer Pair

8 Imaging With PIPER Sprite Evolving in Sky t = t 0 What Photometers See Photometers What PIPER Records

9 Imaging With PIPER t = t 0 + T s What Photometers See Sprite Evolving in Sky Photometers What PIPER Records

10 Imaging With PIPER t = t 0 + 2T s What Photometers See Sprite Evolving in Sky Photometers What PIPER Records

11 Imaging With PIPER t = t 0 + 3T s What Photometers See Sprite Evolving in Sky Photometers What PIPER Records

12 Imaging With PIPER t = t 0 + 4T s What Photometers See Sprite Evolving in Sky Photometers What PIPER Records

13 Imaging With PIPER t = t 0 + 5T s What Photometers See Sprite Evolving in Sky Photometers What PIPER Records

14 Imaging With PIPER t = t 0 + 5T s Integrated Camera Image What PIPER Records Sprite Evolving in Sky

15 Imaging With PIPER Horizontal Photometer Data Vertical Photometer Data Camera Image time PIPER’s unit data product:

Imaging With PIPER ms sprite images Images reduced to 16x16 pixels L2 norm reconstruction L1 norm reconstruction

Imaging With PIPER 17

18 Observation Campaign  June 26, 2007 to August 2, 2007  Yucca Ridge Field Station  Near Fort Collins, Colorado  Instrumentation  PIPER w/ intensified camera  Wide-field-of-view intensified camera  Hi-speed camera on Dobsonian telescope  Stanford AWESOME VLF antenna/receiver

19 July 10, 2007 Thunderstorm  Tracked July 10, 2007 Midwest thunderstorm  05:30 UT to 07:00 UT  moved southeast from southern South Dakota into northern Nebraska  Between 05:50 UT and 06:55 UT:  20 sprites observed by wide field of view camera direction of storm sprites observed in this region

20 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 1: 552 ms to 569 ms PIPER field of view

21 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 2: 570 ms to 586 ms

22 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 3: 586 ms to 603 ms

23 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 4: 603 ms to 619 ms

24 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 5: 619 ms to 636 ms

25 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 6: 636 ms to 652 ms

26 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 7: 652 ms to 669 ms

27 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 8: 669 ms to 686 ms

28 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 9: 686 ms to 703 ms

29 TLE at 06:01:46 UT Frame 10: 703 ms to 719 ms

30 TLE at 06:01:46 UT

31 TLE at 06:01:46 UT

32 TLE at 06:01:46 UT

33 TLE at 06:01:46 UT

34 TLE at 06:01:46 UT  Several distinct regions/events  elve (sub-millisecond), followed by  halo (~1 ms), followed by  gap (~1 ms), followed by  sprite (~30 ms) elve halo cloud reflection sprite light on horizon sprite halo gap elve

35 Elve at 06:01:46 UT  Elve exhibits downward and radially outward expansion  In rangeward direction (which, when project to field of view, looks like downward motion) – left panel  In azimuthal direction – right panel  Consistent with observations of Barrington-Leigh kA elve halo cloudflash halo

Other Elves 36 (from Barrington-Leigh, 2001) kA  Appeared as dim sprite in video  Appeared as bright elve+sprite in PIPER

37 Other Elves  Appeared as dim sprite in video  Appeared as bright elve+sprite in PIPER kA

Other Elves 38  Elve without sprite.  Not detected in video, only in PIPER.

Other Elves kA  Only one CG recorded by NLDN.  Nothing recorded on video.  Three (3) events recorded by PIPER.  Elve(s) appeared without sprite (-CG)

Other Elves kA kA  Two more examples of possible multiple elves  (Vertical PIPER data only)  Not detected in video data; only in PIPER data

41 Summary  PIPER is a photometric “camera”  recovers spatial resolution by using multi- anode photometers in pairs  In PIPER data, we see much that we don’t see in 60 field/sec video data  especially elves  and temporal development of sprites  Elves occur frequently  independently of sprites  sometimes in rapid succession