1 Ontolog Open Ontology Repository Review 19 February 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Open Ontology Repository Planning Meeting for Ontology repositories: approaches, technologies, collaboration Ken Baclawski June 15, 2009.
Advertisements

1 Elisa Kendall August 6, 2009 OOR For Public Sector Use Metadata Questions.
1 Copyright ©2007 Sandpiper Software, Inc. Vocabulary, Ontology & Specification Management at OMG Elisa Kendall Sandpiper Software
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
OOR Architecture and API – Take II Ken Baclawski Michael Gruninger Co-Chairs.
OOR Federation Dan Cerys Jim Chatigny Mike Dean OOR Panel on Coordinating our OOR Software Development 19 February 2010 OOR Panel on Coordinating our OOR.
1 Ontolog OOR Use Case Review Todd Schneider 1 April 2010 (v 1.2)
1 Ontolog Getting OOR Development Going A Proposal 17 September 2010.
BioPortal as (the only functional) OOR SandBox (so far) Natasha Noy, Michael Dorf Stanford University.
OOR: Vision vs. Current State Mike Dean Joint Ontolog-OOR Panel on OOR Sandbox and OOR Requirements - Comparative Analysis 15 October 2009.
August 6, 2009 Joint Ontolog-OOR Panel 1 Ontology Repository Research Issues Joint Ontolog-OOR Panel Discussion Ken Baclawski August 6, 2009.
1 OOR in the Classroom An Experience Report Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
DC Architecture WG meeting Monday Sept 12 Slot 1: Slot 2: Location: Seminar Room 4.1.E01.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Registry/Repository in a SOA Environment SOA Brown Bag #5 SWIM Team March 9, 2011.
Language Specification using Metamodelling Joachim Fischer Humboldt University Berlin LAB Workshop Geneva
The ANSI/SPARC Architecture of a Database Environment
Meta Data Larry, Stirling md on data access – data types, domain meta-data discovery Scott, Ohio State – caBIG md driven architecture semantic md Alexander.
CVRG Presenter Disclosure Information Tahsin Kurc, PhD Center for Comprehensive Informatics Emory University CardioVascular Research Grid Core Infrastructure.
Database System Concepts and Architecture
GridVine: Building Internet-Scale Semantic Overlay Networks By Lan Tian.
1 Introduction to XML. XML eXtensible implies that users define tag content Markup implies it is a coded document Language implies it is a metalanguage.
OWL-AA: Enriching OWL with Instance Recognition Semantics for Automated Semantic Annotation 2006 Spring Research Conference Yihong Ding.
PAWN: A Novel Ingestion Workflow Technology for Digital Preservation
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
PAWN: A Novel Ingestion Workflow Technology for Digital Preservation Mike Smorul, Joseph JaJa, Yang Wang, and Fritz McCall.
1 Chapter 2 Database Environment. 2 Chapter 2 - Objectives u Purpose of three-level database architecture. u Contents of external, conceptual, and internal.
SC32 WG2 Metadata Standards Tutorial Metadata Registries and Big Data WG2 N1945 June 9, 2014 Beijing, China.
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
Practical RDF Chapter 1. RDF: An Introduction
SICoP Presentation A story about communication Michael Lang BEARevelytix May 2, 2007.
OASIS ebXML Registry Standard Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries 10:30 – 11:15 January 20, 2003 Kathryn Breininger The Boeing Company Chair, OASIS.
Baba Piprani (SICOM Canada) Robert Henkel (Transport Canada)
1 Ontology-based Semantic Annotatoin of Process Template for Reuse Yun Lin, Darijus Strasunskas Depart. Of Computer and Information Science Norwegian Univ.
Ontologies and Lexical Semantic Networks, Their Editing and Browsing Pavel Smrž and Martin Povolný Faculty of Informatics,
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Ocean Observatories Initiative Data Management (DM) Subsystem Overview Michael Meisinger September 29, 2009.
1 Open Ontology Repository: Architecture and Interfaces Ken Baclawski Northeastern University 1.
National Partnership for Advanced Computational Infrastructure San Diego Supercomputer Center Persistent Management of Distributed Data Reagan W. Moore.
10/24/09CK The Open Ontology Repository Initiative: Requirements and Research Challenges Ken Baclawski Todd Schneider.
Database Environment Session 2 Course Name: Database System Year : 2013.
Working with Ontologies Introduction to DOGMA and related research.
Open Ontology Repository Initiative Frank Olken Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory National Science Foundation presented to CENDI/NKOS.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
1 Registry Services Overview J. Steven Hughes (Deputy Chair) Principal Computer Scientist NASA/JPL 17 December 2015.
Tutorial on XML Tag and Schema Registration in an ISO/IEC Metadata Registry Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries Tuesday, January 21, 2003; 4:45-5:30.
Metadata and Meta tag. What is metadata? What does metadata do? Metadata schemes What is meta tag? Meta tag example Table of Content.
1 Ontolog OOR-BioPortal Comparative Analysis Todd Schneider 15 October 2009.
1 Open Ontology Repository initiative - Planning Meeting - Thu Co-conveners: PeterYim, LeoObrst & MikeDean ref.:
System Development & Operations NSF DataNet site visit to MIT February 8, /8/20101NSF Site Visit to MIT DataSpace DataSpace.
SICoP Presentation A story about communication Michael Lang BEARevelytix April 25, 2007.
Jens Hartmann York Sure Raphael Volz Rudi Studer The OntoWeb Portal.
Architectural Considerations for Semantic Support Group Name: WG5 Source: Martin Bauer (NEC), Joerg Swetina (NEC) Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
OASIS ebXML Registry Standard Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries 10:30 – 11:15 January 20, 2003 Kathryn Breininger The Boeing Company Chair, OASIS.
Selected Semantic Web UMBC CoBrA – Context Broker Architecture  Using OWL to define ontologies for context modeling and reasoning  Taking.
Database Environment Chapter 2. The Three-Level ANSI-SPARC Architecture External Level Conceptual Level Internal Level Physical Data.
Collection-Based Persistent Archives Arcot Rajasekar, Richard Marciano, Reagan Moore San Diego Supercomputer Center Presented by: Preetham A Gowda.
ONTOLOGY LIBRARIES: A STUDY FROM ONTOFIER AND ONTOLOGIST PERSPECTIVES Debashis Naskar 1 and Biswanath Dutta 2 DSIC, Universitat Politècnica de València.
BioPortal as (the only functional) OOR SandBox (so far)
OPM/S: Semantic Engineering of Web Services
Grid Metadata Management
CS 501: Software Engineering Fall 1999
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Eurostat activities update
Database Systems Instructor Name: Lecture-3.
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2014.
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Toward an Ontology-Driven Architectural Framework for B2B E. Kajan, L
Presentation transcript:

1 Ontolog Open Ontology Repository Review 19 February 2009

2 Agenda/Expectations Inventory/Review of Existing Artifacts Identify Gaps Assumptions Architecture Principles Suggested Prioritization – Core Needs Draft Plan

3 Artifacts Inventory OOR Scope Definition Goals (Expectations) OntologySummit2008 Communiqué: Towards an Open Ontology RepositoryOntologySummit2008 Requirements Use Cases Architecture Principles Prototype OOR "sandbox" based on the NCBO BioPortal

4 Gap Analysis Incomplete Use Cases No Requirements Analysis & Decomposition No (complete) Architecture or Artifacts No Action Plan

5 Definitions Repository (WordNet) A facility where things can be deposited for storage or safekeeping Ontology Repository (Ontolog) An ontology repository is a facility where ontologies and related information artifacts can be stored, retrieved and managed

6 Goals Provide an architecture and an infrastructure that supports Creation, sharing, searching, and governance/management of ontologies, and Linkage to database and XML Schema structured data and documents. Complementary goals Fostering the Semantic Web community Identification and promotion of best practices Provision of services relevant to the RDFS and OWL ontologies and RDF instance stores.

7 Assumptions OOR Supports Evolutionary Development Partitioning of Functionality OOR does not store instance data apart from that of the OOR infrastructure (not resolved) OOR Supports arbitrary representation languages –Repository architecture (mostly) independent of language –Initial support for OWL Meta/Provenance information crucial Standards based to extent possible

8 Architecture Principles OOR shall support evolutionary development OOR shall support distributed instances OOR shall be scalable OOR shall support federation OOR shall provide services decoupled from core repository functionality OOR shall have no hierarchical dependencies OOR shall support arbitrary ontology representation languages OOR shall be ontologically driven OOR shall be platform independent

9 Q&D Decomposition - Core Storage –Ontologies –Meta/Provenance data –Instance Data – ONLY that pertaining to OOR operations (not resolved) –Basic DB operations (read, write, delete): –Put & Get Returns entire ontology or metadata Discovery/Search –Via Metadata Management –Access Control / Policies –Versioning and audit/access trail –Governance Submission – metadata completion; syntax checking Metadata –Levels 0 – 5 (similar to maturity levels) –Supports discovery/search, governance, management

10 Goals of Metadata Metadata should support –Provenance information Author, author credentials Institutional/Organizational affiliation or support Source of ontology reference material Ontology design rationale –Determination of suitability for a user purpose –Retrieval of ontologies by domain or application –Ontology Integration and mapping –Dependencies

11 Plan – Whats Necessary? Core Repository –Specify core/minimal functionality Specify core search functionality Specify core put and get operations Applicable to both ontologies and ontology metadata (i.e. symmetry). –Specify initial meta/provenance data –Continue use case, requirements, architecture development Preliminary Services –Syntax validation –Policy enforcement – Governance, Metadata, ??? Extended Services Roadmap – Whats next??