Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M. Griffin, PhD Greta Friedemann-Sánchez, PhD Diana Burgess,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Hala Hazam Al-Otaibi Department of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Community Nutrition College of Agriculture and Food Science, King Faisal University.
Advertisements

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance FDA Advisory Committee March, 2002 David Lieberman MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology Oregon Health Sciences.
Supported by grants from: National Human Genome Research Institute (ELSI) HG/AG (The REVEAL Study); National Institute on Aging AG (The MIRAGE.
Covariates of perceived colon cancer risk Jennifer Hay, Ph.D., Elliot Coups, Ph.D., & Jennifer Ford, Ph.D. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences.
Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African AmericansIn Lansing Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African Americans In Lansing Costellia Talley, PhD,
FACTORS AFFECTING UPTAKE OF CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING AMONG WOMEN IN NAKASONGOLA DISTRICT, UGANDA AFENET Scientific Conference Authors: John Kamulegeya,
Spotlight on Colorectal Cancer Screening 1 1. Home Screening for Colon Cancer
Understanding Those Who Do and Do Not Plan to Get Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Costanza ME, White MJ, Stark JR, Stoddard AM, Avrunin JS, Luckmann.
Sex Differences in the Prevalence and Correlates of Colorectal Cancer Testing: Health Information National Trends Survey Sally W. Vernon 1, Amy.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2011.
In the name of Allah. Development and psychometric Testing of a new Instrument to Measure Affecting Factors on Women’s Behaviors to Breast Cancer Prevention:
Colorectal cancer: How do we approach health disparities? Marta L. Davila, MD, FASGE University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Exploring the Washington Group Data from the 2011 U.S. National Health Interview Survey Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics, USA.
Haley Hyde Jessica Fordham Jena Hamm  Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer related deaths every year.  150,000 Americans will be diagnosed.
Integrated Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention-focus on Cancer Edward Anselm, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical.
Impact of Cancer Diagnosis and Chemotherapy on Mammography Use Xinhua Yu, M.B., Ph.D. A. Marshall McBean, M.D., M.Sc. Beth A. Virnig, Ph.D., M.P.H Division.
Turning Data into Action for Colorectal Cancer November 17, 2014 Jessica Shaffer, Director, Maine CDC Colorectal Cancer Control Program
Assessment of Colon & Prostate Cancer Screening in WA Peggy Hannon, PhD, MPH Alliance for Reducing Cancer NW.
Knowledge, Cancer Fatalism and Spirituality as Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Practices for African American and Caucasian Women Staci T. Anderson,
Perceptions and attitudes of fifth year medical students of Stellenbosch University regarding the Rural Clinical School in Worcester.
Introduction Nearly 26 million people are diagnosed with diabetes in the United States, roughly 8.5% of the total population (A.D.A. 2013). 2.1 million.
Evaluating A Patient-Centered Medical Home from the Patient’s Perspective Betty M. Kennedy, PhD Community Outreach Specialist Community Outreach Specialist.
Hannah Dale, Gozde Ozakinci, Pauline Adair & Gerry Humphris PhD Student, School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews Health Psychologist NHS Fife
Why Won’t Men Go to the Doctor? Darren R. Jones, PhD, LP HAP Worksite Wellness Forum June 19, 2014.
Cognitive Impairment: An Independent Predictor of Excess Mortality SACHS, CARTER, HOLTZ, ET AL. ANN INTERN MED, SEP, 2011;155: ZACHARY LAPAQUETTE.
Citation Zajac, I. T., Duncan, A., Flight, I., Wilson, C., Wittert, G., & Turnbull, D (2015). The Relationship of Self-Rated Health and Health Priorities.
“The 50 – Year Project: Examining Colorectal Cancer Screening History Among Peninsula Institute for Community Health Patients Aged 50 Years and Older ”
Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D.
Barriers to Screening BCCEDP CRC Project. Iowa Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program Colon Cancer Education Pilot Project  Goal: Increase.
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May Overview of Colorectal Cancer Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Prevention and Health.
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA: a pilot intervention project William Curry, MD, MS Dept of Family & Community Medicine M.S.Hershey Medical.
 Subhendu De, Wonsuk Yoo Institute of Public and Preventative Health (IPPH), Georgia Regents University On Summer Public Health Scholars Program (SPHSP)
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY LABORATORY East Tennessee State University Johnson City, Tennessee INTRODUCTION CONTACT:
Creating health education materials to improve colorectal cancer screening among American Indians Fernando Martinez, Felicia Schanche Hodge & Tracy Line.
Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening through an Academic Detailing Intervention ACCN Research Roundtable October 8, 2008 Mark Dignan, Nancy Schoenberg,
CANCER CONTROL NHPA’s. What is it? Cancer is a term to describe a diverse group of diseases in which some of the cells in body become defective. The following.
Alcohol Consumption and Diabetes Preventive Practices: Preliminary Findings from the U.S.-Mexico Border Patrice A.C. Vaeth, Dr.P.H. Raul Caetano, M.D.,
VA National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Using USPSTF Recommendations in VHA Clinical Practice Linda Kinsinger, MD, MPH Chief Consultant.
Doctors In Turkey Smoke More SAHIN EM, OZER C, DAGDEVIREN N, AKTURK Z Trakya University Faculty of Medicine Department of Family Practice.
Ian Zajac, Ingrid Flight, Carlene Wilson, Tess Gregory, Deborah Turnbull, Steve Cole, Graeme Young Testing the efficacy of internet-based personalised.
SUICIDE ATTEMPT DATA IN A SUICIDE PREVENTION PLANNING MODEL Susan E. Becker Ryan Mullins Mesa State College Prevention Planning Model Steps Establish.
Yield of colonoscopy for advanced neoplasia in a population-based setting Bernard DENIS, Jacques PICOT, Jean François VIES, Marjorie MUSSO, Paul François.
Factors Predicting Stage of Adoption for Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy among Non-Adherent African Americans Hsiao-Lan Wang, PhD, RN, CMSRN,
Colorado Colorectal Screening Program Holly Wolf University of Colorado School of Medicine
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 3: Cancer Progress Review August 17, 2006.
Variations in the health status of population groups in Australia Including: males and females higher and lower socioeconomic status groups rural and remote.
First results of a pilot population-based faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program B. DENIS, P. PERRIN, J.F. EBELIN, P. WEBER, E. KALTENBACH,
Perceived Risk and Emergency Preparedness: The Role of Self-Efficacy Jennifer E. Marceron, Cynthia A. Rohrbeck Department of Psychology, The George Washington.
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rates by Race, Age and Indices of Access to Medical Care in the U.S., Yongping Hao, PhD 1 Ahmedin Jemal,
Beliefs about Male Circumcision among Men from a Traditionally Non- Circumcising Community in Rural Western Kenya, Adega, A, Burmen, B, Mutai,
Correlates of HIV testing among youth in three high prevalence Caribbean Countries Beverly E. Andrews, Doctoral Candidate University.
POLYPS CHOLORECTAL CANCER M. DuBois Fennal, PhD, RN, CNS.
Previous cancer screening behavior as predictor of colon cancer screening among women aged 50 and over Rafael Guerrero-Preston DrPH, MPH APHA 135th Annual.
How Do We Individualize Guidelines in an Era of Personalized Medicine? Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS VA Palo Alto Health Care System Stanford University, Stanford.
What does the data tell us? Colorectal CANCER IN NEVADA
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
A Quality improvement initiative
Colorectal Cancer Screening, Medicare and Disability
Isabel C. Scarinci, PhD, MPH University of Alabama at Birmingham
The Effect of Key Organizational Attributes on Cancer Screening Rates
Repeat Colonoscopy Recommendations
Cancer screening PROF .MAZIN AL-HAWAZ.
A qualitative assessment of factors impacting adoption and implementation of USPSTF age-based hepatitis C virus screening recommendations Amy B. Jessop,
Evaluation of a Spiritually-based Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Among Church-attending African Americans and Whites.
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Maryland Residents Age 65 and Older Maryland Cancer Survey, Presented by: Carolyn Poppell, MS University.
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
Colorectal Cancer Screening Education in The
Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Predict Poor Quality Colonoscopy?
Presentation transcript:

Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M. Griffin, PhD Greta Friedemann-Sánchez, PhD Diana Burgess, PhD Melissa Partin, PhD

Background  Colorectal cancer is the 3 rd most common cancer and the 3 rd leading cause of cancer deaths.  Adherence to screening guidelines has been found to reduce mortality.  Several studies have found women are less likely to be adherent to colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines than men.

Background Sources of the screening gender gap are unknown. Some possible reasons for the gap include:  Differences in mode preference (men prefer endoscopy; women prefer FOBT).  Differences in barriers.  Differences in facilitators.

Exploratory Sequential Design 1. Focus Groups 2. Survey Generate Hypotheses Develop Items Cognitive Interviews Qualitative Analysis Quant Analysis Quant Results Qual Results

Qualitative research main findings* SIMILAR PREFERENCES  Men and women both prefer colonoscopy for screening. BARRIERS/FACILITATORS  Overall  Perception that women were at lower risk for CRC (CRC is a “male disease”)  Endoscopy specific  Fears of exposure, vulnerability for women. Fear of pain for men  Different preferences for information about tests. *Friedemann-Sanchez, et al Health Expectations.

Objectives To assess gender differences in:  CRC screening rates  CRC screening mode preferences.  Barriers and facilitators for CRC screening

Hypotheses SCREENING BEHAVIOR Men will be more adherent to CRC screening guidelines. Men will be more adherent to CRC screening guidelines. Greater proportion of men than women will screened by endoscopy (flex sig or colonoscopy). Greater proportion of men than women will screened by endoscopy (flex sig or colonoscopy). SCREENING PREFERENCES Men and women will not differ in mode preference for colonoscopy. Men and women will not differ in mode preference for colonoscopy.

Hypotheses BARRIERS TO SCREENING Women will be more likely to report affective barriers (embarrassment, exposure, vulnerability) to endoscopic screening procedures than men Women will be more likely to report affective barriers (embarrassment, exposure, vulnerability) to endoscopic screening procedures than men Men will be more likely to report pain as a barrier to endoscopic screening procedures than women Men will be more likely to report pain as a barrier to endoscopic screening procedures than women Women will report lower perceived risk for CRC Women will report lower perceived risk for CRC

Hypotheses FACILITATORS TO SCREENING  Women will report stronger preferences for information prior to and during endoscopic procedures than men.

Methods Cross-sectional, mixed mode (mail and phone) survey Cross-sectional, mixed mode (mail and phone) survey Male and female veterans, ages of (600 men, 300 women) Male and female veterans, ages of (600 men, 300 women) Used the Minneapolis VAMC’s primary care services in the two years prior to the study Used the Minneapolis VAMC’s primary care services in the two years prior to the study Those with colorectal cancer (CRC), dementia or Alzheimer’s diagnoses excluded Those with colorectal cancer (CRC), dementia or Alzheimer’s diagnoses excluded

Measures Adherence:Self-report and VA medical records Preferences:Single-item question Barriers:Questions developed from qualitative work and Vernon’s perceived risk for CRC Facilitators:Questions developed from qualitative work

Results WomenMenp-value Age (mean) <0.01 Marital status (% married) Income (% <$20,000) NS CRC family history (% yes) NS Overall response rate: 77% (n=686, 241/300 women; 445/600 men) Demographics:

Results-CRC adherence determined by self-report % Guideline Adherent (n=686) WomenMenp-value All modes FOBT Flex sig Barium enema Colonoscopy

Results-CRC adherence determined by medical record % Guideline Adherent (n=686) WomenMenp-value All modes NS NS FOBT Flex sig NS NS Barium enema NS NS Colonoscopy

Results Report to records ratio WomenMenp-value All modes NS NS FOBT Flex sig NS NS Barium enema NS NS Colonoscopy <.05 <.05

ResultsResults-Preferences Mode preference % (n=686) WomenMen p<p<p<p< FOBT NS NS Barium Enema NS NS Flex sig NS NS Colonoscopy Don’t want to be tested* Don’t know*

Results-Barriers Affective barriers (% who strongly agree or agree) WomenMen p<p<p<p< Worry about vulnerability Worry about body exposed Tests are embarrassing

Results-Barriers Anxiety about pain as a barrier (% who strongly agree or agree) WomenMen p<p<p<p< Worry tests will be painful Want medicine for pain before test NS

Results-Barriers Perceived risk (% who strongly agree or agree) WomenMen p<p<p<p< Chance I might get CRC is high Very likely I will get CRC Chance of getting polyps high NS

Results-Facilitators Information needs (% who strongly agree or agree) WomenMen p<p<p<p< Before exam, want to learn what exam will be like NS During exam, want to know what is happening at every step I don’t want any details

Conclusions  Self-reports of screening behavior shows a gender gap in screening; medical record data do not. Gender gap in screening may be due to the fact that men are more likely to over report having been screened.Gender gap in screening may be due to the fact that men are more likely to over report having been screened.  Men and women have similar screening mode preferences.  Differences in screening barriers/facilitators Women have more affective, anxiety-related barriers.Women have more affective, anxiety-related barriers. Men have a higher perceived risk for developing CRC.Men have a higher perceived risk for developing CRC. Women and men prefer different types of information before and during endoscopy exams.Women and men prefer different types of information before and during endoscopy exams.

Future Directions for Research and Policy Future research examining gender differences in CRC screening should use medical record data. Future research examining gender differences in CRC screening should use medical record data. Need to test if strength of association between barriers/facilitators that vary by gender affect screening adherence. If so: Need to test if strength of association between barriers/facilitators that vary by gender affect screening adherence. If so: –Campaigns to promote screening should include efforts to reduce beliefs that CRC is a male disease. –Issues of exposure, vulnerability and embarrassment prior to and during exam should be considered through patient education.

Thank you

Adherence-subsample with complete medical records % Guideline adherent based on self report (n=345) WomenMenp-value All modes FOBT Flex sig Barium enema Colonoscopy <.01 <.01

Adherence-subsample with complete medical records % Guideline Adherent by medical record (n=345) WomenMenp-value All modes NS NS FOBT Flex sig NS NS Barium enema NS NS Colonoscopy