Some mediation on fast track reconstruction of BESIII Wang Dayong Mar 10,2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GWDAW 16/12/2004 Inspiral analysis of the Virgo commissioning run 4 Leone B. Bosi VIRGO coalescing binaries group on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration.
Advertisements

Computing EVO meeting, January 15 th 2013 Status of the Tracking Code Gianluigi Boca, Pavia University.
Pattern Recognition in OPERA Tracking A.Chukanov, S.Dmitrievsky, Yu.Gornushkin OPERA collaboration meeting, Ankara, Turkey, 1-4 of April 2009 JINR, Dubna.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
D. Peterson, discussion with CMS representatives, FermiLab, 12-July Charged Particle Reconstruction at Cornell Dan Peterson, Cornell University.
ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,
CMS Alignment and Calibration Yuriy Pakhotin on behalf of CMS Collaboration.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
The LiC Detector Toy M. Valentan, M. Regler, R. Frühwirth Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna InputSimulation ReconstructionOutput.
Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.
Vertex Reconstructing Neural Networks at the ZEUS Central Tracking Detector FermiLab, October 2000 Erez Etzion 1, Gideon Dror 2, David Horn 1, Halina Abramowicz.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Track Reconstruction: the trf & ftf toolkits Norman Graf (SLAC) ILD Software Meeting, DESY July 6, 2010.
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
TPC online reconstruction Cluster Finder & Conformal Mapping Tracker Kalliopi Kanaki University of Bergen.
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
STAR Sti, main features V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.
STAR STAR VMC tracker V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
STAR Kalman Track Fit V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Col. Meeting 2006/01/12.
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Annual Meeting 2005/05/29.
STAR TPC Cluster and Hit Finder Software Raimond Snellings.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
Roberto Barbera (Alberto Pulvirenti) University of Catania and INFN ACAT 2003 – Tsukuba – Combined tracking in the ALICE detector.
Forward Tracking in the ILD Detector. ILC the goal Standalone track search for the FTDs (Forward Tracking Disks)
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:
KalFitAlg: recent developments and tests WANG Dayong Jan.18,2006.
Current Status of MDC Track Reconstruction MdcPatRec Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao
Status report - Tracking code - T.Gogami 9/30/2010.
1 MDC Track Finding at BESIII Zang Shilei BES Annual Meeting (Jun 1, 2005) ______________________________________ -Outline- 
1 Reconstruction tasks R.Shahoyan, 25/06/ Including TRD into track fit (JIRA PWGPP-1))  JIRA PWGPP-2: Code is in the release, need to switch setting.
Preliminary Design of Trigger System for BES III Zhen’an LIU Inst of High Energy Physics,Beijing Oct
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
FTK high level simulation & the physics case The FTK simulation problem G. Volpi Laboratori Nazionali Frascati, CERN Associate FP07 MC Fellow.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Track Reconstruction: the ftf and trf toolkits Norman Graf (SLAC) Common Software Working Meeting CERN, January 31, 2013.
Using IP Chi-Square Probability
CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Status of the Offline Pattern Recognition Code GSI, December 10th 2012
Update of pattern recognition
Study of T0 Extraction in the Online Tracking Algorithm
eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview
Tracking Pattern Recognition
DC trigger test Present layout Trigger electronics
Status and Plans of the Belle-II Tracking Software Martin Heck
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Hough Based Tracking For Low Pt In MDC
L1 Trigger Strategy Ted Liu, Lawrence Berkeley Lab
L1 simulation review Aug 2005 Jamie Boyd
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
road – Hough transform- c2
Presentation transcript:

Some mediation on fast track reconstruction of BESIII Wang Dayong Mar 10,2004

– Purpose, status in the system  For background reduction in L3 trigger(see figures below)  For event classification  Real time data quality check and detector monitoring  To enable physicists’ fast analysis in a few hours after data taking A clear and definite top-level design and decision together with the online system is needed badly Z0 distrib. of triggered events (Left:Babar Right: Belle)

Requirements for fast track reconstruction compulsory requirements (whatever the top level design)  System must be completely automated and operable within the Online System  Fast reconstruction system must incur no deadtime  Complete reconstruction for 100% of all events  System must be fault tolerant Optional requirements: ( according to different top level design)  Detailed quality monitoring data for feedback to detector operators, thus  Low latency (nominally within 2 hours of data acquisition)  Event tagging based upon analysis of fully reconstructed events  Dynamic calculation of traditionally “offline” constants to be used in subsequent reconstruction jobs  Dynamic calculation of alignment corrections  Quality monitoring results must integrate into run summary  Alarms must be recorded and handled properly

Limiting factors, present conditions  it must be performed on online farms  information from hardware triggers could be utilized  the software framework should be identical with at least similar to the final offline reconstruction  clear and flexible event data model accommodating different implementation and later updating  use mature,fast and stable algorithms  if possible,make use of the ready-to-wear core codes due to lack of tracking experts (Babar,Belle,BesII, STAR…)

Different track fitting methods(model)  explicit track model (helix tracking)  variational method  spline approximation  multidimensional function parameterization  Predictor-corrector methods

Different track finding methods A.Local methods  Track following  Track roads  Kalman filter  Track element B. Global methods  Global Kalman filter  Hough transform ( histogram)  Hopfield network  Template matching  Minimum spanning tree

Performance of Babar and Belle fast track reconstruction  Babar AlgorithmsAlgorithms L1 trigger rates ~1000Hz L3 trigger rates CPU time per track:  Belle AlgorithmsAlgorithms L1 trigger rates Hz CPU time per track: L4 track finder:5.0 ms/event/CPU of UltraSPAC 167Mhz compared to offline: 2.7s/event/CPU( total,half from tracking)

BesIII MDC hardware triggers 1.Track Segment Finding : Method of look-up table 2.Track Finding: the same method as TSF Use SL-5 as pivot to find : Long track: TSF also found in SL-10 Short track: TSF only found in SL-5 3.Inner layer z trigger(? Still in study) only for backgrounds suppression without complete z hits information as Belle Pivot layer

Some possibilities of BesIII fast track recon.  Track fitting scheme: surely the simple helix model! a. Rewrite the helix fitting of BesII fortran codes with C++ or make it reusable in BOSS as fortran codes(but how to deal with COMMONs?) b. learn from the related Babar or Belle packages  Track finding scheme: full event data and L1 hits as input a. r-phi track finding with TSF hits and s-z track finding with full event data from stereo wires,then track fitting with full event data to get better resolution (fast,but maybe online only) b. using full event data for track finding then fitting with L1 output as a guidance to set regions of interest for track candidates ( could have multiple uses both online and offline, but speed requirements online?)

Possible track finding algorithm  algorithms of histogram class in conjugation with conformal transformation are both simple and fast, which fulfill requirements of BESIII  Possible choices: I. R-Phi track finding a)Nose-following with track extension and fitting in conformal plane b)Phi histogramming in conformal plane and circle fit in the plane II. S-z track finding and fitting III. Helix fitting

About Event Data Model  be general enough to accommodate different implementations  Data should be independent of the algorithms that produce them  Really OO-styled hierarchy of abstract classes for codes update  A well-defined format of hits  “Hits” conversion from the raw data should be provided by framework  Modularization design for more effective debugging

Babar Dch L1 trigger scheme 1.Track segment finder: time information has been considered : Utilize the 267ns sampling over max ~600ns drift time 0.8mm spatial resolution for a segment ~1.5cm σ Z for stereo layers. 2.Binary link tracker: Share the algorithm of CLEO-II start from the innermost superlayer, and moves radially outward to link them into complete tracks 3.PT discriminator Using TSF fine-phi data to find high Pt tracks within Pt envelope.

Babar L3 fast track reconstruction algorithm L3Dch starts with the track segments from the TSF system and improves the resolution by making use of the actual DCH information.  t 0 determination t 0 values for each segment are binned and the mean produced from the values in the most populated bin is used as the estimated event t 0. resolution ~ ns  pattern recognition L3Dch searches a look-up-table for matches to segments found by the TSFs,allowing for up to two missing TSF segments per track  track fitting algorithm with both the track segments found and the individual hits, adding segments close to the initially fitted track, and dropping hits with large residuals. The final fit does not demand that the track originate from the IP.

Belle CDC L1 trigger scheme 1. r– trigger : from axial superlayers  Anode wires grouped into track segment finder (TSF)  hit pattern in each cell is examined by a memory look-up (MLU) to find track segment  TSF-cell outputs to form track finder (TF) wedges 2. z- trigger : axial and stereo superlayers

Belle L3 fast track reconstruction algorithm Input: summarized hit signals from hardware trigger 1. R- Track finding : based on the memory lookup method a. search for fired TSF in the outermost super-layer b. search for inner hit TSF signals in the limited region c. logical-AND of the obtained pattern and stored patterns 2. Track fitting a. conformal transformation b. fit the line in the conformal space c. get PT from the distance from the origin to the line 3. R-z Track Reconstruction a. get z-hit patterns for the r- segment from r-z trigger b. Fill histogram as a function of the polar angle to get Pz

Belle fast track reconstruction in software trigger L4 trigger track finding and fitting :

Algorithms of L4 fast track reconstruction 1.Track segment finding 2. R- phi track building 3.r-phi track fitting 3 track parameters out of 5 determined (dr, phi0, κ ) 4.Event time correction 5. 3D track building 6. s-z track fitting linear fit to determine the other 2 track parameters(dz,tanλ)