Activity 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades 6–12: Supporting all Students in Close Reading, Academic Language, and Text-based Discussion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
Lesson Plans 101. Lesson Components In the following slides, you will find definitions for the most essential lesson components that are found in a well.
Activity 3a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Gear-up: Content Literacy Jackson Independent/Breathitt Co Schools October 29, 2012
Common Formative Assessment Inquiry & Action RESEARCH & EVALUATION BAKERSFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SEPTEMBER, 2013.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards Day 2: Unpacking the Standards.
A UGUST 2012 Elementary Literacy Standards. New Standards for Literacy Key Intended Learnings– Teachers will… Examine capacities of college and career.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
CREEKSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATA REVIEW FOR FY 2015.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
Half-Day Professional Development November 9, 2012.
Activity 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Supporting All Students in Writing and Research.
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
York Public Schools Curriculum Design December 1, 2010 Toby Boss ESU 6.
Science Instructional Guide For High School Integrated Coordinated Science Biology and Chemistry Professional Development Module 1 Introduction to the.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
Introductory Activities Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K–5: Supporting all Students in Close Reading, Academic Language, and Text-based.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Backwards Design. Activity-Oriented Teaching Many teachers engage in “activity-oriented” teaching.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Introduction to the Process of Formative Assessment.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Activity 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades 6–12: Supporting all Students in Writing and Research.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Introductory Activities Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Supporting All Students in Writing and Research.
Connecting to CCSS & District Initiatives Reflective Virtual Learning Walks… Going from Good to Great!
Activity 9 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades 6–12: Supporting all Students in Close Reading, Academic Language, and Text-based Discussion.
Teacher’s PDP for the School Year October, 2012.
ASSESSMENT IN THE WRITING WORKSHOP Module #3 Highline Public Schools Literacy Team.
Understanding by Design Stage 2: Determining Acceptable Evidence Summer UBD Workshop, Day 2 August 13, 2014.
Writing a Lesson Plan September 2, 2015 * Stanley Teacher Preparation Program * Sarah Baird Glover.
Interim Assessment Information Hope Allen Director of Assessment 4/12/15.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Understanding by Design UMS Opening Day Why UbD?
Kristen A Condella MCSD Mathematics Coordinator. Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS) Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and.
Learning and Accountability College- and Career- Ready Standards A Balanced Assessment System A New School Accountability Model.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Backwards Design Lesson Planning
Welcome PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS WHILE WAITING FOR THE CLASS TO BEGIN: Rate your knowledge of the MTSS process using the colored dot. Rate.
Backwards Design for Rigor
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
Lesson-Design Elements That Reflect the College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics and the Standards for Mathematical Practice  
CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
3 Stages of Backward Design
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Understanding by Design
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Presentation transcript:

Activity 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades 6–12: Supporting all Students in Close Reading, Academic Language, and Text-based Discussion

Activity 2 14 CCS-ELA & Literacy Successes and ChallengesDesign of CCS-aligned Units Close Reading, Text-dependent Questions, and Academic Language Classroom DiscussionUniversal Design for Learning

Exemplary Unit Design 15

Activity 2 Design learning goals and assessments before lessons Derive learning goals directly from CCS Use appropriately complex text Embed formative assessment practices Build toward performance assessments Include close reading, academic vocabulary, and collaborative protocols Consider the learning needs of all students 16

Activity 2 17 What do we want students to understand, know, and be able to do? What will be the evidence that they have accomplished this? What learning activities will lead to the desired outcomes?

Activity 2 Common Core Standards, Content Standards, and Other Established Goals Transfer Goals (CCR) Meaning Goals (Understandings and Essential Questions) Acquisition Goals (Knowledge and Skills) 18

Activity 2 Directly reflects goals identified in Stage 1 Elicits evidence to validate that the targeted learning has been achieved Sharpens and focuses teaching Performance tasks: Students apply learning to a new and authentic situation to assess their understanding and ability to transfer their learning Other evidence: Assessments of discrete knowledge and skills 19

Activity 2 Instructional activities are designed after identifying desired knowledge, skills, and understanding, and determining acceptable evidence toward those goals Formative assessment practices are part of lesson design to check for student understanding and progress toward desired goals Activities are differentiated to ensure that all students will reach the desired outcomes 20

Activity 2 21 Page 10

Activity 2 Stage 1 Learning Goals: Connecticut Core Standards (CCS) Understandings (U) and key/essential/guiding Questions (Q) Declarative and Factual Knowledge and Skills (KS) Stage 2 Evidence: Performance Assessment (PA) Other Assessment (OA) Stage 3 Instructional Activities: Review one lesson for evidence that the Learning Goals are being addressed in the lesson (LG) 22

Activity 2 Content-rich text Targeted set of standards Close reading and Text-dependent Questions Academic vocabulary Discussion Formative assessment Student supports 23

Activity 2 Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievements of intended instructional outcomes (FAST SCASS, October 2006). As can be seen, formative assessment is a process, not a “thing.” 24

Activity 2 25 Page 12

Activity 2 Content-rich Text (T) Targeted set of Standards (CCS) Close Reading and Text-dependent Questions (TDQ) Academic Vocabulary and Language (AL) Discussion (D) Formative Assessment (FA) Student Supports (SS) 26

Activity 2 Join a set of partners who reviewed a different unit. Share evidence of the elements of backward design that you found in your units. Share elements of text-based lesson design in your lessons. Discuss questions or concerns that arose as you were reviewing your units and lessons. 27

Activity 2 Use the “Quick Write” section of the notepad in your Participant Guide. In the section labeled “Reviewing a Unit and a Lesson,” jot down notes about anything you think was significant from this activity that can be applied to Core Standards work in your school or district. 28 Page 61

Activity 2 Grade, Unit #, and Title Unit Overview CT Core Standards Core Understandings and Essential Questions Knowledge and Skills Assessments Vocabulary Resources Supports 29 Page 85

Activity 2 Unit and Lesson Title CT Core Standards Learning Targets (Knowledge and Skills/ Guiding Questions) Sequence and Materials Opening, Work Time, Closing, and Assessments Meeting Students’ Needs 30 Page 89