1 Newly Certified Teachers: Experiences of and Opinions About Teacher Induction in Illinois Brenda K. Klostermann Illinois Education Research Council Southern.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Academic Student Instructional Support -OASIS- -Cheri Tillman, Pat Burns.
Advertisements

Building capacity for assessment leadership via professional development and mentoring of course coordinators Merrilyn Goos.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
New Teacher Center, University of California at Santa Cruz Induction in Illinois: Seizing the Day Ellen Moir Executive Director Illinois New Teacher Collaborative.
Teacher Quality, Distribution, and Turnover in El Paso Ed Fuller The University of Texas at Austin El Paso, Tx June28, 2006.
Curriculum and Instruction Council June 11, 2009.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 SURVEY RESEARCH ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Prepared by: Leonora C. Pangan MBA.
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
BEST Survey Results: Feeding Information Back to Institutions of Higher Education Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University of Connecticut.
School Library Media Specialists Who Provide In-service Training for Teachers Graduate Thesis Spring 2005 Stephanie Gaughan.
1 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education IISME Teacher Retention and Program Impact Study Study conducted in 2001by Dr. Kathryn Sloane Weisbaum.
Stress/Anxiety Intervention at WHS By Kevin Tjoelker.
New Teacher Development Program Tamika Estwick-Sen. Program Manager Elizabeth Kurkjian Henry- New Teacher Developer Alexis Harewood- Year II Teacher.
Developing High-Quality Campus Plans for Teacher Mentoring.
Local Mentor Plan South Brunswick Schools September 2005 South Brunswick Schools September 2005.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
WE’RE ACCREDITED….NOW WHAT? MAINTAINING ACCREDITATION AND SUSTAINING QUALITY Presented by: Julie Leslie & Kim St. Marie.
Holland Central School District New Teacher Mentoring Program Introduction.
Components of a Quality Induction Program Shirley P. Andrews Valdosta State University Valdosta, Georgia.
Preliminary Highlights from the Noyce National Program Evaluation May 30, 2013 Ellen Bobronnikov Cris Price.
RETENTION & TRANSFER OF LEARNING. Distinguish Business Orientation from Pedagogical Orientation Business Orientation Information on how to be an employee.
1 Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 1 Report September 22, 2009 HIGHLIGHTS Research and Policy Support Group FOR PRESS OFFICE.
The Distribution and Retention of Illinois Teachers Jennifer B. Presley Illinois Education Research Council Illinois New Teacher Collaborative Working.
Resource and Talent Planning (5RTP) Cohort: Waterloo Tutor: Michelle Maunder.
New Teacher Development Program developing and retaining talented new teachers.
New Teacher Mentoring Programs Presented by: Shannon Butler, Suzanne Brown, Brandy Day, Giovanni Hines, Scott Holland and Ann Marie Nelin EPPL 643 Spring.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Carroll County New Teacher Induction Champion for Kids “Delivering Support One Teacher at a Time!”
Orientation and Induction of Traditionally and Alternatively Educated New Teachers Jennifer Conkin October, 2012.
State of the State: BTSA Induction Directors Meeting November 18, 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
The Induction and Mentoring of Beginning Kansas Public School Principals Dr. Marcy K. Aycock April 2008.
NEW TEACHER INDUCTION By Amber Keller Dr. Massingill December 5, 2013.
SC/SVNTP Mentor Forum 8/30/13 CA Induction Program Update: LCFF Unintended Consequences and What Districts Can Do.
EVALUATION RESEARCH. Evaluation Research  How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit.
Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Final Results from a Randomized Trial IES Summer Research Conference, June 2010 Steven Glazerman ● Eric Isenberg.
 How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit together?  What purpose do they serve?
Recruiting and Retaining Teachers for High Needs Schools: “It Takes a Valley” Dr. Susan Meyers, Dean March 6, 2009.
Findings from the Perceptions of Success Inventory for Beginning Teachers Northeast Collaborative July 10, 2007 Presented by: Alan Reiman Kristen Corbell.
The Growing Need for Beginning Teacher Induction Richard M. Ingersoll Professor of Education and Sociology University of Pennsylvania and Consortium for.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Challenges using IPEDS for examining the Early Childhood teacher preparation pipeline Abstract The purpose.
Alternate Assessments: A Case Study of Students and Systems: Gerald Tindal UO.
Southern Regional Education Board Florida Leadership Academy for Innovation and Improvement US DOE Communication Hub Meeting Albuquerque, NM September.
Mentoring Preservice Teachers: Survey Results Updated last: 9/15/2008.
2008 FAEIS Annual Longitudinal Assessment With a Comparison to the 2007 Survey Results The purpose of the FAEIS annual evaluation is to develop longitudinal.
Teacher Satisfaction Whitney Zimmerman Christine Henry.
Summer 2010 Session #1. JUST LIKE ME!* LEAD MENTOR / MENTOR WORK IS ALL ABOUT… TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT How are these similar to undergraduate work,
1 Leaving Schools or Leaving the Profession: Setting Illinois’ Record Straight on New Teacher Attrition Karen J. DeAngelis and Jennifer B. Presley IERC.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
ILLINOIS NEW TEACHER COLLABORATIVE (INTC) 2009 CONFERENCE REPORT LAURA A. BARWEGEN, ED.D. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION WHEATON COLLEGE.
1 Context of the training in the regions Train the Trainers February 23-24, 2010 Université de Montréal Montréal,QC Gaëtan Drolet DLI section Statistics.
New Employee Induction Program
Induction and Mentoring: Evidence From the Teacher Graduate Assessment Project Charles Rohn, Dean, Eastern Illinois University Andrew F. Wall, Project.
 Becoming a Reflective Practitioner New Licensed Staff Induction Program.
Support Provider Work Shop Session #1 Looking at Survey Data East Bay BTSA Induction.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Non-traditional Teacher and Candidate Retention: Measures of Educator Preparation, Certification and School Staffing Effectiveness Linked to Student Achievement.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Presentation to the MDE Teacher Evaluation Work Group June 28, 2012 December 6, 2011.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
Sarah Wright Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture April 27, 2009.
Performance Management. Common Misconceptions Appraisal Performance-Related Pay Targets and Objectives Motivation and Discipline.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
SNRPDP Self Evaluation
District Mentoring Plan
Developing as a Professional
Overview and Update June 2018
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Mentor training update
Presentation transcript:

1 Newly Certified Teachers: Experiences of and Opinions About Teacher Induction in Illinois Brenda K. Klostermann Illinois Education Research Council Southern Illinois University Edwardsville American Evaluation Association, November 2004 Website: ierc.siue.edu

2 Background First year is “sink or swim” experience. Nationally, approximately 25% of new teachers leave within first three years (2000 Quality Counts). Between 32% and 40% of Illinois’ public school teachers leave within 5 years (Presley 2002). Research indicates induction activities can help reduce the attrition of new teachers.

3 Methods Telephone interviews in Nov-Dec 2001 Two random samples –Starters: initially certified in SY1999/2000 and working as a regular teacher in IPS in 2000/01(n=353) –Stayers: certified in SY1994/95 and working as a regular teacher in IPS in 1999/2000 and 2000/01 (n=381) Survey questions –Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study –Survey of California Teachers –additional questions specifically for this study

4 Induction Activities Workshops aimed at new teachers Access at school/district expense to topical workshops Mentoring from an experienced teacher Release time to observe other teachers Observation by an experienced teacher Access to technologies to assess and try out in classroom applications Reduced duties (e.g., no committee work) Support sessions with school administrators

5 Number of Induction Activities Received

6 Percent of Teachers Receiving Induction Activities in First Year of Teaching

7 Percent of Teachers Rating Induction Activities as “Very Helpful”

8 Is participation in induction activities related to staying in teaching for new IL teachers? “Intention to teach in 2006” is proxy for “staying in teaching” Three measures of participation –Type of activity –Number of activities –Perceived helpfulness of activities

9 Starters’ Participation in Induction Activities by Their Intentions to Teach in IPS in 2006 p=.05 % Intending to Teach in Fall 2006 Induction ActivityParticipated Did Not Participate Reduced Duties87%70% Release Time to Observe84%72% Topical Workshops81%63% Access to Technologies80%60% Observation by Exp. Teacher80%73% Support Sessions78%77% New Teacher Workshops77%78% Mentoring76%82%

10 Number of Induction Activities Received By Starters, by Intention to Teach in IPS in 2006 % Intending to Teach in Fall 2006 # of Induction Activities Received Yes No and Not Sure 1 activity67%33% 2 activities67%33% 3 activities70%30% 4 activities72%28% 5 activities64%36% 6 activities84%16% 7 activities85%15% 8 activities87%13% p=.05

11 Starters’ Index of Helpfulness by Intention to Teach in 2006 Percent intending to teach in Fall 2006 Induction Helpfulness IndexYes No and Not Sure All were “somewhat or very helpful” 81%19% Some were “not at all helpful” 72%28% At least half were “not at all helpful” 65%35% p=.09

12 Role of Teacher Satisfaction in Intentions to Continue Teaching Teachers satisfied with their position are more likely to intend to teach in 2006 Teachers who found induction activities helpful were more satisfied with their jobs. Satisfaction was higher for teachers who received more induction activities Caution in ascribing causality due to nature of the study.

13 Factors Related to Starters’ Intentions to be Teaching in 2006 Number of Induction Activities Received Satisfaction with Teaching Position Intention to Teach in 2006 Perceived Helpfulness of Induction Activities Participation in:  Support Sessions  Topical Workshops  Release Time  Access to Technology  Reduced Activities

14 Recommended Strategies for Retaining Teachers Provide specific induction activities. Provide as many different activities as possible. Comprehensive induction programs likely reflect professional learning environments that are supportive of their teachers. In turn, increased teacher retention will improve schools as learning environments for students.

15 The Illinois Teacher Study Looked at career plans and experiences of random samples of Teachers newly certified in the starters and non/delayed starters; and Teachers leaving Illinois Public schools after with 1 to 5 years’ teaching experience - the leavers Respondents were representative of respective populations – except Chicago region (under- represented by about 10 percentage points)

16 The Starters 95% intended to be teaching in Illinois public schools after their first year of teaching (Fall 2002) 77% intended to be teaching in Illinois public schools in Fall 2006 –13% were undecided

17 Starters’ Participation in Induction Activities by Their Intentions to Teach in IPS in 2006 Percent intending to teach in Fall 2006 Induction ActivityParticipated Did Not Participate Reduced duties87%70% Release time to observe other teachers 84%72% Topical workshops81%63% Access to computers and other technologies 80%60% p=.05