Introduction to BP Debate

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debaters briefing.
Advertisements

Introduction to British Parliamentary debate 07/10/2011.
Rebuttals.
INTRODUCTION TO DEBATE JUDGING Contents of Video General Information What is Debate Who is in a Debate Before the Debate During the Debate Judge Adaptation.
China Debate Education Network Judging British Parliamentary Debate.
China Debate Education Network Judging Worlds-Style Debate.
Topic 1. Getting Started 8/10/13. Outline  Introduction to “speaker development” sessions  Introduction British Parliamentary Debating  Role fulfilment.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
1. 2 Topics  The Debate  The teams  Structuring Arguments  Speaker Roles & duties  The Tournament  The Competition  The Motions  The Rules  The.
Role Fulfilment Training, 17/10/2012. Opening Government (OG) Closing Government (CG) Opening Opposition (OO) Closing Opposition (CO) 1.Prime Minister.
1. 2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible for young people to.
ADJUDICATORS’ FUNCTIONS Decide which team has won. Decide the best speaker. State the reasons for the decision (oral adjudication). Provide constructive.
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
We couldn’t do it without you! This Brief Presentation Will Cover Five Talking Points That Will Train You To Be Great Judges Style of Debate Role Of.
An Overview By: Christina Weber
An introduction to Asian Parliamentary and Australs-Style Debating
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
Definitions: A debate is “a relatively formal procedure whereby two sides of an issue are argued.” (Devito) Debate formats deal with “the nature of speeches.
Basic Training. What is debating? LUDS practice British parliamentary debate that is: A structured argument about a certain topic (motion) Between two.
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
Teaching BP Lessons, Practices, and Drills China Debate Education Network.
Role Fulfilment. “Rules” of Britisth Parliamentary Formally all speakers in a debate are meant to do certain things In real terms these are guides to.
Judging British Parliamentary Debate
ALWAYS REMEMBER Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM.
Personally Proactive: Samuel Bruce Ltd 2005 JCI NOM/LOM NAME DATE DEBATING Scott Johnston JCI Glasgow Senator JCI Scotland National President 2004 JCI.
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for Leader of Opposition Note: Constructing arguments is not the only job of the First Opposition,
Adjudication Briefing AdjCore of Japan BP Table of Contents ●Basic Rule ●Role of Adjudicator ●Process of Adjudication ●Criteria of Adjudication.
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are making an investment You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible.
Debate What, Why, How?. What do you think debating is?
Quebec Student DebatingAssociation Judge’s Briefing.
Roles and Strategies for the First Government Team China Debate Education Network:
BP DEBATING: STRUCTURE & ROLE FULFILMENT Speaker’s Development, Week 2 Karolien Michiels.
An introduction to Asian Parliamentary and Australs-Style Debating Brett Frazer October 15, 2014 Cheongna Dalton School.
Speech and Debate Terms Basic Definitions Every Speechie Should Know!
Introduction to University Debate Dylan Williams – Fall 2015 University of Alberta Debate Society 1.
Welcome to Warwick Debating Society!. The plan for today  Short introduction to the British Parliamentary debating format  Split off into groups of.
Role Fulfillment TRAINING SESSION 21 OCT Plan  Announcements  Quick review of last time’s stuff  Positions and their roles  How to prepare for.
Quebec Student DebatingAssociation Judge’s Briefing.
DEBATE Mrs. Bruner DEBATE Mrs. Bruner. Remember.... ARE A – Assertion (Your side) “We are against Year Round Schools!” R – Reasons (WHY?) It costs a lot.
Introduction to Debate Saints Conference 2015/16.
DEBATE 21 APRIL, 2015 World Schools (WSDC) Debate Format: Introduction.
EJVED 09. Getting to know debating Debating is a clash of argumentations among the Government team and Opposition team Everything starts from the word.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Role of Speakers. So, debating is.... Reason-giving, Decision-making Not fighting, not oratory, not English proficiency Persuasion.
Presentation by Jessica Prince March 13, 2010 The Pre-competition for the 14 th FLTRP Cup National English Debating Competition 1.
Debate Competition There will be 2 teams of three students The side arguing in favor of the topic is proposition The side arguing against the topic statement.
Junior Debating Society Forms JUNIOR DEBATING SOCIETY FORMS Every other Wednesday Sign in Sign to volunteer to be a speaker Offer ideas on.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
British Parliamentary Debating Course Presented for CPUT by Piet Olivier.
World Schools Debate: an Introduction
Parliamentary Debate:
MSPDP Rules Ms. Chacon.
How to make a speech.
World schools debate championships 3 vs 3 format
Thanks to Ionut Stefan and Eliot Pallot
Debate & Adjudication Briefing
A Briefing For BP Debate
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
THE HOUSE OF COMMONS (Part of Legislative Branch)
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating Rachmat Nurcahyo,M. A
Sixth Debate of the Semester
Roles In Debating Week 2.
NUDC KOPERTIS BOBY-ANGGI-OMAR
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
The Debate.
Debating Seminar Universitas Mataram
Technical Meeting English Debate Competition Mechanical Language Club
Public Speaking Contest
The British Parliamentary Debate Format
Presentation transcript:

China Debate Education Network Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate

Introduction to BP Debate Procedures of BP Debate BP debate format

Procedure for Each Debate The Draw Motion For Debate Preparation time Timing

The Draw 1st Gov 1st Opp 2nd Gov 2nd Opp Judge Room Fudan A Peking B GU A GNU B Logan Yang Ge 201 GNU A GU B Peking A GUFE B Li Yong Huang Tingting 202 GUFE A SCUN A SCUN B Fudan B Chen Ying He Jing 203

Motion For Debate A motion is a statement provided by the Tournament Director that will become the subject of the debate. A motion is sometimes called a debate topic, a resolution, or a proposition. Examples PRC should create wireless cities. Israel should change its policies toward Palestinians Mohandas Gandhi was one of the world’s greatest leaders

Preparation Time Each team has 15 – 30 minutes to prepare (depending on the tournament) after the announcement of the motion. Teams can consult printed materials but may not use the internet or computers. Teams cannot prepare with one another. Teams cannot receive assistance from their teacher or coach.

Timing 7 minutes for each speech Protected Time: First and last minute A single knock on table or sounding of a bell announces protected time double knock or bell signals the end of your speech. Your speeches will be timed by a timekeeper or by the judge

BP Debate Format Four Teams and Eight Speakers Speaker Roles and Responsibilities

The Four Teams and Eight Speakers Upper House 1st Government Prime Minister 1st Opposition Leader of Opposition Deputy Prime Minister Deputy Leader of Opposition Lower House 2nd Opposition Member of Opposition 2nd Government Member of Government Opposition Whip Government Whip

Points of Information POI --- Point of Information Who --- a member of an opposing team; What --- comments, statement, question…; How to offer --- by rising and extending hand or by saying “on that point, Sir/Madam” NO POI --- protected time (the first and the last minute); Time --- 15 seconds or less

Speaker Roles and Responsibilities

1st Speaker -- Prime Minister --- Defines and interprets the motion Define ambiguous terms and Interpret the motion to make it clear and debatable --- Develops a case for the proposition in support of the motion --- Case should consist of one or more arguments supporting the PM’s interpretation of the motion --- Case must be prima facie—strong enough to be accepted on “its first face.” Upper House

2nd Speaker: Leader of Opposition -- Refutes the case of the Government -- Constructs one or more arguments against the Prime Minister’s interpretation of the motion. Upper House

3rd Speaker -- Deputy Prime Minister -- Refutes the arguments of the First Opposition -- Rebuilds the case of the First Government -- Adds one or more new arguments to the case of the First Government Upper House

4th Speaker – Deputy Leader of Opposition --Continues refutation of the case of the 1st Government with emphasis on any new arguments introduced by the DPM -- Rebuilds arguments of the 1st Opposition. -- Adds new arguments to the case of the 1st Opposition. Upper House

5th Speaker – Member of Government --Defends the general direction of the case of the 1st Government -- Continues refutation of 1st Opposition Arguments -- Develops a new argument that is different from but consistent with the 1st Government (frequently called an “extension.”) Lower House

6th Speaker – Member of Opposition -- Very briefly defends the direction taken by the 1st Opposition -- Very briefly continues general refutation of the 1st Government case -- Provides more specific refutation of the the MG extension. -- Develops an opposition extension. Lower House

7th Speaker – Government Whip -- Summarizes the entire debate from the point of view of the Government -- Defends the general view point of both Government teams with a special eye toward the case of the 2nd Government. -- Does not provide new arguments. Lower House

8th Speaker – Opposition Whip -- Summarizes the entire debate from the point of view of the opposition -- Defends the general view point of both Opposition teams with a special eye toward the arguments of the Second Opposition team. -- Does not provide new arguments. Lower House

THANK YOU! 谢谢