Overcoming Challenges To Integrating Renewable Energy Resources May 16, 2013 Paul Roberti, Commissioner Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Improving Transmission Asset Utilization through Advanced Mathematics and Computing 1 Henry Huang, Ruisheng Diao, Shuangshuang Jin, Yuri Makarov Pacific.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
1 Presentation to the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (WIEG) T. Graham Edwards President & CEO August 9, 2007.
EStorage First Annual Workshop Arnhem, NL 30, Oct Olivier Teller.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
ENERGY ONLY RESOURCES & THE RPS CALCULATOR. Deliverability Overview Most resources procured to date have been procured to be fully deliverable – CAISO.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
New England’s Power System: At a Crossroads – Again! Stephen Rourke VICE PRESIDENT, SYSTEM PLANNING NECPUC Symposium: Governors’ Infrastructure Initiative.
THE TRES AMIGAS SUPERSTATION Southwest Renewable Energy Conference Santa Fe, NMSeptember 16 th 2010 UNITING THE NATION’S ELECTRIC POWER GRID.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
GE Energy Asia Development Bank Wind Energy Grid Integration Workshop: Issues and Challenges for systems with high penetration of Wind Power Nicholas W.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
ISO New England Regional Update Wholesale Electricity Markets & State Energy Policy Seminar Connecticut Business & Industry Association December 14, 2010.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Grid Integration of Renewable in India - Challenges and Policy Responses Sanjay Garg General Manager General Manager PGCIL/ Ministry of Power.
NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
The Smart Grid: A Brief Introduction Qinran Hu Ph.D. Candidate Jun 12 th, 2014 Knoxville, Tennessee.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
FCC Field Hearing on Energy and the Environment Monday November 30, 2009 MIT Stratton Student Center, Twenty Chimneys Peter Brandien, Vice President System.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
GHG, Renewables, and Reliability IEP ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 Carrie Bentley Resero Consulting
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
John Norden, Manager, Renewable Resource Integration ISO New England Inc NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Roadmap to Renewable Integration in.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
Monterey Plaza Hotel October 8-10, 2007
Integrating Wind Energy Capabilities of Wind Power Plants Mark Ahlstrom Wind Energy: A Good Citizen of the Electric Grid Four Corners Wind Resource Center.
2003 State of the Market Report ERCOT Wholesale Electricity Markets.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
Smart Grid Schneider Electric Javier Orellana
Planning for Texas’ Energy Future Select Committee on Electric Generation Capacity and Environmental Effects Bob Kahn President & CEO February 6, 2008.
PacifiCorp and CAISO Expanding Regional Energy Partnerships
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Wind Management at MISO
Analysis of the Effects of a Flexible Ramping Ancillary Service Product on Power System Operations Ibrahim Krad Eduardo Ibanez Erik Ela.
Electricity Wholesale Markets: Designs for a low-carbon future
penetration of wind power
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
New England Resource Adequacy
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Presentation transcript:

Overcoming Challenges To Integrating Renewable Energy Resources May 16, 2013 Paul Roberti, Commissioner Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission

Renewable Integration Challenges in New England Are Regional In Nature Independent System Operator of New England (ISO-NE) Responsible for: –Ensuring regional reliability –Administering electricity markets Regulated by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2

New England’s Electric Power Grid at a Glance 6.5 million households and businesses; population 14 million 350+ generators 8,000+ miles of high-voltage transmission lines (115 kV and above) 32,000 megawatts of total supply and 2,000+ megawatts of demand resources 28,130 megawatts all-time peak demand, set on August 2, participants in the marketplace $5 billion total energy market value in

4 Fuel Mix for New England – 2012

5 Generator Proposals in the ISO Queue Approximately 5,000 MW looking to connect to the New England system – Greater than 50 Percent are Renewable Energy Resources

Challenges Posed by Greater Levels of Variable Resources The region’s aging generation fleet and uncertain performance of demand response resources has increased the need for system operations flexibility – both system wide and locationally As traditional units retire or are too expensive to run, and variable resources increase on the system, the system operator will need more resources that have quick-start capability, fast ramp rates, and are dispatchable across seasons Wide spectrum of solutions available, some already underway, each with unique costs and complexities. For example: –Increase system reserves –Enhance performance incentives and penalties in wholesale markets –Negative pricing for energy market offers –Integrate wind forecasting into commitment and dispatch 6

New England Renewable Energy Targets, 2021 Today, MA accounts for 46% of the region’s total electricity consumption; CT 25%; RI 6% With passive demand response forecasts (11.6% energy reduction in 2021), LSEs would need renewables to provide 20.2% of projected electric energy use to meet existing targets. By 2021, 31.8% of region’s projected electric energy consumption could be met by EE, RPS targets, and related renewable goals. Source: ISO-NE RSP 2012, p. 135,

New England Generator Interconnection Proposals Approximately 6,000 MW proposed; over a third are wind projects 8

9 Population and electricity demand concentrated in southern New England No overlap between wind resources and high energy demand areas Transmission investment would be required for large-scale wind integration Challenges for Wind Development

10 New England Wind Integration Study (NEWIS) New England-focused wind integration analysis Large-scale wind integration in New England is technically feasible Regional requirements: –Maintaining flexible resources to manage variability –Transmission upgrades –Increasing regulation service and operating reserves –Developing wind forecasting tools

Challenges of Wind Integration The ISO is unable to dispatch wind resources today. –Unit dispatch software is unable to send dispatch instructions. –Non-dispatchable resources (which includes wind) are ineligible to set price. –Market/operations protocol used to determine curtailment priority generally results in wind being curtailed before other resources. –Inability to submit negative energy offers gives competing resources little incentive to reduce output when congestion occurs. –System operators must rely on manual actions to ensure reliability. Improved short, medium, and long-term forecasting tools are needed. Full integration of wind resources into automated market and dispatch systems is needed. 11

Addressing the Challenges of Wind Integration The ISO is developing market and infrastructure improvements: –Allow negative energy offers –Make wind resources dispatchable and eligible to set price –Calculate and send out a do-not-exceed (DNE) limit to each wind plant on dispatch The DNE limits will reflect several characteristics of each plant: –Economic offer curve –Maximum output under ideal weather conditions –Short-term wind output forecast –Transmission constraints –Telemetered physical status for the next dispatch interval A wind plant will be free to operate anywhere between 0 MW and the DNE limit 12

Addressing the Challenges of Wind Integration cont. A centralized, regional wind power forecasting system is scheduled to be in service in early All wind resources will be required to provide real-time telemetry indicating current output and weather conditions. –Improves system operator’s situational awareness –Enable ISO’s real-time automated communication of dispatch instructions –Enhances the quality of the centralized forecast More flexible structure for hourly day-ahead energy offers and intraday reoffers is being developed. –Reduces the desire to self-schedule, giving system operators more flexibility to integrate renewable energy resources –Increases the percentage of resources dispatched economically –Better for efficient system operation as a whole 13

Addressing the Challenges of Wind Integration cont. Potential increase in regulation requirements as more wind resources interconnect to the grid –Current hourly requirement averages ~60 MW –Could increase to ~300 MW if wind penetration increases to 20% of annual energy –New England currently has 800+ MW of regulation capable resources Forward Capacity Market issues under consideration –Pay-for-performance incentives –Identification of operational needs of resources to be acquired in the capacity auction 14

Current Situation Wind resources and other Intermittent resources are “non- dispatchable” –Unit Dispatch Software (UDS) is unable to manage congestion by sending dispatch instructions –Wind resources not eligible to set price in LMP calculator –System operators must manually curtail resources if necessary to ensure reliable operation of the grid Anticipated wind production generally not reflected in unit commitment for real-time Manually curtailing non-dispatchable resources when required to manage congestion does not result in price separation –Non-dispatchable resources are effectively zero-priced –Resulting LMPs are inconsistent with “dispatch” decisions to curtail zero-price resources 15

Existing RT Curtailment Procedure When economic dispatch is insufficient to manage congestion, priority goes to resources that cleared or self-scheduled in Day-Ahead. As a practical matter, this leads to economically inefficient outcomes –Renewable energy credits and production tax credits result in wind plants having a negative energy price –Interconnections on weaker portions of the grid, and fast ramp rates mean wind plants are typically curtailed more frequently than other resource types 16

Existing Manual Procedure Will Not Be Adequate Going Forward Lack of real-time telemetry and uncertainty about anticipated wind output lead to: –More conservative operating practices and limits –Less optimal resource commitment Suboptimal dispatch and inappropriate pricing –Low cost resources may be curtailed before higher cost resources –Manual curtailments to manage congestion don’t result in price separation With higher wind penetration, system operators with only manual dispatch & curtailment procedures will be overloaded during dynamic weather conditions 17

Near Term Improvements Wind short-term forecast – early 2013 –An accurate forecast is critically dependent on wind resources providing detailed plant data ASAP OP-14 & OP-18 – real-time telemetry from wind plants Both of these: –Greatly improve operator situational awareness –Reduce uncertainty –Improve commitment and dispatch of all resources –Make possible a real-time “Do Not Exceed” (DNE) dispatch of wind resources 18

Wind RT DNE Dispatch - Objectives Secure, reliable, and efficient operation of the system through normal economic dispatch of the system. Reduced need for manual curtailments of non- dispatchable resources. –Improved opportunities for wind production Allow wind resources to impact energy prices in a manner consistent with their economic value and energy market offers. 19

How Will Wind RT DNE Dispatch Work? UDS will calculate and send out a Do Not Exceed limit to each wind plant on dispatch The DNE limits will reflect –Economics –Constraints –plant status (RTHOL and persistence) –high-confidence “next 5 minutes” wind output forecasts Will consider both energy balance (i.e. gen = load) and reliability Will allow price-based congestion management based on offer parameters –Contemplates the eventual introduction of negative energy offers 20

How Will Wind RT DNE Dispatch Work? (cont.) Wind plants will be considered “following dispatch” if operating between 0 MW and the DNE limit and not exceeding ramping limits. –Output can vary with changing weather conditions –Downward ramps due to plant emergencies and/or decreasing wind not counted for “following dispatch” Will allow wind plants on dispatch to be eligible to set price Accurate forecasts and frequent telemetry should reduce curtailments and provide greater opportunity to maximize output. Will prevent “manual procedure” overload for system operators 21

Who is Affected and When? No one is affected until the DNE dispatch software can be implemented (estimated for 2014) –ISO efforts have been unable to identify a feasible way to dispatch wind manually Once software is in place, DNE dispatch may be optionally selected by wind plants through their offer data DNE dispatch is planned to become mandatory when negative energy offers are implemented, for wind plants that meet one or more of the following conditions: –Interconnect to a transmission facility or a FERC jurisdictional distribution facility –Has a Capacity Supply Obligation –Is a Capacity Network Resource –Has a total nameplate capacity at the point of interconnection of >= 5 MW 22

How Will a Wind Plant Participate Submit an economic offer curve into the Day-Ahead or Real-Time Energy Markets Must be providing all weather and plant data required by recent OP- 14 & OP-18 changes –This data supports the forthcoming real-time wind forecast system –Accurate real-time wind production forecasts are critical to effective operation of the DNE dispatch No requirement to offer into Day-Ahead Self-scheduling will continue to be permissible while Wind RT Dispatch is voluntary. Assuming a dispatchable wind plant offers $0 commitment costs, it will be treated as “committed” whenever available (i.e. RTHOL > 0) –Otherwise, must offer & clear in DA, or self-schedule in RT 23

New England’s Current Implementation Plan Voluntary Wind RT DNE Dispatch – mid-2014 –Market rules being presented today address only voluntary DNE dispatch Implementation on a voluntary basis provides some early operational/reliability benefits, but will not fully resolve pricing and congestion management issues until all wind plants are responding to DNE dispatch instructions Becomes mandatory when negative offers are implemented. –Likely not until 2014 or 2015 –Will require a separate rule change at that time 24

THANK YOU Paul Roberti, Commissioner Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission 89 Jefferson Blvd. Warwick, RI Tel: (401)