Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
1 Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. University of Connecticut Vicki Stayton, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University Personnel Preparation: What we Know and What we Need.
Module: IEPs Head Start Center for Inclusion
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
ENHANCE Update Research Underway on the Validity of the Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process ECO Center Advisory Board Meeting March 8, 2012 Arlington,
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
Supporting Early Childhood Transition: State of the Evidence and Implications for Policy and Practice Beth Rous Caroline Gooden.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
TRANSITION TO PRESCHOOL: National Survey Findings and Implications for State Policy Beth Rous, Katherine McCormick & Teri Nowak, University of Kentucky.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Timely and Effective Transition at Age 3 David P. Lindeman, Peggy Miksch & Phoebe Rinkel Kansas Division for Early Childhood Conference Wichita, Kansas.
Early Development Network Conference June 10, 2015 Kearney, NE Amy Bunnell & Cole Johnson, NDE Julie Docter, DHHS.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Florida’s Participation in the National Transition Initiative WHY US? Strand 3 – Collaborative Leadership Session # S3 107 &
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
EI Colorado Technical Assistance Call CAPTA Referrals SSIP Phase II Evaluation Activities State Updates January 14, 2016.
ARC Chairperson Training
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
Regional Meetings for Teachers of the Deaf Spring 2014
ARC Chairperson Training
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Presentation transcript:

Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina Katherine McCormick University of Kentucky

Today We Will… Review the National Early Childhood Transition Center Scope and Activities Present preliminary findings from current study on state policy and practice

WHY IS A TRANSITION CENTER NEEDED? Law Sets Up Need For Transition Legal Provisions to Insure Smooth Transitions Evidence of Continued Difficulty – Parent Report – Research Studies – Federal and State Monitoring

ECOLOGY OF TRANSITION

HOW WILL THE CENTER HELP? EXAMINE LITERATURE EXAMINE STATE POLICIES COMPARE EMPIRICAL & SOCIALLY VALIDATED PRACTICES CONDUCT LONGITUDINAL STUDIES PROVIDE TRAINING & SYSTEM CHANGE

STATE POLICY COMPONENT NATIONAL STUDIES – Analysis of Monitoring-Related Documents – Policy Survey: Part C – Policy Survey: 619 – Role of the SICC FIVE (5) STATE STUDIES – Policy Document Analysis – Role of the LICC (Survey) – Interviews

ANALYSIS OF MONITORING DOCUMENTS DOCUMENTS USED Part B & C Self-Assessments State Continuous Improvement Plans OSEP Part B & Part C Monitoring Reports State Continuous Monitoring Progress Reports State Part B Performance Reports ALL DOCUMENTS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVERY STATE

ANALYSIS OF MONITORING DOCUMENTS WHAT DID WE DO? Requested all relevant documents from state Part C and 619 Coordinators Categorized contents of documents – Issues – Goals – Strategies and Activities Documented Data Source for Each Entry Conducting Cross State Analyses

ANALYSIS OF MONITORING DOCUMENTS AN EXAMPLE IssueTransition GoalsStrategies & Activities Interagency Agreement Data System The number of communities with established interagency agreements that facilitate transition from Part C to Part B will increase Require communities to document how they will gather information through personal interviews, surveys, and/or focus groups about how families experienced their transition process Timelines Data System The percentage of eligible children who have completed their transition plans no later than 3 months prior to their third birthday will increase Gather accurate and uniform data about transition and the timely provision of services upon the child’s third birthday through IFSP 1 reviews, parent focus groups and targeted on- sites Parent Satisfaction Training 100 percent of families will report a smooth and timely transition from Part C to Part B by their child’s third birthday. Identify additional training and technical assistance needs from Service Coordination Core Training School Participation Timelines Training Interagency Agreements School district personnel will be invited to participate in transition planning no later than 6 months prior to the child’s third birthday for all children potentially eligible for Part B Develop a self assessment tool for local communities to document the participation of school districts, parents, and Part C in transition meetings. Provide training to service coordinators, child find coordinators, and preschool personnel. Provide technical assistance to local communities to develop interagency agreements. 1 IFSP: Individual Family Service Plan

ANALYSIS OF MONITORING DOCUMENTS PRELIMINARY FINDINGS Evaluations Transition contained in IFSP Timelines Service Array Inclusion Summer

ANALYSIS OF MONITORING DOCUMENTS PRELIMINARY FINDINGS - Continued Parent Participation Parent Rights Parent Satisfaction Adequate Staff Participation

ANALYSIS OF MONITORING DOCUMENTS PRELIMINARY FINDINGS - Continued Data System Training Interagency Agreements

WHAT’S NEXT? Complete Cross State Analyses – Establish Reliability Finalize State Profiles Write Report Put Profiles and Report on Website Complete All Other State Studies Use Website to Consolidate All State Info on Transition Gathered by Others – Example: NECTAC Survey Data

Transition Survey Content Transition Policies & InfrastructureSICC Structure & Transition Activities I. Policies and Values II. Approach to Transition * Narrow vs. broad III. Policies * Type of policies * Outcomes * Involvement in transition policy development * Timing * When initiated * Who participated on transition team * Scheduling of transition team * Continuity of services * Assessment *Family information * Guidance * IEP * Summer birthdays * Information sharing IV. Structures to Support Transition * ICC * Working relationships V. Funding VI. Training VII/. Monitoring and Evaluation VIII. Barriers and Strategies I. Interagency History and ICC Description * SICC role in developing interagency agreements * Approach to service delivery * Are there LICCs or RICCs II. Transition Materials and Policies * Philosophy * Materials to support transition * What types * Types of transition policies III. Interagency Relationships * Level * Quality IV. Accomplishments

Additional Resources of Interest RESOURCES FROM OTHER ORGANIZATIONS Summary of Transition Related Information as presented in the National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center 619 Profiles (PDF)PDF Summary of Transition Related Information as presented in the National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center Part C Updates (PDF)PDF Summary of Transition Related Information as presented in the National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center State ICC Overview (PDF)PDF

CHECK OUR WEBSITE FREQUENTLY Teri Nowak, Project Coordinator Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute University of Kentucky 126 Mineral Industries Building Lexington, KY Phone: Toll Free: Fax: CONTRIBUTE YOUR TRANSITION STORY!