MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Advertisements

2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Intro Tour of the Male Student Mind In American Higher Education European Access Network National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland June 28, 2007 Tom.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
Student Success Programs Where Retention Theory and Practice Converge Mary Stuart Hunter Houghton Mifflin College Survival National Conference July 12,
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
LFCC SENSE 09 Data Dave Urso John Milam March 23, 2010.
Iowa State University Teaching Seminar August, 2003 Center for Teaching Excellence and Graduate College Learning to Teach, Teaching to Learn
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement JIM Meeting Presentation January 20, 2009 Jerome Ward Director, Institutional Research Cochise College.
Strategic Conversation: A Commitment to Student Engagement.
Student/Faculty Interaction Presenter: Dr. Steady Moono Dean of Student Success Montgomery County Community College.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ENGAGING STUDENTS, CHALLENGING THE ODDS 2006 SFCC Findings
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
1 Techniques for Online Retention Dr. Andrea Henne, Dean, Online and Distributed Learning.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Intro The Trouble with Boys Ross School Ross, California August 30, 2010 Tom Mortenson Senior Scholar The Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement Wyoming Community Colleges Statewide Workshop October 29, 2013.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
NSSE Results for Faculty
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)
Director, Institutional Research
The Heart of Student Success
Presentation transcript:

MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of Data Mary M. Cauley

 AtD Colleges must use data relative to student success to plan and evaluate interventions.  Martin Community College (MCC) used student engagement data in plans to increase student success.

MCC is a small, rural, single-campus institution with fewer than 1,000 students.

Research shows that the more actively engaged students are - - ־ with faculty and staff ־ with other students ־ with the subject matter they study - - the more likely they are to learn and to stay in college until they achieve their academic goals.

Student engagement is a valuable yardstick for assessing whether and to what extent an institution’s educational practices are likely to produce successful results. The term “successful results” is defined as more students across all groups learning at higher levels and achieving their academic goals.

MCC wanted to know: MCC wanted to know: ־ if our students are actively engaged in the institution, and if so, - at what level they are engaged. To do this, we asked our students about their level of engagement. To do this, we asked our students about their level of engagement. We listened to student voices through the administration of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) We listened to student voices through the administration of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE)

A growing body of research has identified institutional practices and student behaviors that promote student engagement. A growing body of research has identified institutional practices and student behaviors that promote student engagement. The CCSSE survey targets these areas for improvement. The CCSSE survey targets these areas for improvement.

Good practice in undergraduate education: Encourages student-faculty contact. Encourages student-faculty contact. Develops reciprocity and cooperation among students. Develops reciprocity and cooperation among students. Encourages active learning. Encourages active learning. Gives prompt feedback. Gives prompt feedback. Emphasizes time on task. Emphasizes time on task. Communicates high expectations. Communicates high expectations. Respects diverse talents and ways of knowing. Respects diverse talents and ways of knowing.

CCSSE measures students’ levels of engagement in good educational practices and what they gain from their college experience. CCSSE measures students’ levels of engagement in good educational practices and what they gain from their college experience. The good practices in undergraduate education are used as benchmarks. The good practices in undergraduate education are used as benchmarks. Benchmarks are groups of conceptually related items that address key areas of student engagement, learning, and persistence. Benchmarks are groups of conceptually related items that address key areas of student engagement, learning, and persistence.

CCSSE’s 5 benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important in quality educational practice. CCSSE’s 5 benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important in quality educational practice. Benchmarks of effective educational practice: Benchmarks of effective educational practice: 1. Active and collaborative learning. 2. Student effort. 3. Academic challenge. 4. Student-faculty interaction. 5. Support for learners.

Benchmark No. 1 Active and Collaborative Learning 4a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions. 4a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions. 4b. Made a class presentation. 4b. Made a class presentation. 4f. Worked with other students on projects during class. 4f. Worked with other students on projects during class. 4g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments. 4g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments. 4h. Tutored or taught other students 4h. Tutored or taught other students 4i. Participated in a community based project as a part of a regular course. 4i. Participated in a community based project as a part of a regular course. 4r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co- workers, etc.) 4r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co- workers, etc.)

These benchmarks are tools that can be used to compare college performance across benchmarks, to similarly-sized institutions, and to the full CCSSE population of community colleges. These benchmarks are tools that can be used to compare college performance across benchmarks, to similarly-sized institutions, and to the full CCSSE population of community colleges.

Part-time vs. full-time student enrollment status: Research samples are based on classes not students. Research samples are based on classes not students. CCSSE samples entire classes of students. CCSSE samples entire classes of students. Therefore, more full-time students are selected for the surveys, simply because the full-time students are enrolled in more classes than part-time students. Thus, the full-time students are more likely to be selected. Therefore, more full-time students are selected for the surveys, simply because the full-time students are enrolled in more classes than part-time students. Thus, the full-time students are more likely to be selected. While 2/3 of the students attending participating community colleges attend part time, the survey showed the opposite. While 2/3 of the students attending participating community colleges attend part time, the survey showed the opposite.

CCSSE assigns weights to responses based on respondents’ enrollment status, thereby producing more accurate measures of student engagement. CCSSE assigns weights to responses based on respondents’ enrollment status, thereby producing more accurate measures of student engagement. When aggregate data are reported for both part- time and full-time students, it is weighted by enrollment status. When aggregate data are reported for both part- time and full-time students, it is weighted by enrollment status. Goal: To increase community college student engagement and ultimately completion rates. Goal: To increase community college student engagement and ultimately completion rates. We can use survey results to improve our programs and services for students. We can use survey results to improve our programs and services for students.

CCSSE 2005 Survey MCC Respondents CCSSE Colleges Population Gender Male Male15.2%40.7% Female Female84.8%59.3%

CCSSE 2005 Survey MCC Respondents CCSSE Colleges Population Enrollment Status Full time Full time77.5%40.2% Part time Part time22.5%59.8%

Five ways you can analyze and interpret your CCSSE results: (Consider the results in terms of your own college mission, institutional focus, and student characteristics.) 1. Compare your college to the national average. (Look at areas in which you are most different. Then identify strengths and areas for improvement.) 2. Compare your college to “high performing colleges.”

3. Measure your college’s performance in terms of your least-engaged student group. You can use your raw data file to look at a. first-generation students b. developmental students c. high-risk students (single parents, having to care for dependents attending college part time, low income, etc.) You can also compare engagement levels of You can also compare engagement levels of a. minority groups b. returning female students c. other groups

4. Gauge work in areas most strongly valued. Examine results in light of your institution’s vision, mission, and/or strategic objectives. Which of the benchmarks are most important to your college? 5. Compare where you are now with where you want to be. Perform a gap analysis—where you are now versus where you want to be. What issues have been identified for your college through self-study for reaffirmation of accreditation? Or recommendations from the visiting team?

Report to the faculty and to the college community on actions taken in response to the survey results. Report to the faculty and to the college community on actions taken in response to the survey results. Involve your students in discussions about your CCSSE survey results. The survey emphasizes that students have a role to play in their own learning, and these are their observation on their educational experiences. Encourage student-faculty discussions. Involve your students in discussions about your CCSSE survey results. The survey emphasizes that students have a role to play in their own learning, and these are their observation on their educational experiences. Encourage student-faculty discussions.

Both positive and negative survey data can help improve educational practice and performance. Use the positive data to showcase your college’s best practices. Both positive and negative survey data can help improve educational practice and performance. Use the positive data to showcase your college’s best practices.

Sources of Research 1984 – National Institute of Education 1984 – National Institute of Education 1987 – “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Chickering and Gamson 1987 – “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Chickering and Gamson How College Affects Students. Pascarella and Teranzini How College Affects Students. Pascarella and Teranzini 1993 – Leaving College. Tinto 1993 – Leaving College. Tinto Thank you