Comparison of Permeation Standards Among HySAFE, SAE and Japanese Regulations and Proposal to GTR JASIC -SGS-9-069 SGS-9-06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linear Programming Problem
Advertisements

OIL#19 Alternative warm-up procedure (JAPAN proposal) 14th of January, 2015 WLTP rev1e.
EU Workshop – RCS on H 2 and FC Technologies for Vehicles Slide no. 1 EU-HarmonHy Workshop, Bruxelles, 26 September 2005 – JRC presentation SYStems for.
Japanese Technical Standard for Hydrogen Containers
Draft Deliberative Document1 of 15 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Safety Research to Support Rulemaking/GTR Objectives September 2008 SGS
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 21.
Hydrogen Fuel Cells as an Alternative Automobile Power Source By Kenneth Noyce Physics 3150 Energy and Sustainability.
Working Paper No. WLTP-09-07e 1 Agenda item 5: Progress report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) by H. Steven th WLTP IG meeting, 14.
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Definition of NMHC & THC density. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-18e.
Chemical Equilibrium: Basic Concepts
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Determination of System Equivalency – TaskForce Audi, EA-52, V4.0 WLTP-10-33e.
Default Road Load issue Initial Dutch proposal for a Update Progress report Annex 4 Open Issues: WLTP-07-07e 5. Default road load parameters (OIL.
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, section 2 Use of the gearbox, required data.
The Ideal Gas Law Section Standard Molar Volume of a Gas Assume the gas is an ideal gas Standard molar volume of a gas: the volume occupied by one.
New Template of Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Environmental Approvals Branch Presented to Air Practitioners’ Group.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
Head Restraint GTR Status to AC th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item II
“Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made.” ― Otto von BismarckOtto von Bismarck WLTP-10-36e B. Coleman.
Activity-based Cost Management
Proposal for Management of gas emitted from REESS May, 2014 U.S. DOT Head Quarter 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DG JASIC 1.
Item 3: Electrified Vehicle Battery Performance & Durability EVE-14-08e Presented by: USA, Canada EVE-14 meeting April 20,
Review of definitions -Mass /weight -VPSD WLTP-11-24e.
Mobile Source Control Division November 13, 2002 Planning and Technical Support Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Proposed.
1. A positive correlation. As one quantity increases so does the other. 2. A negative correlation. As one quantity increases the other decreases. 3. No.
Transposition of GTR No.13 “Hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles” into UN Regulation - Explanatory material - 20/September/2013 The European Commission and.
TÜV SÜD Automotive GmbH SGS HFCV, Japan, 24th – 26th September 2008 GTR-Development for H2- and FC-Vehicles a TÜV SÜD - opinion SGS
DISCRETE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
W. BentzEMBA 8021 Agenda Today Points regarding the practice questions Update regarding the final input Quiz Overview of product control system variances.
Metric System Book Definition In your own words… Picture A system of measurement used everywhere EXCEPT the United States that contains the units of meters,
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan 3 Jun 2014 Definition for ‘non-exposed’ type of fuel storage tank EPPR-07-20e Japanese.
Categorization of Light N1 Vehicles 58 th GRB (2 – 4 September 2013) JASIC This is a reference material for “GRB (Japan) Proposal for the 03 series.
Level (3.1) - Carry out an extended practical investigation involving quantitative analysis (Version 2) Exemplars of Student Work.
1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven WLTP.
Development of FC-motorcycles 1 IMMA Mr Takehiko Mashiba RESS
1 Warning requirement for the management system of the REESS May, 2014 U.S. DOT Head Quarter 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DG JASIC.
December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Transmitted by the expert from JapanGRSP Rev.1 (58th GRSP, 8-11 December 2015,
1 Ch 12: More Advanced Linear Programming Concepts and Methods Applying Linear Programming to Those Investments in Which The Simplifying Assumptions of.
Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP
Chapter 3 Lesson 2 “The Gas Laws” Gas Review 1. Indefinite shape 2. Indefinite volume 3. Takes shape of container 4. Fast moving particles (1600 km/hr)
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Review of EVS 9 th Meeting 1> TF8 catch an agreement on the definition of heavy duty electric vehicles as below: heavy vehicles cover the vehicles belong.
TF#4 – Mechanical Integrity Approved Japanese proposal for addition of vehicle mechanical protection structure into mechanical integrity requirement. EVS-11-17e.
FUNDAMENTALS OF CONTROLLING DHANYA ASOKAN M120005MS.
Types of tests Risk Assessment Procedures – Auditors use the results of risk assessment procedures to determine the type and amount of further audit.
10th EVS-gtr IWG Progress Report TF6 - SOC 2nd March
Car Valuation for Import and Classic Cars
Developing the Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program
Proposal on Drafting Hydrogen Storage System Part of the HFCV-gtr
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Comments and Questions on Proposal for new Class VIII close-proximity and close rear-view devices UN R46 Devices for indirect vision GRSG (Japan)
JASIC Japan ______ 62nd GRSP Session December 2017
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
JASIC Japan ______ 61st GRSP Session May 2017
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Gas fuelled vehicles in GTR 15: Bringing WLTP in line with Reg. 83:
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Area of a rectangle Tuesday, 05 February 2019 Definition:
Comparing Different Types of Average
Japanese proposal on evapo –gtr
Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center (JASIC)
Japan’s position and proposal on draft of -gtr 2
Review of the European test procedure for evaporative emissions
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
Dr. Hans Holdik Dongseok CHOI / Ph.D.
IMMA’s proposal for China’s proposal
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-05
SGS-4-05 Current Status of Discussion on New Standards for High-Pressure Hydrogen Containers in Japan Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization.
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of Permeation Standards Among HySAFE, SAE and Japanese Regulations and Proposal to GTR JASIC -SGS SGS-9-06

1)Comparison of Permeation Standards Among HySAFE, SAE and Japanese Regulations Current Japanese regulation: Prescribes that permeation rate for new containers be 5 Ncc/L/hr. As temperature, we set it at 15˚C. Further, we reflected the opinions of container manufacturers and automakers and considered the actual performance of currently used containers. SAE: Prescribes that the allowable permeation amount of the vehicle be 150 Ncc/min. Considers an external temperature of 55˚C taking EOL into account. Prescribes garage volumes according to the sizes of the vehicle. HySAFE: Prescribes that the allowable permeation rate of the container be 6 Ncc/L/hr. Considers an external temperature of 55˚C taking EOL into account. Prescribes the sizes of tank and garage for three sizes of vehicles. Allowable Permeation Rate (Ncc/L/hr) [New at 15 ˚C ] Allowable Permeation Rate (Ncc/L/hr) [New at 55˚C] Allowable Permeation Rate(Ncc/L/hr) [EOL at 55˚C] Storage Volume (L) Allowable Permeation (Ncc/min) Ventilation rate (ac/hr) Garage Volume (m3) Maximum Hydrogen Concentration (%) Japanese regulations 5- - SAE HySAFE (Large Car ) HySAFE ( Small Car ) HySAFE (Mini Car ) Definition of permeation amount among HySAFE, SAE, and Japanese regulations [Purpose of Review] Since the definition of permeation amount varies among HySAFE, SAE, and Japanese regulations, it is difficult to clearly compare allowable permeation amount under these standards. The purpose of this review is to unify the definition and compare permeation amount among these standards.

2) Examination of Permeation Rate for Containers Under SAE Standard * Here we calculated the permeation rate for containers under SAE from permeation amount for vehicles (150 cc/min). Based on SAE’s concept of vehicle permeation amount and garage volume, we calculated permeation rate for containers using vehicle sizes, temperature factor, and aging factor of HySAFE. - Vehicle size (HySAFE values) Large Car: 5.2 m*2.2 m*1.5 m (Storage Volume=249 L) Small Car: 3.6 m*1.9 m*1.4 m (Storage Volume=149 L) Mini Car: 2.7 m*1.8 n*1.5 m (Storage volume=91 L) - Vehicle permeation amount (SAE base) Allowable Permeation (Ncc/min)= 150*(Vehicle Length+1)*(Vehicle Width +1)*(Vehicle height +0.5)/ Garage volume (SAE base) Garage Volume (m3)= (Vehicle Length+1)*(Vehicle Width +1)*(Vehicle height +0.5) - Temperature factor and aging factor (HySAFE values) Aging Factor=1/2 (from EOL to New) Temperature Factor=1/4.7 (from 55˚C to 15˚C) Allowable Permeation Rate (Ncc/L/hr) [New at 15˚C] Allowable Permeation Rate (Ncc/L/hr) [New at 55˚C] Allowable Permeation Rate (Ncc/L/hr) [EOL at 55˚C] Storage Volume (L) Allowable Permeation (Ncc/ min ) Ventilation rate (ac/hr) Garage Volume (m3) Maximum Hydrogen Concentratio n (%) SAE (Base ) SAE (Large Car) SAE (Small Car) SAE (Mini Car) SAE(360L container) 1 [Results of calculation of permeation rates for containers from permeation amounts for vehicles under SAE standard] Permeation rate for new containers under SAE standard calculated from permeation amount for vehicles (150 cc/min) is 5.2 Ncc/L/hr.

Allowable Permeation Rate (Ncc/L/hr) [New at 15˚C] Allowable Permeation Rate (Ncc/L/hr) [New at 55˚C] Allowable Permeation Rate (Ncc/L/hr) [EOL at 55˚C] Storage Volume (L) Allowable Permeation (Ncc/ mi n ) Ventilation rate (ac/hr) Garage Volume (m3) Maximum Hydrogen Concentration (%) Japan (i) Japan (ii) Japan (iii) Japan (iv) 1 3) Review of Permeation Amount for Vehicles Under Japanese Regulations Japanese plan (i): The current Japanese regulations are based on a high ventilation rate (0.18). Japanese plan (ii): If we adopt the same ventilation rate as SAE and HySAFE, namely 0.03, hydrogen concentration will be 1.44%. Japanese plan (iii): If we adopt the same size of container as HySAFE, namely 249 L, hydrogen concentration will be 1%, even with a ventilation rate of Japanese plan (iv):If we adopt the 55.6 garage size(same as SAE garage size), hydrogen concentration will be 1%, even with a ventilation rate of ) Summary of the Comparison The permeation rate for containers calculated from the SAE’s permeation amount for vehicles (150 cc/min) (the severest value among large cars, small cars, and mini cars) is about 5 Ncc/L/hr, which is the same value as that of Japanese regulations. Further, this value is severer than 6 Ncc/L/hr, the value under HySAFE plan.

[Proposal of a gtr draft] We propose that the gtr draft satisfy either of the two conditions below. We propose the condition (ii) as an alternative. (i) Current gtr draft (Fig. 3) 150 =150*(Vehicle Length+1)*(Vehicle Width+1 )*( Vehicle Height+0.5)/30.4 (ii) The definition is given with the permeation amount per liter of the container and the value is in leakage/permeation test after gas cycle test (Fig. 5). [(ii) Reasons for the proposal] * If we define permeation amount in relation to garage volume and vehicle size, we have to manage the combinations of container size and vehicle size. We want to spare this management work. *The value of 46 takes into account a higher degree of deterioration compared to 5 for new containers. Therefore it takes into account the actual performance of currently used containers and is applicable to these containers. 5) Proposal to gtr At 55˚C after deterioration Container size (L) Permeation amount (cc/L/hr) 46 cc Fig. 5 Garage volume (m^3) Fig. 3 Permeation amount (cc/min)

6) Detailed Data Fig. 1: Shows the difference of garage volumes for vehicles between HySAFE and SAE. Fig 2: In this review, we assumed that container size is the same for all vehicle sizes. Fig. 3: Permeation amounts in relation to garage volumes (cc/min) are the same between SAE and HySAFE. This is because HySAFE defines the permeation amounts of new containers according to vehicle sizes. Fig. 4: Shows permeation amounts in relation to container sizes. The size of container changes with the size of vehicles and garage volumes (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). Fig. 2 Fig. 4 Fig. 3 Fig. 1

Fig. 7 図8 Fig. 5: Shows the permeation amount of containers after deterioration (after gas cycle test) per liter and per hour in relation to container sizes. Fig. 6: Shows the permeation amount of new containers at 55˚C per liter and per hour in relation to container sizes. Fig. 7: Shows the permeation amount of new containers at 55˚C per liter and per hour in relation to container sizes. Fig. 8: Shows the permeation amount of containers after deterioration (after gas cycle test) per liter and per hour in relation to garage volumes. At 55˚C after deterioration Container size (L) Permeation amount (cc/L/hr) 46 cc Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 8