1 County Redistricting Legal Issues 2011 Redistricting Committee Thomas (Mat) Miller, Senior Deputy Office of the County Counsel February 10, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sully District Fairfax County Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011.
Advertisements

Nevada Open Meeting Law
OVERVIEW OF CALIFORNIA’S OPEN MEETING LAW Human Resources Centralization Steering Committee Training March 15, 2012 Presented by Heather J. Lenhardt Deputy.
The Public Records Act -R.C  …To be interpreted liberally to facilitate broader access  …Exceptions to be strictly interpreted in favor of disclosure.
Brown Act Training Urban Montessori Charter School Presented by: Janelle A. Ruley, Esq. Website:
Through 2008 Season Barry Bonds 762 Home Runs Roger Clemens 354 Wins Alex Rodriguez 553 Home Runs.
Lisa Endres General Counsel Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Fundamentals of the Brown Act Student Governing Bodies Presented by the Office of General Counsel April 2010.
A Baker’s Dozen: 13 Issues Regarding the Open Meetings Law 2004 IARC Staff Retreat May 14, 2004 Ames, IA David Vestal General Counsel Iowa State Association.
Lassen County 2011 Supervisorial Reapportionment Public Hearing Lassen County Courthouse – Photo courtesy of Couso Technology & Design.
1 Parent involvement is most successful when it is viewed, practice and promoted as a partnership between the home and the school. Resource: California.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT Presented by Maribel S. Medina January 16, 2014.
Open Meetings Briefing for Public Body Chairpersons Presented by the Office of the University Attorney Fall 2001.
Open Meetings and Communication Presented to the First Eight Members of the Citizens Redistricting Commission November 2010 BSA, D. Neville.
USF Office of the General Counsel (813)
Common Sense Approach to Wisconsin Open Meetings Law.
Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 7 Freedom of Information Act Open Meetings/Open Records.
Presentation by REDISTRICTING L.L.C.. February 3, 2011: Census Data is delivered to the State Beginning of 6 month mandatory redistricting timeframe April/May,
NRS Chapter 241 OPEN MEETING LAW. Legislative Intent  All public bodies exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business.  Deliberations must be.
OPEN MEETING LAW GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 39, SECTIONS 23A-D.
The Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). FOIA Topics of Discussion Public Meetings Closed Meetings Meeting Notices & Agendas Electronic Communication.
1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REDISTRICTING 2011.
College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &
Sunshine Law, Public Records and Ethics. Discussion Topics Government in the Sunshine Public Records Code of Ethics The Bluewater Bay MSBU Board has a.
Orange County Charter Review Commission Orientation Open Government and Ethics Kate Latorre Assistant County Attorney February 12, 2015.
ACADEMIC SENATE ORIENTATION 9/3/09 Welcome New and Returning Senators!
The Open Meetings Act The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq.
1 THE KENTUCKY OPEN MEETINGS ACT KRS – [T]he basic policy of KRS to is that the formation of public policy is public business.
Open and Public Meetings Act Training Revised 1/12.
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT Eva Rooks, MA Health Services Administrator/Trainer Health Systems Quality Assurance Division Washington State Department of Health.
PUBLIC MEETING LAW Clackamas County Counsel Steven Lounsbury.
1 THE BROWN ACT. 2 Brown Act Codified in Government Code §§ et seq. Codified in Government Code §§ et seq. Basic Rule: “meetings” of legislative.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
1 THE BROWN ACT CA Gov’t. Code Section et. seq. Office of the County Counsel.
Redistricting After the 2010 Census Jill Wilson and Clint Pinyan July 18, 2011 Board of Education Redistricting Committee.
Sunshine Law, Public Records Law, State and Local Gift Law, and State and Local Code of Ethics (Voting Conflicts & Disclosure) Dana Crosby Assistant County.
Knowing When and How the Public Gets a Seat at the Table.
Government Code Sections – Purpose Sunshine provision The Legislature envisioned that an additional seat on the board is reserved for the.
Government Data Practices and the Open Meeting Law August 2014.
Westlake Charter School Annual Brown Act Training Presented by: Lisa A. Corr, Esq. Website:
Brown Act & Beyond February 27, 2015 Association of California School Administrators.
THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT Cal. Gov’t Code § et seq. Presented to the First 5 Commission San Mateo County Monali S. Sheth, Deputy Office of the County.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Red Flag and Sunshine Workshop.
Utah’s Open Meetings Act. Declaration of Public Policy The Legislature finds and declares that the state, its agencies and political subdivisions exist.
Open Meetings Open Records and Ethics Training Member Training.
Results. Relationships. Reputation. Legal and Policy Elements to Community Planning and Zoning – Open Meeting Law Christopher A. Schmaltz Gust Rosenfeld,
COUNTY COUNSEL Brown Act Public Records Act Presenter: Janice D. Killion Public Records Act – Ethics – Conflicts of Interest.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
City Attorney’s Office THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT. City Attorney’s Office “Open and Public” Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §§ et seq.) "All meetings.
1 Brown Act Workshop  Seal Beach City Council Craig Steele, City Attorney May 9, 2016.
Type Name of Presentation Here Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Trustee Areas: Glendale Community College District November 18, 2014.
State Center Community College District Trustee Area Redistricting 2011 Legal Requirements and Other Redistricting Criteria September 6, 2011 Presented.
The Brown Act The Legal Requirements for Local Open and Public Meetings Presented by: The Office of the General Counsel.
The BAGLEY-KEENE Open Meeting Act The Legal Requirements for Open and Public Meetings.
Ian Marquand Montana Board of Medical Examiners
Florida’s Sunshine Law Public Meetings
Open Meetings & Public Records Laws: Search Committee Tips
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
Citizens of the World Los Angeles
Wyoming Statutes §§ through
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
The Brown Act The Legal Requirements for Open and Public Meetings
West Virginia Economic Development Council Open Meetings Act Training 2018 Derek Knopp Staff Attorney West Virginia Ethics Commission.
2018 Open Government Overview
The Looking Glass: Eyes of Transparency
LCAP Committee – September 28, 2017
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
AB617 Steering Committee November 14, 2018.
III. Government Transparency Laws
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Presentation transcript:

1 County Redistricting Legal Issues 2011 Redistricting Committee Thomas (Mat) Miller, Senior Deputy Office of the County Counsel February 10, 2011

2 Redistricting – Legal Issues Equality of Population Equality of Population The Equal Protection Clause of the 14 th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the election of local government officials from districts of disparate population. Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968) The Equal Protection Clause of the 14 th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the election of local government officials from districts of disparate population. Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968) Districts must be “as nearly equal in population as may be.” Id. Districts must be “as nearly equal in population as may be.” Id. A total population deviation of 10% between largest and smallest legislative district is presumed to be acceptable. Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735 (1973); White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755 (1973) A total population deviation of 10% between largest and smallest legislative district is presumed to be acceptable. Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735 (1973); White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755 (1973)

3 Redistricting – Legal Issues (cont.) California Elections Code Section provides that in establishing the boundaries of supervisorial districts the Board may give consideration to: California Elections Code Section provides that in establishing the boundaries of supervisorial districts the Board may give consideration to: Topography. Topography. Geography. Geography. Cohesiveness, contiguity, integrity, and compactness of territory. Cohesiveness, contiguity, integrity, and compactness of territory. Should be contiguous and compact, taking into account the availability of transportation and communication. Should be contiguous and compact, taking into account the availability of transportation and communication. Social and economic interests common to the population of an area should be considered. Social and economic interests common to the population of an area should be considered. Compactness does not refer to geometric shapes but to the ability of citizens to relate to each other and their representatives and to the ability of representatives to relate effectively to their constituency. Compactness does not refer to geometric shapes but to the ability of citizens to relate to each other and their representatives and to the ability of representatives to relate effectively to their constituency. Community of interests of the districts. Community of interests of the districts. Relationships that are facilitated by shared interests and by membership in a political community. Relationships that are facilitated by shared interests and by membership in a political community.

4 Redistricting – Legal Issues (cont.) U.S. Supreme Court has held that other considerations may be acceptable. U.S. Supreme Court has held that other considerations may be acceptable. Protection of incumbency, voting patterns and race may also be considered in redistricting. Hunt v. Cromartie, 121 S. Ct (2001). Protection of incumbency, voting patterns and race may also be considered in redistricting. Hunt v. Cromartie, 121 S. Ct (2001). The goal is the creation of legislative districts that are effective, both for the represented and the representative. DeWitt v. Wilson, 856 F. Supp (1994). The goal is the creation of legislative districts that are effective, both for the represented and the representative. DeWitt v. Wilson, 856 F. Supp (1994).

5 Redistricting – Legal Issues (cont.) Supervisorial redistricting must comply with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (42 U.S.C.A. 1973). Supervisorial redistricting must comply with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (42 U.S.C.A. 1973). Prohibits actions by a local government which impair the ability of a racial minority to elect its candidates of choice on an equal basis with other voters. Prohibits actions by a local government which impair the ability of a racial minority to elect its candidates of choice on an equal basis with other voters. Minority group must be large, geographically compact and politically cohesive. Minority group must be large, geographically compact and politically cohesive. The County cannot take intentional action to dilute existing minority voting strength in redrawing supervisorial district lines. Garza v. County of Los Angeles, 918 F. 2d 763 (1990). The County cannot take intentional action to dilute existing minority voting strength in redrawing supervisorial district lines. Garza v. County of Los Angeles, 918 F. 2d 763 (1990).

6 Redistricting – Legal Issues (cont.) Voting Rights Act. Voting Rights Act. Under a totality of the circumstances, the minority group may not have less opportunity than others to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of its choice. Thornburgh v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986); Growe v. Emison, 507 U.S. 25 (1993). Under a totality of the circumstances, the minority group may not have less opportunity than others to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of its choice. Thornburgh v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986); Growe v. Emison, 507 U.S. 25 (1993). Does not require any affirmative steps to be taken by the County during the redistricting process. Does not require any affirmative steps to be taken by the County during the redistricting process. Race may also not be the only factor used; cannot ignore traditional redistricting principles. Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996). Race may also not be the only factor used; cannot ignore traditional redistricting principles. Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996).

7 The Brown Act 2011 Redistricting Committee

8 Meeting Requirements: Open and Public Meetings The Brown Act generally requires that all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency be “open and public.” The Brown Act generally requires that all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency be “open and public.”

9 Applies to any “legislative body” of a “local agency” “Legislative body” is broadly defined and includes:  The governing board of a local agency, or any local board created by statute.  Any commission, committee, board or other body created by formal action of a legislative body.  2011 Redistricting Committee

10 What constitutes a “meeting” “Any congregation of a majority of the members of a legislative body at the same time and location, including teleconference location...to hear, discuss, deliberate or take action on any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.” Section (a). “Any congregation of a majority of the members of a legislative body at the same time and location, including teleconference location...to hear, discuss, deliberate or take action on any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.” Section (a).

11 No Serial Meetings Prohibits a majority of the members of a legislative body from using a series of communications of any kind, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item of business, even if no “collective concurrence” is ever reached. Section (b)(1). Prohibits a majority of the members of a legislative body from using a series of communications of any kind, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item of business, even if no “collective concurrence” is ever reached. Section (b)(1). Valladolid v. County of San Diego BOS Valladolid v. County of San Diego BOS No intent is required. No intent is required.

12 Regular, Special, and Emergency Meetings Regular meetings: Each legislative body shall provide the time and place for holding regular meetings. Regular meetings: Each legislative body shall provide the time and place for holding regular meetings. Special Meetings: May be called at any time by the presiding officer of the legislative body of a local agency, or by a majority of the members of the legislative body Special Meetings: May be called at any time by the presiding officer of the legislative body of a local agency, or by a majority of the members of the legislative body By posting a notice and also delivering written notice to each member of the legislative body and to each local newspaper of general circulation and radio or television station requesting notice in writing. Section By posting a notice and also delivering written notice to each member of the legislative body and to each local newspaper of general circulation and radio or television station requesting notice in writing. Section Emergency meetings: May hold an emergency meeting without complying with the 24-hour “Special Meeting” notice and posting requirements. Section Emergency meetings: May hold an emergency meeting without complying with the 24-hour “Special Meeting” notice and posting requirements. Section

13 What is Not a “Meeting” Under the Brown Act The following events are not considered meetings, subject to the requirements of the Brown Act: Individual contacts or conversations between a member of a legislative body and any other person; Individual contacts or conversations between a member of a legislative body and any other person; Attendance of a majority of the members of a legislative body at a conference open to the public or purely social or ceremonial event (may not discuss official business). Attendance of a majority of the members of a legislative body at a conference open to the public or purely social or ceremonial event (may not discuss official business).

14 Meeting Requirements: Open and Public Meetings At regular and special meetings, members of the public have a right to address the legislative body on any item appearing on the agenda. At regular and special meetings, members of the public have a right to address the legislative body on any item appearing on the agenda. The agenda shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the legislative body on any item. The agenda shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the legislative body on any item. Legislative body may adopt reasonable regulations limiting the total amount of time for particular issues or particular speakers. Section (b). Legislative body may adopt reasonable regulations limiting the total amount of time for particular issues or particular speakers. Section (b). No “sign in” requirement allowed. No “sign in” requirement allowed. Legislative body may not prohibit public criticism. Section , sub. (c) Legislative body may not prohibit public criticism. Section , sub. (c) Meetings may be recorded by the public. Section Meetings may be recorded by the public. Section Any materials provided to the body are public records, unless otherwise exempt. Section Any materials provided to the body are public records, unless otherwise exempt. Section

15 Agenda Requirements Agenda must be posted at least 72 hours before the meeting. Agenda must be posted at least 72 hours before the meeting. Must contain brief description of each item to be discussed. Must contain brief description of each item to be discussed. Except as otherwise provided by law, no action or discussion shall be undertaken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. Section Except as otherwise provided by law, no action or discussion shall be undertaken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. Section When an item not appearing on the agenda be discussed or acted upon When an item not appearing on the agenda be discussed or acted upon Members of a legislative body or its staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights. Members of a legislative body or its staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights. On their own initiative or in response to questions posed by the public, a member of a legislative body or its staff may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her own activities. On their own initiative or in response to questions posed by the public, a member of a legislative body or its staff may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her own activities.

16 Enforcement & Penalties Criminal Penalties – A misdemeanor if there is intent to deprive the public of information which the member knows or has reason to know the public is entitled to receive. Section Criminal Penalties – A misdemeanor if there is intent to deprive the public of information which the member knows or has reason to know the public is entitled to receive. Section Civil Injunction Civil Injunction Attorneys Fees and Court Costs Attorneys Fees and Court Costs Court May Invalidate Action Taken In Violation of Brown Act Court May Invalidate Action Taken In Violation of Brown Act

17 The Public Records Act 2011 Redistricting Committee

18 The California Public Records Act In 10 Seconds… Any person may inspect or receive a copy of a public record unless it is exempt. (Gov. Code, § 6253)

19 What Agencies Are Subject To The Public Records Act? All state and local agencies. All state and local agencies. Boards, commissions or agencies created by a covered agency, including advisory boards. Boards, commissions or agencies created by a covered agency, including advisory boards. Non-profit entities that are legislative bodies of a local agency. Non-profit entities that are legislative bodies of a local agency. The Redistricting Committee is subject to the Public Records Act!

20 What is a public record? “Public records” include any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public's business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics. (§ 6252(e).)

21 What is a public record? A writing means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored. (§ 6252(g).)

22 Public Records Act Checklist The Request – Can be oral or written. The Request – Can be oral or written. The Review – Identify responsive records and determine if they are exempt. The Review – Identify responsive records and determine if they are exempt. The Response – Notify the requester within 10 days if we will comply with the request or assert an exemption. The Response – Notify the requester within 10 days if we will comply with the request or assert an exemption. The Production – Requester can inspect records for free or obtain copies for the direct cost of duplication. The Production – Requester can inspect records for free or obtain copies for the direct cost of duplication.

23 Questions? Office of County Counsel (714)