AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EDUCATION: AB 490 Impact on Foster Youth & CSW’s Responsibilities
Advertisements

Developing collaborative partnerships to improve educational outcomes for foster youth.
Protection of privacy for all Students!
4/18/2015AB 490 Implementation An overview of AB 490’s changes to the law and creation of enhanced education rights for foster children Closing the Education.
The Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children / Module 1 1 Providing policy, tools, and resources to further enhance the quality.
Ensuring Educational Stability for Students in Foster Care: Our Shared Responsibility Mindy Kukich, MSW Project Specialist, Foster Youth and Homeless Education.
THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED…. HOPEFULLY!! Dispute Resolution.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Understanding Confidentiality and Education Decision Making for Youth in Foster Care Child Welfare, Education and the Courts: A Collaboration to Strengthen.
The Education Rights of Homeless Students © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network, 35 Halsey Street, Newark NJ (93)
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
October 10, The Texas Education Agency has recently clarified and expanded the use of Prior Written Notice (PWN) in Special Education.
Educational Champion Training MODULE 5: Enrollment in Appropriate Schools and Classes © National Center for Youth Law, April This document does not.
School Stability and Transportation Coordination for Children in Out of Home Placement Philadelphia Department of Human Services and School District of.
Bethanie Barber Assistant Guardian ad Litem Program Coordinator Legal Aid Society of the O.C.B.A. 100 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Fl (407)
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
Collaborating Across Systems– Working with Education and the Courts Michelle Lustig, MSW, Ed.D Coordinator, Foster Youth and Homeless Education Services.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
A Brief Overview of California’s Early Start Program Early Intervention Services in California Developed by California MAP to Inclusion and Belonging…Making.
A presentation by the El Dorado County Office of Education Charter SELPA (adapted from a presentation developed by Riverside County SELPA)
1 EDUCATION: Court Reports: What to include related to the Child’s Education.
Effective Partnerships in Providing Education to Youth in Detention Centers Sheril R. Smith, Ph.D., Director Office of Dropout Prevention Mississippi Department.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
The Honorable Suzanna Cuneo Pima County Juvenile Court Commissioner April 12, 2011 Strategies to Support School Stability and Continuity: The Pima County.
Michelle Lustig, Ed.D, MSW San Diego County Office of Education Student Services and Programs Foster Youth and Homeless Education Services SAN DIEGO COUNTY.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
HOOVER CITY SCHOOLS In-Service Training: Annual Review of.
What are Parent’s Rights in Georgia Special Education? Parents and students over age eighteen have the right … To Participate You have the right to refer.
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
Calloway County Schools CONFIDENTIALITY TRAINING Protection of Personal Information School Year
AB 490 and McKinney-Vento Bridging education for homeless families and foster youth Alameda County Office of Education Student Programs and Services Foster.
Questions & Answers about Extending Foster Care to Age 21 THP-Plus Institute November 8, 2010 Oakland, CA.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Foster Youth Within Lake Elsinore Unified School District Presented by: Steve Behar, Director of Student Services.
San Francisco Unified School District Student Support Services Department Foster Youth Services Program FYS Liaison Orientation.
Improving Educational Outcomes Click Play to advance the presentation.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
Act 861 of Summary Act 861 of the 2012 Regular Legislative Session required the LDOE, in collaboration with BESE, to develop procedures and regulations.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Hon. Carlos Villalon, Jr.. TODAYS FOCUS What is a Foster Care Case? Aren’t All Courts the Same? What is the Judge’s Role? What are the Educational Issues.
McKinney-Vento Act Implications under ESSA for Title I.
Educational Protections for Foster Children: Legislation.
Los angeles unified school district Pupil Services foster youth achievement program AB 216 Overview.
Challenges of Every Student Succeeds Act
The Role of the Education Rights Holder (ERH)
The Changing World of Guardianships
Closing the Education Achievement Gap for Foster Youth
School Stability and Transportation Coordination for Children in Out of Home Placement Philadelphia Department of Human Services and School District of.
Carmen M. Sanchez Education Program Specialist
Educational Advocacy And The CASA Volunteer.
TIPs for ELP Trauma Informed Practices for Extended Learning Programs
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Special Education Directors
Foster Care Updates and Issues
Educational Stability for Students in Foster Care
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Open Adoption Agreements
Act 861 of 2012.
The Magic Ages of Transition
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Act 861 of 2012.
Presentation transcript:

AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement

AB490: Ensuring Educational Rights for Foster Youth Effective January 1, 2004, establishes legislative intent that foster youth are ensured access to the same opportunities to meet academic achievement standards to which all students are held, maintain stable school placements, be placed in the least restrictive educational placement, and have access to the same academic resources, services and extracurricular and enrichment activities as all other students. [Education Code § 48850(a) Makes clear that education and school placement decisions must be made in the best interests of the child. [Education Code § § 48850(a), 48853(g)]

Overview of AB490 Requirements School of Origin Designation of foster care education liaison Timely transfer of students & records Priority for comprehensive school placement Immediate Enrollment Partial credit calculation Release of records Free from penalization due to absences Collaboration by service providers

Right to Remain in School of Origin At the initial detention or placement, or any subsequent change in placement of a foster child, the local education agency serving the foster child shall allow the foster child to continue his or her education in the school of origin for the duration of the school year if remaining in that school is in the child’s best interests. [Education Code § (d)(1)]

School of Origin (Continued) Prior to making any recommendation to move a child from school of origin, the foster care liaison shall provide the child and the person holding educational rights with a written explanation as to the basis of the recommendation and how it serves the child’s best interests. [Education Code § (d)(3)] If any dispute arises regarding the request for a foster child to remain in the school of origin, the foster child has the right to remain in the school of origin pending the resolution of the dispute. [Education Code § (d)(5)]

Child Welfare Placement Decisions The selection of the most appropriate home shall, in addition to other statutory considerations regarding placement, also promote educational stability by taking into consideration proximity to the child’s school attendance area at the time of removal or re-placement. Welfare & Institutions Code §

AB490 & Transportation AB490 DOES NOT include funding to cover costs for transporting foster youth to and from their school of origin. Options: -McKinney-Vento -Special Education -Department funding? -Inter-county agreements

AB490 Implementation: Rules of Court + Forms Rules & Forms: Effective January 1, Amends California Rules of Court: 5.502, 5.518, 5.534, 5.650, 5.668, 5.695, Adopts Rule Revises Forms: JV-225, JV-365, JV-535, JV-536 -Approves New Forms: JV-537, JV-538, JV-539

Dispute as to Change of Placement Affecting Child’s Right to Attend School of Origin After receiving notice of the proposed change of placement, minor’s attorney must discuss the proposed change with the minor. If the minor’s attorney disagrees with placement change due to the removal from school of origin, the attorney may request a hearing by filing Form JV-539, no later than two court days following receipt of the notice. California Rule of Court 5.651(e)(2)

Hearing Regarding Change of Placement Affecting Child’s Right to Attend the School of Origin At the hearing on such a proposed change of placement, the Court must find: -The child welfare worker notified the court, the minor’s attorney and the person holding educational rights that the proposed change of placement would result in removal from school of origin -Within 24 hours of the determination that a removal from school of origin would occur -If the child is eligible for special education, notified the prior and receiving Local Education Agency at least ten days prior to the move California Rule of Court 5.651(e)

JV-539 Hearing, Continued Note: Person who holds educational rights for the minor may request a hearing via the same procedure. Hearing on the JV-539 must be held no later than seven calendar days after the form is filed. Within two days of the filing of Form JV-539, a report must be filed by the child welfare worker that addresses a series of questions related to the decision to recommend a change of placement outside of school of origin. At the hearing, the court must consider a series of issues, and then will make findings and orders following the hearing on Form JV-538. California Rule of Court 5.651(e)(2), (e)(4)

JV-539 Hearing, Continued Social Worker’s Report [5.651(e)(4)] Must Address: -Whether ed liaison consulted with the child before recommending that the minor’s school of origin right be waived -Whether there was a written explanation of the basis for the recommendation -Whether child has been allowed to continue in school of origin pending dispute resolution -How the proposed change serves best interests of the minor -Responses from specified persons (CWW, minor’s attorney, etc.) -Compliance with information sharing requirements -A statement of the worker’s own assessment

JV-539 Hearing, Continued Court’s Review [5.651(f)] -How the proposed change will affect school stability and access to resources -If the proposed school would allow placement in least restrictive educational program -If educational rights holder believes school of origin is in child’s best interests -If the child has the educational supports to meet state standards -Whether proposed placement meets legal requirements -What actions are necessary to ensure the minor’s educational and disability rights are protected -Enforcement steps

Additional Forms JV-225: “Your Child’s Health & Education” -Requires information about the parent and child including medical and educational history -Should be updated prior to each status review hearing to maintain accurate history JV-365: Termination of Dependency Jurisdiction JV-537: Educational Representative or Surrogate Parent Information -Optional form -Allows educational representative to voluntarily report on the child’s educational needs and any actions taken related to the child’s education

Educational Rights If the Court limits the rights of the parent/guardian to make educational decisions, the Court must at the same time appoint an “educational representative” (also known as a “responsible adult”) to make decisions for the youth, regardless of whether the youth is receiving or in need of special education. Appointment is made via JV-535. Welfare & Institutions Code § 361, 726 If the Court is unable to locate an educational representative for a dependent who has been referred to or is currently receiving special education services, the Court shall then refer the child to the LEA for appointment of a “surrogate parent.” Response from the LEA is made via the JV-536. Welfare and Institutions Code § 361, 726; Government Code §

AB490 Implementation : San Francisco County Interagency Agreement Agreement entered into in August of 2008 aimed at implementing the specific provisions of AB490 within San Francisco County. Parties include: -San Francisco County Unified Family Court -Human Services Agency, Family & Children’s Services -Juvenile Probation Department -Various group homes and foster family agencies -CASA & Honoring Emancipated Youth -San Francisco Unified School District -School Health Programs - Pupil Services Department -Foster Youth Services Program - Educational Placement Center -Court & Community Schools - Transportation Department -Special Education Local Plan Area

Interagency Agreement: Delineation of Responsibilities The agreement outlines the responsibilities of each party as it relates to ensuring the rights of foster youth under AB490 are protected. Examples: immediate enrollment, awarding of credits, appointment of educational surrogates, record transfer

Interagency Agreement: Dispute Resolution Agreement sets up internal dispute resolution process (outside of JV-539 hearing) through which participants to the Agreement may request a dispute be brought to a “Resolution Council” made up of representatives from SFUSD, HSA, JPD, community partners, and the Foster Youth Services Program Coordinator. The Council will hear a dispute within two work days, and must come to a unanimous decision before any decision may be implemented.

Contact Information Maya WebbGloria Anthony-Oliver Foster Youth Services CoordinatorHSA Educational Liaison T: (415) , Ext. 3310T: (415) F: (415) Jeff PerryLauren Brady Blalock CASA Educational Staff Attorney, LSC Advocacy Coordinator T: (415) , ex. 317 T (415) F: (415) F (415) SF County Interagency and Community Agreement: